2.8L crossfire in 87 z28
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
2.8L in 87 z28
please delete, answers been given, i understand now
thanks
thanks
Last edited by Randy82WS7; Jan 15, 2005 at 04:34 PM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 4
From: Bonner Springs, KS
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
Well, not that this has anything to do with Transmissions, but the LB8 is just a port injected V6... Its not crossfire or anything like that... Just a plain MPFI V6... 2.8L of course...
The "Crossfire" motor was a V8 for one. Also, it was a Dual TBI engine.. And yes, it was gone after '83..
The "Crossfire" motor was a V8 for one. Also, it was a Dual TBI engine.. And yes, it was gone after '83..
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
is there an engine board ? i didnt notice one, hmm
why does this engine say crossfire on it and have crossfire intake and all ?
whats is going on with this car ?
there nopt a single cut or spliced or mis routed wire or tube or hose or anything at all, anywhere under the hood, so..
im confused ?
thanks
why does this engine say crossfire on it and have crossfire intake and all ?
whats is going on with this car ?
there nopt a single cut or spliced or mis routed wire or tube or hose or anything at all, anywhere under the hood, so..
im confused ?
thanks
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
no, it looks nothing like the MPFI 2.8 i had in an 88 S/E, nothing at all similar cept for block and heads maybe, even valve covers are different, in this 87 they are smooth gray steel, wierd looking, the 88 MPFI ones were different
this isnt the same setup, at all, way different,
the 88 MPFI didnt have x shaped intake like this 87 does
i have no digicam sorry, i wish though
this isnt the same setup, at all, way different,
the 88 MPFI didnt have x shaped intake like this 87 does
i have no digicam sorry, i wish though
Last edited by Randy82WS7; Jan 13, 2005 at 09:32 AM.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
so why was a member telling me that no v6 were in z28's
whats up with that
its obvious that there were tons of them
why do i get told conflicting stories ?
thanks
whats up with that
its obvious that there were tons of them
why do i get told conflicting stories ?
thanks
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 4
From: Bonner Springs, KS
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
No V6's were put in Z28's... I've never seen a Z28 with a V6.... Z28's up to '87 at least had an LG4 V8...
Last edited by thirdgen88; Jan 13, 2005 at 09:42 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
It's not a Z28.
It's not factory; at least not for one of these cars.
LB8 is the usual 6-cyl RPO code. No mystery there.
Sounds aftermarket to me.
Factory "CrossFire " was on V8s, and consisted of 2 TBI units; one on the left feeding the right bank, and one on the right feeding the left bank. 83 was its last year. It never came on 6-cyls. In those days, the 6-cyl motors were carbed.
The "dual snorkel" air intake was used on both the TPI V8s, and the MPFI 6-cyls. Again, nothing unusual there.
Sounds like somebody installed an aftermarket or other-model intake manifold. There's a certain number of such things in the marketplace; since it fits S trucks as well. Anybody could cast a piece of aluminum and include the word "Crossfire" on it; no wires or hoses would necessarily have to be moved.
Pics are worth 1000 arguments. Maybe more.
It's not factory; at least not for one of these cars.
LB8 is the usual 6-cyl RPO code. No mystery there.
Sounds aftermarket to me.
Factory "CrossFire " was on V8s, and consisted of 2 TBI units; one on the left feeding the right bank, and one on the right feeding the left bank. 83 was its last year. It never came on 6-cyls. In those days, the 6-cyl motors were carbed.
The "dual snorkel" air intake was used on both the TPI V8s, and the MPFI 6-cyls. Again, nothing unusual there.
Sounds like somebody installed an aftermarket or other-model intake manifold. There's a certain number of such things in the marketplace; since it fits S trucks as well. Anybody could cast a piece of aluminum and include the word "Crossfire" on it; no wires or hoses would necessarily have to be moved.
Pics are worth 1000 arguments. Maybe more.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
ok my bad, i stand corrected,
yep its not crossfire i was imagining that it said crossfire,
but it doesnt,
the x shaped intake setup really threw me off,
so youre right 83 was last for that system yep, i learned something again, more to learn yet for sure
anyways why did the 88 s/e i had have normal non-x shaped MPFI intake on its 2.8 when this 87 maro out here has this funky x shaped intake setup ?
this 87 2.8 doesnt look like that last engine pic either, not the intake setup anyways, doesnt look anything like what was in the 88 either, at all
apparently 2.8L had a billion different intake and/or injection systems,
hmm..
so this z28 is not really a z28 ? it has red blue emblem on front nose bumper cover, and says camaro on dash emblem pass side face of dash, all black interior everywhere, cloth interior and seats
what is going on with this car ?
and why does the 2.8 in it look nothing like the usual 2.8 ?
what does the vin code say this car is ?
thanks
yep its not crossfire i was imagining that it said crossfire,
but it doesnt,
the x shaped intake setup really threw me off,
so youre right 83 was last for that system yep, i learned something again, more to learn yet for sure
anyways why did the 88 s/e i had have normal non-x shaped MPFI intake on its 2.8 when this 87 maro out here has this funky x shaped intake setup ?
this 87 2.8 doesnt look like that last engine pic either, not the intake setup anyways, doesnt look anything like what was in the 88 either, at all
apparently 2.8L had a billion different intake and/or injection systems,
hmm..
so this z28 is not really a z28 ? it has red blue emblem on front nose bumper cover, and says camaro on dash emblem pass side face of dash, all black interior everywhere, cloth interior and seats
what is going on with this car ?
and why does the 2.8 in it look nothing like the usual 2.8 ?
what does the vin code say this car is ?
thanks
Last edited by Randy82WS7; Jan 13, 2005 at 10:12 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
what is going on ?
The VIN cose says the car has a 6-cyl. That means it says it's a base model Camaro, not a Z28.
This is not that hard to figure out. We're not talking rocket science here.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
ok so the z28 GFX has all been put on sometime over the years by an idiot
right ?
thanks
what are the codes that start with digit 1 ?
im all about learning, so learn me
thanks
right ?
thanks
what are the codes that start with digit 1 ?
im all about learning, so learn me
thanks
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
by an idiot
Could have been a rocket scientist or a brain surgeon for that matter
It's a handful of screws and some stuff you can find in the junkyard
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
not saying it is hard to understand or that i dont understand
i just want to learn
thats all
you are totally right i stand corrected the car turns out to be a fake Z28 and its not a CS engine
i had no idea, and now i know, so i learned more good info about these cars just now
lol, no worries, go take a break or something
thanks
i just want to learn
thats all
you are totally right i stand corrected the car turns out to be a fake Z28 and its not a CS engine
i had no idea, and now i know, so i learned more good info about these cars just now

lol, no worries, go take a break or something

thanks
Last edited by Randy82WS7; Jan 13, 2005 at 10:16 AM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
i wish, but i cant since my digicam got stolen 
i can rest easy that a base model camaro fake Z28 v-6 car is getting wasted and not a low production one or anything special
thanks everyone

i can rest easy that a base model camaro fake Z28 v-6 car is getting wasted and not a low production one or anything special
thanks everyone
Here is a real tough one, look in your console and check the RPO codes, if one says Z28 then guess what, it's a Z28. Also check the VIN # on the RPO sheet against the one on the dash.
At least you got some cool stickers.
At least you got some cool stickers.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Originally posted by Fast68
i wish, but i cant since my digicam got stolen
i can rest easy that a base model camaro fake Z28 v-6 car is getting wasted and not a low production one or anything special
thanks everyone
i wish, but i cant since my digicam got stolen

i can rest easy that a base model camaro fake Z28 v-6 car is getting wasted and not a low production one or anything special
thanks everyone
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
im not a rocket scientist or anything but i figure that a car thats not a Z28 but is badged as such is prooooooobably a fake z28
just a hunch
it definitely has z28 gfx pieces and such,
what hood was used on 87 z28s ? smooth one right ?
dash badge be one that says CAMARO only ?
hood emblem on center front is red white blue ?
nothing on bumper cover anywhere in rear
no it doesnt have RPO code Z28 listed nope
thanks
just a hunch
it definitely has z28 gfx pieces and such,
what hood was used on 87 z28s ? smooth one right ?
dash badge be one that says CAMARO only ?
hood emblem on center front is red white blue ?
nothing on bumper cover anywhere in rear
no it doesnt have RPO code Z28 listed nope
thanks
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: 62656
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
hehe
i dunno
i just like calling it a fake Z
why couldnt it be called such
did 85 up Z's have different nose/lights than base models ? or were they all the same ? i know 82 84 the Z's had extra pieces on the nise down low, had a different look than the bases
but 85 up ?
this 87 outhere has nothing extra below the bumper cover and has plain boring looking parking lamps,
thanks
i dunno
i just like calling it a fake Z
why couldnt it be called such
did 85 up Z's have different nose/lights than base models ? or were they all the same ? i know 82 84 the Z's had extra pieces on the nise down low, had a different look than the bases
but 85 up ?
this 87 outhere has nothing extra below the bumper cover and has plain boring looking parking lamps,
thanks
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





