Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago O'Hare
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC Z28 Camaro
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: Stock
Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Are Jegster bolt on subframe connectors easy to install on jack stands? 1987 camaro irocz american thunder full exhaust no cat.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
When installing ANY SFCs, the car's weight need to be resting on the suspension.
So if you did it on jack stands, 2 would need to be under the rear axle & 2 under the front a-arms, but I don't like the idea of the front a-arms on jactstands. Just strikes me as not good support for being under there.
Maybe the front up on ramps, then the rear on jackstands, but I'm not sure that the chassis wouldn't flex by 1 end being lifted independantly of the other end. Considering that the function of SFCs is to hold the chassis in a certain place, I don't like the idea of flexing the chassis to a different position & locking it in that position, once the SFCs are put in place.
So if you did it on jack stands, 2 would need to be under the rear axle & 2 under the front a-arms, but I don't like the idea of the front a-arms on jactstands. Just strikes me as not good support for being under there.
Maybe the front up on ramps, then the rear on jackstands, but I'm not sure that the chassis wouldn't flex by 1 end being lifted independantly of the other end. Considering that the function of SFCs is to hold the chassis in a certain place, I don't like the idea of flexing the chassis to a different position & locking it in that position, once the SFCs are put in place.
#3
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
I wouldn't trust ramps seen a few break,If you haven't bought the sfc get a weld on set they are stronger then bolt on or weld in the bolt on ones.I would take it somewhere with a wheel lift and let them put it on.
#4
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: under the hood of my car in Massachusetts
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 rs daily driver work in progress
Engine: 3.1 , 204/214 cam
Transmission: 700 r-4, b& m megashifter
Axle/Gears: I want a posi with rear discs
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Can they be installed in a flat driveway?
I have limited access to any shops at the time.
I have limited access to any shops at the time.
#6
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: under the hood of my car in Massachusetts
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 rs daily driver work in progress
Engine: 3.1 , 204/214 cam
Transmission: 700 r-4, b& m megashifter
Axle/Gears: I want a posi with rear discs
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Too much work. LOL
I'll save up and get weld-in ones and have a shop install them.
I'll save up and get weld-in ones and have a shop install them.
#7
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Iroc-Z Black w/ blue/silver
Engine: L98 5.7
Transmission: 700R4 (obviously)
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt 2.77
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Im the definition of "bean pole" and i still dont think even i can squeeze my scrawny @ss under a 3rd gen without a jack or jackstands LOL. Thats a tight tight squeeze
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 84 camaro, 88 trans am, 98 camaro
Engine: Modded , stock, LSX modded
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, t-56
Axle/Gears: 327, 308, 373
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Jegster are super easy to install
#9
Supreme Member
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
im very happy with the fit of the jegsters. you can weld them later. my t-tops used to make noise coming in the driveway. once i installed and welded the SFCs, ive never had a squeek. big diff.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
You can do it in a driveway on jackstands. They fit well are easy to install, and you can have them welded in later. I am always amazed at the amount of nayusayers on here. It's not a hard job and can be done quite easily....
#11
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc
Engine: Single turbo Vortec 5.7, Megasquirt
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4 3000 stall Vigilante
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.25 w/True Trac
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
I agree, not very tough to install, bolt in and weld later. Good fitment, I'm very happy with them.
#12
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Laredo, TX
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350ci TPI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen rear end
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Any pics of these subframes installed?? Im in the market for some
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro
Engine: TPI 350ci
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
I really like the Jegster SFC. They are easy to install (as mentioned above), fit well along underside of frame rail, give a good jack point/body stiffness and only weigh about 15lbs.
I reccomend welding them in place (which is a cinch)!
I reccomend welding them in place (which is a cinch)!
#14
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc
Engine: Single turbo Vortec 5.7, Megasquirt
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4 3000 stall Vigilante
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.25 w/True Trac
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Not the best pics but I found a couple. The pieces going from the side subframe connectors to the trans tunnel area are pieces I added later.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Georgetown TX
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Base 91 'bird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27 & PBR
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Do the Jegster ones fit in conjunction with the Alston inners or do they interfere?
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rincon, Ga.
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TPI conversion.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi 4th gen rear
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
I bolted in my jegster subframes while my car was on ramps and jackstands. i have yet to weld them but i do check the bolts everynow and then. i also put on a set of topdown solution tubular subframe connector with no interference at all. the car is as asolid as it can be.
#18
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 3.42 Posi
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
I bolted in my jegster subframes while my car was on ramps and jackstands. i have yet to weld them but i do check the bolts everynow and then. i also put on a set of topdown solution tubular subframe connector with no interference at all. the car is as asolid as it can be.
#20
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 3.42 Posi
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Hows the driving after putting them on? is it pretty stiff around corners?
#21
Member
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 84 camaro, 88 trans am, 98 camaro
Engine: Modded , stock, LSX modded
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, t-56
Axle/Gears: 327, 308, 373
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
All you do is bolt them in on the rear lca munt and swing them up into place on thefront rails/floor pan and support them. You can either drill using the subframe holes as a guide or mark them and swig them back down and drill just make sure you have your carpet pulled back ect....
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Too bad they don't actually connect the subframes since they are not actually even touching EITHER subframe on the car. They are just a still bar that bolts under the car & I question how much they actually stiffen the "frame". I'm sure they help but SUBFRAME CONNECTORS they sure aren't.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
The UMI design is much better with 6 major weld points.
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=127
Look down at the bottom of the page and click on the photos.
They cost more than the Jegsters but are far superior in design.
UMI makes excellent products and those are the sub frame connectors I will be installing.
Here's the link to the Jegsters so you can see the difference.
http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/40053/10002/-1
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=127
Look down at the bottom of the page and click on the photos.
