Alternative Port EFI Intakes This board is for tech discussions and questions about aftermarket port EFI such as the HSR, MR, SR, BBK, FIRST, etc.

Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2005, 11:35 PM
  #101  
Junior Member

 
fmsracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 42
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
any news on the ported intake?
Old 07-16-2005, 09:54 AM
  #102  
Member
 
german-motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: germany
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Selling F.I.R.S.T Set up

Selling our setup see pics earlier in this thread!
Shipping to the US (secure) 60Euro
Banktransfer or Pay pal

Send PM with offer

will trade for set up for two used magnacharger LS1 intakes!
Old 07-24-2007, 09:41 AM
  #103  
Member

 
Jeffrey Fontaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 225
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1992 Z/28
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 2.73's I think
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Hi BadSS,
Any more news on your FIRST combo(s)? I'm intently following this as I will shortly be buying a new intake. Since I don't trust my skills at porting, I'm going between the HSR (cheap, high RPM/horsepower), SR (expensive, good all around power), and the FIRST (looks stock, cheaper, middle of the road power/RPM). I was hoping to see some real world dyno graphs rather than magazine stuff but doesn't appear to have happened. I was also wondering how much was gained from the stock FIRST vs. the ported version.

My combo is shaping up to be a 350 w/ a 218-220* intake roller cam, mid .500" lift, probably Edelbrock Etec heads etc. etc. It will have to pass CT emissions so I can't go too crazy. Since I would probably only go to the track once a year, I'm more concerned with weekend driving and street blasts. I'm worried that to have a good driving street car w/ the HSR I'll need a 3000 stall converter and 3.73's minimum. I'm hoping that the FIRST can be cheaper than the SR and provide about the same power(band).

PS. Your SS is awesome!!!
Old 07-25-2007, 02:37 AM
  #104  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
F-Body Demon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Originally Posted by Jeffrey Fontaine
Hi BadSS,
Any more news on your FIRST combo(s)? I'm intently following this as I will shortly be buying a new intake. Since I don't trust my skills at porting, I'm going between the HSR (cheap, high RPM/horsepower), SR (expensive, good all around power), and the FIRST (looks stock, cheaper, middle of the road power/RPM). I was hoping to see some real world dyno graphs rather than magazine stuff but doesn't appear to have happened. I was also wondering how much was gained from the stock FIRST vs. the ported version.

My combo is shaping up to be a 350 w/ a 218-220* intake roller cam, mid .500" lift, probably Edelbrock Etec heads etc. etc. It will have to pass CT emissions so I can't go too crazy. Since I would probably only go to the track once a year, I'm more concerned with weekend driving and street blasts. I'm worried that to have a good driving street car w/ the HSR I'll need a 3000 stall converter and 3.73's minimum. I'm hoping that the FIRST can be cheaper than the SR and provide about the same power(band).

PS. Your SS is awesome!!!
Man im glad you pulled this out of the dead pile. had some great info in there.
Old 07-25-2007, 05:35 AM
  #105  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,741
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

I almost feel as if this thread belongs in TPI.

Hrmm..
Old 07-25-2007, 07:36 AM
  #106  
Member

 
Jeffrey Fontaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 225
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1992 Z/28
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 2.73's I think
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Guess it depends on where the line is drawn for "alternative" intakes...

Its too bad there isn't a way to have a "shadow" post on the other board that updates each other when there are posts, i.e. a thread in each category with the same posts in each one.
Old 07-25-2007, 09:37 AM
  #107  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

"I almost feel as if this thread belongs in TPI."

I agree because it is actually a TPI style system.
Old 07-25-2007, 02:19 PM
  #108  
Junior Member

 
Zipdrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Allen,

Where are you at with your first conversion?
Old 07-25-2007, 07:20 PM
  #109  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

I'm close to posting pictures and starting a thread on it. I'm about 95% done with the machine work. Next up is the welding shop then lots of grinding, back to the welding shop, then more grinding and then back to machine shop for the final 5%.

The conversion is not for the faint of heart and you better have a big wallet or know someone with a machine shop as that is the case with me. However the potential for a substantial horsepower gain is there if you have the motor for it. We shall see when we go to the dyno.
Old 07-25-2007, 11:44 PM
  #110  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BadSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 1,390
Received 78 Likes on 64 Posts
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Originally Posted by Jeffrey Fontaine
Hi BadSS,
Any more news on your FIRST combo(s)? I'm intently following this as I will shortly be buying a new intake. Since I don't trust my skills at porting, I'm going between the HSR (cheap, high RPM/horsepower), SR (expensive, good all around power), and the FIRST (looks stock, cheaper, middle of the road power/RPM). I was hoping to see some real world dyno graphs rather than magazine stuff but doesn't appear to have happened. I was also wondering how much was gained from the stock FIRST vs. the ported version.

My combo is shaping up to be a 350 w/ a 218-220* intake roller cam, mid .500" lift, probably Edelbrock Etec heads etc. etc. It will have to pass CT emissions so I can't go too crazy. Since I would probably only go to the track once a year, I'm more concerned with weekend driving and street blasts. I'm worried that to have a good driving street car w/ the HSR I'll need a 3000 stall converter and 3.73's minimum. I'm hoping that the FIRST can be cheaper than the SR and provide about the same power(band).

PS. Your SS is awesome!!!
Jeffery, thanks for the compliment on the SS. I bought it new in 85 and it has served me well over the years. It's been down for some time now, but since I've sold the IROC, I've started back on getting it road and show worthy.

Sounds like your combination is similar to my old IROC. As far as intakes go,,, it's all about what you want from the car. I liked the FIRST on the IROC,, because of the midrange boost from the longer runners. It pulled almost as hard as the fully ported base and "customized" SLP runners - I took them on and off the car grinding a little,, then doing three or four vericom (g-tech) passes until the ETs and MPH leveled off. It was as "tuned" as it could be for that combination and the FIRST right out of the box performed better over all.

I liked the StealthRam,, but missed the midrange rush of the old TPI - although I did like how the car could hook decently on street tires,, something impossible to do with the old TPI/SLP combo,,, and how well it ran from a kick. The FIRST is middle of the road,, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. It moved the power band up a few hundred RPM compared to the fully ported TPI/SLP combo,,, but not as high as the StealthRam.

Power band wise:
TPI/SLP - off idle to 5500 rpm - high-12.9s@105mph
FIRST - 2000 - 5800 - mid-12.5s@107mph
HSR - 3000 - 6400 - low-12.6s@108
ETs are for similar conditions with temps in the high 80s

A buddy with a 13.0 LS car would pull ever so slightly away from me with the old TPI/SLP combo from a 60mph kick. I could blow his doors off with either the HSR or the FIRST - with the HSR being a steady even pull while the FIRST would really put it on him on the initial hit and kinda tapered off a bit. That same 13.0 car could hand over the TPI/SLP combo on street tires,, bad,, I could not hook the thing. Again,, with the StealthRam and the FIRST I could flat blow his doors off,,, but the FIRST was harder to hook. Like I said,, it all depends on what you're looking for. I never ran a ported FIRST on the IROC, but would have expected about a .12 reduction in ETs over the box stock FIRST with relatively minor port work / clean-up. Not that it's bad out of the box,,, it's just sized to a stock exit,, and it turns down into it. The injector bumps are also quite large and can be dang near flattened out.

Anyway,, no hard data and won't be until I get the Monte back on the road.

Take care and good luck.

Kevin
Old 07-26-2007, 05:23 AM
  #111  
Supreme Member
 
formul8!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: www.thirdgentech.com
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2004 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Interesting info. I forgot all about these intakes. Those runners are HUGE!

How is the casting and machining quality of the pieces?
Old 07-26-2007, 07:10 AM
  #112  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BadSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 1,390
Received 78 Likes on 64 Posts
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Originally Posted by formul8!!
Interesting info. I forgot all about these intakes. Those runners are HUGE!

How is the casting and machining quality of the pieces?
I'd say they're very good. If you enlarge the first picture, you can see the radiused inlets of the plenum,,, nothing to port there,, except for maybe a minor gasket match. The second picture shows the roof of the out of the box port. Quite smooth for as-cast.

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...s-first-plenum

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...ase-flange.jpg
Old 07-26-2007, 10:31 AM
  #113  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

I only have the First intake manifold but the casting and machining is quite well done.
Old 07-26-2007, 12:14 PM
  #114  
Member

 
Jeffrey Fontaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 225
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1992 Z/28
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 2.73's I think
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

BadSS, thanks for the input. I had an 87SS but sold it back in May '04.

