TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
Who's running a TH700R4 with lower gears than 3.73? 3.90? 4.10?
Currently running 3.42.
I'm likely doing a gear vendors install next month and with that, there's the future option of running even lower gears very comfortably on the highway. For example, a 4.10 axle ratio with GV unit engaged is the equivalent of ~3.20 ratio. Such that I'd actually be running at a lower cruising rpm than I'm now with 3.42's.
That said, the only thing is you can't leave the line with the GV unit engagaed (according to what GV told me). So whatever axle ratio I choose is what I'm stuck with off the line.
The question I have for those of you running lower than 3.73 is how do you like it in terms of everyday type driving while leaving from a stand still? Does it feel like too steep of a gear ratio? I think 3.73 is pretty safe from that respect, but I'm curious about going beyond that.
Currently running 3.42.
I'm likely doing a gear vendors install next month and with that, there's the future option of running even lower gears very comfortably on the highway. For example, a 4.10 axle ratio with GV unit engaged is the equivalent of ~3.20 ratio. Such that I'd actually be running at a lower cruising rpm than I'm now with 3.42's.
That said, the only thing is you can't leave the line with the GV unit engagaed (according to what GV told me). So whatever axle ratio I choose is what I'm stuck with off the line.
The question I have for those of you running lower than 3.73 is how do you like it in terms of everyday type driving while leaving from a stand still? Does it feel like too steep of a gear ratio? I think 3.73 is pretty safe from that respect, but I'm curious about going beyond that.
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,174
Likes: 569
From: Meriden, CT 06451
Car: 84 TA orig. 305 LG4 "H" E4ME
Engine: 334 SBC - stroked 305 M4ME Q-Jet
Transmission: upgraded 700R4 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 4.10 Posi w Lakewood TA Bars
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
4.10, 10 bolt with 28" tall tires. I like it just fine.
Where will you find the room to fit a GV unit under the car?
Where will you find the room to fit a GV unit under the car?
Supreme Member



Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 77
From: Fl
Car: 5.3L turbo 2800lbs RWD
Engine: Prefer 3L Iron & 5.3L Aluminum
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 3.512
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
It depends on the type of car
Drag racing vehicles that ONLY 1/4 mile drag race need to put their max MPH at the end of 1:1 gear so there isn't any overdrive use during the race.
Daily drivers care more about fuel economy, the rear gear could be numerically lower (slower car but more economy) and engines with more torque in the low/midrange
Steep gears help engine RPM quickly develop, but the engine needs to have usable power in that range or it's not favorable
for example:
3000lbs, 3.5:1 gear, 26" tire, 1:1 final gear, top speed will be limited 120-130mph if spin the engine 6k 7k with ~400hp
But if the car eventually gains enough power to go 150mph or 160mph a 3.5:1 may no longer be low enough to finish in 1:1
So these are (most of?) the factors we account for:
weight, tire diameter, final gear (assumed 1:1), top speed requirement, Engine max RPM requirement, power output, type of racing
Drag racing vehicles that ONLY 1/4 mile drag race need to put their max MPH at the end of 1:1 gear so there isn't any overdrive use during the race.
Daily drivers care more about fuel economy, the rear gear could be numerically lower (slower car but more economy) and engines with more torque in the low/midrange
Steep gears help engine RPM quickly develop, but the engine needs to have usable power in that range or it's not favorable
for example:
3000lbs, 3.5:1 gear, 26" tire, 1:1 final gear, top speed will be limited 120-130mph if spin the engine 6k 7k with ~400hp
But if the car eventually gains enough power to go 150mph or 160mph a 3.5:1 may no longer be low enough to finish in 1:1
So these are (most of?) the factors we account for:
weight, tire diameter, final gear (assumed 1:1), top speed requirement, Engine max RPM requirement, power output, type of racing
Last edited by Kingtal0n; Jun 3, 2019 at 10:54 PM.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
What do you want the car to do well?
Drivability as a daily?
Highway speed?
Mileage?
Tractor / stump pulling?
Impress an uncle who kept Pabst in business?
You can do really well with a good lockup converter and leave the 3.42 in place.
I have had 3.73 rear gears with the 700-R4 for tens of thousands of miles. With a powerband past 6000, going beyond 3.73 wasn't going to overall help anything. And having a granny gear or an intractable final drive ratio isn't an accomplishment either.
Drivability as a daily?
Highway speed?
Mileage?
Tractor / stump pulling?
Impress an uncle who kept Pabst in business?
You can do really well with a good lockup converter and leave the 3.42 in place.
I have had 3.73 rear gears with the 700-R4 for tens of thousands of miles. With a powerband past 6000, going beyond 3.73 wasn't going to overall help anything. And having a granny gear or an intractable final drive ratio isn't an accomplishment either.
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
Car is built like a daily driver even though it isnt one. But I like the pleasant manners the car has now.
100% street driven with some spirited driving.
SBC with minram, AFR 180 heads and mild to mid-range cam... although the engine will pull hard to 6000 rpm.
I currently get 28-29 mpg with highway mode engaged.
Based on feedback from another board, I'm leaning toward 3.90.
100% street driven with some spirited driving.
SBC with minram, AFR 180 heads and mild to mid-range cam... although the engine will pull hard to 6000 rpm.
I currently get 28-29 mpg with highway mode engaged.
