V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Who here can hang with an eight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 03:27 PM
  #1  
MakeitQuick92RS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 9-Bolt, with 3.42 Gears
Who here can hang with an eight?

I was wondering if anyone here has enough horsepower to keep up with V8. I don't mean TBI either. I mean like Mustang GT's and other kinds. And how did you do it? Any way besides turbo or Nitrous Oxide? No swapping either. I'm talking a little 3.1L V6 hooked up so well it can.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #2  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
AM91_CamaroRS is likely the closest NA... and.. uhm... honestly, a mid 15 isn't really enough to hang with your average 14-14.5 second V8.... so, without a power adder, I'd say you're not likely to find anyone.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #3  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
..

Yech is right....You need juicy juice or a trubo/blower. After the cam is in, when sprayin I doubt I'll be able to outrun anything faster than a mid 90's GT . It's ok though, as long as it's faster than Hondas right??
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #4  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
What about 614street???
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #5  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Uhm.. 614's running a blower.. that counts as a power adder :P
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #6  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
how fast have we gotten in a non 3.4 with power adders? < 15?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 06:34 PM
  #7  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Existing record (to my knowledge) is The_Raven's : 1985 GMC S-15 Jimmy, 3.2L turbocharged, intercooled hybrid 13.873 @ 99.08

That vehicle also had a 3100 series top end mangled onto it...

Last edited by TechSmurf; Jun 19, 2004 at 06:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #8  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I'm gunning for The_Raven's setup... I outran a 15.0 Crown Vic fast enough for me to *conservatively* say 12psi put me @ 14.3-14.5, on a bad tune.

Now I'm redesigning the Y pipe, for better flow... and should I mention the roller aluminum headed 3.1 I've got in the works?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 09:42 PM
  #9  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i've run 15.1Xs...also, i've beat a couple of 5.0 mustangs at the dragstrip before. they may have had something wrong with them, i don't know...all i know is that i beat them. also, i beat one of the new Dodge Hemi Rams, shortbed. i'm looking for high 14s once i get the 4 barrel carb on it.

edit: also, at the track, my friend's 96 Z28 beats me with like 14.3s...on the street, i run circles around him. my car (and foot adjustments) do a little better traction wise than his so i pull out far enough that he can't catch up before we back out.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 09:47 PM
  #10  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Yeah, you're getting that launch down pat!
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 09:50 PM
  #11  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
P.S. i pulled a new vette Z06 off the line, BAD, at the track. i pulled him about the first half of the first 1/8 mile. The best part is that i have it on video too.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 09:56 PM
  #12  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I can hang with an 8... but I fall under the 'power adder' category, as well
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 10:09 PM
  #13  
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Ozone Park, NYC
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
thats why you dont try to race an 8 when your on the street, i have no beef with v8's , if were both thirdgens i make it more of a cruise then a race, but if its a mustang id def try to race him even though i'll lose , lol,
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 12:52 AM
  #14  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
if you can beat a z28, then there's something wrong with your friend... no offense, but I believe they rate those at something like 300hp? more than 2x, and usually a posi rear end...

Unless you have like 4+ rear end, and he has a 2.73 or something.... dunno
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 01:19 AM
  #15  
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Ozone Park, NYC
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
z28's 300hp? are you for real, in a thirdgen?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 07:33 AM
  #16  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
oh, you misread, he said '96 z28... I believe they are around 300 hp. unless he meant 86?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 12:12 PM
  #17  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
96 Z28...rated at 275 hp i believe. he has posi, i do too...i have 3.73 gears, he doesn't. i think i have about 220 or so hp at the crank...only about 50-60 hp less and much better traction can make a huge difference...not to mention the weight differences. at the track, he did beat me fairly bad but on the street, my car will take his...only going up to 60 or 65 mph. at the 1/4 mile, he was running like 95 where i was running 88.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #18  
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Ozone Park, NYC
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
oh okay , a 4thgen
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 12:24 PM
  #19  
92RSSlowmaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
I outran an 88' Z28. It wasnt a driver's race either. He got the jump on me and I reeled him in.

Probably was TBI, but even a stock 305 TBI has more power than my engine. Chalk one up for the 6 banger!
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 05:02 PM
  #20  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
220 on a 3.1??? that almost seems impossible! almost double stock...

shoot, you'd have to turbo the car to get 220 I'd think...

what's your max speed with those gears?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 05:20 PM
  #21  
biff85ta's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow Kentucky
Car: 04 Vette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
AM91Camaro_rs does it fall flat on the second half of the quarter or are those times from different tracks?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 06:24 PM
  #22  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
naturally aspirated...i should be pushing 210+, anything is possible. max speed in 3rd gear is right at 100 mph.

yea, it does fall on its face because of a stock TB and a mildly ported intake...once i go carb'd, i'm looking for high 14s.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 07:57 PM
  #23  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
..

I hope it gives good gains, I've been wondering about it myself. Although, I just found an old FWD 2.8 intake lying in the shop with the same basic TB (TPS is diff...) I'm thinking of doing the "Starship Enterprise" intake and seeing how that goes. All I need is some Rectangular tubing and some time and I'll make it happen. I just wanna go 15's...maybe 14's with juice.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #24  
br()bert's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
The "i should" or "i was told i should" or "i think i have" Method of guessing the hp rating of an engine is really not a good idea. I've seen people who thought they had so and so hp numbers and when it came down to the dyno they were VERY wrong.

Also maybe a certain car make model would be more helpful then simply "who can hang with an 8"

I remember my parents old chevy wagon, it was an 8. Had about 5 hp thing was slow as hell.

Then i remember my old mustang. Different story all together , both 8's though
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 10:04 PM
  #25  
biff85ta's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow Kentucky
Car: 04 Vette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I would say his horsepower estimate is pretty close considering I know for a fact my rear wheel horsepower from before the headers and my times and he should be right about where he says he is at the crank. I know the weight of the cars can't be that different and should be running simmiliar time if he could uncork it in the quarter.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 09:03 AM
  #26  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Brobert, i do have a "i was told" in here but, here's how i am figuring my hp. I put my car on a mustang dynamics dyno about 4 or 5 months ago, it showed like 135 hp at the rear wheels, someone told me (here's the, i was told...) to, seriously, add about 50 hp to that number and that is what a dyno jet dynonamometer would show, to the rear wheels. since NASCAR uses dyno jet, i have seen a nextel cup car on a dynojet chassis dyno, i think i will go by dynojet numbers, not mustang dynamics. anyways, 135 + 50= 185. 185 + 15% (loss through drivetrain) = 213. i have changed my computer chip since then, which seemed to help and, that assuming i'm ONLY losing 15% through my auto tranny which seems to be slipping too. or, you could do it one of the other routes, go to a website or program that will give you estimated hp from ET and weight. i've gotten basically the same numbers from 2 or 3 different programs. But, coming up in August, when fl-thirdgen.org has a dyno day...i will be dynoing my car again, on a dynojet this time.

thanks, biff85ta. i'm hoping to be running pretty close to the times you have once i get it to run on top end.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #27  
br()bert's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
I see, So when are you gonna do the carb swap. Im curious to see what it'll do. I'm sure you'll gain some.





BTW wasnt tryin to sound like an *** in the above post. Its just ive seen people guess some crazy numbers no place near the correct amount
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 10:05 PM
  #28  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i don't really know when i'll get it swapped to carb but i hope its soon. first thing i need to do is find a 4" cowl hood that i can put on the car with the carb.

i know what you mean about people guessing really high hp numbers that are no where close...i can't stand that kind of stuff so i don't like to guess unless i have a real reason to say a number.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 10:49 PM
  #29  
br()bert's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
I dont know exactly how high the v6 mani with a carb will be but i still have the stock firebird hood and i have an edelbrock performer rpm mani with a 3/4 inch carb adapter, a large holly carb and a slightly smashed 2 inch air filter. Of course the v8 sits a little lower then the v6 but over all from the bottom of my manifold to the top of the carb is 10 inches irc.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #30  
Nixon1's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
My old V6 hung with an 84 Z28. My best G-Tech 1/4 mile was 16.48 at 85 mph. That was one RAGGED OUT Z28, lemme tell ya. I think it was an L69. What a dog of a motor that was....L69's are normally quite respectable.

Last edited by Nixon1; Jun 21, 2004 at 11:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 12:44 AM
  #31  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
..

I outran a Thunderbird once..... I wouldn't call that fast though
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 03:21 AM
  #32  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
I beat a 4 banger exlipse... once... when the guy totally... well... sorta... screw it, he was looking at his radio... damnit..

so what the hell do you need to do to get your car to 185+? hp? is this mostly just cam upgrade? did you stroke it or what? that sounds insane, 67% increase in power from stock.

That 135 sounds right, but damn what did you do? I wouldn't hardly expect that much out of a turbo on a stock motor. (I know you aren't stock)
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 01:41 PM
  #33  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i have to whole carb setup...it measures about 13.5" where the mpfi setup is about 9-9.5"


well, its more what i don't have done... I have a stock crank and rods and valves, that's about the extent of the stock stuff inside my motor. and i want to knock valves off of the stock list by going to 1.8" intakes. if i was really only making 135, even at the wheels, with all the mods i have, i would cry.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #34  
camaro_junkie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I once beat a lawnmower.

I'm going to "guess" my hp at 110, but that might be a little high.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 04:17 PM
  #35  
br()bert's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
When i had my 2.8 in the car i beat one of those old big as hell chevy station wagons. I also got beat by a mini van

I had all the smog crap off the engine and i also removed the stock air filter can and replaced it with a cone type filter.
The egr was blocked off and the cat was hollow (i didnt know it was hollow untill the v8 swap)

Overall i thought the 60 v6 sucked, only cool thing was on the highway it was easy to wrap the speedo back around.

Now my car is a different car all together.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 02:53 PM
  #36  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
I have a 120mph so I don't get that pleasure... and to top it off, my speedo reads 15% low... so if I get it to 120... I'm going way to damn fast.

And... I would never race a minivan, they are ALL faster than our cars, unfortunately... the two vans we have have at least 4.0's in them, and weigh just a tad bit more... so I just cruise like I don't wanna race, saves on gas plus my exhaust still makes me sound like I can be fast if I wanna be...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #37  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
P.S. i pulled a new vette Z06 off the line, BAD, at the track. i pulled him about the first half of the first 1/8 mile. The best part is that i have it on video too.


Oo.... Can you host it?? I'd love to see
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #38  
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Ozone Park, NYC
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by ScrapMaker
saves on gas plus my exhaust still makes me sound like I can be fast if I wanna be...
haha i do that alot, i dont have to race him to be better, unless its a honda then i really have to punch the gas
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #39  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Quick_Trans_Am
Oo.... Can you host it?? I'd love to see
i'd love to post some of my videos some where but i haven't been able to find a place where i can put them. if you know of a place where i can put them, please let me know.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:42 PM
  #40  
camaro_junkie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Get a yahoo account, then use yahoo briefcase... you can post a link I think.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 09:49 PM
  #41  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
hey nyc what did you do to get your rims so shiny? I assume that's your car in your sig
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
87iroctheo
Exhaust
18
Dec 4, 2016 11:47 AM
83RDRACR
Exhaust
5
Mar 26, 2016 08:13 PM
BADNBLK
Brakes
11
Oct 6, 2015 02:51 PM
chubsworth
Exhaust
5
Aug 26, 2015 02:34 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.