I think the FIRST is going to be more up my alley. As you say with your RPM range's, that will be where I'm at 95% of the time. I wish the runner's were just a few inches shorter, so maybe peak rpm could be more like 6000-6100. But, I would not want this to be a high-rpm only car, so starting power at 3k just won't work out with my cam selection. I wish I could drive an HSR car to see how "bad" it really is off the line...
Old 07-26-2007, 02:41 PM
  #115  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,850
Received 215 Likes on 162 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Originally Posted by Jeffrey Fontaine
BadSS, thanks for the input. I had an 87SS but sold it back in May '04.

I think the FIRST is going to be more up my alley. As you say with your RPM range's, that will be where I'm at 95% of the time. I wish the runner's were just a few inches shorter, so maybe peak rpm could be more like 6000-6100. But, I would not want this to be a high-rpm only car, so starting power at 3k just won't work out with my cam selection. I wish I could drive an HSR car to see how "bad" it really is off the line...
Not bad at all, AS&M semisiamesed tpi setup, and I converted it to HSR later and it barely noticed a difference off the line. But getting above 4500rpm it pulled much harder.
Old 07-26-2007, 11:46 PM
  #116  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BadSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 1,390
Received 78 Likes on 64 Posts
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Originally Posted by Jeffrey Fontaine
BadSS, thanks for the input. I had an 87SS but sold it back in May '04.

I think the FIRST is going to be more up my alley. As you say with your RPM range's, that will be where I'm at 95% of the time. I wish the runner's were just a few inches shorter, so maybe peak rpm could be more like 6000-6100. But, I would not want this to be a high-rpm only car, so starting power at 3k just won't work out with my cam selection. I wish I could drive an HSR car to see how "bad" it really is off the line...
I wouldn't say the HSR is bad off the line,,, especially once you jack up the lower rpm timing in the chip. It's very similar to how a good dual plane intake feels,, which is no slouch. In fact,, the guy I sold the car to,,, is having difficulty launching the car with the StealthRam and goes on and about how responsive it is,,, and I'm not saying it isn't. It's just if the long runner system is getting enough air to the engine and it's tuned in fairly close,,, there is just no comparison in the part throttle and midrange pull.
Old 08-06-2007, 01:53 AM
  #117  
Member
 
camaroguy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro 5.7L Z28
Engine: L98, G92 option
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Just caught this thread- Very cool stuff! I'm building a 383 using the zz383 block as the base and with all forged internals. I was wondering what might be a good head and cam setup for me using the First Injection setup? I want to keep the car streetable on pump gas with about a 450hp range. I have a Pro-Built transmission, aluminum driveshaft, 2800 stall converter, and the 3.23posi rear.
Old 08-06-2007, 10:01 AM
  #118  
Member

 
Jeffrey Fontaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 225
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1992 Z/28
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 2.73's I think
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Originally Posted by BadSS
I wouldn't say the HSR is bad off the line,,, especially once you jack up the lower rpm timing in the chip. It's very similar to how a good dual plane intake feels,, which is no slouch.
Quite funny you say that, because I was talking to someone on a local board and I was thinking the same thing when I was looking at the runner length etc. Its just that TPI has such an "abnormal" torque boost... When you put it like that, that's not a problem. Argh, now I'm back to not sure between the FIRST and HSR FWIW, Ken at FIRST said they would be coming out with a CNC version once the current stock is depleted (could be a while)...
Old 08-06-2007, 07:55 PM
  #119  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BadSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 1,390
Received 78 Likes on 64 Posts
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Originally Posted by camaroguy21
Just caught this thread- Very cool stuff! I'm building a 383 using the zz383 block as the base and with all forged internals. I was wondering what might be a good head and cam setup for me using the First Injection setup? I want to keep the car streetable on pump gas with about a 450hp range. I have a Pro-Built transmission, aluminum driveshaft, 2800 stall converter, and the 3.23posi rear.
Canfields (Jegs are Canfields), TrickFlow, AFR, all are good heads and will work well with the right combination. If you have the money the M2 Track I or KC Track I heads are the best standard 23* head running now.

