V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

14.23 with a 2.8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #51  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by TRICK_Z28
man good thing you guys arnt cops otherwise i would be guilty untill proven innasent, dude, it is a v6, says so right on the sight,
no it does not say it is a V6 on the site
and like cops we like proof. one way or the other.

Like I said you made a pretty bolt statement...
if you just make it you have to expect people to doubt it, especially something like that...

I am not saying your lying or that it is impossible, but just the info that you have stated about it makes me very seriously doubt what you say is true.

The times alone (from the descriptions you have given) is outrageous alone...

Last edited by V6sucker; Aug 25, 2006 at 10:14 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #52  
Naft's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA
Car: 89 Firebird, 92 RS
Engine: 2.8L MPFI, 355 TPI
Transmission: t-5, t-5
Axle/Gears: open 3.42, posi 3.42
they aren't necessarily completely outrageous, because we have no clue how much the car actually weighs. im willing to bet its under 3000 pounds, even with the interior intact. hardtop, no gfx, v6, standard, no options, remove a/c(and condenser evaporator etc), p/s, etc, even radiator(if drag only). your talking about one low weight thirdgen. still a hell of an accomplishment if the guy actually pulled a 14.23 though.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #53  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ
Originally Posted by Naft
they aren't necessarily completely outrageous, because we have no clue how much the car actually weighs. im willing to bet its under 3000 pounds, even with the interior intact. hardtop, no gfx, v6, standard, no options, remove a/c(and condenser evaporator etc), p/s, etc, even radiator(if drag only). your talking about one low weight thirdgen. still a hell of an accomplishment if the guy actually pulled a 14.23 though.
my car is down to 3,100ish in track form,and in super stock i think the min weight is like 3,000 for a v6 car id have to check though super stockers are pretty heavy
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 10:42 PM
  #54  
Derickab's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury NC
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 3.4 Liter
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: stock
Dave you get much respect here b/c you have done alot with your car. Things I wouldn't even try to do with mines, but the fact remains that something is different. Who's to say your picture is any different than his. I don't know, but lets just give him a chance. Just by comparing the pics I can see where his is lighter than your front end. Wheels alone can drop about 50lbs. I don't know but to me you have done more than anybody else so I'll go with your word b4 some1 elses. I say give him a chance to state his case b4 judgin.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 10:45 PM
  #55  
facelessnumber's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS
Engine: L03 carbed
Transmission: 700R4, rebuilt+kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42, posi, disc
Originally Posted by V6sucker
no it does not say it is a V6 on the site
But it does:

maritimestock-superstock

Look for the pic of his car. Under the pic, the caption says:

Vince Hazel 1982 Camaro 173(2.8l) V6 V/S

Honestly, I thought this was probably crap too until I saw that. But it was just enough to really make me think about it. I stopped thinking about more powerful cars that can't do it, and started thinking about what it would take for a less powerful car to pull it off. It's really not too hard to believe as long as the weight is right, and more importantly, the weight distribution. Of course he could be lying to get attention. We've all seen people do that in the past. But I don't think he is.


Last edited by facelessnumber; Aug 25, 2006 at 10:46 PM. Reason: Typo
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 11:21 PM
  #56  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ
Originally Posted by Derickab
Dave you get much respect here b/c you have done alot with your car. Things I wouldn't even try to do with mines, but the fact remains that something is different. Who's to say your picture is any different than his. I don't know, but lets just give him a chance. Just by comparing the pics I can see where his is lighter than your front end. Wheels alone can drop about 50lbs. I don't know but to me you have done more than anybody else so I'll go with your word b4 some1 elses. I say give him a chance to state his case b4 judgin.
yeah ur are right those iroc wheel i have are heavy *****,specially with 11.5 inch wide tires on them front and rear,chances are if i were to install a set of morosso trick front springs on the fronts and leave a lil harder i MIGHT get my fronts off the ground an inch or so,but even still then i doubt it.thers just something about a 2.8 even with a full drag race suspension pulling the tires i cant belive.im pretty familar with the superstock rules.and they dotn allow all that much engine work.pretty much only listed replacement parts,and stock heads,though theres 2 versions of superstock classes,and one alows some mild porting.also engine/heads must be correct casting for year cliamed on the car,so that eliminates any form of aluminum heads
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 12:09 AM
  #57  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by facelessnumber
But it does:

maritimestock-superstock

Look for the pic of his car. Under the pic, the caption says:

[I] Vince Hazel 1982 Camaro 173(2.8l) V6 V/S

I stand corrected, but I did look at almost all the pages and saw no mention of it.

But you also see the radiator.
Like I said, I am not calling him a liar, but that is a mighty big statement to just throw out there. Especially with all the other info he has given, IE full interior, "mostly stock" 2.8... ect...

but also looking through the archive thing where it giver driver/car/racing number he is not listed...

Last edited by V6sucker; Aug 26, 2006 at 12:13 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 12:13 AM
  #58  
CC_HotRod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Maryland,USA
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: V6
Transmission: 700 R4
How High?

