Stomped a Challenger r/t
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: jacksonville, florida
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stomped a Challenger r/t
i was on the way home from church when a blue challenger passes me going around 45. i saw him and i know he saw me. i opened the cut-out and pulled up beside. i gave him a thumbs up and he knew it was on. i hear him slam the gas and i did as well i was in overdrive so i was side by side till around third when i started pulling on him. i slowed back down and he looked over and smiled. then he pointed ahead and hit the gas. i dropped it into second thise time and pulled instantly and continued to pull. when i slowed back down this time he said good lord that thing is nasty. i commeted him on his car and he gave me a thumbs up. it looked exactly like the one from the fast and furious and it sounded real mean. guy was cool as anything.
#5
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: northwest
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula (sold)
its a Dodge thing
Originally posted by TexasLT1
wtf?
wtf?
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
uhhh u know a challanger is like a cuda, pony size fast and the furious is a charger i think like a 68 69 same type as the one in bullit bullits is a 68 so im guessin a 68 in fandf
#7
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 IROCZ
Engine: 363 Vortec w/Miniram
Transmission: built 700r4
the charger in F&F was a 70, that was the only year the charger had the wraparound grille. if the challenger was a hemi, 440 six pack, 440 quad, or AAR (340 six pack) I'd find it hard to believe, those are all 12 second vehicles on bias plys, modern radials they are even faster, and a 330 HP motor in a 3rd gen is good for mid-low 13s
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: jacksonville, florida
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
don't call bs. i never lie. i felt bad for beating him. he acknowledged my car and complemented on how great it ran. i don't know what it is but my combiation on my drivetrain is like a match made in heaven
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elk Grove Village, IL
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
I always thought that Challenger R/T's and AAR Cuda's came equipped with 340's from the factory so that they were legal for SCCA rules.
A 440 six-pack, or a Hemi should have given you an enema though. Heck the 440 six pack put out more than the hemi. The Hemi was advertised at like 425hp I think, but put more like 500hp out.
Now realise I'm only 23, and wasn't around for that stuff so I only have my web research to go on. I could most definitely be wrong and it wouldn't be the first time. Could anyone possibly deny, or backup my post?
A 440 six-pack, or a Hemi should have given you an enema though. Heck the 440 six pack put out more than the hemi. The Hemi was advertised at like 425hp I think, but put more like 500hp out.
Now realise I'm only 23, and wasn't around for that stuff so I only have my web research to go on. I could most definitely be wrong and it wouldn't be the first time. Could anyone possibly deny, or backup my post?
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
r/t s came with a 360 as the smallest i think i know charger 500s or daytonas or superbirds smallest engine was the 440
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the charger in F&F was a 70, that was the only year the charger had the wraparound grille. if the challenger was a hemi, 440 six pack, 440 quad, or AAR (340 six pack) I'd find it hard to believe, those are all 12 second vehicles on bias plys, modern radials they are even faster, and a 330 HP motor in a 3rd gen is good for mid-low 13s
don't call bs. i never lie.
Just cause you saw slow cars racing them in movies doesn't mean your slow car will beat them. Flag stays.
#14
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Burlington, NC USA
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jocww
uhhh u know a challanger is like a cuda, pony size fast and the furious is a charger i think like a 68 69 same type as the one in bullit bullits is a 68 so im guessin a 68 in fandf
uhhh u know a challanger is like a cuda, pony size fast and the furious is a charger i think like a 68 69 same type as the one in bullit bullits is a 68 so im guessin a 68 in fandf
The car in Bullit was a 1967(or 68, i forget) Mustang Fastback.
#16
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '89 RS Convertible
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
A Challenger could have most anything in it... a 318 w/ automatic was a pretty common, and pretty lame, combo. So...without knowing what he had... and reading "when i slowed back down this time he said good lord that thing is nasty. i commeted him on his car and he gave me a thumbs up"....(hmmm...you read lips?)...and also "it looked exactly like the one from the fast and furious", which wasn't even the same kind of car....and this whole thing happened on the way home from church??? well, sounds more like a daydream dreamt up during a long boring sermon...
#17
Originally posted by Meat Curtains
Just cause you saw slow cars racing them in movies doesn't mean your slow car will beat them. Flag stays.
