Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

New pic of the FX Designs body kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 02:16 AM
  #1  
TorqueWolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Albertville AL
Car: 85 TA TTA clone
Engine: 355sbc (turbo planned)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt rear disk
New pic of the FX Designs body kit

It dosent look so bad once its painted. Im still waiting till I see more pics before i decide if i like it or not. Hey it looks alot better than 90% of thos kits out there

Old Nov 15, 2006 | 05:33 AM
  #2  
'86 350's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: Tolland, CT
Car: '86 Camaro SC
I'm not a big fan of it.....
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 06:25 AM
  #3  
jamon8's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
From: Southern IL
Car: 88 GTA "Cocaine"
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
thats a firebird-camaro-ferrari-whatamagig

dude make up your mind

you could always get a pipe bender, fiberglass mold, and a sheet of metal and make your own car if personalization is the key to your life:

dont take this personally, I just believe, that as a guy who would not mind building these cars in the future for big bucks, this devalues every GM car ever built

all the trash talkin aside- I give that a profound thumbs down
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 07:55 AM
  #4  
grimmcs's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
Originally Posted by jamon8
this devalues every GM car ever built

all the trash talkin aside- I give that a profound thumbs down

I dont understand the whole "make american cars look like imports" thing. In my opinion third gens are classics now...and that shouldnt be done. Just my
But to each his own.
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #5  
dennisbernal91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 92
From: West Warwick RI, postal code: 02893
Car: Building LS3, T56 Z28
Engine: LS3
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser/ 4.11
yeah, i am too am all for "do whatever makes you happy" but from a personal standpoint. I would cut off my hands before I ever put that on my car.

Why is it that as soon as I see that nose I assume there it is impossible for that car to have a V8???
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 09:40 AM
  #6  
IROCJoyce's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 479
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: 350 Gm H.O
Transmission: 700r4 built
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Locker
What ever floats your boat. or sink......Just don't like the bumper, the rest is pretty cool.
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #7  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
all I can say is I'm sorry..
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #8  
crowebuilt's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
less IS more
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #9  
BADNBLK's Avatar
COTM Editor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 14
From: WINDSOR, CO
Car: 91 Z28, 87 SC, 90 IROC, 92 RS
Engine: LS1, 305 TPI, L98, NADA
Transmission: T56, 700r4's, and NADA
Axle/Gears: 3.89, 3.42, 3.23, NADA
I think that even alot of the import kids out there have moved away from the obnoxious body kits enough that they would not even install that.

Yuck!!!
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #10  
rce2win's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Livonia, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 355ci SBC, Holley carb
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 4th gen Z28
[/quote]

Gooooo, too many surface changes! I like it from the hood back but the bumper cover just doesn't fit. Maybe, MAYBE some black mesh would help it but i doubt it.
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 01:16 PM
  #11  
TorqueWolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Albertville AL
Car: 85 TA TTA clone
Engine: 355sbc (turbo planned)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt rear disk
Hey guys, just wanted to let ya know i wasent actualy planning on buying or installing that thing =p

Besides i can think of about a million things better, that i could buy with 1200$ like maybe another third gen =p
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #12  
rwdtech's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Car: 1991 Z28 (sold)
i bet the side skirts would look cool on a stock 85-90 trans am. but thats it
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #13  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
That's gross looking...
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 11:27 PM
  #14  
GTAfanatic's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Mass, Boston
Car: 1988 GTA Black notchback
Engine: 1991 L98 355 TWIN Superchagred
Transmission: 700r4 shift kit 2500 stall
Axle/Gears: www.cardomain.com/id/gtafanatic
it's different i like the top half of the bumper from the lights up. the bump is to flat and two many opening although it would make great for a intercooler
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 12:30 AM
  #15  
Firebat's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,786
Likes: 3
One thing it has over stock is a real place to put the front license plate. I wish they wouldn't cover up the fender so much, they do this kind of on the predator kit too.
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 12:32 AM
  #16  
OneManArmy's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.70
no thank you. maybe the back half of that kit looks good but damn is the front ugly!
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 12:33 AM
  #17  
92RS(real slow)'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
From: Osceola Indiana
Car: 92 RS(sold) 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ones that turn
Originally Posted by rwdtech
i bet the side skirts would look cool on a stock 85-90 trans am. but thats it
side skirts dont look to bad, but the rest I dont like
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 07:42 AM
  #18  
Psycho_91Camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 3
From: Torrance, CA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: THE LT1 SWAP SHALL BEGIN!!!!
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: LSD! =(
Originally Posted by TorqueWolf
Hey guys, just wanted to let ya know i wasent actualy planning on buying or installing that thing =p

Besides i can think of about a million things better, that i could buy with 1200$ like maybe another third gen =p
sure you weren't............ rice boy
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #19  
usamuscle892's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 275
Likes: 1
From: Augusta,GA
Car: 1992 Z03 RS
Engine: (L03) 305TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: bone stock
looks like that sat in the paint oven too long and started to melt......

here's another rule of thumb, if you wouldnt put a body kit on your 69 camaro why would you put one on your IROC or 91 Z28? They are the same car....so give them the same respect!
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #20  
GodSpeedGTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock, TX
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: Future: LSX Turbo
Transmission: built T-56
TERRIBLE any which way you slice it...it doesnt get "better" looking with anything...its bad all the way through
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 11:48 PM
  #21  
fun Pain's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Crestline,OH
Car: 1987 Formula 350
Engine: 6.0 boost and smak
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27
I like it...it is different....And that is the reason to make any changes to a car!!!

I probably wouldn't go that route (personally)

unless maybe, I made those grills functional with, turbo scoops and intercooler frontal area.....but

Kik buttt for the stand out ride....
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 12:20 AM
  #22  
noahTHEpurdy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 1992 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Auburn Posi
Nothing says "r1cer" like a body kit.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #23  
PHAT89TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Newark, Ca, USA
Car: 02 ws-6
Engine: 5.7 liter
Transmission: t56
they forgot to add the honda emblems. hahah. its not my cup of tea. but i congrats on the hard work its been put it. maybe if the car had better rims, it might look semi decent.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 01:07 AM
  #24  
TorqueWolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Albertville AL
Car: 85 TA TTA clone
Engine: 355sbc (turbo planned)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt rear disk
Originally Posted by Psycho_91Camaro
sure you weren't............ rice boy
Would i put a body kit on my car? Sure, just not that one. The Trans am has a body kit and it looks good doesn't it? Bodykits don't have to look as riced out as that one. If i have to I will design and build something myself. something that flows with the lines of the car and doesn't destroy it.
I'm trying to keep an open mind and not limit the car to its absolute stock form. If GM had that same mentality in the late 80s then we wouldn't have the 91-92 style groundfx, body kit, whatever you want to call it. Just because you wanna call anything different "rice".




Non stock body kits CAN be a good thing! Or is this rice to?
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 04:05 AM
  #25  
CarterCarbureto's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: canada, eh
Car: 1987 Z28 camaro
Engine: 305 V8
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt pozi
that is NOT rice x.x thats elanor from the "gone in 60 seconds movie"
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 09:23 AM
  #26  
GodSpeedGTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock, TX
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: Future: LSX Turbo
Transmission: built T-56
Originally Posted by fun Pain
I like it...it is different....And that is the reason to make any changes to a car!!!

I probably wouldn't go that route (personally)

unless maybe, I made those grills functional with, turbo scoops and intercooler frontal area.....but

Kik buttt for the stand out ride....
Once again i stress, DIFFERENT does not = GOOD/CUSTOM/COOL ETC. WOW, you have a terrible looking car that looks worse/diff from the stock version...way to waste your money.

its like emo kids...im gonna stand out by wearing makeup, all black, listening to stupid music, and crying a lot...youll sure be different in a very stupid way
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #27  
usamuscle892's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 275
Likes: 1
From: Augusta,GA
Car: 1992 Z03 RS
Engine: (L03) 305TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: bone stock
that is a SIX DIGIT car designed for years by a team of top builders, not a backyard bodykit like most of them are. You wont find that elenaor body kit in a paper back catalog.......thats why its kick @ss. The ***** firebird kit is backyard crap.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 05:05 PM
  #28  
billsfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
It would look a "little" better with black grills instead of white.

-bill
Attached Thumbnails New pic of the FX Designs body kit-gm-firebird-82-92  
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #29  
Camaroguy18's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1986 Camaro SC (Supercool)
Engine: one composed of various metals
Originally Posted by billsfirebird
It would look a "little" better with black grills instead of white.

-bill


that actually made it look 100x better, but still something I probably wouldnt purchase
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #30  
Daytona T/A's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Car: 1983 25th Anniversary Daytona 500 Pace Car Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305 Crossfire-Injected V8
Transmission: 4 spd. auto
that'd be like taking the nose off a silverado SS and smacking it on a T/A... yeah the piece itself might look good but on a muscle car it looks like ****.. that style of kit might look good on an import, but that's because that style will with the import body... it does not, however, fit a muslce car, nor would a truck nose... it's just ridiculous imo
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 04:17 AM
  #31  
88KARRV6's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: California (again.....)
Car: All sold :-(
Engine: None
Transmission: None
Axle/Gears: None
Uhhhh..... ugly, not as bad as the 24" wheels that I've seen on a 'maro mind you, but pretty bad. Doesn't look "cornfed american muscle" looks likes like it's on a "rhyce" diet LOL
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 05:16 AM
  #32  
WaaX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Saint Clair Shores, Michigan
Car: 1985 IROC
Engine: 350 TPI (block was swapped)
Transmission: 700r4 w/corvette servo
Axle/Gears: no idea
I personally think it looks kind of cool, makes it really aggresive looking.


http://www.compusmart.ab.ca/fx/GM%20Camaro%20Rear.jpg

That rear bumper cover is DAMN sexy.

