V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Low vacuum (33) from 1.7RR install?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #1  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Low vacuum (33) from 1.7RR install?

Got the car running with the 24# injectors by gutting the stock fuel pressure regulator (and using an aftermarket AFPR), but now is throwing code 33. What did you guys do when installing a cam that causes low vacuum (or rockers)?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 06:52 PM
  #2  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ
u ned to remove those 1.7's before u ruin the valve guides,il explain why after i eat dinner,but the geometry is really messed up,and ur gonan side load the valves really bad.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #3  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
u ned to remove those 1.7's before u ruin the valve guides,il explain why after i eat dinner,but the geometry is really messed up,and ur gonan side load the valves really bad.
The Crane rockers were off to the side also.
Not overly concerned about the iron heads getting ruined, but please tell so others have a referance...
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #4  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Problem solved! Guess the MAP sensor will read low vac when it's not connected, HAHA. 11:00PM and tired, I mistakenly hooked up the HVAC controls in place of the MAP (sofa king we todd did).
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 06:06 PM
  #5  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ
ok heres the deal with the 1.7 ford rockers,the distance from the stud to the valve stem center on a ford is further then a chevy,so when u use the ford rocker even though it physically fits it puts the rocker tip on the edge of the valve stem,as the valve is opening and closing most of the force from the rocker arm is pushing on the valve sideways,instead of striaght down the valve,which in turn forces the valve stem onto the side of the valve guide causing it to wear out prematurley.it will take some time to wear out the guide but it will eventually happen.

now if we can get the stud to vale measurement on the 60* head and compare that to the sbc heads,and its the same or dam close,those may possible be used without any worrys
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #6  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
ok heres the deal with the 1.7 ford rockers,the distance from the stud to the valve stem center on a ford is further then a chevy,so when u use the ford rocker even though it physically fits it puts the rocker tip on the edge of the valve stem,as the valve is opening and closing most of the force from the rocker arm is pushing on the valve sideways,instead of striaght down the valve,which in turn forces the valve stem onto the side of the valve guide causing it to wear out prematurley.it will take some time to wear out the guide but it will eventually happen.

now if we can get the stud to vale measurement on the 60* head and compare that to the sbc heads,and its the same or dam close,those may possible be used without any worrys
SBC and 60* are the same, already found that out - but where to get cheap SBC high ratio rockers?!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM
jklein337
Tech / General Engine
2
Sep 19, 2018 06:23 PM
mdtoren
TPI
12
Aug 23, 2015 12:52 PM
Fronzizzle
Electronics
3
Aug 17, 2015 02:52 PM
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.