Crazy V6 Idea's From Gumby.....A very long thread about the might v6
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Crazy V6 Idea's From Gumby.....A very long thread about the might v6
[ A sequel to Crazy Audio Idea's From Gumby; on the audio board]
A very long thread about the might v6. ONLY. [your V8 opinion is not welcome here.]
A special note: [No V8 BS will be tolerated here, don't even bring it up, don't even say it, don't even consider how much money I could save, don't even consider it even one bit, your V8 opinion is not welcome here.]
--------------
I was watching a show on A&E all about tractor pulls and these mullity engine monsters.
Hmmm anyone remember that hot wheels car with 2 v8 motors in a v???
Besides the adapter parts my brain go thinking about having 2 2.8's under the hood. There is enough room if you’re not worried about seeing the road.
Course 2 straight 6es might work better, but I love the quick rpms of the 2.8
A very long thread about the might v6. ONLY. [your V8 opinion is not welcome here.]
A special note: [No V8 BS will be tolerated here, don't even bring it up, don't even say it, don't even consider how much money I could save, don't even consider it even one bit, your V8 opinion is not welcome here.]
--------------
I was watching a show on A&E all about tractor pulls and these mullity engine monsters.
Hmmm anyone remember that hot wheels car with 2 v8 motors in a v???
Besides the adapter parts my brain go thinking about having 2 2.8's under the hood. There is enough room if you’re not worried about seeing the road.
Course 2 straight 6es might work better, but I love the quick rpms of the 2.8
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, NS,Canada
Car: 1995 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Built 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - Limited Slip
Your so Crazy.
I am sure a design, time, effort and money would allow this idea to be very real and possible. Not feasible by anymeans, but would be fun to drive, and show.
I will give you original on your dual 2.8 idea. But I can not ever see anyone doing this.
Caddy built a dual V-8 mounted car a few years ago. Thats like 550-600 hp from Two North stars and powered each axle independtly.
I am sure a design, time, effort and money would allow this idea to be very real and possible. Not feasible by anymeans, but would be fun to drive, and show.
I will give you original on your dual 2.8 idea. But I can not ever see anyone doing this.
Caddy built a dual V-8 mounted car a few years ago. Thats like 550-600 hp from Two North stars and powered each axle independtly.
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Batesville, IN
Car: 84 Firebird & 85 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6 : 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4 : 700R4
My girlfriend's brother is working on a 1950 something ford truck that he put 2 engines in. He put the second engine under where the passenger seat was. That probably wouldn't work too well in a unibody car though.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
Playing devil's advocate here. How will you mount the two 2.8's? How will they connect to the transmission?
You could probably find info on how to run twin engines from most boat manufacturers as many of them offer twin, and tripple engine configurations on some boats.
Some of the big offshore custom boats even have 4 engines! Can you say 70 to 80 gallons per hour of gas consumption?
You could probably find info on how to run twin engines from most boat manufacturers as many of them offer twin, and tripple engine configurations on some boats.
Some of the big offshore custom boats even have 4 engines! Can you say 70 to 80 gallons per hour of gas consumption?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Well I was thinking you could attach them together easily with a few brackets and a custome oil pan. bring the bottom edge together but the engine to tranny part may not be fun.
I owuld think all you need is an arangment of gears, somethingl ike a rear end so, if one is a tad slower or faster it wont screw with the other engine.
I am sure it would need to be an automatic though, You would need both hands to hang on. and since the final drive parts will be custome, sky is the limit on what trany to use.
Thee is also that 3 speed auto trans they make for monster trucks, you ever see that sucker??? looks like a sb ford tranny but it made for 2000_hp monster rucks.
I owuld think all you need is an arangment of gears, somethingl ike a rear end so, if one is a tad slower or faster it wont screw with the other engine.
I am sure it would need to be an automatic though, You would need both hands to hang on. and since the final drive parts will be custome, sky is the limit on what trany to use.