Just cause you saw slow cars racing them in movies doesn't mean your slow car will beat them. Flag stays.
what the f*ck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
can you prove that he did not beat this car?
lets see here a car from the 70 that waights a ton with a heavy big block..compared to a 3300lb camaro with at least 330hp...hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
seems to me that it is possible...if all you can say is bs*then you need to expand your vocabulary so we understand what your trying to say! just becouse of that gd movie your going to flame this guy saying he could not have beat a charger? why dont you just shut the f*ck up!
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: jacksonville, florida
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Deemax
A Challenger could have most anything in it... a 318 w/ automatic was a pretty common, and pretty lame, combo. So...without knowing what he had... and reading "when i slowed back down this time he said good lord that thing is nasty. i commeted him on his car and he gave me a thumbs up"....(hmmm...you read lips?)...and also "it looked exactly like the one from the fast and furious", which wasn't even the same kind of car....and this whole thing happened on the way home from church??? well, sounds more like a daydream dreamt up during a long boring sermon...
A Challenger could have most anything in it... a 318 w/ automatic was a pretty common, and pretty lame, combo. So...without knowing what he had... and reading "when i slowed back down this time he said good lord that thing is nasty. i commeted him on his car and he gave me a thumbs up"....(hmmm...you read lips?)...and also "it looked exactly like the one from the fast and furious", which wasn't even the same kind of car....and this whole thing happened on the way home from church??? well, sounds more like a daydream dreamt up during a long boring sermon...
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can you prove that he did not beat this car?
lets see here a car from the 70 that waights a ton with a heavy big block
you need to expand your vocabulary
what the f*ck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
why dont you just shut the f*ck up!
he could not have beat a charger
Flag stays.
Last edited by Meat Curtains; 06-12-2003 at 05:20 PM.
#21
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: jacksonville, florida
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bigals87z28,
no i have not had time to run my car at the track yet. my dad was sick with cancer and has recently went to live with the lord. the track is the last thing on my mind. i got pulled over yesterday for out of date tags. it's weird these are things that my dad use to remind me about. i hope i don't work on father's day. i work at a resturaunt.
no i have not had time to run my car at the track yet. my dad was sick with cancer and has recently went to live with the lord. the track is the last thing on my mind. i got pulled over yesterday for out of date tags. it's weird these are things that my dad use to remind me about. i hope i don't work on father's day. i work at a resturaunt.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
Oh man. Thats horrible... Im so sorry to hear that. I know how you feel man. I think ya still won this race. F the dam cops. Nice car and I hope things work out for ya. Good luck man.
Alex
Alex
#23
Originally posted by Meat Curtains
I assume you can prove he can?
its a littly thing called common sence and trust!
Here's a link to a site of a 1970 Challenger (same car in quesiton) that weighs 2900. I don't know about you, but 2900 where I come from is less than 3300. Here, *******
i stand corrected but i still dont belive that a challenger weighs 2900lb...maby with no motor or tansmission!
It would seem to me, that you are the on who is lacking in vocabulary skills. There is no need to yell at me because I have a hard time believing his story.
i wasent yelling "a hard time believing his story" is different from throwing the bs flag around bs=bull sh*t=your lying....get my drift!
Maybe he could have. If you would have taken more time to actually read before you ran to the keyboard and acted like a menopausal woman, you wouldn't be so upset right now.
apparently you cannot read that is not what i said quot me me on this "your going to flame this guy saying he could not have beat a charger?"
Flag stays.
I assume you can prove he can?
its a littly thing called common sence and trust!
Here's a link to a site of a 1970 Challenger (same car in quesiton) that weighs 2900. I don't know about you, but 2900 where I come from is less than 3300. Here, *******
i stand corrected but i still dont belive that a challenger weighs 2900lb...maby with no motor or tansmission!
It would seem to me, that you are the on who is lacking in vocabulary skills. There is no need to yell at me because I have a hard time believing his story.
i wasent yelling "a hard time believing his story" is different from throwing the bs flag around bs=bull sh*t=your lying....get my drift!
Maybe he could have. If you would have taken more time to actually read before you ran to the keyboard and acted like a menopausal woman, you wouldn't be so upset right now.
apparently you cannot read that is not what i said quot me me on this "your going to flame this guy saying he could not have beat a charger?"
Flag stays.
Last edited by Xceleratemaro; 06-10-2003 at 03:52 PM.
