V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Do single cat V8 exhausts fit V6's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #1  
V8 Slayer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 909
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
Do single cat V8 exhausts fit V6's?

Like Borla kits say "F-Body 82-82 Single Cat" Does that mean V6's also? Anyone actully have a Borla on their 6?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #2  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
the only diff between any of the V8 catbacks from each other is the way they connect to the cat...

from the I pipe back, they're all identical. as long as you can mate your cat (or "cat") to the I pipe, you're all set.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #3  
V8 Slayer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 909
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
What is different about the way they connect to the cat?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #4  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by V8 Slayer
What is different about the way they connect to the cat?
GM used diffrent cats depending on the motor in the car... notice some cars are dual cat, some single... some have a long cat with a wide 4bolt flange, some used a totally diffrent one...

other then the cat itself, the I pipe location, rear hangers, ect... are all the same.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #5  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Some of the V8's used the exact same connection at the cat as the V6 cars, I know my 86 LG4 did, and 90-92 305 tbi and non g92 tpi cars did.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #6  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Only the '87 or '89 N10 optioned V8's had the dual cats, everyone else should be a single cat and everything SHOULD be exactly the same.

As far as I know, the option was available in either 87 or 89, and that was it. I know it was only for like 1 year or something. They tried to mount 2 cats side by side in the stock single cat area, and man, the passenger didn't have to worry about warming their feet up on a cold winter day.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #7  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Acutally the dual cats were from 89-92, however there were quite a few different single cat exhausts and the size of the intermediate pipe as well as the connection varied. Yes some were the same as the 2 bolt small cat (305 tbi, and 90-92 (possibly 89 ?) tpi non G92).
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 07:32 PM
  #8  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
learn something new everyday...
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 09:38 AM
  #9  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
F Bodys did use Dual Cats but for limited vehicles
Like IROC, ILE, Z28 rides,
when they were equipted with 350 engines.
The dual cats were exactly that, the factory manifolds going to dual cats, but then they were "merged" with a "Y" pipe to continue downstream using the single "I" pipe to a muffler out back.
Yes engine did gain performance.
Give Borla a call 877-462-6752
Pricey mufflers but you can decide if the price if worth your money.
PS don't dump on me for the design of exhaust. The 3rd gen is a very limited underbody exhaust optioned car. And one large "I" pipe can flow quite well...
Buy the headers from Pace Setter Exhaust instead and make some power....it's our restrictive exhaust manifolds & correcsponding "Y" pipe holding back the V6 engine power.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:10 AM
  #10  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Wrong info again, dual cats werent limited to 350's

Originally posted by KED85
F Bodys did use Dual Cats but for limited vehicles
Like IROC, ILE, Z28 rides,
when they were equipted with 350 engines.
The dual cats were exactly that, the factory manifolds going to dual cats, but then they were "merged" with a "Y" pipe to continue downstream using the single "I" pipe to a muffler out back.
Yes engine did gain performance.
Give Borla a call 877-462-6752
Pricey mufflers but you can decide if the price if worth your money.
PS don't dump on me for the design of exhaust. The 3rd gen is a very limited underbody exhaust optioned car. And one large "I" pipe can flow quite well...
Buy the headers from Pace Setter Exhaust instead and make some power....it's our restrictive exhaust manifolds & correcsponding "Y" pipe holding back the V6 engine power.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 03:58 PM
  #11  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
I believe quite strongly in my response.
Not saying to put up or that stuff, but I do strongly believe the dual cat set up was limited to just those rides I mentioned.
In the end, I gave ya the number for Borla so they can be asked.
And I'm very sure Borla can tell ya "exactly" which Camaros and/or Firebirds had the dual cat set ups....
The discusion ain't worth continuing.
AND IF ya knew why didn't ya supply correcting input?
I enjoy corrections anytime with accurate information.
Not a response without documentation.
That's bogus.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #12  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
you can have dual cats on a 305 from the factory.


i donno the options or whatever, but ive just seen cars with them new....
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #13  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
I do not doubt that also.
I can strongly assume without doing major going thru old Hot Rods & such, it was reserved for the 350 engined cars.
Again I don't doubt that at all......that 305 SOME may have had the dual cat set ups.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 07:32 PM
  #14  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
You state that they were limited to 350's only, and only on certain cars, then I post the correct info, stating that they were on the G92 90-92 305's, you again post stating that you still uphold your original post, again implying that they were limited to 350's, which in fact they werent, any 90-92 G92 pkg 305 got the dual cats (now as far as limitations the 90-92's in order to get G92 on a 305 HAD to 1. be manual trans, and 2. be a hardtop).

It wasnt "reserved" for 350's, and you can leave your dusty box of magazines where its at.


Originally posted by KED85
I do not doubt that also.
I can strongly assume without doing major going thru old Hot Rods & such, it was reserved for the 350 engined cars.
Again I don't doubt that at all......that 305 SOME may have had the dual cat set ups.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #15  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
Actually we're both correct.
I went to the Camaro White book
And the only detail I left out was the BC4 packaged cars.
I was correct only my calls of 350 limitations, too. If you ordered the 350 engine powered rides, you got dual cats.
BUT IF the car came with a STICK optioned 305 in the RPO optioned cars codes I mentioned, that car also would have dual cats. You were partially correct.
And I also said I don't doubt the 305 powered rides. And a 305 stick option in the IROC/Z28/1LE wasn't specified by yourself. I didn't feel like digging out this Camaro Bible I use often.

Now your final point is a partial correct, too.

IF the cars had checked off/called for the G92 performance package, yes, they did receive dual cats.
BUT you had to order the IROC-Z package with that G92, to get it!
Page 103
The Genuine Camaro White Book
Years covered 1967 to 1993
Michael Antoonick, author.
Endorsed by General Motors for accurate information.
The years for this dual convertor package are
1989-1992.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #16  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
One small, well GIANT hole in your theory, 91 and 92 there was no IROC available, sorry you're incorrect again.

90-92 G92 with a 305 got you dual cats, exactly as I stated it, no if's and's or but's.

Originally posted by KED85
Actually we're both correct.
I went to the Camaro White book
And the only detail I left out was the BC4 packaged cars.
I was correct only my calls of 350 limitations, too. If you ordered the 350 engine powered rides, you got dual cats.
BUT IF the car came with a STICK optioned 305 in the RPO optioned cars codes I mentioned, that car also would have dual cats. You were partially correct.
And I also said I don't doubt the 305 powered rides. And a 305 stick option in the IROC/Z28/1LE wasn't specified by yourself. I didn't feel like digging out this Camaro Bible I use often.

Now your final point is a partial correct, too.

IF the cars had checked off/called for the G92 performance package, yes, they did receive dual cats.
BUT you had to order the IROC-Z package with that G92, to get it!
Page 103
The Genuine Camaro White Book
Years covered 1967 to 1993
Michael Antoonick, author.
Endorsed by General Motors for accurate information.
The years for this dual convertor package are
1989-1992.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2005 | 04:51 AM
  #17  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
Thanks for adding the correction.
Everyone appreciates it.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2005 | 05:35 AM
  #18  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by KED85
Thanks for adding the correction.
Everyone appreciates it.
Im sure everyone appreciates the incorrect information also.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2005 | 07:51 AM
  #19  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
And everyone appreciates your reply.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2005 | 10:39 AM
  #20  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
As silly as this whole argument is, I really can't see a reason to take any action other than deleting jimp2001's reply.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Prodigious
Theoretical and Street Racing
35
Apr 13, 2021 02:37 PM
jrdturbo
Firebirds for Sale
26
Mar 31, 2016 02:58 PM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
86IROC112
Interior
14
Nov 7, 2015 06:50 AM
Night rider327
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 25, 2015 04:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.