Thee is also that 3 speed auto trans they make for monster trucks, you ever see that sucker??? looks like a sb ford tranny but it made for 2000_hp monster rucks.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Hmmm if you ccccould get one of the engine to run backwards itwould be even esier.
what all does it take to get an engine to run backwards???
you know that fabled nascar motor that can start in either direction, for inspection they run it rightm then once on the track, you stall it out, and fire it up backwards, so the engine applies downforce/
could any engine run backwards?????
what all does it take to get an engine to run backwards???
you know that fabled nascar motor that can start in either direction, for inspection they run it rightm then once on the track, you stall it out, and fire it up backwards, so the engine applies downforce/
could any engine run backwards?????
Actually, it wasn't Cadillac that built one. The car in question WAS a Cadillac (an Eldorado, late 90s) but this is still being done. The design, etc is done by a company called Mosler Auto. They are located about 20 miles from Moroso Motorsports Park. Mosler Auto is located in Jupiter Beach, Florida. I go up there all the time during the summer to go snorkling and you will often see a couple of those driving around. You can tell it's a Mosler "TwinStar" by the fact that it has a large grill mesh vent on the trunk lid. They sell them for about 80 grand if I remember correctly.
Mosler auto also builds race-cars, a few are the Mosler Raptor, etc... I think the website is www.mosler.com..
oops, never mind, just checked the web site, it's now..
http://www.moslerauto.com/
and they happened to move too.. they are now located in Riviera Beach, Florida. But the owner still lives in Jupiter, you can see his house from the road.. HUGE friggin mansion off the shore.
As far as the dual engine concept goes... Chevrolet was originally considering (as a possibility) a dual-V6 platform for the new 1984 Corvette. Obviously this never came to be, but the platform would have been SIMILAR to that of the Pontiac Fiero, except minus the space frame. They took two front wheel drive cars, cut them in half, and welded their fronts together.
It had two V6/60s (2.9 turbos) placed in conjunction with eachother. The original one was the primary engine (in the front) and then with a starter button, the rear could be started as well. The car only had one alternator, and only one battery as well.
Mosler auto also builds race-cars, a few are the Mosler Raptor, etc... I think the website is www.mosler.com..
oops, never mind, just checked the web site, it's now..
http://www.moslerauto.com/
and they happened to move too.. they are now located in Riviera Beach, Florida. But the owner still lives in Jupiter, you can see his house from the road.. HUGE friggin mansion off the shore.
As far as the dual engine concept goes... Chevrolet was originally considering (as a possibility) a dual-V6 platform for the new 1984 Corvette. Obviously this never came to be, but the platform would have been SIMILAR to that of the Pontiac Fiero, except minus the space frame. They took two front wheel drive cars, cut them in half, and welded their fronts together.
It had two V6/60s (2.9 turbos) placed in conjunction with eachother. The original one was the primary engine (in the front) and then with a starter button, the rear could be started as well. The car only had one alternator, and only one battery as well.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Batesville, IN
Car: 84 Firebird & 85 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6 : 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4 : 700R4
I think that my girlfriend's brother used a transfer case to hook the 2 engines to the drive shaft for his truck. As long as the 2 engines are fairly equal to each other it will work. Its been several months since he explained how it all worked so I can't remember all the detail of what he had to do.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
moved from ebay finds
NEW PROPANE INJECTION KIT DIESEL GASOLINE
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=1876324473
after further reading, I may consider add propane to my 2.8 beofre notrous. No worrieas about detonation and extra fuel problems.
If you read the other adds for propane injection, they claim it add 100hp and 250 ft of torque.
more power and extra gas mileage.
------I was considering a cheap plate system for my bird, cause it delivers fuel too. Was just gonna put the plate in front of the TB but too much money, too many problems and i can get propane free.
NEW PROPANE INJECTION KIT DIESEL GASOLINE
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=1876324473
after further reading, I may consider add propane to my 2.8 beofre notrous. No worrieas about detonation and extra fuel problems.
If you read the other adds for propane injection, they claim it add 100hp and 250 ft of torque.
more power and extra gas mileage.
------I was considering a cheap plate system for my bird, cause it delivers fuel too. Was just gonna put the plate in front of the TB but too much money, too many problems and i can get propane free.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
"PROPANE INJECTION SYSTEM
Compatible With ALL Turbocharged-Supercharged Vehicles
http://www.importpoweronline.com/propane.html
Why Propane?
