rear louvers? look good or bad?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: marlborough/dartmouth, MA
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
rear louvers? look good or bad?
what is everyone's opinion of rear windshield louvers?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355ci
Transmission: WC-T5
personally.. i think there meant for the mach 1, and to stay on the mach 1.. i dont think camaros can "wear" it and look good. thats just me tho 5% tint hatch works for me
#3
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salisbury, MD, USA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my opinion, i think louvers were the most ugly thing that was put on a car. When I first got my car it had louvers, i took them off first thing and they have been sitting in my garage since.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by MdFormula350
they look ok on certain thirdgen's..
but i dont really like them that much..
they look ok on certain thirdgen's..
but i dont really like them that much..
Trending Topics
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 2,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 Iroc-Z28
Engine: FB385
Transmission: 700r4
Like said above, they have to look right on a certain car. If you decide to get them, do not get them from JC Whitney! The ones i got were around $2-300 and they were junk. Very cheap plastic and the description said they were going to be metal. I had placed them on there and they looked like crap. so i returned them. Although, from time to time i'll see a nice car with them on it. Rarely though! good luck
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
I guess it depends what color the car is..
and what mags it has.. could look good.
and what mags it has.. could look good.
#18
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 SC
Engine: '88 2.8L
Transmission: 700R4
Our old Camaro (almost the same color as Scott's) looked pretty good with them, but when I got my Camaro they came off before I ever even started the engine. We put them on my grandpa's golf cart--bitchin! :rockon:
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree, they look terrific on some cars and totally terrible on some cars. But i do have a really nice set for sale if you want a set!!! email or PM me if you are interested!!
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pineville, NC US
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: An '87 Italian Retard Out Cruisin'
Engine: LS1 install in progress
Transmission: 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
I like them. But again only on certain cars like mine but I hate those 3 piece ones.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 TA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: M5
They were on my white car when I first bought it, and promptly were the first item to come OFF of it. I def agree though that they work on some cars like Scott's, and there's also a black and gold 85 TA on the boards which I think looks good with them.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: marlborough/dartmouth, MA
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
i cant say i really like em that much either...igot them with my car but never put them on...i have seen them look good on some thirdgen and i was interested to see what the general populous thought...
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Somewhere around the South Side of Chicago just crusin' in one of the Niteriders
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92RS 25th Anniv./88 IROC Z28 Vert
Engine: 305 TBI w/Tpi Air / 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4/700r4
Axle/Gears: Posi
It depends on the car. there is a yellow IROC that just moved around my house. He has the wrap around ones with a complete bra in the front. It looks good.
But personally I don't really like them. give me the 5% tint in the back. Keeps the car just as cool and it looks good.
I remember when I got a bra for free. Put it on my Camaro. It lasted 3 days. Now it sits in my garage never to be used again because after I put it on I decided it didn't look right. You need to do the same. Put them on and see if you like it. If you do keep 'em, if not get rid of "em.
But personally I don't really like them. give me the 5% tint in the back. Keeps the car just as cool and it looks good.
I remember when I got a bra for free. Put it on my Camaro. It lasted 3 days. Now it sits in my garage never to be used again because after I put it on I decided it didn't look right. You need to do the same. Put them on and see if you like it. If you do keep 'em, if not get rid of "em.
#25
i took the louvers off of my '87 SC to repaint them and put them on my '91 RS, but i'm not too sure about doing it. i repainted them about 5 months ago and have been sitting there ever since. so when i get around to it, i'm either going to put them on or sell them.
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc Z28
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: T56
I think they look ok on some cars... like mine. I have a black / gold 87 Iroc. I have the louvers just gotta paint them, put them on and see how they look. What would look better painted gloss black to match the body or more of a satin finish ?
#30
Moderator
I don't understand this crap about certain things, especially louvers, being so 80ish. THE CARS ARE FROM THE 80's PEOPLE!!!
The rallye rims found on the 67-69 Camaros are so 60ish, so it's a good thing nobody still has them on their cars,huh! That has got to be the dumbest comment I've heard from people on this board. Buy a new car if you don't like the style of the 80's. It leaves more for those of us that appreciate the style.
The rallye rims found on the 67-69 Camaros are so 60ish, so it's a good thing nobody still has them on their cars,huh! That has got to be the dumbest comment I've heard from people on this board. Buy a new car if you don't like the style of the 80's. It leaves more for those of us that appreciate the style.
#31
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wall Township, NJ
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 "1991 Z" Sport Coupe
Engine: LG4
Transmission: TH700R4
i hated mine.....they were on it when i got them.....took them off the next day......plus they put like weird wear marks or like scratches on my glass and now im stuck with this big plastic thing in the way...
#33
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
I think they look great, but as you can see from the posts, I'm in the vast minority. Because of my audio system, I don't want people to easily see through my hatch window, and I have yet to find a tint job on a thirdgen hatch that doesn't look like a 5 year old did it.
I also think that it just happens to look good on an 80s car. They were all the rage in the 80s, and it goes with an IROC or a Trans Am like butter on bread.