Cam will depend on your expectations and exhaust system. If you have large tube headers,, and a killer exhaust system,, depending on the exhuast to intake ratio,,, a single pattern cam may work best. Smaller tube headers, single 3" exhaust,,, you'll need more duration on the exhaust. I tend to recommend solid rollers when I can - like a limited use / weekend car (although I've driven them daily). However, there are some very nice hydraulic rollers out there that'll let you fully utilize the higher lift flow from the better heads if you don't mind dropping the dime on the "r" series lifters. Again,,, all depends on what you have and what you want out of the engine.
Old 12-09-2008, 08:58 PM
  #120  
Junior Member
 
navion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Just thought I might resurrect this thread and let everyone know that a group buy for the FIRST intake is set up in the group purchase forum. Should be able to get a good price if anyone's been looking into this setup.
Old 01-28-2013, 01:31 AM
  #121  
Member

 
Lampropeltis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '89 Flame red metallic GTA!!
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

TTT I am now in the market for a FIRST intake; if anyone is in please let me know.
Old 01-19-2020, 02:48 PM
  #122  
Senior Member

 
my hemi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 608
Received 56 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: A few things lol
Engine: 350 tpi supercharged and a 383 stro
Transmission: Both 700r4s
Axle/Gears: 3.23s and 3.54s
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

How did you every make out with the First performance intake? I have one going on a 383 now...
Old 03-06-2021, 11:42 PM
  #123  
Banned

iTrader: (4)
 
badgta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 1,014
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1991 FORMULA
Engine: ZZ4 + LT4 HT CAM 430HP
Transmission: 700-R4 COMING T56
Axle/Gears: 9" 4.56's (COMING)
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Imagine if "FIRST" decided to do an "ALL OUT" ported base and siameesed runner design!!

HOLY COW!
Old 03-07-2021, 08:39 AM
  #124  
Senior Member

 
my hemi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 608
Received 56 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: A few things lol
Engine: 350 tpi supercharged and a 383 stro
Transmission: Both 700r4s
Axle/Gears: 3.23s and 3.54s
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

Originally Posted by badgta
Imagine if "FIRST" decided to do an "ALL OUT" ported base and siameesed runner design!!

HOLY COW!
I gotta say were very impressed with the First performance intake right out of the box my wifes iroc is very quick lots of torque.. revs easily to 5500 without an issue stock shifts points need to manually shift it next time she races it..
The following 2 users liked this post by my hemi:
1989GTATransAm (03-07-2021), Jeffrey Fontaine (03-07-2021)
Old 07-21-2021, 10:40 AM
  #125  
Member
 
newbvetteguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 208
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1979 Corvette L82
Engine: Gen1 SBC 350 L82 4 bolt mains 010
Transmission: Monster 4L60e 2wd 1997 PWM capable
Axle/Gears: 355
Re: Ported FIRST Injection Runners

As long as other folks are resurrecting this thread...

WAAAY back towards the beginning of this thread there was some discussion on whether the the center of the runners could be ported without cutting into the runners. -I'm not clear on what the answer was...

One of the limitations/weaknesses of TPI runners including the FIRST runners is that you are trying to get air to make 180 degree turn and it REALLY just can't do it well at high velocities. (See attached CFD drawing from a Porsche intake with a similar shape.)
--What helps air make such an intense turn in direction is to increase the area at the point of maximum velocity (increase the area around the apex of the turn so that the velocity slows there and more of the runner area gets used) ---being able to open up that apex is really useful...

Has anyone tried or considered using something like a 1 7/8" (1.875") Flex Hone with aluminum oxide @ say 40 grit to try and open up the center of the runners? This would be the BC series Flexhones; they have a length of only 8", but it's dead simple to just use an old pushrod length checker and some JB weld and extend the length. -The flex hone is kind flexible and would naturally move more of the outside of the runner curve than the inside, which is really what you want anyway to help the air make the turn. You could follow up with 120 grit to end up with a smoother finish...



Related thread after I asked how to get the air to better make the 180deg turn in a TPI intake on SpeedTalk: https://www.speed-talk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=63458


Adam
The following users liked this post:
Bmassa75 (03-10-2022)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BadSS
TPI
94
04-11-2005 08:18 PM
1bad91Z
Aftermarket Product Review
18
07-08-2003 10:29 AM
Larry Dunlap
TPI
3
03-12-2003 09:34 PM
280Z28
TPI
3
03-11-2003 08:25 AM
91 z28 350
TPI
4
11-17-2002 02:58 PM



Quick Reply: Ported FIRST Injection Runners



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 AM.