24 valve V6
24 valve V6
Hey guys, ive got this idea floating around in my head for some days now.
Could it be possible to put some 4 valve per cylinder heads on a 91 V6 block?
I know it sounds strange, but i go the idea from the 350 32 valve heads.
Any ideas are welcome.
Greetings from Mexico
Could it be possible to put some 4 valve per cylinder heads on a 91 V6 block?
I know it sounds strange, but i go the idea from the 350 32 valve heads.
Any ideas are welcome.
Greetings from Mexico
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: 24 valve V6
Not feasible. The blocks are very different between the OHV and OHC.
You would be far better off to use the DOHC block, and modify for the opposite side starter.
You would be far better off to use the DOHC block, and modify for the opposite side starter.
Re: 24 valve V6
They will bolt on, but you need to do something for ignition since the distributor will no longer fit. 3500 heads are too big for the 3.1/2.8 bore (combustion chambers hang over), so 3400 heads are the largest you can go. Try to find 3100/3400 heads and intake set from a 2000 or later because of larger valves and ports.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,525
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 24 valve V6
Originally Posted by mexicanknight
Hey guys, ive got this idea floating around in my head for some days now. Could it be possible to put some 4 valve per cylinder heads on a 91 V6 block?I know it sounds strange, but i go the idea from the 350 32 valve heads. Any ideas are welcome. Greetings from Mexico....

Re: 24 valve V6
They will bolt on, but you need to do something for ignition since the distributor will no longer fit. 3500 heads are too big for the 3.1/2.8 bore (combustion chambers hang over), so 3400 heads are the largest you can go. Try to find 3100/3400 heads and intake set from a 2000 or later because of larger valves and ports.
So could i put some 99-06 grand am heads on my block?
Here I can get a set of them for about 200 bucks
Trending Topics
Re: 24 valve V6
I'm still in the building phase of the engine, check out the thread "What's a Hybrid?"...
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/4...ts-hybrid.html
EDIT : $200 is a lot for used heads. You can get remans for a little more. Check out ebay, I found a set of 3400 heads (look for 170 or 487 castings) for cheap.
Last edited by firstfirebird; Sep 2, 2007 at 08:38 PM.
Re: 24 valve V6
You will need the entire top end, and put a crank trigger on it, there is no room to put a distributor in with the 3x00's. I'm solving this by using a 3.4 block that has a crank trigger. You will also have to use FWD pistons or your compression will be high. It's going to take some fabrication to get them to work with the older blocks.
I'm still in the building phase of the engine, check out the thread "What's a Hybrid?"...
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/4...ts-hybrid.html
EDIT : $200 is a lot for used heads. You can get remans for a little more. Check out ebay, I found a set of 3400 heads (look for 170 or 487 castings) for cheap.
I'm still in the building phase of the engine, check out the thread "What's a Hybrid?"...
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/4...ts-hybrid.html
EDIT : $200 is a lot for used heads. You can get remans for a little more. Check out ebay, I found a set of 3400 heads (look for 170 or 487 castings) for cheap.
P.S. I also want to use my stock block because i dont have to much funds, im surviving on a college budget and dont have a job right now
Last edited by mexicanknight; Sep 2, 2007 at 09:06 PM.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 1992 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Auburn Posi
Re: 24 valve V6
There's advantages and disadvantages to it both.
First, the advantages;
Four valve per cylinder heads offer more valve surface area then traditional two valve per cylinder heads which means more fuel and air in and out over the traditional two valve per cylinder heads.This means more high rpm horsepower over traditional two valve per cylinder heads. Part of this gain comes from the tumble caused by the two intake valves as the fuel and air mixtures hit each other, they tumble into the cylinder, instead of swirling. Tumbling of the mixture helps promote high rpm horsepower.
Now, the disadvantages;
Tumbling of the fuel mixture also promotes the loss of low end torque. Swirling of the mixture, as from two valve per cylinder heads, promotes low end torque, the best would be a combination of swirl and tumble. To really take advantage of the four valve per cylinder heads, you will need to be able to run the engine at very high rpms. This typically means that the bottom end has to be built up with stronger then stock parts. Loss of compression with stock pistons. One thing you can bet, four valves need bigger combustion chambers. Special pistons with high lift cams. Most pistons are designed for two valve per cylinder heads, so, the eyebrows in the pistons probably will not be correct, and to get compression back from the larger combustion chambers, domed pistons are likely to be needed, which creates another problem with valve contact with the piston, which means even higher costs to have the pistons specially made.
So, weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the four valve per cylinder heads, it's never really worth the cost. Ever. For our little V6's or for our big V8's.
First, the advantages;
Four valve per cylinder heads offer more valve surface area then traditional two valve per cylinder heads which means more fuel and air in and out over the traditional two valve per cylinder heads.This means more high rpm horsepower over traditional two valve per cylinder heads. Part of this gain comes from the tumble caused by the two intake valves as the fuel and air mixtures hit each other, they tumble into the cylinder, instead of swirling. Tumbling of the mixture helps promote high rpm horsepower.
Now, the disadvantages;
Tumbling of the fuel mixture also promotes the loss of low end torque. Swirling of the mixture, as from two valve per cylinder heads, promotes low end torque, the best would be a combination of swirl and tumble. To really take advantage of the four valve per cylinder heads, you will need to be able to run the engine at very high rpms. This typically means that the bottom end has to be built up with stronger then stock parts. Loss of compression with stock pistons. One thing you can bet, four valves need bigger combustion chambers. Special pistons with high lift cams. Most pistons are designed for two valve per cylinder heads, so, the eyebrows in the pistons probably will not be correct, and to get compression back from the larger combustion chambers, domed pistons are likely to be needed, which creates another problem with valve contact with the piston, which means even higher costs to have the pistons specially made.
So, weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the four valve per cylinder heads, it's never really worth the cost. Ever. For our little V6's or for our big V8's.
Last edited by noahTHEpurdy; Sep 3, 2007 at 01:42 PM.
Re: 24 valve V6
On the custom intake i was thinking of something like this:

But with longer runners to each port, something like an old cross ram intake, like a bastard child of that intake with this one:

What type of power could it make??
I guess it's mostly low end torque, so is that good or bad?

But with longer runners to each port, something like an old cross ram intake, like a bastard child of that intake with this one:

What type of power could it make??
I guess it's mostly low end torque, so is that good or bad?
Last edited by mexicanknight; Sep 3, 2007 at 11:33 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
9
Sep 13, 2015 11:35 PM








