V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Blew it up :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #1  
WhitePower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Detroit,MI
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Blew it up :(

Well I went to the track today with a buddy of mine... Ran my car tiwce 15.67 @89mph and backed it up with a 15.62 @88mph...

Well now comes the bad part. My buddy has one of those "gym bag" nitrous kits that plugs in the cigarette lighter. So i said "what the hell" lets try it. Hooked it up with the 75HP jet and ran 14.99@96mph only to throw a rod at the end of the track

I'll get some pics tomorrow...im too pissed right now to even look at the car
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #2  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Wow, that sucks.. you DID retard the timing a few degrees before running it, and was running 93 octane, right?
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #3  
WhitePower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Detroit,MI
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Doward
Wow, that sucks.. you DID retard the timing a few degrees before running it, and was running 93 octane, right?
Had Sunoco 94 in it plus octane booster. Didn't retard the timing though, but i didn't hear any detonation just the rod giving loose at the big end.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2004 | 08:14 PM
  #4  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
you're running those times on a stock cam?? that's some good times! that's just about a tenth slower than i ran today at the track! i was running 15.5x. how much is your TB bored?

sorry to hear about your experience with the nitrous. i thought about trying one of the bags one time and i was scared of blowing my motor up so i didn't do it.

edit: what kind of 60' times and 1/8 mile times were you pulling?
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #5  
WhitePower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Detroit,MI
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS


edit: what kind of 60' times and 1/8 mile times were you pulling?
60' was 2.02 and the 1/8th went by in 10.21
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2004 | 10:28 PM
  #6  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Quick 60'! I got a 2.3x best on my 2.8/T5 - one wheeled wonder
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2004 | 11:29 PM
  #7  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
What are these gym bag nitrous kits? Do they have their own fuel source or tap into the car's fuel?

EDIT: quick research shows... bling bling. No fuel management. The kit expects the car to compensate on its own... with a 75hp jet, anywhere from 30:1-20:1 afr depending on what RPM you were at per given moment. Of course it blew up.

Last edited by TechSmurf; Jul 31, 2004 at 11:35 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2004 | 01:29 AM
  #8  
85f-bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
sorry to hear, blowing my engine would really **** me off (when i actually did blow one, it simply scared me)

Well, I'd have to say that depending on how nice the car's looking, and how much you like the vehicle, this would present the perfect time to build something better, bigger, and stronger. If you're runningthose times w/ a mildly modded 3.1, your times on a slightly modded 3.4 should be awesome. I'd say, find a 3.4L, add a nice cam to the mix, take all your intake setup along w/ exhaust and place it on there. And once you get over the fear uve probably acquired for nitrous, a 50 shot should finish things off.....just do it the right way.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2004 | 06:21 AM
  #9  
WhitePower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Detroit,MI
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by 85f-bird
sorry to hear, blowing my engine would really **** me off (when i actually did blow one, it simply scared me)

Well, I'd have to say that depending on how nice the car's looking, and how much you like the vehicle, this would present the perfect time to build something better, bigger, and stronger. If you're runningthose times w/ a mildly modded 3.1, your times on a slightly modded 3.4 should be awesome. I'd say, find a 3.4L, add a nice cam to the mix, take all your intake setup along w/ exhaust and place it on there. And once you get over the fear uve probably acquired for nitrous, a 50 shot should finish things off.....just do it the right way.
Naaw time for LS1 power
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2004 | 10:37 AM
  #10  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
if you're serious about switching to ls1 ro something other than the v6, i'm interested in you throttle body! question though, how did you pull a 2.02 60' and only a 10.21 1/8 mile? i've never gotten a 2.02, my best is like 2.05 but i run the 1/8 in 9.5 seconds. when i had my stock 3.1, i ran 10.6x - 10.7x 1/8 with 2.37 60' all day. now i've got a stall convertor infront of my auto and behind my built 3.1...with 3.73 posi rear and 235/60/15s

edit: just saw that you have a 5 speed. what rpm are you launching at?

Last edited by AM91Camaro_RS; Aug 1, 2004 at 10:40 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2004 | 03:42 PM
  #11  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
if ya gonna use nitro, be smart or you WILL blow the motor.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2004 | 06:12 PM
  #12  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Anyone got a link for this gym-bag-nitrous-system? Or is it that Sneeky Pete setup; I think NOS made it?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #13  
WhitePower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Detroit,MI
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by TomP
Anyone got a link for this gym-bag-nitrous-system? Or is it that Sneeky Pete setup; I think NOS made it?
Its made by Compu-car
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 03:36 AM
  #14  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
http://www.compucarnitrous.com/690310.htm