Based on feedback from another board, I'm leaning toward 3.90.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
You dabbled in very relevant numbers on another board; might as well go there here.
700-R4, GV OD you mentioned and 3.90.
11.934 1st gear, as 3.06 x 3.90 - realistically usable but "a bit much" for the short 1st gear of the 4L60 unless running taller tires.
2.73 OD as 0.70 x 3.90 - drivable anywhere but I like more OD than this, by far.
2.1294 final gear, as 0.70 x 3.90 x 0.78 - tractable with a relevant powerband. GM put out cars with 2.41 rear and 200-4R, and with 2.14 and no OD. But as you discussed elsewhere, will this actually help mileage or cabin noise or anything? Probably not compared to what you have.
Since you likely have no fear of the controllers, why not consider 6L80?
I pulled a freshly rebuilt, ideal-geared, absolutely nothing wrong T5 in order to gain 6th gear in a T56. I gained nothing. I lost an ideal stall ratio of 1st x rear gear. And 6th wasn't tractable. So I totally know the desire. But I'd be hard pressed to expand a floor to install a GV for that little extra. Yeah, it could gain you some gear spread. But usually, "where it counts" like a massive road trip for mileage, is such a small gain, it doesn't amortize well for the effort and cost.
700-R4, GV OD you mentioned and 3.90.
11.934 1st gear, as 3.06 x 3.90 - realistically usable but "a bit much" for the short 1st gear of the 4L60 unless running taller tires.
2.73 OD as 0.70 x 3.90 - drivable anywhere but I like more OD than this, by far.
2.1294 final gear, as 0.70 x 3.90 x 0.78 - tractable with a relevant powerband. GM put out cars with 2.41 rear and 200-4R, and with 2.14 and no OD. But as you discussed elsewhere, will this actually help mileage or cabin noise or anything? Probably not compared to what you have.
Since you likely have no fear of the controllers, why not consider 6L80?
I pulled a freshly rebuilt, ideal-geared, absolutely nothing wrong T5 in order to gain 6th gear in a T56. I gained nothing. I lost an ideal stall ratio of 1st x rear gear. And 6th wasn't tractable. So I totally know the desire. But I'd be hard pressed to expand a floor to install a GV for that little extra. Yeah, it could gain you some gear spread. But usually, "where it counts" like a massive road trip for mileage, is such a small gain, it doesn't amortize well for the effort and cost.
Trending Topics
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
Unfortunately the 6L80 doesnt really fit that well in a 2nd gen. The pan hangs down to low.
Theres not much to putting a GV in a 2nd gen. Only thing you have to do is trim a floor stiffener a little where it interferes.
Theres not much to putting a GV in a 2nd gen. Only thing you have to do is trim a floor stiffener a little where it interferes.
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
i have this combo (700R4 and 3.73's) and i have to say its a lot of fun. I do happen to get in a bit of trouble with it now though. my only issues with it though are
1.) my LSD doesnt engage properly. It could be that its worn out, but sometimes after spinning a bit it'll hook up the other tire. I see summitracing sells a different carrier for this rear for 3.73 and higher ratios, which has me wondering if that the issue, that the axle isnt spinning quick enough to engage the LSD
2.) my trans almost always starts in 2nd gear now. with such a short first gear, i guess theres not much reason for it to stay in it? I know 1st gear works because i can put it in that gear manually and it is fine, but if i'm punching at a redlight or going from a slow crawl it wont stay in 1st. Not that it really needs to with this ratio IMO
1.) my LSD doesnt engage properly. It could be that its worn out, but sometimes after spinning a bit it'll hook up the other tire. I see summitracing sells a different carrier for this rear for 3.73 and higher ratios, which has me wondering if that the issue, that the axle isnt spinning quick enough to engage the LSD
2.) my trans almost always starts in 2nd gear now. with such a short first gear, i guess theres not much reason for it to stay in it? I know 1st gear works because i can put it in that gear manually and it is fine, but if i'm punching at a redlight or going from a slow crawl it wont stay in 1st. Not that it really needs to with this ratio IMO
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
That said, the only thing is you can't leave the line with the GV unit engagaed (according to what GV told me).
i tuned a lt1 swapped thirdgen with 4l60e with 4.10’s. It was fun but first is pretty useless. With miniram and mild cam it should work out ok. If you make anywhere near 300-320 whp, it wont be a terrible match on a 26” tire. 27-28” might be better but you’ll cross the 1/4 in the 6000-6300 range. If much over 350 whp which i dont see if your cam is smallish, then 3.90 would be better
either gear starting line ratio will be steep but possible if suspension is tweaked right and good tire
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
Yeah, 1/4 mile trap speeds and ETs are not really factored into my decision here since the car never sees the track.
It's just about having fun with some spirited driving around town and occasional long cruises with various Camaro groups.
It's just about having fun with some spirited driving around town and occasional long cruises with various Camaro groups.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: TH700R4 w/ lower than 3.73 gears
Anything above 3.42 starts getting weaker in the ring and pinion gears but should last on the street
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FocusGhia
Transmissions and Drivetrain
8
Sep 22, 2004 04:27 AM
Matt87GTA
Transmissions and Drivetrain
6
Sep 18, 2001 11:55 PM
Abe91Z28
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Dec 30, 2000 11:57 PM







