New cam
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
New cam
I was looking into swaping out my old cam for a new one. I found one at Summit. Does anyone know what kind of hp gains this cam will give to my car. I also want to put 1.52 roller rockers on. Does anyone know what i can expect.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
What else do you have done to the car?
Cam and rockers alone, yes they'll help, but your cam is at the limits of your heads and other factors such as how much your intake and exhaust can flow... Start opening those up in conjunction, and then start making REAL power. That cam sounds like it should work well though with stock or close to stock-stuff, and it shouldnt give you any stall-speed issues with your tq. converter.....
Cam and rockers alone, yes they'll help, but your cam is at the limits of your heads and other factors such as how much your intake and exhaust can flow... Start opening those up in conjunction, and then start making REAL power. That cam sounds like it should work well though with stock or close to stock-stuff, and it shouldnt give you any stall-speed issues with your tq. converter.....
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
Yeah I want to put the cam lifter kit, a 1.52 rocker pushrod kit, and headers on. these along with other little things to try to push out a few more ponies. Any suggestions.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
From: southern maryland
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
im going with edelbrock, i wonder if this cam will have a nice lope with its 212 duration @ .50 my friends 5.0 has a nice lope with is e303 cam with 220 duration @ .50.
Trending Topics
Just a word of caution, the Edelbrock valve covers are NOT baffled.
What this means is you have to make sure and buy a breather checkvalve ontop of the cover so the beather tube does not fill the intake with oil spurting out from the passenger valve cover. Also, the drivers side PVC valve will become clogged easily without a baffle under it.
Also, the stock cam profile in the 2.8 and 3.1 60*V6 engines is .262i/.273e. Combine that cam with the 1.52 rollertip rockers and they barely clear at the exhaust max of .415" total lift. The max the stock iron heads can take is .420 unless you change the springs.
(note: the stock stamped steel rockers are rated at 1.5, however they actually range form anywhere between 1.42-1.49 meaning that our stock intake lift can be as low as .372"i/.387"e using them. By changing to 1.52 rollers you are insured a .398"i/.415"e lift on that same cam if new.)
Lastly, you can not put 1.6 rockers onto the factory cam and springs. You would have .419"/.437" on a max of .420" springs
So, The only thing you can do without pulling the heads and changing the vavle springs is to just add 1.52 rollertip rockers.
What this means is you have to make sure and buy a breather checkvalve ontop of the cover so the beather tube does not fill the intake with oil spurting out from the passenger valve cover. Also, the drivers side PVC valve will become clogged easily without a baffle under it.
Also, the stock cam profile in the 2.8 and 3.1 60*V6 engines is .262i/.273e. Combine that cam with the 1.52 rollertip rockers and they barely clear at the exhaust max of .415" total lift. The max the stock iron heads can take is .420 unless you change the springs.
(note: the stock stamped steel rockers are rated at 1.5, however they actually range form anywhere between 1.42-1.49 meaning that our stock intake lift can be as low as .372"i/.387"e using them. By changing to 1.52 rollers you are insured a .398"i/.415"e lift on that same cam if new.)
Lastly, you can not put 1.6 rockers onto the factory cam and springs. You would have .419"/.437" on a max of .420" springs
So, The only thing you can do without pulling the heads and changing the vavle springs is to just add 1.52 rollertip rockers.
Last edited by V6#20; Sep 13, 2005 at 07:39 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Originally posted by 91greenbird
im going with edelbrock, i wonder if this cam will have a nice lope with its 212 duration @ .50 my friends 5.0 has a nice lope with is e303 cam with 220 duration @ .50.
im going with edelbrock, i wonder if this cam will have a nice lope with its 212 duration @ .50 my friends 5.0 has a nice lope with is e303 cam with 220 duration @ .50.
212 will probably sound pretty good on your motor.. Havent heard a cammed 60* before so it's hard to say, but it sounds like a reasonable number.....
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: ENGLISHTOWN NJ
Engine: 3.4lL 60* V6
Transmission: Tremic TKO 600 RR
Would this be also for the 3.4 engine & cam
Lastly, you can not put 1.6 rockers onto the factory cam and springs. You would have .419"/.437" on a max of .420" springs
So, The only thing you can do without pulling the heads and changing the vavle springs is to just add 1.52 rollertip rockers.
Lastly, you can not put 1.6 rockers onto the factory cam and springs. You would have .419"/.437" on a max of .420" springs
So, The only thing you can do without pulling the heads and changing the vavle springs is to just add 1.52 rollertip rockers.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
So if i go with this Cam kit and a 1.52 roller rocker and pushrod kit how much of the engine do i take apart. I know i take out the radiator to get the cam out, but do i need to take the heads off? Im gonna end up taking it somewhere and i dont want to get charged for stuff i dont need.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Your rad is gonna have to come out like you mentioned for the cam... anything else in the way... Heads will probably have to come off...to get to them you'll have to take off your upper and lower intake, valve covers, and unbolt the heads..
Basically you're gonna have to take the motor down to block
Basically you're gonna have to take the motor down to block
Originally posted by TVRPAUL
Would this be also for the 3.4 engine & cam
So, The only thing you can do without pulling the heads and changing the vavle springs is to just add 1.52 rollertip rockers.
Would this be also for the 3.4 engine & cam
So, The only thing you can do without pulling the heads and changing the vavle springs is to just add 1.52 rollertip rockers.
"No" on yours, "Yes" on a used 4th gen camaro motor
You can add them fine, you have better springs on that HT3.4 crate motor that can take .500" lift.
The Camaro 3.4 can only take .420"
Originally posted by grimmcs
So if i go with this Cam kit and a 1.52 roller rocker and pushrod kit how much of the engine do i take apart. I know i take out the radiator to get the cam out, but do i need to take the heads off? Im gonna end up taking it somewhere and i dont want to get charged for stuff i dont need.
So if i go with this Cam kit and a 1.52 roller rocker and pushrod kit how much of the engine do i take apart. I know i take out the radiator to get the cam out, but do i need to take the heads off? Im gonna end up taking it somewhere and i dont want to get charged for stuff i dont need.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
Yeah i read it. Sorry it must not have registered. I read yours than as i read TVRPAULS i got my signals crossed and i thought it was for the 3.4.
Originally posted by grimmcs
Yeah i read it. Sorry it must not have registered. I read yours than as i read TVRPAULS i got my signals crossed and i thought it was for the 3.4.
Yeah i read it. Sorry it must not have registered. I read yours than as i read TVRPAULS i got my signals crossed and i thought it was for the 3.4.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