#24
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 IROCZ
Engine: 363 Vortec w/Miniram
Transmission: built 700r4
Originally posted by Xceleratemaro
what the f*ck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
can you prove that he did not beat this car?
lets see here a car from the 70 that waights a ton with a heavy big block..compared to a 3300lb camaro with at least 330hp...hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
seems to me that it is possible...if all you can say is bs*then you need to expand your vocabulary so we understand what your trying to say! just becouse of that gd movie your going to flame this guy saying he could not have beat a charger? why dont you just shut the f*ck up!
what the f*ck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
can you prove that he did not beat this car?
lets see here a car from the 70 that waights a ton with a heavy big block..compared to a 3300lb camaro with at least 330hp...hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
seems to me that it is possible...if all you can say is bs*then you need to expand your vocabulary so we understand what your trying to say! just becouse of that gd movie your going to flame this guy saying he could not have beat a charger? why dont you just shut the f*ck up!
#25
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '89 RS Convertible
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Sorry to hear about your Dad, man. That's gotta be tough. And father's day I'm sure will be especially tough..whether you work or not.
As far as the rest of this... just a few points....
I may be the only guy on this thread who actually drove those old muscle cars back when they were new. And they were fast...but actually...not any faster than some of the stuff out there now. Sure...hemis and LS6s were in a different league...but they were few and far between...
Quite frankly...you're all wrong. No matter which side of this argument you're on. You guys who think any 3rd gen is quick just cause that's what you drive....you got a lot to learn. And you guys who think any 60's muscle car is gonna outperform the new iron out of detroit...never got sideways on F60 redlines. The bottom line is...every car..and every driver...and especially, every car/driver combo..is unique. Some are fast, some aren't..and some are just plain scary.
But then again...I'm the guy who thinks anyone who street races anyone, anywhere, any time...is in idiot. It's childish, dangerous, disrespectful to your machine, people around you...and plain immature. It doesn't prove a thing. You wanna run it? Take it to a track, and run it right. Other than that..show it, cruise it...and respect every body else who cares about theirs as much as you do yours.
As far as the rest of this... just a few points....
I may be the only guy on this thread who actually drove those old muscle cars back when they were new. And they were fast...but actually...not any faster than some of the stuff out there now. Sure...hemis and LS6s were in a different league...but they were few and far between...
Quite frankly...you're all wrong. No matter which side of this argument you're on. You guys who think any 3rd gen is quick just cause that's what you drive....you got a lot to learn. And you guys who think any 60's muscle car is gonna outperform the new iron out of detroit...never got sideways on F60 redlines. The bottom line is...every car..and every driver...and especially, every car/driver combo..is unique. Some are fast, some aren't..and some are just plain scary.
But then again...I'm the guy who thinks anyone who street races anyone, anywhere, any time...is in idiot. It's childish, dangerous, disrespectful to your machine, people around you...and plain immature. It doesn't prove a thing. You wanna run it? Take it to a track, and run it right. Other than that..show it, cruise it...and respect every body else who cares about theirs as much as you do yours.
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its a littly thing called common sence and trust!
i stand corrected but i still dont belive that a challenger weighs 2900lb...maby with no motor or tansmission!
i wasent yelling
apparently you cannot read that is not what i said quot me me on this "your going to flame this guy saying he could not have beat a charger?"
just becouse of that gd movie your going to flame this guy saying he could not have beat a charger?
ps: who the f*ck are you calling *******?
ooooooooooyour a big bad red haired red neck thats 21.....you need to watch what you say to other people and have some respect..im sure no one has gone into any of your post and just answered it with
PS: Blah blah blah, personal insult, blah, blah, this has nothing to do with anything, blah blah, shut up dip****.
#27
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ, USA
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1996 Jeep Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Transmission: 5 speed
You know what would be great? If everyone would just stop arguing about something that will never get resolved! If he is telling the truth, good for him, nice kill. If he is BSing, let him fool himself into thinking he is cooler than he really is. NONE OF THIS MATTERS. I personally believe that he DID beat the Challenger, nice kill. I really can't believe people go back and forth about stupid **** like this.
