The wide tires fraud
#1
The wide tires fraud
Yes, they look better. Yes, they can improve grip. But is the improvement a guaranteed function of simply installing wider tires? No.
If your car has 900 pounds of vertical load on the left front tire when parked, and your left front tire is at 30 psi, you will have 30" of contact patch, whether it's 6" wide and 5" long, or whether it's 10" wide and 3" long.
This is why width doesn't matter.
Your tires will squish until there are enough square inches touching the road . Less squish may be better sometimes, and that's where you may try a wider tire, but there is an alternative many road racers have used with success: more air pressure in the tire.
Width has disadvantages such as drag, drawing the attention of police, and making your car look fast instead of stealthily hiding your advantages. Width also costs more.
Tire grip does not increase on the same curve as the contact pressure increases, and this is why wider tires can help performance. It's also part of why aerodynamic down force is useful. But weight reduction is the best option.
A Miata that corners at 1G will take any given curve at a higher speed than a heavier Viper. But unless you have a turbo LSx in that Miata, the Viper will get to the next curve first.
Our cars are heavy, there's no escaping that. The '82 Z28 and the '87 Formula both skirted 3000 pounds, every other V8 version was even heavier. That's fine out on the Bonneville Salt Flats, but that doesn't help you.
Want wide tires anyway? Me too. If all goes well this spring, I will have one third gen on 215/65R15s and the other on 305/30R19s front and rear.
Why do I want wide tires anyway?
We all know you can't tuck a 295/50R15 under the front of these cars. Even if you could, you'll get more tread width from a 275/40R17 that does tuck.
It's all about the shorter sidewalls.
You can tuck wide wheels under the front when you get them tall enough to clear the steering, right up until they touch the struts. The taller you go, the wider they can be, because the struts are angled.
So, run out and get a set of 995/15R22s?
No.
Detroit Speed got it right with 315/35R18x11s. That will shame my 215/65R15 setup for one reason and only one reason.
You can get the low profile tires in softer compounds. I'll hafta pay an awful lot extra to get a 215/65 with a tread compound comparable to the BFG Rival S 1.5
I'm not sure I want to spend that much of my remaining $1.5M.
But when it rains, whose car will hydroplane? Detroit Speed's, not mine.
And when you live somewhere that rains more than half the time, you want deep, narrow treads.
In the winter, for those of you with snow and no second vehicle? Narrower snow tires always do better than wide snow tires. Always.
Go buy what you like, but keep a set of 215s.
Lastly for now, not every tire works on the front of these cars.
I took a set of BFG Radial T/A 235/60R15s off my '78 Camaro, where they did really well, and tried them on my '89 S-10 where they did really well. Then I tried them on my '85 Camaro, and they sucked massive donkey.
The '78 and the '89 both had something the third gen doesn't: upper control arms.
Gotta go,
If your car has 900 pounds of vertical load on the left front tire when parked, and your left front tire is at 30 psi, you will have 30" of contact patch, whether it's 6" wide and 5" long, or whether it's 10" wide and 3" long.
This is why width doesn't matter.
Your tires will squish until there are enough square inches touching the road . Less squish may be better sometimes, and that's where you may try a wider tire, but there is an alternative many road racers have used with success: more air pressure in the tire.
Width has disadvantages such as drag, drawing the attention of police, and making your car look fast instead of stealthily hiding your advantages. Width also costs more.
Tire grip does not increase on the same curve as the contact pressure increases, and this is why wider tires can help performance. It's also part of why aerodynamic down force is useful. But weight reduction is the best option.
A Miata that corners at 1G will take any given curve at a higher speed than a heavier Viper. But unless you have a turbo LSx in that Miata, the Viper will get to the next curve first.
Our cars are heavy, there's no escaping that. The '82 Z28 and the '87 Formula both skirted 3000 pounds, every other V8 version was even heavier. That's fine out on the Bonneville Salt Flats, but that doesn't help you.
Want wide tires anyway? Me too. If all goes well this spring, I will have one third gen on 215/65R15s and the other on 305/30R19s front and rear.
Why do I want wide tires anyway?
We all know you can't tuck a 295/50R15 under the front of these cars. Even if you could, you'll get more tread width from a 275/40R17 that does tuck.
It's all about the shorter sidewalls.
You can tuck wide wheels under the front when you get them tall enough to clear the steering, right up until they touch the struts. The taller you go, the wider they can be, because the struts are angled.
So, run out and get a set of 995/15R22s?
No.
Detroit Speed got it right with 315/35R18x11s. That will shame my 215/65R15 setup for one reason and only one reason.
You can get the low profile tires in softer compounds. I'll hafta pay an awful lot extra to get a 215/65 with a tread compound comparable to the BFG Rival S 1.5
I'm not sure I want to spend that much of my remaining $1.5M.
But when it rains, whose car will hydroplane? Detroit Speed's, not mine.
And when you live somewhere that rains more than half the time, you want deep, narrow treads.
In the winter, for those of you with snow and no second vehicle? Narrower snow tires always do better than wide snow tires. Always.
Go buy what you like, but keep a set of 215s.
Lastly for now, not every tire works on the front of these cars.
I took a set of BFG Radial T/A 235/60R15s off my '78 Camaro, where they did really well, and tried them on my '89 S-10 where they did really well. Then I tried them on my '85 Camaro, and they sucked massive donkey.
The '78 and the '89 both had something the third gen doesn't: upper control arms.
Gotta go,
The following users liked this post:
ughmas (01-30-2024)
#2
Supreme Member
Re: The wide tires fraud
[citation needed]
The right tires width is like the best header arrangement; ultimately you're limited by packaging and there comes a point when it's not what's slowing you down anymore.
The right tires width is like the best header arrangement; ultimately you're limited by packaging and there comes a point when it's not what's slowing you down anymore.
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (01-29-2024)
#4
Junior Member
Re: The wide tires fraud
Don't go BFG.. Go Michelin PS2 no hydroplaning
The following 2 users liked this post by dabomb6608:
dennisbernal91z (02-02-2024), T.L. (01-29-2024)
#6
Member
Re: The wide tires fraud
But these tires go to 11.
Last edited by Firechicken82; 01-29-2024 at 02:00 PM.
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (01-29-2024)
Trending Topics
#10
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,909
Likes: 0
Received 1,856 Likes
on
1,271 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
The following 2 users liked this post by QwkTrip:
Roorancher (01-29-2024), T.L. (01-29-2024)
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (01-29-2024)
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
Received 138 Likes
on
98 Posts
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: The wide tires fraud
I drive my car at least three times a week to work. And yes, it does rain here...occasionally. But keep that in mind when you have to "winterize" your car or put it away for the winter or whatever it is that you guys do when you can't drive it year 'round. Plus, I have lived elsewhere. It was still my DD when I lived in Colorado, and it had BFGs on it then as well.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
Received 138 Likes
on
98 Posts
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: The wide tires fraud
Oh, forgot to mention that I do not in fact own an umbrella. Never have, and I have lived in places that rained/snowed regularly.
#14
Senior Member
Re: The wide tires fraud
When people winterize their cars you want them to "keep in mind" that it occasionally rains in Southern California? Or you want them to remember that you drive your car to work three times per week?
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (01-30-2024)
#15
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,909
Likes: 0
Received 1,856 Likes
on
1,271 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: The wide tires fraud
How well do the BFG's drive in poop? I'm asking the California guy with all the experience.
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (01-30-2024)
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
Received 138 Likes
on
98 Posts
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: The wide tires fraud
The simple fact that I don't have to avoid snow and can drive my car whenever I want. Cost might be higher here, but you cannot beat the weather.
#18
Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: central Texas
Posts: 262
Received 97 Likes
on
71 Posts
Car: 91 TA Vert WS6-94 TA Vert
Engine: 5.0/5.7 LT1
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73-3.42
Re: The wide tires fraud
As far as an umbrella, I do own a large one, but only use it for walking the dogs on the rare occasion we experience a "turd floater."
#19
Senior Member
Re: The wide tires fraud
(quote from blacksunshine'91 on 01-18-24)
Let's get back to talking about tires, rain, and California poop. Although I can see how at least one of those could easily turn the topic to politics...
Edit:
And although I too drive my car year-round and don't have to winterize it, I will do my best to remember that some guy in SoCal drives his car to work and occasionally sees rain.
Last edited by Aaron R.; 01-30-2024 at 01:14 PM.
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (01-30-2024)
#20
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Merryland
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LC9
Transmission: AR5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: The wide tires fraud
I drove my Camaro on Hoosiers in the rain to a PCA autocross. Roughly 20 miles. Didn't die. Took FTD (while still raining).
Pat
Pat
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (01-30-2024)
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
Received 138 Likes
on
98 Posts
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: The wide tires fraud
(quote from blacksunshine'91 on 01-18-24)
Let's get back to talking about tires, rain, and California poop. Although I can see how at least one of those could easily turn the topic to politics...
Edit:
And although I too drive my car year-round and don't have to winterize it, I will do my best to remember that some guy in SoCal drives his car to work and occasionally sees rain.
I'd be perfectly happy to move away from political B.S. on here. We hear enough of that crap everywhere else. I wasn't bringin up whatever poop y'all were referring to or other snide comments about CA. I made one simple post about not hydroplaning and for some reason you found it funny, as if I haven't driven in rain or as though I'd lived here for my entire life.
P.S. Don't forget though, that the rain here is only occassional. Lol.
Last edited by blacksunshine'91; 01-30-2024 at 01:51 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gumby
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
01-06-2005 09:19 PM