The Pro Street Heat was designed to be the simplest nitrous system on the market to use and install. This is a "dry system" injecting only nitrous into the motor. It works by "tricking" the computer back into the cold start mode. In cold start mode, the computer injects more fuel into the motor just like a carburetor does when the choke is on. Other sensors detect the oxygen rich air and adjust the fuel mixture and timing to compensate for this extra income of oxygen making this system near fool proof on performance. This kit comes with jetting from small, medium, large, extra large, and kickin ***. This will give you approximately 20 to 100 HP on your motor. Installation on this kit takes 10 minutes to complete and the kit can easily be place onto other vehicles in the same amount of time. This kit is designed to work on any EFI (fuel injected) vehicle.
That's almost grounds for a law suit without a big bold disclaimer. You can't trick a car into cold start mode without taking it out of closed loop and defeating the O2 sensor, and EVEN then the O2 sensor can't compensate for 50+ hp of nitrous on its own, and neither can a "cold start mode". Honestly, though, Whitepower, I don't mean to be cruel, but it has to be said for everyone reading this... this is what you get for using nitrous without having a damn clue what you're doing or how nitrous (or your engine management system) works. Next time, do some serious homework first and use a wet kit.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 10:06 AM
  #15  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
OMFG. I can't even BELIEVE that!! Yes, dude, you went WAY THE HELL LEAN!

Tricking the computer into 'Cold Start' mode, will give you like 1-3% more fuel, but you added about (on a 75 shot) 50% more *air*.

Yeah, your optimal 12:1 a/f ratio, went somewhere around
50:1 - 50:3 at best.

Real sorry to hear that... You'll probably find the piston is ok (we've got some beefy pistons stock) and our rods are forged, so hopefully you'll just need to recon the rod, and new mains/rods - then try a 75 shot with the appropriate amount of fuel
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #16  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
This is a "dry system" injecting only nitrous into the motor. It works by "tricking" the computer back into the cold start mode. In cold start mode, the computer injects more fuel into the motor just like a carburetor does when the choke is on.
Yeah, just like I said... 50:1 - 50:3 Completely not cool.

Other sensors detect the oxygen rich air and adjust the fuel mixture and timing to compensate for this extra income of oxygen making this system near fool proof on performance.
Jesus H Christ. By the time the O2 sensor reads *WHOA LEAN!!* IT'S TOO FREAKING LATE. YOU HAVE ALREADY GONE LEAN!

That's like a bomb going off, and someone walking through the wreckage, going 'A bomb went off!' No friggin' duh Captain Obvious.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 01:10 AM
  #17  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Holley does make a dry kit for our cars but its only a 65 shot kit. It work by over loading the fuel regulator. It uses a return line restricter. So the regulator tries to send excess fuel and PSI to the tank but it blocks it off and forces it to go through the injectors.

Though wet is more fail safe.

Here is a similar thread when a guy did the same thing on a 75. As he shifted into 5th at the end of the run the motor grenades into a 1000 pieces. It looks like he used a 250 shot but it wasn't.


A 75 shot sounds tame unless it set up wrong.

http://turbosaturns.net/forum/viewto...er=asc&start=0
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 01:41 AM
  #18  
GreyFox's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: VA
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: V6
Transmission: ATOD
wow you used that kit and knew little about what you needed to? N2O IS NO TOY in my opinion your ucky all you lost is your car but good luck on the rebuild
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 02:01 AM
  #19  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by Gumby
Though wet is more fail safe.
100% failsafe against this, anyway. A wet kit, when set up properly, adds the exact amount of fuel required to balance the nitrous oxide... something a dry kit has a snowball's chance in hell of pulling off perfectly.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 02:20 AM
  #20  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open











... ... holy hell.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 01:26 AM
  #21  
GreyFox's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: VA
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: V6
Transmission: ATOD
Will nitrous work on a stock engine?

Yes, the addition of nitrous oxide on a stock motor is the most economical power adder you can buy. Always choose the correct kit for your application and follow the manufacture's instructions. Most 4 cylinders are capable of horsepower increases from 50 to 75 horsepower, 6 cylinders work good on 75 to 90 horsepower and 8 cylinder engines from 125 to 225 horsepower without any major modifications.



that was taken from their FAQ pages, definately a lawsuit
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 01:28 AM
  #22  
GreyFox's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: VA
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: V6
Transmission: ATOD
wow smurf and i'll bet you thought i was a little slow haha
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 01:32 AM
  #23  
FruityOne's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
Dayummmm.....looks like world war 3 went off in your oil pan! Impressive times though!

Still waiting to see what you can do with your Turbo charged V6 Doward.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 05:02 AM
  #24  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by Gumby
Here is a similar thread when a guy did the same thing on a 75. As he shifted into 5th at the end of the run the motor grenades into a 1000 pieces. It looks like he used a 250 shot but it wasn't.


A 75 shot sounds tame unless it set up wrong.

http://turbosaturns.net/forum/viewto...er=asc&start=0
The pics I posted are of that motor.. since the image hosting died on them and I managed to track them down, I felt posting them might be a good idea for future reference.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 08:45 PM
  #25  
GreyFox's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: VA
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: V6
Transmission: ATOD
i saw that post too smurf, but i didn't care enough to track down the pics, but thanks i did wanna see them, yep that was a saturn
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FormulasOnly
TPI
95
Jul 23, 2018 08:47 AM
grngryoutmyway
LTX and LSX
325
Oct 18, 2016 05:48 PM
Twin_Turbo
LTX and LSX
50
Mar 14, 2016 10:10 PM
Gordonr1973
Electronics
0
Sep 29, 2015 11:59 AM
cking99
Tech / General Engine
3
Sep 22, 2015 11:33 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.