Something different.
Something different.
Here's a car I saw over in my girlfriend's neighborhood. I snapped some pics of it. Looks like a wing off an eclipse or something. I saw it one day, and I knew I had to come back and snap pictures for you guys.
The first time I saw it, I saw it from behind, and it looked just awful.
This time, I obviously got some shots from the side, and it doesn't look as bad. I think it's the way the wing is angled that makes it look some damn horrid.
Mathius
The first time I saw it, I saw it from behind, and it looked just awful.
This time, I obviously got some shots from the side, and it doesn't look as bad. I think it's the way the wing is angled that makes it look some damn horrid.
Mathius
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC Wheels:KMC Clocker 17"
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: upgrading...
Transmission: upgrading...
just too round and too import for that car, i think. but yah it'd look better if it was a little more understated.
Man that spoiler is way ugly. I think its funny how we catch pix of peoples cars without them knowing. I dont even think an import guy would want that.
Last edited by Spdfrk1990; Jun 10, 2003 at 08:00 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
I'm not really a fan of big "shopping cart" wings. I like my factory 91 Z-28 wing and thats plenty big enough.
What would look better on that particular car is the 3 piece 5 in. IROC wing. If my car didn't come with the wing that it did, then the IROC 5 in. wing would be on my car.
What would look better on that particular car is the 3 piece 5 in. IROC wing. If my car didn't come with the wing that it did, then the IROC 5 in. wing would be on my car.
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 482
Likes: 2
From: Midvale, UT
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 4.11
wings.. well.. wings are an easy way to ruin a car. There are some that look like they should be there, whether I like them or not, is irrelevent. Some, dont look horrible, some look really bad.
This one IMO looks really bad. the form of the spoiler doesnt fit the lines of the car.
This one IMO looks really bad. the form of the spoiler doesnt fit the lines of the car.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
doesnt match the lines..
4th gen it would
4th gen it would
Originally posted by DevilsAddvocate
Ya just be blunt people, that spoiler is hella ugly. Take it off.
Ya just be blunt people, that spoiler is hella ugly. Take it off.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: West Des Moines, IA
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Originally posted by demonchild
does anyone have any pictures of spoilers or wings that were not made for our cars that look good?
does anyone have any pictures of spoilers or wings that were not made for our cars that look good?
Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Car: '87 IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: TH700R4
Whatever happened to installing parts that made thirdgens look good?
I think the modern spoilers (high ricers) are overdone. I'd like to see something out of the late '60s early 70s where the spoiler scoops high off the back of the car like on a 72 RS.
tj
I think the modern spoilers (high ricers) are overdone. I'd like to see something out of the late '60s early 70s where the spoiler scoops high off the back of the car like on a 72 RS.
tj
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




)