#28
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: jacksonville, florida
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks ian, and for everyone that said it thanks for your concerns with my dad. if you would have saw him before he died then you would know why i am not regreting his death. cancer took him from a healthy 230lbs to 138lbs. i am so glad he is in heaven and i and the rest of my family will see him there
on a side note my dad use to be heavily into cars. he had a 1970 GSX Stage 1 with a 455, a 67 gto, 85 regal t-type, and a bandit edition trans am. we use to work on these cars all the time.
if it's not to much to ask throw up a little prayer for him and especiallly my mother. thank you all and *** bless!
on a side note my dad use to be heavily into cars. he had a 1970 GSX Stage 1 with a 455, a 67 gto, 85 regal t-type, and a bandit edition trans am. we use to work on these cars all the time.
if it's not to much to ask throw up a little prayer for him and especiallly my mother. thank you all and *** bless!
#32
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 IROCZ
Engine: 363 Vortec w/Miniram
Transmission: built 700r4
lol, that sounds like a ric3r beats a V8 kill story
ric3r "man I smoked a big block, that RV had me for a while but I pulled top end and beat him by a car man, I smoked that American V8!"
ric3r "man I smoked a big block, that RV had me for a while but I pulled top end and beat him by a car man, I smoked that American V8!"
#33
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Morris, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Formula
Engine: 400 sbc
Transmission: 700r4
who has looked up the weight specs on a 70 challenger? i've always figured (from the drag strips) on the guys that just bring their cars right off the street and weight them there.. 3400 to 3600 lbs.
#34
There is alot of missinformation in this post. First off, no challenger/cuda ran a 12 especialy not on bias ply tires. The fastest time for a stock challenger with a hemi was in the 13.5 range. Challenger T/As(340 6 packs) ran right along side their 440 counter parts to the tune of 14.3 in the quarter. These cars also only weigh 2900 if they are stripped down to nothing. A more realistic number is 3500 for a T/A or other small block vehicle. Here is a lesser known mopar fact, the road runner was designed as a cheap go-fast car for the time, it actualy weighed slightly less than the challenger/cuda although it was a larger vehicle.
Also keep in mind how horsepower was rated back then. The engine was out of the car with no accesories on it when they took numbers.
Two of my buddies own mopars, one is a 70 Challenger T/A(ALL original) the other is a 71 cuda with a 340. I just sold my road runner it was a 71 original 383 air grabber car that I dropped a 440 into.
Also keep in mind how horsepower was rated back then. The engine was out of the car with no accesories on it when they took numbers.
Two of my buddies own mopars, one is a 70 Challenger T/A(ALL original) the other is a 71 cuda with a 340. I just sold my road runner it was a 71 original 383 air grabber car that I dropped a 440 into.
#35
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 IROCZ
Engine: 363 Vortec w/Miniram
Transmission: built 700r4
magazine racer ^
I guess your written "facts" out weigh my visual observations and the knowledge of their owners. and yes they were stock, and yes they were on 7" tires. btw, gross HP numbers aren't too far off from net HP. I guess I should also believe that a new Mustang GT runs a 15.1 and an LS1 can only run a 13.8 bone stock?
I guess your written "facts" out weigh my visual observations and the knowledge of their owners. and yes they were stock, and yes they were on 7" tires. btw, gross HP numbers aren't too far off from net HP. I guess I should also believe that a new Mustang GT runs a 15.1 and an LS1 can only run a 13.8 bone stock?
#36
Originally posted by Black363IROCZ
magazine racer ^
I guess your written "facts" out weigh my visual observations and the knowledge of their owners. and yes they were stock, and yes they were on 7" tires. btw, gross HP numbers aren't too far off from net HP. I guess I should also believe that a new Mustang GT runs a 15.1 and an LS1 can only run a 13.8 bone stock?
magazine racer ^
I guess your written "facts" out weigh my visual observations and the knowledge of their owners. and yes they were stock, and yes they were on 7" tires. btw, gross HP numbers aren't too far off from net HP. I guess I should also believe that a new Mustang GT runs a 15.1 and an LS1 can only run a 13.8 bone stock?
Also have you seen what a LS1 will put out in terms of gross hp when its on a stand with no accessories? Before you reply I suggest you go get some real knowledge and take better visual observations, because you are attempt to spread alot of missinformation.
#37
Originally posted by FruityOne
I always thought that Challenger R/T's and AAR Cuda's came equipped with 340's from the factory so that they were legal for SCCA rules.
A 440 six-pack, or a Hemi should have given you an enema though. Heck the 440 six pack put out more than the hemi. The Hemi was advertised at like 425hp I think, but put more like 500hp out.
