Big in back small in front
Big in back small in front
Hey anyone have pics of a car running bigger tires in the back than in the front?
Perhaps 225/50/15s front and 275/6015s rear ?
Im thinking about it
Perhaps 225/50/15s front and 275/6015s rear ?
Im thinking about it
Trending Topics
Originally posted by RARE-ROC-Z
here is my old camaro. loved the way it stood..
wish i could have it back.
here is my old camaro. loved the way it stood..
wish i could have it back.
Nate
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
RARE-ROC-Z: I remember that car, it sure was beautiful. How's the project RS comin along?
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
I think that this trend should stay back in the 70's where it belongs,although they do look good on 2ndgens.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Allensville, PA
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI (Now HSR)
Transmission: 700R4 by Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:27 9 Bolt Posi W/ Discs
this all reminds me of my 86 sc I had I put bigger tires on the back of it and the handling went to crap do you guys have the same problem I just noticed my car liked it better with the same size all around it. I didnt like the way it looked at all I like the third gens to stand the same all around just my $.02 though
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 91Zman
I think that this trend should stay back in the 70's where it belongs,although they do look good on 2ndgens.
I think that this trend should stay back in the 70's where it belongs,although they do look good on 2ndgens.
I don't like the "higher aspect ratio" way of going, I think it looks way better if you run low profiles and 2 different sizes, personally I'm going to be running 275/40/17's and 295/35/18's.
Just remember if you are running high end tires that are directional, you can't rotate them at all, so when the backs are starting to go you just have to get new ones. This will get pretty expensive especialy if you're an agressive driver.
Just remember if you are running high end tires that are directional, you can't rotate them at all, so when the backs are starting to go you just have to get new ones. This will get pretty expensive especialy if you're an agressive driver.
Originally posted by KlayBuRn
Is it just me, or does this seem a little, stupid ?
Is it just me, or does this seem a little, stupid ?
All the high school kids went through this back in the 60's & 70's and now it seems they are doing it again. You do realize that GM put a lot of engineering into the suspensions of these cars and by using different sizes of tires front and back; you are negating any benefits of the suspension? Not to mention that when taken too far the handling characteristics of the car can become very unpredictable and possibly very dangerous.
Supreme Member

Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: Davison / Troy ,Michigan
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 3.8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Dana 60
Originally posted by 91Zman
I think that this trend should stay back in the 70's where it belongs,although they do look good on 2ndgens.
I think that this trend should stay back in the 70's where it belongs,although they do look good on 2ndgens.
Originally posted by Poppa Chubby
She looks TONS better now . . .
She looks TONS better now . . .
To each his own. I personally like the older style look. I'm not going to add another pic to this thread though. I have 275 15 60's in the rear and 215 15 70 up front. I like the way it sits and I've never had a rubbing problem. Sure it don't handle the corners like it did when it was new, but dangerous, not even close. I built mine to handle quarter miles not autocross.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 1
From: Manassas, VA
Car: 89 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305 - Demon 525
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 88 WS6 TransAm GTA
Redbird... that is a photochop right? Looks like it. I sure hope so! Looks WAAAAAAAY better with the Formy rims.
Redbird... that is a photochop right? Looks like it. I sure hope so! Looks WAAAAAAAY better with the Formy rims.
Nope thats not my car and yes it is real, no chop there. Its one of my friends and If I'm correct he put 295s on the rear. Every time he its a bump the body tears into those tires. Your right I like the way my car looks and rides. I dont think I would go that far. The the persons who owns that car is sorry that he put those big sobs on there.
My car is in the sig for those how havent seen it. Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere around the South Side of Chicago just crusin' in one of the Niteriders
Car: 92RS 25th Anniv./88 IROC Z28 Vert
Engine: 305 TBI w/Tpi Air / 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4/700r4
Axle/Gears: Posi
The best of both worlds...
from a teen of the 70's. 215/65 in front and 235/60 in rear both sitting on 15's in crome. Slightly RAKED!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
From: Pekin, IL
Car: 91 Formula, 79 Trans Am, 72 LeMans
Engine: 305 TPI, 6.6, 350 Pontiac
Transmission: T5, 3 speed, TH350
I think Camaros should be on the ground not up in the air. But thats just my opinion. Later
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Camrs89
I think Camaros should be on the ground not up in the air. But thats just my opinion. Later
I think Camaros should be on the ground not up in the air. But thats just my opinion. Later
"face down a$$ up, thats the way we like to fuc|<"
:rockon:
Originally posted by omnipotentgoku
In the words of the great pimp-hop philosphers of the early 90's .. 2 live crew
"face down a$$ up, thats the way we like to fuc|<"
:rockon:
In the words of the great pimp-hop philosphers of the early 90's .. 2 live crew
"face down a$$ up, thats the way we like to fuc|<"
:rockon:
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
I did not raise the rear of my car, the tires did. I know thats obvious but lowering this car is really not an option for me. It scraped the wheel wells as it was , and still does on launch. A better suspension perhaps, but not lowering. The front could use a small drop, but I also enjoy being able to get over speed bumps.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM
1992rs/ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Jan 28, 2016 09:58 PM






