V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

3.4L Crate engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #1  
TVRPAUL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: ENGLISHTOWN NJ
Engine: 3.4lL 60* V6
Transmission: Tremic TKO 600 RR
3.4L Crate engine

Hi All

I am new to the site, I am going to put the new Chevy 3.4L crate engine into my car, I am putting the Edelbrock Performer 4V manifold. 390 Holley carb. I am staying with the cam that come with the crate engine because it is just about the same as the Edelbrock's. I am going to have to get a distributor any suggestions. Any thoughts and suggestions on my whole set up.

Thx.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:53 PM
  #2  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
GO with a bigger cam. And port those factory heads, you'll love the results.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 01:41 AM
  #3  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by FbodTrek
GO with a bigger cam. And port those factory heads, you'll love the results.
Well said!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:09 AM
  #4  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Actually, the crate cam is the largest 6/60 cam I have seen. It is designed for s10s and lots of torque, but not much top end.


I dont see where your going "wrong".
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:31 AM
  #5  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
ON a carb'd 3.4 4bbl setup, I'd recommend a cam with about 224/232º @ .050" lift, and about .550" lift - make sure the springs will handle it! Port the heads, as well!
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
YA SCORED A 3.4 CRATE ENGINE
YA GOT ONE OF THE LAST ONES AS THEY NO LONGER EXIST!
IF IT WAS ME, I would UPGRADE ON THE ROCKER RATIO to make the cam, "better". Either use 1.52 aftermarket or score 1.6.
I do know several here have done that "trick" & pleased with result & cost involved.
Next
Distributor
Go find a 1982-1985 S-10 Blazer distributor.
FEDERAL VERSION ONLY!!!! CA version is electric just like your F Body now.
S-10 Blazer distb. IS VACUUM ADVANCED and that is what ya need to make your conversion seamless.
NEXT IS the fuel pump!
What year is your F Body platform?
The 3.4 mills do not have a mechaincal mounted fuel pump provision.
IF ya use an in tank pump, it'll kick out too much pressure (like 45PSI!!).
Carbs need only 5-7PSI.
I'VE READ ABOUT a pressure reducer/regulator for the FI pumps.
In my Blazer swap (I have a 1985), I mounted a Carter electric fuel pump 5-7PSI. It works well in my situation, as I stuck the factory 1985 2SE carb stuff onto the 1995 3.4 mill.
Hope these are good clues.
Attached Thumbnails 3.4L Crate engine-belle3.4pass.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 05:13 PM
  #7  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
PS just noticed ya have a stick set up
YOU NEED SCORE A 3.4 FLYWHEEL
Others can answer exactly WHY BUT
Ya do need score a 3.4 flyheel
It has to do with balancing/vibration issues.
3.4 balancer & flywheel (auto or stick) are matched items!, to be used together or else ya get vibration issues.
CAN YA CONVERT THE 2.8 flywheel to 3.4 usage?
Let others chime in on that detail
My two 3.4 swaps involved auto trannys & used what ya got with the 3.4 crate mill.
ALSO WATCH OUT FOR YOUR OIL FILTER HOUSING
YOU MAY need reuse your original vehicle platform 2.8 oil filter housing.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #8  
E-Z Rollin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: W.P.B. FL. U.S.A.
You didn't say what year vehicle you were putting the crate motor into. If it already has a tbi add tthe 4.3 injectors and save yourself some money,or you can use the larger tbi off a 4.3 engine. The difference between the cratecam and the crane is the LSA ,the cratecam makes it's power in the midrange,the crane makes it on the top,max rpm is the same.I'd stick with the cratecam because with the weight/power ratio you'll need the torque provide by the cratecam.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 04:44 AM
  #9  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
3rd Gen F Bodies never came with 4.3
3rd gen F Body V6 never used TBI.

The 3.4 Crate engine cam and the assembly line issued 3.4 cam, underhood of the 1992-thru Dec 94/Jan 1995 3.4 engine in the 4th Gen F Body, the cam was designed by Crane.
It's identical.
States this in the GM Performance Parts Book.
GM Legal Dept would not allow this detail to be printed unless it was true. They'd be sued so fast by Crane.........serious this detail is true
Crane Cams designed the 3.4 cam. Crate engine, production line engine, identical cams.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 12:26 PM
  #10  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally posted by KED85
The 3.4 Crate engine cam and the assembly line issued 3.4 cam, underhood of the 1992-thru Dec 94/Jan 1995 3.4 engine in the 4th Gen F Body, the cam was designed by Crane. It's identical.
Sory KED, know were friends, but I disagree with this one.

The cam in the 3.4 crate is different the the cam issued in 93-95 3.4 fbodys.

Crate cam is designed for torque with carb injection, lots higher lift, differnet duration.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #11  
Parrydise7's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
Do you have smog check?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 01:37 PM
  #12  
TVRPAUL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: ENGLISHTOWN NJ
Engine: 3.4lL 60* V6
Transmission: Tremic TKO 600 RR
Dumb question, what is smog check?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #13  
Parrydise7's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
Is the vehicle subject to a smog inspection?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 02:21 PM
  #14  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
Typing my reply based upon information supplied in the GM Performance Parts book....
GM Crate engine part number 12363230 (the 3.4 mill)
Cam specs- 204/216 @.050" lift

GM Part number 12363220, Group number 0.519-.539 Camshafts, Camshaft kits & bearings

The following camshaft KITS were DESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED BY CRANE CAMS CO. (r) FOR GM SERVICE PARTS DIVISION. THESE CAMSHAFT KITS INCLUDE (1) CAMSHAFT & (12) TAPPETS
This performance flat tappet hydraulic camshaft is used in the new 3.4 engine conversion package (P/N 12363230) & is also applicable to 2.8/3.1 litre engines. Designed to increase mid-range torque & HP, this camshaft is ideal for daily performance usage. The duration at .050" lift is (intake/exhaust) 204*/216*, while the valve lift is .427"/.454". The basic RPM range is 1500-4500RPM & the lobe separation is 107*.

HP of 3.4 is 160 @ 5000 RPM and torque is 194 foot/pounds at 2700 RPM. That spec from GM Perf Part Book.

Anyone want to guess what is the published HP/Torque specs offered in the General Motors 1995 Firebird brochure?
Try 160 HP at 4600 RPM & 200 foot pounds at 3600 RPM.

I dare say the cam(s) is identical to the assembly line 3.4 used under the 1992-95 V6 F Body rides.

Dale you are still numero uno compadre!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 07:06 AM
  #15  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
I have found the crate cam as:

204/216, .427/.454, lobe112, IC 109


stock 3.4 cam as
196/203, .394/.410, IC 109

:shrug:
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 10:45 AM
  #16  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
I cannot account for the information you've offered Dale.
I offered the sources for my response.
Not making this a "duel of words!!!",
KED85
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2023 | 05:34 PM
  #17  
TVRPAUL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: ENGLISHTOWN NJ
Engine: 3.4lL 60* V6
Transmission: Tremic TKO 600 RR
Re: 3.4L Crate engine

Originally Posted by E-Z Rollin
You didn't say what year vehicle you were putting the crate motor into. If it already has a tbi add tthe 4.3 injectors and save yourself some money,or you can use the larger tbi off a 4.3 engine. The difference between the cratecam and the crane is the LSA ,the cratecam makes it's power in the midrange,the crane makes it on the top,max rpm is the same.I'd stick with the cratecam because with the weight/power ratio you'll need the torque provide by the cratecam.
These post is very old, but I put the engine with a Tremic 5spd

into a 71 TVR
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Mar 5, 2017 06:37 PM
masonta
TPI
13
Aug 31, 2015 10:14 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.