Very High Octane Rating of 110+
Lower Intake Charge temps-Leaves bottle at -60 degrees
Allows You To Run Higher Boost Levels Without Detonation
Very Cost effective. One $2.50 PropaneTank fill up lasts many gas tank fill ups"
---------------
http://www.paintbyyates.com/jason/rx7/propane/
-----------------------
http://mazdarepu.com/board/viewthread.php3?FID=3&TID=135
----------------
so lots of small cars using propane....
Compatible With ALL Turbocharged-Supercharged Vehicles
http://www.importpoweronline.com/propane.html
Why Propane?
Very High Octane Rating of 110+
Lower Intake Charge temps-Leaves bottle at -60 degrees
Allows You To Run Higher Boost Levels Without Detonation
Very Cost effective. One $2.50 PropaneTank fill up lasts many gas tank fill ups"
---------------
http://www.paintbyyates.com/jason/rx7/propane/
-----------------------
http://mazdarepu.com/board/viewthread.php3?FID=3&TID=135
----------------
so lots of small cars using propane....
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 82-T/A [Work]
As far as the dual engine concept goes... Chevrolet was originally considering (as a possibility) a dual-V6 platform for the new 1984 Corvette. Obviously this never came to be, but the platform would have been SIMILAR to that of the Pontiac Fiero, except minus the space frame. They took two front wheel drive cars, cut them in half, and welded their fronts together.
It had two V6/60s (2.9 turbos) placed in conjunction with eachother. The original one was the primary engine (in the front) and then with a starter button, the rear could be started as well. The car only had one alternator, and only one battery as well.
As far as the dual engine concept goes... Chevrolet was originally considering (as a possibility) a dual-V6 platform for the new 1984 Corvette. Obviously this never came to be, but the platform would have been SIMILAR to that of the Pontiac Fiero, except minus the space frame. They took two front wheel drive cars, cut them in half, and welded their fronts together.
It had two V6/60s (2.9 turbos) placed in conjunction with eachother. The original one was the primary engine (in the front) and then with a starter button, the rear could be started as well. The car only had one alternator, and only one battery as well.
Yeah, I've got the actual SCANS from the magazine.
Now that you mention it, I'm not sure if they were 2.9s or 3.2s. I know it wasn't something normal like 2.8 or 3.1 or 3.4.
It WAS a V6/60, but it wasn't one of the normal sizes.
I DO remember that the engine was made all aluminum for weight saving reasons.
And yeah, I seem to remember it being called the Push-Pull too.
Now that you mention it, I'm not sure if they were 2.9s or 3.2s. I know it wasn't something normal like 2.8 or 3.1 or 3.4.
It WAS a V6/60, but it wasn't one of the normal sizes.
I DO remember that the engine was made all aluminum for weight saving reasons.
And yeah, I seem to remember it being called the Push-Pull too.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
easier/more feasable way: take 2 2.8-3.4 motors. remove front clip from grand am or lumina, install in front of f-body. take transaxle from fiero & install in rear of f-body. remove "back seats" & install custom fuel tank/cell. get custom ecm/shifter made to coordinate everything. 4wd, twin engine, & should go "Twice as fast as the same car w/1 engine"
:sillylol: yes, but I still think it could be done. For emissions, disable one of the engines
:sillylol: yes, but I still think it could be done. For emissions, disable one of the engines
To be honest, it would be a lot easier to do that in a Fiero from the start.
The front of the Fiero is actually the front of the Citation X-11.
If you remove the spare tire and braking components from the front of the Fiero, there is a regular frame in there, you can acutally mount an engine in there.. though I think it's longitudinally mounted.. so never mind!
But actually, a lot of people who drag race Fieros at the track.. like to do that. They drop in a small block chevy in the front of the Fiero. It fits fine, but you have to cut a HUGE hole in teh front.
Personally, I prefer the V8 wedged i the rear.
Todd
The front of the Fiero is actually the front of the Citation X-11.
If you remove the spare tire and braking components from the front of the Fiero, there is a regular frame in there, you can acutally mount an engine in there.. though I think it's longitudinally mounted.. so never mind!
But actually, a lot of people who drag race Fieros at the track.. like to do that. They drop in a small block chevy in the front of the Fiero. It fits fine, but you have to cut a HUGE hole in teh front.
Personally, I prefer the V8 wedged i the rear.
Todd
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by 82-T/A [Work]
To be honest, it would be a lot easier to do that in a Fiero from the start.
The front of the Fiero is actually the front of the Citation X-11.
If you remove the spare tire and braking components from the front of the Fiero, there is a regular frame in there, you can acutally mount an engine in there.. though I think it's longitudinally mounted.. so never mind!
But actually, a lot of people who drag race Fieros at the track.. like to do that. They drop in a small block chevy in the front of the Fiero. It fits fine, but you have to cut a HUGE hole in teh front.
Personally, I prefer the V8 wedged i the rear.
Todd
To be honest, it would be a lot easier to do that in a Fiero from the start.
The front of the Fiero is actually the front of the Citation X-11.
If you remove the spare tire and braking components from the front of the Fiero, there is a regular frame in there, you can acutally mount an engine in there.. though I think it's longitudinally mounted.. so never mind!
But actually, a lot of people who drag race Fieros at the track.. like to do that. They drop in a small block chevy in the front of the Fiero. It fits fine, but you have to cut a HUGE hole in teh front.
Personally, I prefer the V8 wedged i the rear.
Todd
I remember seeing a big block wedged behind a Fiero. I couldn't believe it myself. I was like, "Get the F_____K out of here, you got to be kidding me, that's not real, S__T that is real."
So anything can be done, all you need is time, money, and materials.
I have a crazy idea, How about fusing 2 2.8ls together and their parts to create a 5.7L V12. I a have often day dreamed about something like that.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by camaro89dude
That would be one of, if not the only V12 that makes less than 300 hp...
That would be one of, if not the only V12 that makes less than 300 hp...
The old Ferrari Colombo V12 only put out 280bhp, but then again it's displacement was smaller than 4.0l.
How about two DOHC 2.8ls mated together and put tranversally into the rear. LOL
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Tenino, Washington
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I read once several yrs ago in an old hotrod or something they put a 396 into a corvair. it had all the details on how they made the engine run backwards. I just don't remember what they did.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I need to get better at search engines but there is that fabled nascar motor that ran in either direction, it just depended on which way you cranked it when starting.
I found a very very very interesting plug, they can be had in canada for 10buck for our v6.
BRISK PREMIUM LGS SPARK PLUGS
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=154327
I found a very very very interesting plug, they can be had in canada for 10buck for our v6.
BRISK PREMIUM LGS SPARK PLUGS
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=154327
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by devianb
I have a crazy idea, How about fusing 2 2.8ls together and their parts to create a 5.7L V12. I a have often day dreamed about something like that.
I have a crazy idea, How about fusing 2 2.8ls together and their parts to create a 5.7L V12. I a have often day dreamed about something like that.
they used a giant oven to fused all the part together, block, heads, crank, cam.
but the sucker went straight into storage and never made it into a car.
kind of a waste.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
A very interesting post to my plug question in the product section.

.......................................................................................................

SmartPlug
Verses
Spark Plug

Them suckers are 125 buck but man just think about getting ride of the ignition system. no more coil, dis, cap rotor or plugs. so many parts and headaches gone. It is almost worth it.
you know for sure, that spark is never an issue. now only if they work as well as they say they do. anyone got money to burn???
Originally posted by JPrevost
www.smartplugs.com
Another interesting spark plug company.
Personally spark is spark. The major factors are voltage and current (depending on resistance). No matter what you change in the engine, there will only be one path of least resistance and that is the path the voltage will take to ground. The best thing you can do is index the spark plugs and gap them as wide as possible without mis-fire around redline. If you've got a crappy coil and high compression (more resistance in the chamber because of the compression) then gap smaller. If you haven't changed anything, gap larger. Oh yeah, and the whole multispark MSD box's are also a lot of
. If you understood that typical ignition systems keep voltage going accross the spark plug for a longer period of time at lower engine speeds then that whole "multi-fire" excuse is just that! CD is only good if you've got a real fire breather of a motor. Do you honestly think that the 60's muscle cars would have been faster with an MSD box, lol, I just laugh when I think about it and how often people mistaken bad plug wires, plugs, coils, etc. for needing an MSD 6 box.
I guess there will be people buying these things just like those that bid on ebay electronic turbo's.
www.smartplugs.com
Another interesting spark plug company.
Personally spark is spark. The major factors are voltage and current (depending on resistance). No matter what you change in the engine, there will only be one path of least resistance and that is the path the voltage will take to ground. The best thing you can do is index the spark plugs and gap them as wide as possible without mis-fire around redline. If you've got a crappy coil and high compression (more resistance in the chamber because of the compression) then gap smaller. If you haven't changed anything, gap larger. Oh yeah, and the whole multispark MSD box's are also a lot of
. If you understood that typical ignition systems keep voltage going accross the spark plug for a longer period of time at lower engine speeds then that whole "multi-fire" excuse is just that! CD is only good if you've got a real fire breather of a motor. Do you honestly think that the 60's muscle cars would have been faster with an MSD box, lol, I just laugh when I think about it and how often people mistaken bad plug wires, plugs, coils, etc. for needing an MSD 6 box.I guess there will be people buying these things just like those that bid on ebay electronic turbo's.

.......................................................................................................

SmartPlug
Verses
Spark Plug

Them suckers are 125 buck but man just think about getting ride of the ignition system. no more coil, dis, cap rotor or plugs. so many parts and headaches gone. It is almost worth it.
you know for sure, that spark is never an issue. now only if they work as well as they say they do. anyone got money to burn???
Last edited by Gumby; Jan 17, 2003 at 02:18 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Anyone catch Trucks on TNN today. They put both a propane system and a NOS system on a monster dodge truck. They gained 240 extra hp with both.
some where around 495-59 total hp
some where around 495-59 total hp
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Power Problems
I'm having some power problems that might be audio related, I don't know.
System bumpin hard and clean; all the power shut off & on real fast
Other night just out for a drive and jammin away; all of a sudden all the power goes off and on real fast, twice. Like someone shut the key off and on real fast. engine died for a sec n everything.
seamed fine after I turned the radio down. but today it did not want to start, when I hit the start position on the key it would goto turn over but then like the whole system lost power, did that a few dozen times and then finally started and i went home.
System bumpin hard and clean; all the power shut off & on real fast
Other night just out for a drive and jammin away; all of a sudden all the power goes off and on real fast, twice. Like someone shut the key off and on real fast. engine died for a sec n everything.
seamed fine after I turned the radio down. but today it did not want to start, when I hit the start position on the key it would goto turn over but then like the whole system lost power, did that a few dozen times and then finally started and i went home.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
if it was a fusable link, it shouldn't have started at all.
also, checked out that smart plug thing. seems to me they claim to have invented a glowplug to work in lower compression engines.
compress the mixture enough, it will generate enough heat to spontaneously combust that's basically the theory behind deisel engines, compress the air/fuel mixture enough where only the heat from the glow plug is needed to set the mixture off.
edit: how is it controlled, i.e. what would advance/retard the firing? gues it's not needed on my lawnmower
also, checked out that smart plug thing. seems to me they claim to have invented a glowplug to work in lower compression engines.
After sufficient temperature is achieved, due to compression, multi-point homogeneous ignition results.
edit: how is it controlled, i.e. what would advance/retard the firing? gues it's not needed on my lawnmower
Last edited by Project: 85 2.8 bird; Jan 24, 2003 at 09:45 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Them smart plugs would be hot all the time, so any time enouh fuel was in there for a fire, it would fire off. like having constant spark????I guess.
your cam timing would be the important one then i guess, would need an adjustable cam gear.
your cam timing would be the important one then i guess, would need an adjustable cam gear.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
i gave you a reply to NOS snake oil.
getting back to the topic......how about taking a 97+ gtp powertrain and making the sucker fit between the front wheels? When I get back, and it's a lot warmer
, I'll park the GPGT & the Bird beside each other, pop the hoods, break out the yardstick & think.
getting back to the topic......how about taking a 97+ gtp powertrain and making the sucker fit between the front wheels? When I get back, and it's a lot warmer
, I'll park the GPGT & the Bird beside each other, pop the hoods, break out the yardstick & think. Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by Project: 85 2.8 bird
i gave you a reply to NOS snake oil.
getting back to the topic......how about taking a 97+ gtp powertrain and making the sucker fit between the front wheels? When I get back, and it's a lot warmer
, I'll park the GPGT & the Bird beside each other, pop the hoods, break out the yardstick & think.
i gave you a reply to NOS snake oil.
getting back to the topic......how about taking a 97+ gtp powertrain and making the sucker fit between the front wheels? When I get back, and it's a lot warmer
, I'll park the GPGT & the Bird beside each other, pop the hoods, break out the yardstick & think. But I'm no sure about the stearing linkage.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Wire welder flux/mig
Id like to get a welder for boxing off parts, exhaust work, putting in sub frame connectors and all them easy mods that just require a welder. IM looking for some welder choice input.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=157792
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=157792
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by 85SportCoupeto89RS
? What is boxing off parts?
? What is boxing off parts?
I just wanna make sue I get *** one for working on the car. I can think of millions of parts I could weld. a welder makes most custom jobs easy if you can just make what you need or just weld it in place.
Last edited by Gumby; Jan 29, 2003 at 08:42 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
I think you can get inexpensive boxed off lca from slp, or even spohn. Gumby, quit messing w/the avatar. show that you fear change
back to topic again.
2 of us will be staring @ the poped hoods of our f-body & a fwd car & stratching our heads come warmer weather. who else?
back to topic again.
2 of us will be staring @ the poped hoods of our f-body & a fwd car & stratching our heads come warmer weather. who else?
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
If I had a FWD car to park next to an F-body, I would. I hope someday to put the aluminum FWD heads on a RWD motor.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Coolant Flow
anyone ever priced out a reverse coolant flow system for our V6???
And/or thought of a way to do it your self???
I assume our system is still or was standard and the heads do not get cooled first.
Just noticed a side not in a thread about GM waking up and realizing if they reversed the flow on the vette it had much more power.
Cool the heads first.
And/or thought of a way to do it your self???
I assume our system is still or was standard and the heads do not get cooled first.
Just noticed a side not in a thread about GM waking up and realizing if they reversed the flow on the vette it had much more power.
Cool the heads first.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
MD, I'm gonna check that road out this summer when I redo the motor. I have a feeling the junkyard I usually go to would let me have a set of the aluminum heads for next to nothing. If the FWD pistons really line up and everything, we might be all set. 'Course then there's the issue with aluminum heads and warping... (sigh)
Oh and Gumby, if you were to plumb in a Meziere remote water pump, my guess is that you could rig the coolant system up to flow in reverse. Would the T-stat housing need to be moved at all?
Oh and Gumby, if you were to plumb in a Meziere remote water pump, my guess is that you could rig the coolant system up to flow in reverse. Would the T-stat housing need to be moved at all?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
if you put the fwd heads on, don't forget the fwd pistons for clearance. For what it's worth, the water pump on the 3.4 is set up to run in the opposite direction as the 2.8. Not really reverse flow, just opposite I guess
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Originally posted by TomP
MD, I'm gonna check that road out this summer when I redo the motor. I have a feeling the junkyard I usually go to would let me have a set of the aluminum heads for next to nothing. If the FWD pistons really line up and everything, we might be all set. 'Course then there's the issue with aluminum heads and warping... (sigh)
MD, I'm gonna check that road out this summer when I redo the motor. I have a feeling the junkyard I usually go to would let me have a set of the aluminum heads for next to nothing. If the FWD pistons really line up and everything, we might be all set. 'Course then there's the issue with aluminum heads and warping... (sigh)
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
keep the tb facing backwards, get one of those 4" cowl induction hoods and close most o off, except for where the K&N filter is to get that instant cai effect.
Last edited by Project: 85 2.8 bird; Feb 13, 2003 at 08:01 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by Project: 85 2.8 bird
keep the tb facing backwards, get one of those 4" cowl induction hoods and close most o off, except for where the K&N filter is to get that instant cai effect.
keep the tb facing backwards, get one of those 4" cowl induction hoods and close most o off, except for where the K&N filter is to get that instant cai effect.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
you've been loking at too many of those fieros & bugs with those big a$$ scoops on them
what ever is done, dodn't do that little air filter sticking up out of the hood like on that one post a while back
:sillylol: :sillylol: :sillylol:
what ever is done, dodn't do that little air filter sticking up out of the hood like on that one post a while back
:sillylol: :sillylol: :sillylol: Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM





