Mean Mouse vs. Impersonator II
03-10-2005, 01:45 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gary, In USA
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
Mean Mouse vs. Impersonator II
See these articles:
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/68999/
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...imp/index.html
What are the real differences here? Which one has a better chance of passing emissions without a weird test only tune?
Are you aware of any better setups that will pass a sniffer?
Thanks,
Jason
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/68999/
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...imp/index.html
What are the real differences here? Which one has a better chance of passing emissions without a weird test only tune?
Are you aware of any better setups that will pass a sniffer?
Thanks,
Jason
03-11-2005, 09:47 PM
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ajax, ON
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 85Z28 87GTA 91GTA 98SS
Engine: SBC, LS-x
Transmission: T-5, 700-R4, T-56
I didn't read either article but any engine running right should have no problem passing emissions unless it is super radical. I've seen some beasts of engines pass with flying colours.
03-20-2005, 09:44 PM
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gary, In USA
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
I think part of what I am trying to determine is if either of these is too radical. Also I am looking to see what could change to make them better (powerful, cheaper, more reliable -pick two)
Jason
Jason
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
un4givin89
Electronics
1
12-02-2001 07:43 AM
