V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

2.8L Rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2012 | 06:31 PM
  #1  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
2.8L Rebuild

Hey, im thinking about rebuilding my engine this summer and here is the parts i was thinking about getting.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-1413-12/ Rocker Arms
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-601-12/ Cam Valve Locks
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-K16-232-4/ Cam and lifter kit
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CLE-SH1364S/ Cam Bearings
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FEL-512SD/ Head Gasket
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SLP-6-4020A/ Rod Bearings
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/UEM-1463C-STD/ Pistons



I was thinking about using the old pushrods from before, car has 120k miles on it. Anything else i should consider or drop from the list?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2012 | 09:39 PM
  #2  
Maverick H1L's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 6
From: LeRoy, NY
Car: 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT
Engine: 2.7L V6
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.41
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

1. If you're going to put in a new cam, you're better off getting 1.6 rockers, as the ones you have on the list aren't that much different from what's already there (1.5).
2. Reuse the stock valve keepers...
3. If you're going to get the CL-232, might as well get the CL-233 kit...
4. Cam bearings are unnecessary. But, if you're going to replace them, there are some that are SBC-style. They were available from GM a while back, but I don't know if they're offered any more, and I'd need to look up the P/N.
5. Only head gasket you should be looking into, short of a hybrid turbo conversion, is the FelPro HS8699PT2. It's half the price of what you've got there.
6. You forgot Main Bearings...
7. You only need new pistons if the cylinders have damage and the block needs to be bored oversize. Look at rings instead. And you do realize that if you DO get new pistons, you will need to have a machine shop install them to the rods because the wrist pins are press fit and not circlipped into place, right?

What you forgot on your list is either a way to tune the stock ECM (almost impossible), or a replacement, be it a 1227165 from a TPI V8 or aftermarket. Your stock calibration isn't going to work too well with the new cam, much less anything else. And possibly fuel injectors... And don't forget the full gasket kit.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2012 | 10:26 PM
  #3  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Like maverick says, get the 1.6 rockers. Summit sells the same kit with 1.6 rockers right on their site. Youll also need different valve covers since they would cause clearance issues with the stock covers. Anything less than a 260 grind cam really isnt worth buying. Depending on the year/engine setup of the car a tune isnt as necessary as some may think. Apparently early 2.8 ECM/MAF read and adjust better and dont require a tune (although it would probably still help).
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 08:57 AM
  #4  
zombienerd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Hudson, NH
Car: 1982 Firebird Base
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Originally Posted by Maverick H1L
What you forgot on your list is either a way to tune the stock ECM (almost impossible), or a replacement, be it a 1227165 from a TPI V8 or aftermarket. Your stock calibration isn't going to work too well with the new cam, much less anything else. And possibly fuel injectors... And don't forget the full gasket kit.
Being that his name is 83Berli, I am going to conjecture that it's an 83, and therefore Carbureted. As long as he sticks with the E2SE, shouldn't the Stock ECM be fine?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 08:58 AM
  #5  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Yep, thats what i was told as well.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 08:59 AM
  #6  
zombienerd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Hudson, NH
Car: 1982 Firebird Base
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

If your car is in fact and 83 and Carbureted, you should consider going with the Edelbrock intake, and a Holley 390 carb as well.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 09:02 AM
  #7  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Ill second that, its what ill be doing.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 09:56 AM
  #8  
Maverick H1L's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 6
From: LeRoy, NY
Car: 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT
Engine: 2.7L V6
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.41
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Well, if that were the case, the carb would need to be jetted for the increased air. Assuming it's carbed. Keep in mind that the cam, rockers, and intake (if purchased) would increase the air flow. Not sure on the ECM for those, but I would think it would benefit better from being tuned. Getting a 4-barrel to go with the Edelbrock intake would be better as the stock carb is restrictive. Which will give you more freedom, but is more expensive, and probably not what you're looking for with a basically stock rebuild.

(I wasn't thinking it was carbed since so many of those have died already)

And the Comp CL-233 is their 260 grind. However, Delta Cams has almost the same cam for about $60 cheaper, from what I remember.

Also, if you're going to go down as far as the bare engine block, you'd benefit the most by getting fuel injected, post-85, cylinder heads. They have bigger valves.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 12:17 PM
  #9  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

So should i just put a 3.4L in instead?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 12:21 PM
  #10  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Thats totally up to you. Most would say yes. Im keeping my 2.8 and building it up but others dont think its worth their time.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 10:12 PM
  #11  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Originally Posted by 83Berli
So should i just put a 3.4L in instead?


I would in your situation, That would net you more gains, and provide a good base for future upgrades.

nice carb intake, new carb, some of those fancy chrome valve covers, headers and a cam.. it'll look good and run great.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 10:43 PM
  #12  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

dont waste ur money on the stock engine u have now, much better off buying a 3.1 or 3.4 and swapping on ur carb manifold and carb
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 06:27 PM
  #13  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

okay, so i've decided to just go to pull-a-part near my home town and get an engine and tranny for $200. gonna put a 3.4l in it and was wondering on what carb i should put on it. i know people say to put the holly 390cfm on it, but can i put something bigger on there or is the 390cfm about all it can handle?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 06:45 PM
  #14  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

I was told the 390 was more than big enough.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 09:08 PM
  #15  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

the 390 is plenty, any bigger and it will have horrible throttle responce and **** poor milage, i belive the next step up is what a 500 cfm carb ?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 11:14 AM
  #16  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

okay, so i'm getting my wishlist put together on summit. got main bearings, 233 comp cam, 390cfm holley carb, was wondering if this is what i need for the manifold.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-3785/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-3789/

i know they say theyre for the 2.8, but everywhere i read people say to put the 2.8 parts straight on the 3.4. so i'm guessing this will bolt on directly?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 01:53 PM
  #17  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Yep, thats what you need.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 02:40 PM
  #18  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

cool, hopefully i can get it ordered in a week or two and start my summer project. i guess it's time to call my buddy and go get the engine then
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 11:52 PM
  #19  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

would the heads on the 3.4 be worth keeping or 2.8 heads with http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-RP1414-12/
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2012 | 12:08 AM
  #20  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