Some questions to help me make a decission on this topic.
1. Is he riding a "wheelie"?
2. Is it a full both wheels in the air stand or is it just a one wheel up.

I have never tried to pull my '84 Camaro up in the air but my '74 would do it.

Think about this: We all know how we can do the one wheel peel and our bodies do twist, So if the situation is right and the one wheel catches as the clutch is dropped with the flex of the body it could possibly pull at least one wheel up, not real high but high enough to state that the wheel was pulled up. Just a thought.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #59  
TRICK_Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
well the car dosent alaways pick its wheels up. it dose more that a 2.8 should but it isent an every run ocurance. i have only seen it cairry the wheels for about 5 feetor so. it isent that far i know that. i know i am new to this sight and yea i guess i did throw in one big statement with little proof of it.

this is why this guy is like my idol lol. i will see if i can get a compleet list of things and maby a time slip. and hopefuly some more pics
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 09:47 AM
  #60  
TPI-Formula350-'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 4
From: Long Island New York
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: Forged 385 H/C/I
Transmission: 700R4-4300 Stall-lockup
Axle/Gears: BW 9 Bolt 3:70
I figured out how he pulled the front wheels in his 2.8. He used the old helium in the front tires trick that works everytime
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 10:56 AM
  #61  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by TRICK_Z28

this is why this guy is like my idol lol. i will see if i can get a compleet list of things and maby a time slip. and hopefuly some more pics
maybe you should find a faster idol....

even still mid-low 14's is not that fast...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 11:00 AM
  #62  
TRICK_Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
maby not but he knows how to make a real fast car, the camaro waqs not his fastest, he also usta run rail car
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #63  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ


now heres a v6 that can pull the tires for sure,happenes to be a member on my other board

edit dam forums resized the pic
http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j3...wheelup7lk.gif

Last edited by daves12secV6; Aug 26, 2006 at 11:26 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #64  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by daves12secV6


now heres a v6 that can pull the tires for sure,happenes to be a member on my other board

edit dam forums resized the pic
http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j3...wheelup7lk.gif
not to nit pick but that is only one tire... (at least showing in that pic)
and I am sure that is also a turbo fed beasty... not a NA 60 2.8...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #65  
TRICK_Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
still tho, that is impressive, that is what i wanted see was other v6's. eaven tho i do run a small block i love to see em
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 09:36 PM
  #66  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ
Originally Posted by V6sucker
not to nit pick but that is only one tire... (at least showing in that pic)
and I am sure that is also a turbo fed beasty... not a NA 60 2.8...
in that pic it is only one tire.he can lift both about 2 inches,also the car is not turbo,but it is nitrous injected 3.8 ,but he does not spray off the line.the car also just went in the 11.90's recently,car is massivley gutted though down to like 2,7xx pounds
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 09:36 PM
  #67  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
in that pic it is only one tire.he can lift both about 2 inches,also the car is not turbo,but it is nitrous injected 3.8 ,but he does not spray off the line.the car also just went in the 11.90's recently,car is massivley gutted though down to like 2,7xx pounds
edit if u also notice he is on drag radials not slicks
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 12:06 AM
  #68  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
edit if u also notice he is on drag radials not slicks
I think we also all know that a 3.8 can put some very good numbers down...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 12:33 AM
  #69  
Derickab's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury NC
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 3.4 Liter
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: stock
I know this is a lil off the subject but I just had a fun moment that I have to share with you all here. I was on my way home from crusin the strip at the beach tonight and a 03 mustang pulled up beside me on 264 and wanted to get some. So I dropped to third and we did a lil bit and needless to say I got him by a car and 1/2. This guy followed me all the way home and swore up and down I had an 8 in my car. I had to pop the hood and let him see thats it was a 6. Granted fresh rebuild about 3 months ago, opened up a lil( with 3.1 crank and pistions). Its not much but these .28 can put out a lil power if they are treated right and the driver knows what they are doing. This 87 is a beast if you ask me and I love it to deaf. Nothin like a chevy smokin a ford and this is ford country here with the plant right up the street from me.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #70  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ
2.8/3.1/3.4 60* v6 > 90* 3.8 v6

Last edited by daves12secV6; Aug 27, 2006 at 12:46 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2006 | 12:31 AM
  #71  
85berlinetta2.8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: IROC Z
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
"no it does not say it is a V6 on the site" /quote

maritimestock-superstock
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #72  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by 85berlinetta2.8
"no it does not say it is a V6 on the site" /quote

maritimestock-superstock
hey moron try reading down a few posts from that...
I said I stand corrected...
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #73  
TRICK_Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
ok if anyone lives by newhampsher they can see him run on the 8,9,10 of sept
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86maro_252
Tech / General Engine
6
Oct 10, 2015 06:52 PM
usafirebird
Engine Swap
3
Sep 29, 2015 11:58 PM
spartanreaper
Engine Swap
12
Sep 25, 2015 07:22 PM
RABMAN
Interior Parts Wanted
2
Sep 18, 2015 09:02 PM
89bird2.8
TBI
15
Sep 18, 2015 07:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.