1999 3.8 Mustang??
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
1999 3.8 Mustang??
Just wondering how fast they are... My friend has had one for a long time...but he has no times on it or anything. Its a 5 speed 3.8. Its got a flowmaster catback, CAI, and 3.73's. Its also decked out in GT trim (rear bumper, dual exhaust, hood, wheels). Ive been it in many-a-times and it feels like a pretty quick car. I'm almost positive he would rape my auto LO3 but i wasnt sure. he beats on his car whereas i ***** mine so its always hard to judge...
The only mods that will be on my car when it comes out in the spring will be a catback, open element, and maybe a hi-flo cat.
The only mods that will be on my car when it comes out in the spring will be a catback, open element, and maybe a hi-flo cat.
#3
Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: 1999 3.8 Mustang??
Originally posted by a mack6
Just wondering how fast they are... My friend has had one for a long time...but he has no times on it or anything. Its a 5 speed 3.8. Its got a flowmaster catback, CAI, and 3.73's. Its also decked out in GT trim (rear bumper, dual exhaust, hood, wheels). Ive been it in many-a-times and it feels like a pretty quick car. I'm almost positive he would rape my auto LO3 but i wasnt sure. he beats on his car whereas i ***** mine so its always hard to judge...
The only mods that will be on my car when it comes out in the spring will be a catback, open element, and maybe a hi-flo cat.
Just wondering how fast they are... My friend has had one for a long time...but he has no times on it or anything. Its a 5 speed 3.8. Its got a flowmaster catback, CAI, and 3.73's. Its also decked out in GT trim (rear bumper, dual exhaust, hood, wheels). Ive been it in many-a-times and it feels like a pretty quick car. I'm almost positive he would rape my auto LO3 but i wasnt sure. he beats on his car whereas i ***** mine so its always hard to judge...
The only mods that will be on my car when it comes out in the spring will be a catback, open element, and maybe a hi-flo cat.
#4
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hilliard, OH
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 open diff
With the small amount of mods to my LO3, I absolutely destroyed a 3.8 Mustang. If you get a catback and open element, you have a decent shot. With those gears he has, make sure you don't do a short race because he probably has the advantage at lower speeds.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Theres a night and day difference between a 94-98 3.8 and a 99-04 3.8. The 99+ cars could be mid to low 15s with good drivers (my friends bone stocker went 15.4 at a crap track) so my guess with his mods is low 15s!
#6
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hilliard, OH
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 open diff
Originally posted by 25thmustang
Theres a night and day difference between a 94-98 3.8 and a 99-04 3.8. The 99+ cars could be mid to low 15s with good drivers (my friends bone stocker went 15.4 at a crap track) so my guess with his mods is low 15s!
Theres a night and day difference between a 94-98 3.8 and a 99-04 3.8. The 99+ cars could be mid to low 15s with good drivers (my friends bone stocker went 15.4 at a crap track) so my guess with his mods is low 15s!
I never raced the 99+ 3.8, although I did race an '05 Mustang 4.0 and stayed right with him in a race to about 50.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
Originally posted by Wind Charger
I thought they were 4.6's
I thought they were 4.6's
#10
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: spartanburg, sc
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
i think you would take him. i test drove a 01 v6 today with exaust and headers and my lo3 would have taken
#13
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Waldorf,MD
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87, 88 and 89 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305, and 350
Transmission: 700R, and T-5
Axle/Gears: 3:23 POSI
the 99 v6 is only alittle slower than the 97 non pi that i raced and thats kinda sad becuase the non pi had catback and offroad h pipe.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: north carolina
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 04 Dodge SRT-4, 91 formula firebird
Engine: 2.4 L4, 305 tbi
Transmission: 5-speed, 700 r4
There slow as heck! we almost beat a 05 V6 in my friends 96 sentra with about 250k miles on it. it only beat us by like a car length. you got it!
#15
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '99 Cobra
Engine: 4.6 DOHC 32V
Transmission: T-45
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Originally posted by wheelstandin87
the 99 v6 is only alittle slower than the 97 non pi that i raced and thats kinda sad becuase the non pi had catback and offroad h pipe.
the 99 v6 is only alittle slower than the 97 non pi that i raced and thats kinda sad becuase the non pi had catback and offroad h pipe.
Oh yea, its just a 2V SOHC, i forgot
Eric
#16
99+ V6s are weak, imho they are the best to race, because so many of the owners around here are young/dumb teenagers who think that their exhaust has made them the fastest car around....lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post