Modifying Hypertech Code...
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Modifying Hypertech Code...
Hi. Should I have no problems reading my Hypertech PROM, changing the cooling fan parameters and re-writing the code back to a new 27C128 PROM?
I have the "Thermal-Master" track chip, which leaves my cooling fan running all the time... I would like to have the fan turn on at around 170° instead... I have a 180° thermostat (required ro use with this version of the Hypertec chip).
I'm assuming the $32 mask is compatible with the Hypertech, since it is supposed to be compatible with my original PROM from GM.
Any thoughts? Thanks!
I have the "Thermal-Master" track chip, which leaves my cooling fan running all the time... I would like to have the fan turn on at around 170° instead... I have a 180° thermostat (required ro use with this version of the Hypertec chip).
I'm assuming the $32 mask is compatible with the Hypertech, since it is supposed to be compatible with my original PROM from GM.
Any thoughts? Thanks!
#2
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Anyone have a good compatibility cross reference for the 7165, 6870 and 7302 ECM's?
Last edited by BackInBlackGP; 06-11-2003 at 07:36 PM.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Modifying Hypertech Code...
Originally posted by BackInBlackGP
Hi. Should I have no problems reading my Hypertech PROM, changing the cooling fan parameters and re-writing the code back to a new 27C128 PROM?
I have the "Thermal-Master" track chip, which leaves my cooling fan running all the time... I would like to have the fan turn on at around 170° instead... I have a 180° thermostat (required ro use with this version of the Hypertec chip).
I'm assuming the $32 mask is compatible with the Hypertech, since it is supposed to be compatible with my original PROM from GM.
Any thoughts? Thanks!
Hi. Should I have no problems reading my Hypertech PROM, changing the cooling fan parameters and re-writing the code back to a new 27C128 PROM?
I have the "Thermal-Master" track chip, which leaves my cooling fan running all the time... I would like to have the fan turn on at around 170° instead... I have a 180° thermostat (required ro use with this version of the Hypertec chip).
I'm assuming the $32 mask is compatible with the Hypertech, since it is supposed to be compatible with my original PROM from GM.
Any thoughts? Thanks!
The aftermarket chips in general are just a waste of time to even work with.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by BackInBlackGP
Anyone have a good compatibility cross reference for the 7165, 6870 and 7302 ECM's?
Anyone have a good compatibility cross reference for the 7165, 6870 and 7302 ECM's?
6870 uses a 2732 prom, and is the early C3 series of ecm, used in the 85 F Bods.
302 was a v6 ecm C3 as I recall, again 2732.
#5
As far as the fan on/off temperature, I usually like to set it to about 10° over the thermostat temperature. Basically, let the thermostat do it's job. If it can't maintain it's specified temperature, the cooling fans are there to help. Otherwise, you're simply throwing horsepower away by having more load on the alternator for the engine to overcome. Also, running an engine colder than 180°F is very thermaly inefficient.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Originally posted by Pro-Tour71
As far as the fan on/off temperature, I usually like to set it to about 10° over the thermostat temperature. Basically, let the thermostat do it's job. If it can't maintain it's specified temperature, the cooling fans are there to help. Otherwise, you're simply throwing horsepower away by having more load on the alternator for the engine to overcome. Also, running an engine colder than 180°F is very thermaly inefficient.
As far as the fan on/off temperature, I usually like to set it to about 10° over the thermostat temperature. Basically, let the thermostat do it's job. If it can't maintain it's specified temperature, the cooling fans are there to help. Otherwise, you're simply throwing horsepower away by having more load on the alternator for the engine to overcome. Also, running an engine colder than 180°F is very thermaly inefficient.
I agree with the fact that approx 182°F is the ideal operating temperature for an internal combustion gasoline engine... People will argue this to death, stating that 160° is better-blah-blah-blah, but let's not go there right now...
I will be reading the PROMs tomorrow...
#7
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by BackInBlackGP
Anyone have a good compatibility cross reference for the 7165, 6870 and 7302 ECM's?
Anyone have a good compatibility cross reference for the 7165, 6870 and 7302 ECM's?
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manassas VA
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 04 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12 T56
Originally posted by Pro-Tour71
As far as the fan on/off temperature, I usually like to set it to about 10° over the thermostat temperature. Basically, let the thermostat do it's job. If it can't maintain it's specified temperature, the cooling fans are there to help. Otherwise, you're simply throwing horsepower away by having more load on the alternator for the engine to overcome. Also, running an engine colder than 180°F is very thermaly inefficient.
As far as the fan on/off temperature, I usually like to set it to about 10° over the thermostat temperature. Basically, let the thermostat do it's job. If it can't maintain it's specified temperature, the cooling fans are there to help. Otherwise, you're simply throwing horsepower away by having more load on the alternator for the engine to overcome. Also, running an engine colder than 180°F is very thermaly inefficient.
And the hypertech and other chips are truly a waste of time. Look at this https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792 for an example of why.
#9
Originally posted by Ed Maher
Right on. Running a fan temp lower than the stat makes no sense at all.
And the hypertech and other chips are truly a waste of time. Look at this https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792 for an example of why.
Right on. Running a fan temp lower than the stat makes no sense at all.
And the hypertech and other chips are truly a waste of time. Look at this https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792 for an example of why.
Like you, Ed, I got my hands on a Hypercrap 92 TPI 350 chip and took a look at it. They did even less than the 305 in your post. The main fuel/spark tables were untouched and they only altered the WOT fuel/spark tables a little and changed the cooling fan temp on/off. What a waste.
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Well... Here's my first wrench in the gears...
Tried reading the stock Delco PROM today... No go. The reader did not even acknowledge it's existance. I had several other PROMs working today in the reader, so the reader is not malfunctioning. I know they can be finicky sometimes...
Any thoughts?
Tried reading the stock Delco PROM today... No go. The reader did not even acknowledge it's existance. I had several other PROMs working today in the reader, so the reader is not malfunctioning. I know they can be finicky sometimes...
Any thoughts?
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by BackInBlackGP
Nobody wants to field this one?
Nobody wants to field this one?
HNU is a 86 2.8 5 spd bin.
2732 chip
#14
Hmm... all I can suggest is double check your software installation, your connections, and that you're putting the chip in the ZIF correctly (with the notch facing the correct direction).
I'm running a ROMMAX chip reader/burner, so I'm fairly unfamiliar with this Sunshine thing.
I'm running a ROMMAX chip reader/burner, so I'm fairly unfamiliar with this Sunshine thing.
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 W69 Special Edition
Engine: 2.8/ECM/Int/Exh
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Grumpy: The Q is, why can I not read the Delco PROM.
Pro-Tour: The reader is in 100% functional condition. We use it at work to burn code for our machines. (And, yes, I'm inserting the chip correclty... )
Pro-Tour: The reader is in 100% functional condition. We use it at work to burn code for our machines. (And, yes, I'm inserting the chip correclty... )
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
10-15-2015 05:00 PM