DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Modifying Hypertech Code...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2003, 06:48 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
BackInBlackGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Modifying Hypertech Code...

Hi. Should I have no problems reading my Hypertech PROM, changing the cooling fan parameters and re-writing the code back to a new 27C128 PROM?

I have the "Thermal-Master" track chip, which leaves my cooling fan running all the time... I would like to have the fan turn on at around 170° instead... I have a 180° thermostat (required ro use with this version of the Hypertec chip).

I'm assuming the $32 mask is compatible with the Hypertech, since it is supposed to be compatible with my original PROM from GM.

Any thoughts? Thanks!
Old 06-11-2003, 07:26 PM
  #2  
Member

Thread Starter
 
BackInBlackGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Anyone have a good compatibility cross reference for the 7165, 6870 and 7302 ECM's?

Last edited by BackInBlackGP; 06-11-2003 at 07:36 PM.
Old 06-11-2003, 09:07 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Modifying Hypertech Code...

Originally posted by BackInBlackGP
Hi. Should I have no problems reading my Hypertech PROM, changing the cooling fan parameters and re-writing the code back to a new 27C128 PROM?

I have the "Thermal-Master" track chip, which leaves my cooling fan running all the time... I would like to have the fan turn on at around 170° instead... I have a 180° thermostat (required ro use with this version of the Hypertec chip).

I'm assuming the $32 mask is compatible with the Hypertech, since it is supposed to be compatible with my original PROM from GM.

Any thoughts? Thanks!
Start with a known good bin and go from there.
The aftermarket chips in general are just a waste of time to even work with.
Old 06-11-2003, 09:10 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by BackInBlackGP
Anyone have a good compatibility cross reference for the 7165, 6870 and 7302 ECM's?
7165 uses memcal and is a P4 series of ecm.

6870 uses a 2732 prom, and is the early C3 series of ecm, used in the 85 F Bods.

302 was a v6 ecm C3 as I recall, again 2732.
Old 06-12-2003, 08:21 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
ULTM8Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,036
Received 193 Likes on 167 Posts
As far as the fan on/off temperature, I usually like to set it to about 10° over the thermostat temperature. Basically, let the thermostat do it's job. If it can't maintain it's specified temperature, the cooling fans are there to help. Otherwise, you're simply throwing horsepower away by having more load on the alternator for the engine to overcome. Also, running an engine colder than 180°F is very thermaly inefficient.
Old 06-12-2003, 10:53 PM
  #6  
Member

Thread Starter
 
BackInBlackGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Originally posted by Pro-Tour71
As far as the fan on/off temperature, I usually like to set it to about 10° over the thermostat temperature. Basically, let the thermostat do it's job. If it can't maintain it's specified temperature, the cooling fans are there to help. Otherwise, you're simply throwing horsepower away by having more load on the alternator for the engine to overcome. Also, running an engine colder than 180°F is very thermaly inefficient.
Right! I have the 180° t-stat and I would like to set the temperature appropriately. Currently the Hypertech code runs the cooling fan ALL the time... I feel this is what might be killing my alternators every 1500 miles...

I agree with the fact that approx 182°F is the ideal operating temperature for an internal combustion gasoline engine... People will argue this to death, stating that 160° is better-blah-blah-blah, but let's not go there right now...

I will be reading the PROMs tomorrow...
Old 06-12-2003, 11:07 PM
  #7  
TGO Supporter
 
AlexJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by BackInBlackGP
Anyone have a good compatibility cross reference for the 7165, 6870 and 7302 ECM's?
The GM ECM page at www.diy-efi.org has a list, it's displayed by ECM and their applications.
Old 06-12-2003, 11:07 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member
 
Ed Maher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manassas VA
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 04 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12 T56
Originally posted by Pro-Tour71
As far as the fan on/off temperature, I usually like to set it to about 10° over the thermostat temperature. Basically, let the thermostat do it's job. If it can't maintain it's specified temperature, the cooling fans are there to help. Otherwise, you're simply throwing horsepower away by having more load on the alternator for the engine to overcome. Also, running an engine colder than 180°F is very thermaly inefficient.
Right on. Running a fan temp lower than the stat makes no sense at all.

And the hypertech and other chips are truly a waste of time. Look at this https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792 for an example of why.
Old 06-13-2003, 07:51 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
ULTM8Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,036
Received 193 Likes on 167 Posts
Originally posted by Ed Maher
Right on. Running a fan temp lower than the stat makes no sense at all.

And the hypertech and other chips are truly a waste of time. Look at this https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792 for an example of why.
It actually gauls me that after so many years they can still sell these worthless chips for so much money. They recouped their "R&D" years ago and the parts cost all of about $4, yet they sell these things for, what, $150? Unbelievable.

Like you, Ed, I got my hands on a Hypercrap 92 TPI 350 chip and took a look at it. They did even less than the 305 in your post. The main fuel/spark tables were untouched and they only altered the WOT fuel/spark tables a little and changed the cooling fan temp on/off. What a waste.
Old 06-13-2003, 08:24 PM
  #10  
Member

Thread Starter
 
BackInBlackGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Well... Here's my first wrench in the gears...

Tried reading the stock Delco PROM today... No go. The reader did not even acknowledge it's existance. I had several other PROMs working today in the reader, so the reader is not malfunctioning. I know they can be finicky sometimes...

Any thoughts?
Attached Thumbnails Modifying Hypertech Code...-stockprom.jpg  
Old 06-13-2003, 08:25 PM
  #11  
Member

Thread Starter
 
BackInBlackGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Here's the reader... It's a "Sunshine"!!!
Attached Thumbnails Modifying Hypertech Code...-sunshine.jpg  
Old 06-18-2003, 08:43 PM
  #12  
Member

Thread Starter
 
BackInBlackGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Nobody wants to field this one?
Old 06-18-2003, 09:22 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by BackInBlackGP
Nobody wants to field this one?
What's the guestion?
HNU is a 86 2.8 5 spd bin.
2732 chip
Old 06-18-2003, 09:22 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
ULTM8Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,036
Received 193 Likes on 167 Posts
Hmm... all I can suggest is double check your software installation, your connections, and that you're putting the chip in the ZIF correctly (with the notch facing the correct direction).

I'm running a ROMMAX chip reader/burner, so I'm fairly unfamiliar with this Sunshine thing.
Old 06-18-2003, 10:02 PM
  #15  
Member

Thread Starter
 
BackInBlackGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Grumpy: The Q is, why can I not read the Delco PROM.

Pro-Tour: The reader is in 100% functional condition. We use it at work to burn code for our machines. (And, yes, I'm inserting the chip correclty... )
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Car Audio
26
03-03-2022 05:38 PM
InfernalVortex
Electronics
10
04-20-2021 11:31 AM
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
10-15-2015 05:00 PM
3rdgenkindagal
Tech / General Engine
15
09-13-2015 02:02 PM



Quick Reply: Modifying Hypertech Code...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.