They cost more than the Jegsters but are far superior in design.
UMI makes excellent products and those are the sub frame connectors I will be installing.
Here's the link to the Jegsters so you can see the difference.
http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/40053/10002/-1
Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; 12-12-2012 at 02:48 PM.
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
i have a set of jegster bolt ins in my car. i welded them in and added some extra braces like vortec350s10 did.
here's how i put the car on jackstands whenever i'm doing sfc's...this is InfernalVortex's car from a few years ago when i put spohn sfc's on his car:
here's how i put the car on jackstands whenever i'm doing sfc's...this is InfernalVortex's car from a few years ago when i put spohn sfc's on his car:
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
The only reason I beleave the UMI has such a good design is that it directly addresses the twisting of the uni body where the problem exist. "vortec350s10"seems to agree with his alterations,and BlackenedBirds comment just enforces that. I am not a racer so I don't know the exact demands on a Third Gen. with a straight launch.
I am simply helping the OP make a educated decision with his purchase. If he has his mind made up already than none of this makes any difference.
I am simply helping the OP make a educated decision with his purchase. If he has his mind made up already than none of this makes any difference.
#30
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Not trying to be a jerk,and it may work but you still could not pay me to clime under a car with the front stands like that, I don't care how many times it been done.The lower control arm is just on the other side of that wheel and is considered a jack point that will accomplish the desired effect.
Nice looking car "InfernalVortex"
Nice looking car "InfernalVortex"
Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; 12-12-2012 at 09:16 PM.
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
i figured i might get someone giving me a hard time about it, as it does look a bit sketchy. it's stable, and keeps the suspension 100% loaded. a drive on lift would obviously be better. the jackstands go under the balljoints now, just for extra piece of mind though.
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
I always do the shove test in all four corners when a car is on jackstands. If it passes then I crawl under.
The following users liked this post:
CKone (07-02-2020)
#35
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Pontiac 89 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI 5.7L V8
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
The UMI design is much better with 6 major weld points.
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=127
Look down at the bottom of the page and click on the photos.
They cost more than the Jegsters but are far superior in design.
UMI makes excellent products and those are the sub frame connectors I will be installing.
Here's the link to the Jegsters so you can see the difference.
http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/40053/10002/-1
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=127
Look down at the bottom of the page and click on the photos.
They cost more than the Jegsters but are far superior in design.
UMI makes excellent products and those are the sub frame connectors I will be installing.
Here's the link to the Jegsters so you can see the difference.
http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/40053/10002/-1
I'll like to build ones like this I have the tubing and a Wellder just need the Blueprint of thees connectors do you have anny?
#36
Supreme Member
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Location, Location!
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 92 T/A 'vert
Engine: Mild .040 over L98 4 bolt mains
Transmission: Mostly stock 700R4, 2600 Vigilante
Axle/Gears: LS1 3.42
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Thank you for giving Jegs the opportunity to assist you with your technical question.
I have checked, I am sorry, the 40053 sub frame kit does not fit convertible models. Unfortunately, I do not know where to tell you to look from here. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us.
Thank you,
Jon Shook
Technical Sales Representative
800-345-4545
ext # 639
Jon.Shook@jegs.com
I have checked, I am sorry, the 40053 sub frame kit does not fit convertible models. Unfortunately, I do not know where to tell you to look from here. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us.
Thank you,
Jon Shook
Technical Sales Representative
800-345-4545
ext # 639
Jon.Shook@jegs.com
#37
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stewartsville, NJ
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: auto
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
wow, i am glad someone told him about that dangerous jack stand placement. I always leave my floor jack under the front crossmember also, and put a little pressure on it for peace of mind. Safety first !
#40
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC & ROLL-Z
Engine: L98 Vortec FIRST TPI
Transmission: T56, Mech Speedo
Axle/Gears: G92 J65 3.27
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Q:
Can LCA relocation brackets still be used with SFC's?
Can LCA relocation brackets still be used with SFC's?
Last edited by Keoman; 01-13-2013 at 12:12 PM.
#41
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' camaro RS TTOP
Engine: 92 5.0tpi Bosch III, headers, msd
Transmission: 700r4 built. trans go. 2,300 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 posi ls disc brake conversion
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
put a strap between those to front jack stands. that'll hold em' in nice and tight. Then your set!
#42
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' camaro RS TTOP
Engine: 92 5.0tpi Bosch III, headers, msd
Transmission: 700r4 built. trans go. 2,300 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 posi ls disc brake conversion
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
I too have the Jegsters. Bolted in and then welded. Love them. Even fit up under the 3" exhaust.
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
and where do you think all the forces on the rear of the car go exactly? The LCA mount is what is pushed/pulled during acceleration and braking at that exact spot, not the "subframe" back there. IMO the lca mount welded subframe is superior .
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Yes, forces from the tires/LCAs do go through those mounts. But do you really think that the LCA mount is actually stronger than the engineered "frame" of the car?
#46
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
yes once you weld that thick steel to it I sure do. Not to mention that the subframe is on the same piece of folded over steel if you look at it under the car and a few inches inward. I cut into all that crap when notching my frame for mini tubs and it's stupid thin.
#47
Member
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
The subframe part is thinner compared with the LCA.
I can also tell that by hitting each with a screw driver's head because the sound is quite different.
Also, in Alston's case, they said the distance between each cup is short compared with the LCA type and that will make it a bit harder to play its role.
But anyway this is just a theory. For now judging from many people's opinions who use them, I think we can say both are effective.
#48
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Jegster Bolt-on subframe connectors
Any subframe connector is going to benefit a unibody car.
The difference in the design and the related difference in effectiveness is probably so minute you would never even be able to notice.
The difference in the design and the related difference in effectiveness is probably so minute you would never even be able to notice.