I also think that it just happens to look good on an 80s car. They were all the rage in the 80s, and it goes with an IROC or a Trans Am like butter on bread.
#34
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: Recaro Option T/A
Engine: 305 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3:27 Borg Warner
Seems to be a good amount of style consultants here.
They keep the heat and the thieves out while preserving the interior.
Ill leave mine on. I don't think I get too many points deducted in shows for having them.
Most tint jobs I have seen look like doo doo (except for my brother's 2nd gen Z-28, he removed the window and had it done right).
They keep the heat and the thieves out while preserving the interior.
Ill leave mine on. I don't think I get too many points deducted in shows for having them.
Most tint jobs I have seen look like doo doo (except for my brother's 2nd gen Z-28, he removed the window and had it done right).
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I personally think they look great on the cars I've seen. Makes me want to try them out on my car, but I don't know if they'll look as good.
How much do these things sell for used? And, how much trouble is it to mail? (Will it break easily?)
How much do these things sell for used? And, how much trouble is it to mail? (Will it break easily?)
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
I used to love louvers and I got some for my car a year ago. Guess how long I had them on until I took them off for good - 3 whole months. They make the window dirtier, rattle, cut vision, look horrible, get bent, and the list goes on. Mine ended up looking so bad that I just threw them in the trash. The look more like something on a house than a car.
The louvers are just too large for our windows to look good. Pluse they weighed 27 lbs. making the already heavy window even heavier. I prefer the more aerodynamic look thank you.
The only louvers that look good are the ones that are embedded in a targa rear like on the new Lamborghinni, Lancia Stratos, and the BMW M1. Those are the only cars that make louvers look good.
When I see louvers from the side, all I can think about is armadillos.
The louvers are just too large for our windows to look good. Pluse they weighed 27 lbs. making the already heavy window even heavier. I prefer the more aerodynamic look thank you.
The only louvers that look good are the ones that are embedded in a targa rear like on the new Lamborghinni, Lancia Stratos, and the BMW M1. Those are the only cars that make louvers look good.
When I see louvers from the side, all I can think about is armadillos.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1983 Firebird S/E
Originally posted by bubbakutz
will my louvers that were on my 87 camaro fit on a 83 camaro?
will my louvers that were on my 87 camaro fit on a 83 camaro?
#42
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sterling, ILL
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 3 3rd Gen F-bodies and 7 others
Engine: 305 CFI, 350 TPI & 3.8 Turbo V-6
Transmission: all automatics (stock)
I like them, but they have been on the car since it was new. I'd like to think I have one of the IROC's that look good with louvers. My only complaint is that they are noisy at speeds over 130mph.
It is an '80's car, so the style fits okay with me. I don't want to look like everyone else who has F-bodies without louvers.
It is an '80's car, so the style fits okay with me. I don't want to look like everyone else who has F-bodies without louvers.
#44
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I had louvers on my car when I bought it. Took me about two weeks to decide whether or not to keep them. Finally took them off because they rattled too much.
#46
Moderator
Originally posted by omnipotentgoku
******* mod.. IMO Maybe they would be useful in the days before window tinting but in this day and age they are useless. They do look good on some cars though.
******* mod.. IMO Maybe they would be useful in the days before window tinting but in this day and age they are useless. They do look good on some cars though.
#47
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Look, IMO - means in my Opinion.. make of it what you will... I will not argue to be a fact because its not. I did not say that "if you have louvers on your ride, your a *******". I was merely referring to the fact that Camaro's are often attributed to rednecks, a stereotype I cannot stand. You might make note that I said "some cars look good with them", but I do not believe all do. Now I think it shows your intelligence level to retort in the manner you did on that which was merely an opinion. No offense was intended, take my comments for what they say and nothing more.
oh.. and actually.. no.. I am neither a "*******" or trailer trash...this is me dude..
Halloween, a time to mimic the dead and the 80's
oh.. and actually.. no.. I am neither a "*******" or trailer trash...this is me dude..
Halloween, a time to mimic the dead and the 80's
Last edited by omnipotentgoku; 01-14-2003 at 10:44 PM.
#48
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Originally posted by scottmoyer
I don't understand this crap about certain things, especially louvers, being so 80ish. THE CARS ARE FROM THE 80's PEOPLE!!!
The rallye rims found on the 67-69 Camaros are so 60ish, so it's a good thing nobody still has them on their cars,huh! That has got to be the dumbest comment I've heard from people on this board. Buy a new car if you don't like the style of the 80's. It leaves more for those of us that appreciate the style.
I don't understand this crap about certain things, especially louvers, being so 80ish. THE CARS ARE FROM THE 80's PEOPLE!!!
The rallye rims found on the 67-69 Camaros are so 60ish, so it's a good thing nobody still has them on their cars,huh! That has got to be the dumbest comment I've heard from people on this board. Buy a new car if you don't like the style of the 80's. It leaves more for those of us that appreciate the style.
Perhaps I should say.. IBTL... flame war coming im sure..
#49
Moderator
Originally posted by taturbo
I like the way that looks alot! :hail: