V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

resistor instead of air temp sensor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 12:48 PM
  #1  
camaro_V6_Tuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 2002 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
resistor instead of air temp sensor?

I have heard many times about putting a resistor in the connection to the air temp sensor instead of actually connecting it to the air temp sensor but apparently my brother didnt. He just wasted like $10 on ebay for a resistor for his 2000 grand am gt. I figrued while im thinking of it i might as well do the same to my camaro. What amount of resistance would give a 2.8(3.4) camaro optimum performance from the air temp sensor. In other words, what resistance does the sensor have when it senses cold air?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 01:01 PM
  #2  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
This kind of modification is honestly quite pointless in a closed-loop condition, since your O2 sensor is the governing factor in your mixture control. Generally this is only done in an attempt to compensate for a lean condition after multiple modifications to your motor... if your BLMs aren't reading lean, there's just no point. It's alot like stickerpower if you don't know what you're doing.. sure, it may look like a performance mod, but why is that minivan still beating you?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #3  
camaro_V6_Tuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 2002 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Yes, i know all that. And yes, my car is running lean, but no one answered my question?!?!?!?!? As for the mini van thing, i actually never had to worry about that, i dunno about u
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2003 | 03:27 PM
  #4  
FAST RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
I did it to my car i cant remeber what restiance i put in tho but it was susposto make the car think it was 27 degrees outside. Any ways i noticed no difference with it in what so ever only thing i did learn is becasue i did that i burnt out my CAT. When i hooked the stock sensor up i still noticed no difference between the resistor and the Temp sensor
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2003 | 09:46 PM
  #5  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
The reason the CAT went bad, for those wondering, is because in open loop the motor thought that cooler, denser air was going into the motor, so the computer added more fuel to compensate. The exra fuel was expelled unburnt and toasted the cat, they really don't like raw gas.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #6  
FAST RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
Exactly why i went back to the IAT that came from the factory. The cat was only 2 years old too. Dont mess with it you ewnt notice a difference and it will cause more problems.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2003 | 10:31 PM
  #7  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by FAST RS
Exactly why i went back to the IAT that came from the factory. The cat was only 2 years old too. Dont mess with it you ewnt notice a difference and it will cause more problems.
Why not just kill the cat??? with the resistor you arnt gonna pass an echeck anyways. you will clog your cat if you do mods like this and leave it installed. I really hate them things.


http://www.schematica.com/

has a nice freeware resistor program. 300k. let you play withthe colors and the different types. neat thing program that is handy. nice know what you want instead of doin the double check while at radioshack.

Matt
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 10:45 PM
  #8  
camaro_V6_Tuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 2002 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Tahnks Gumby, thats all i wanted when i asked the question although, from popular opinion, i dont think ill be trying this mod.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 12:47 AM
  #9  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Plus you gotta think: Why are people trying to fool the computer? Hell, it knows best... seriously. Rigging up a resistor to fool the computer isn't going to help anyone out! Instead, make sure that the MAT sensor isn't getting warm from the engine; it should be as close to the incoming air stream as possible. Hell if you want to, extend the wires, and hang the MAT sensor in front of your air filter. That'd be the best reading.

(It's called a Manifold Air Temp sensor because some v8's actually had the MAT sensor mounted in the aluminum intake, and these sensors were prone to false readings due to absorbed heat.)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
2
Dec 16, 2024 01:50 PM
Caspar
TPI
24
Jun 19, 2016 11:19 PM
Bstrang6
Electronics
2
Sep 8, 2015 04:29 PM
greenyone
Electronics
0
Aug 29, 2015 11:08 AM
92purpz28
TBI
2
Aug 11, 2015 02:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.