The 3.4 heads would be the latest/last casting for the gen1's which would be the best to use.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2012 | 01:20 AM
  #21  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

should i still put the 1.6 rocker arms in, is it that big of an upgrade?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2012 | 04:14 PM
  #22  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

do i need http://www.summitracing.com/parts/HLY-17-6/ for the holley carb to fit on the edelbrock manifold? making sure i have everything before i finalize my order
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 12:29 AM
  #23  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

if the holley is a 4 barrell carb u need to buy the correct edelbrock top for the manifold.

i dont rember if the edl intake comes with the stock top and the 4 barrell top or not, when u call summit to place ur order they will make sure u get the right parts
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 09:37 AM
  #24  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Im pretty sure part #3789 is the adapter for the 4 barrel that you need to go with part # 3785 which is the manifold. At least thats what i was told. I havnt ordered mine yet since im waiting on my tax return (so much for direct deposit being quicker...) since i spent what i had on other parts for the engine. lol
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 11:31 AM
  #25  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

i've got that, just wasnt sure if the holley bolt pattern was a direct fit to the edelbrock. you gotta watch these companies, they'll do whatever they can to make a penny, even if it means making the holes lign up 1/8in. different.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 02:36 PM
  #26  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

just bought the carb. http://www.allcarbs.com/detail.php?p...=8&stt=10&gb=2 it's $330 + $20 shipping. looks nice and clean to go with it
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 11:48 AM
  #27  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

I ordered the intake manifold parts last night, would it be okay to put the 390cfm carb on the 2.8? can it handle that much fuel input?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 12:31 PM
  #28  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Yep, should be fine. Anything over that is overkill though unless you have a pretty serious setup going on. lol
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 02:09 PM
  #29  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

good then, I doubt this thing is pushing 85Hp at the moment
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 02:13 PM
  #30  
Adrenaline1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 N/A
Transmission: Manual 4 Speed
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Yikes, even stock it should be a bit better than that. lol
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 03:35 PM
  #31  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

yea, it needs a little work. thats why i'm putting the 3.4 in there. my current carb is messed up, needs rebuilt. engine needs at a top end rebuild anyways
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 06:34 PM
  #32  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

okay, so my carb came in last friday and the manifold pieces should be in this week. since i'm doing a complete rebuild almost, should i consider new valves? what about rods? do I need to take the 3.4L block to a machine shop and have it reworked or examined?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 09:40 PM
  #33  
evilemokid94's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 3
From: Elwood, IN
Car: 1986 camaro Sports Coupe
Engine: L31 350
Transmission: 89 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 gov lock
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

id get it hot tanked, makes for a happier build since your working with clean parts, and some new. also on parts your reusing and botls your reusing i would highly recommend you get some purple power( a gallon cost about $6.50 at an auto store) and soak them over night, you will be amazed at how clean they come, this stuff eats oil and grease. im building a 350 right now and i tossed in my filthy black pistons and rockers, push rods, and bolts and every single one of them has come out clean, even my rockers and pistons, they are silver again. its amazing stuff.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 09:59 PM
  #34  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

was it straight solution? what container did you put it in that was big enough to hold all the parts?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 10:18 PM
  #35  
evilemokid94's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 3
From: Elwood, IN
Car: 1986 camaro Sports Coupe
Engine: L31 350
Transmission: 89 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 gov lock
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

It's just straight solution right outta the bottle. I have a giant autozone bucket here thst I have filled with about 4 gallons of purple power. I don't soak all the stuff at once. I do it one at a time, especially bolts so I don't get them mixed up. But like last night. I soaked all my pistons at one time, removed them about 5 maybe 6 hours later and they were all spotless with alittle carbon on the bottom, today I soaked all my mains at the same time( I had them marked) and they are all spotless. Right now I have a head soaking to see what it will do to it, a windage pan, and my oil pump. It's great stuff. After I soak the stuff for a few hours or over night I wipe what ever it was down with a rag to clean excess oil or dirt off and the rest of the purple power
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2012 | 12:57 PM
  #36  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

after cleaning the valves and pistons, do i want to try and keep them together as a pair or does it matter which valves go to what?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2012 | 02:34 PM
  #37  
evilemokid94's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 3
From: Elwood, IN
Car: 1986 camaro Sports Coupe
Engine: L31 350
Transmission: 89 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 gov lock
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

Pistons matter so mark them using a center punch before removal, valves will unless you lap them
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 07:08 PM
  #38  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

54 hours a week and i finally have enough money to get the engine and some parts, i am working on the parts list and came to a question...

1.6 rocker arms for the 3.4 cost about $250
1.6 rocker arms for the 2.8 cost about $140

can i use the 2.8 parts in the 3.4 heads? if not, what would be the difference between the two heads if i upgraded them both? since the 3.4 has iron heads and the 2.8 also does, should i just keep the 2.8 heads?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 03:25 PM
  #39  
83Berli's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 200C
Re: 2.8L Rebuild

anyone know?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sleprock
Interior Parts Wanted
2
Oct 3, 2015 11:01 PM
hartsmike
Engine Swap
11
Oct 2, 2015 07:11 AM
Derrick86
Transmissions and Drivetrain
7
Oct 1, 2015 05:12 AM
Aaronv808
Members Firebirds
9
Sep 30, 2015 12:55 PM
bplessy
TPI
0
Sep 30, 2015 12:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM.