History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

production years for "Bandit II"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2006, 05:52 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
1st3rdgen23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 tbi (currently)
Transmission: B/W 5spd
production years for "Bandit II"?

what year(s) was this model produced and what options were included is the package?
Old 08-29-2006, 06:55 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
DJP87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Never was a Factory"Bandit edition" made. you are seeing to many reruns of a bad movie.
Old 08-29-2006, 08:42 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
92RS(real slow)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Osceola Indiana
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 RS(sold) 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ones that turn
I thought they did make some but I dont think they were factory I think some aftermarket company made them
Old 08-29-2006, 09:10 PM
  #4  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,392
Received 178 Likes on 131 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Bandit IIs are aftermarket. Choo Cho Customs from Chatanooga built these cars. They were just appearance options thrown at the car. Pinstriping, embroidered seats and different rims were all they were.
Old 08-31-2006, 02:28 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
gcgarner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morganton, NC
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
I think it was just '87 ... or '89 ... can't remember right off.

I almost bought a "Bandit II" before I bought my vert. Sure am glad I went the direction I did. I was VERY disappointed when I found out it was just an appearance package. A guy in my town has one (#64 I think) with 74k on the clock and he wants something like $8,500 for it. Crazy.
Old 08-31-2006, 04:54 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
1st3rdgen23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 tbi (currently)
Transmission: B/W 5spd
so all that's part of these cars is just a sticker and some seat covers. thanks for the info.
Old 09-01-2006, 08:11 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
gcgarner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morganton, NC
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Unfortunately so, but I'd say they will still be a little more valuable than a plain T/A in the future.
Old 09-01-2006, 08:59 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
1st3rdgen23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 tbi (currently)
Transmission: B/W 5spd
Old 09-01-2006, 01:21 PM
  #9  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes on 119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
All of the Bandit II cars that I have ever seen on 3rd gens have been base firebirds with an LO3 or the V6. I have yet to see a converted T/A...

John
Old 09-01-2006, 01:24 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
onebad400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
are you guys refering to smokey and the bandit 2?
Old 09-01-2006, 01:48 PM
  #11  
JT
Community Administrator

iTrader: (1)
 
JT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,197
Likes: 0
Received 261 Likes on 187 Posts
They also had the fake (non-functional) hood scoop with a few other appearance features. We've got a few members here who have those Bandit II conversions by Choo Cho as scottmoyer mentioned.

Below is a Bandit II from a member here on TGO:
Old 09-02-2006, 11:40 AM
  #12  
Junior Member

 
Speedfreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Morganton, NC. USA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They made them 88-92 in the third gens and I have seen some 4th gens. There were 500 in 88-89 600 in 90-91 and 700 i think in 92. They were nothing more than an apperance package. GFX's striping, non functional shaker hood, double exhaust tips on each side. Embrodered seats and floor mats, brushed aluminum gold color around the gauges, # plaque on the dash, mesh wheels, the one above is missing the front GFX on the front bumper. Made by Choo Choo Customs and was a dealer order, not a factory production run. I currently have 1990 # 18 of 600, They were made to duplicate the 79 Bandit cars. Choo Choo also made the Pro am which as simillar GFX. The last one I saw on Ebay had 140k miles on it and it brought $4500. If I hadn't owned mine for 13 years I sure wouldn't go out looking for one, I guess it just caught my eye when I was 18 and didn't know any better.

Last edited by Speedfreek; 09-02-2006 at 11:45 AM.
Old 09-10-2006, 05:50 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (58)
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 20,309
Received 1,052 Likes on 748 Posts
An aftermarket conversion will be worth more money then a real Trans Am?

So then by that logic I could get together with a few buddies and buy up several run of the mill thirdgens and slap on some vinyl and have something embroidered in the headrest, then have the local trophy shop make up some cheesy brass plaques for the dash and I could sell them for more money? I doubt it. I'd guess that the true enthusiasts will view these cars as more of a joke then prime material for Barrett Jackson.

File it under the same heading as the roadster convertibles. The only aftermarket conversion that seems to be worth anything are the MSE T/A's and then only because they typically were a performance oriented package, not just stickers and stripes.
Old 09-11-2006, 08:15 AM
  #14  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes on 119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Drew,
I agree with you on some points but not all.

It appears that the Autoform Convertibles are catching a pretty penny these days, 14K for a Autoform 85 Camaro or T/A is not unheard of, that same car with T-tops is catching $8K...

SOME of the packages are a hit or miss as far as collectability. I would think the Convertibles before 1987 that will hold the most value would the the Autoform "Roadster" ones, considering they were sold through dealerships as new cars and apparently still retained the ful warrenty. The other convertibles like the Metrix3 and the Hi-Line also seem to be doing well but not as well as the Autoform. Although I like the top down with it up I think it looks odd the way that the top comes down onto the side of the car with snaps.

From 1987-1992 the ONLY convertibles to get would be the ASC's. Obviously since they were the only "Official" verts. The Pontiacs may suffer slightly because they were not Official, however everyone gawks over the one or two 89 TTA's that were converitbles... go fig.

The MSE t/a's had an advantage over most of the other conversion cars of the period. ONLY MSE to my knowledge created a car with a better engine in any kind of volume. Also they had a TON of advertisements out there in various magazines to get the word out. I think all of the advertising in the day may be helping the values of those cars.

As for the Choo Choo customs... I would not think that they will be substantially more desirable than the run of the mill car. slightly at best, not because of any other reason that the cars were a cosmetic upgrade. If they changed the engine, or did special things to other portions of the car than the body I would suspect it would have helped it more.

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cornholio7979
TPI
4
09-20-2018 02:31 AM
-=Z28=-
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
02-25-2016 09:06 PM
wild1
Interior
5
08-27-2015 09:01 AM
theurge
TPI
7
08-21-2015 12:46 PM
IrocZ'85
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
08-17-2015 06:24 PM



Quick Reply: production years for "Bandit II"?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.