Now realise I'm only 23, and wasn't around for that stuff so I only have my web research to go on. I could most definitely be wrong and it wouldn't be the first time. Could anyone possibly deny, or backup my post?
I always thought that Challenger R/T's and AAR Cuda's came equipped with 340's from the factory so that they were legal for SCCA rules.
A 440 six-pack, or a Hemi should have given you an enema though. Heck the 440 six pack put out more than the hemi. The Hemi was advertised at like 425hp I think, but put more like 500hp out.
Now realise I'm only 23, and wasn't around for that stuff so I only have my web research to go on. I could most definitely be wrong and it wouldn't be the first time. Could anyone possibly deny, or backup my post?
R/Ts came standard with a 383 B engine. The 440 RB in both configs were in the line up along with the street hemi.
#38
Moderator/TGO Supporter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloomingdale, IL , United States
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1997 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I think someone should lock this ,it is obvious a few of us here are to childish to participate in an adult conversation.
I believe you won man, you're in my prayers.
Why would he lie to everyone? Was he just sitting around one day and figure "hey, i think i will make something up and post it on the boards!"
I doubt it, do a search for some of his posts, he's not a "monkie"
I believe you won man, you're in my prayers.
Why would he lie to everyone? Was he just sitting around one day and figure "hey, i think i will make something up and post it on the boards!"
I doubt it, do a search for some of his posts, he's not a "monkie"
#39
Originally posted by Meat Curtains
Here's a link to a site of a 1970 Challenger (same car in quesiton) that weighs 2900. I don't know about you, but 2900 where I come from is less than 3300. Here, *******
Here's a link to a site of a 1970 Challenger (same car in quesiton) that weighs 2900. I don't know about you, but 2900 where I come from is less than 3300. Here, *******
#40
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That site was the first one that popped up in search when I typed in "1970 Challenger weight".
From sounddomain or not, that information is wrong. This is from another site,
1970 Challenger R/T (383) Weight 3660 lb (curb)
So I stand corrected. Even though I am "a big bad red haired red neck thats 21" I'm not too big to admit I'm wrong. I guess I should search a little more through next time, eh?
From sounddomain or not, that information is wrong. This is from another site,
1970 Challenger R/T (383) Weight 3660 lb (curb)
So I stand corrected. Even though I am "a big bad red haired red neck thats 21" I'm not too big to admit I'm wrong. I guess I should search a little more through next time, eh?
#41
Originally posted by Meat Curtains
That site was the first one that popped up in search when I typed in "1970 Challenger weight".
From sounddomain or not, that information is wrong. This is from another site,
1970 Challenger R/T (383) Weight 3660 lb (curb)
So I stand corrected. Even though I am "a big bad red haired red neck thats 21" I'm not too big to admit I'm wrong. I guess I should search a little more through next time, eh?
That site was the first one that popped up in search when I typed in "1970 Challenger weight".
From sounddomain or not, that information is wrong. This is from another site,
1970 Challenger R/T (383) Weight 3660 lb (curb)
So I stand corrected. Even though I am "a big bad red haired red neck thats 21" I'm not too big to admit I'm wrong. I guess I should search a little more through next time, eh?
You are indeed a big man to be able to admit when you are wrong. Most people can't do that.
#42
Originally posted by Meat Curtains
That site was the first one that popped up in search when I typed in "1970 Challenger weight".
From sounddomain or not, that information is wrong. This is from another site,
1970 Challenger R/T (383) Weight 3660 lb (curb)
So I stand corrected. Even though I am "a big bad red haired red neck thats 21" I'm not too big to admit I'm wrong. I guess I should search a little more through next time, eh?
That site was the first one that popped up in search when I typed in "1970 Challenger weight".
From sounddomain or not, that information is wrong. This is from another site,
1970 Challenger R/T (383) Weight 3660 lb (curb)
So I stand corrected. Even though I am "a big bad red haired red neck thats 21" I'm not too big to admit I'm wrong. I guess I should search a little more through next time, eh?
#43
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
when they have neon lights inside of a challenger
the only reason that i made that comment was becouse you called me a *** hole
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZZ3Astro
Power Adders
1045
08-13-2019 12:57 AM
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
05-28-2019 01:47 PM
tyeo098
Tech / General Engine
38
11-30-2015 06:27 PM