Flame away.

Last edited by WaaX; Nov 18, 2006 at 05:27 AM.
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #33  
3vi1p3nguin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 125
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Car: 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350 4bbl
Transmission: T-5
i think that if you could bring the front bumper closer to the stock look that it would look pretty good, I like the lines of the side skirts
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 05:37 PM
  #34  
rwdtech's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Car: 1991 Z28 (sold)
someone buy the side skirts and put them on their trans am. we all want to see how awesome it looks. it cant be anymore "import-ish" than the 91-92 camaro scooped gfx
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 06:12 PM
  #35  
Jgolden314's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Milan, MI
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Looks like garbage. Does not flow whatsoever.
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 09:21 PM
  #36  
TheScaryOne's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 3
From: Tucson, Arizona
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: L98 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW
That looks like the hood off of the 4th gen TA's. Which I dislike. And see, there's a difference between r!cers and tuners. I've seen a fairly stock body'd Honduh going around my town, it's quiet, he has a very minimal looking maximum functioning body kit that basically only cuts down air under the car, and a small wing that puts downpressure on the car. And he's fast as a demon out of hell. A r!cer has a mildly modified motor and fifty grand dropped into bodykits, neons, and all of the parts to get all of the stickers they plastered on their rides. This looks like a r!cer bodykit. All flash, no function. That, and it just looks bad.

Oh, and I side with everyone else on the Eleanor Mustang bodykit. I believe it was an expensive option from the factory, or from a company that bought them and suped them up way back then. You can get the bodykit now, but it's only holding a candle to the "true" Eleanor's.

Edit: Confirmed ideas on the Eleanor. It was a 1967 Shelby Mustang GT500 with an production run of two thousand forty-eight units. High powered, great styling, it was a true Shelby creation. Now there's a bodykit to do that, but it is only making it look like the Eleanor.

Last edited by TheScaryOne; Nov 18, 2006 at 09:29 PM.
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 10:18 PM
  #37  
misstransam's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: cow country ONT.
Car: 1986 T/A
Engine: #880 350 4BBL, VORTEC HEADS
Transmission: t500
Axle/Gears: 3:73
umm hold on../barfs beside desk.
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #38  
fun Pain's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Crestline,OH
Car: 1987 Formula 350
Engine: 6.0 boost and smak
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27
GodSpeedGTA



You Sound like you live in Texas.....


and aren't you the one, talking about putting 295 19's on your car.....ugh that didn't come like that from factory....

How about the HSR intake....hummmm sounds like another DIFFERENT change

so calm down " emo cowboy ", you seem to like everything else changed,

helpful links.....................japanese hood is my favorite,

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/auto...bird-hood.html

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/auto...-just-18s.html

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/body...-interior.html

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/brak...51-brakes.html
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 01:48 AM
  #39  
TheScaryOne's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 3
From: Tucson, Arizona
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: L98 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW
Wow... Yea. It wouldn't be so bad if he didn't tear into the car for looking different. He wants brakes that *look* good? Personally I could care less if my brakes were pretty, as long as they stopped great they could look like they were made out of dog doo.
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 04:01 AM
  #40  
Tony89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
Well his interior turned out pretty nice

Would like to see a pic of that hood finished though.
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 04:05 AM
  #41  
TheScaryOne's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 3
From: Tucson, Arizona
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: L98 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW
That's true. If I wasn't gonna keep the interior of this car stock, I'd totally get those seats. They look great, they're leather, and they have custom embroidering.
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #42  
TorqueWolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Albertville AL
Car: 85 TA TTA clone
Engine: 355sbc (turbo planned)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt rear disk
IF anyone has the pic of this kit still in primer that used to be floating around here can you post it? I think its kinda funny the site tries to sell these kits and doesn't even have decent pictures of it. And about that ram air 2 hood you were talking about Thescaryone, is on a whole lot of cars on this site =p

maybe i can do something with an RX7 fc kit. those cars are often mistaken for third gens around here they look so smiler to a sport coupe.

I dont like the kit enough to get that perticular one. the designers had a good idea with the basic look of it then threw some extra lines in there for... i dont know. It would only take about 15 mins to redesign it into something much better
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 01:44 PM
  #43  
usamuscle892's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 275
Likes: 1
From: Augusta,GA
Car: 1992 Z03 RS
Engine: (L03) 305TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: bone stock
why are we discussing use of just the sideskirts? You would still need a front end/rear bumper that flowed into or resembled the same design of the side skirts.
And about this elanor thing. Back in the sixties shelby took the fastbacks and did alot of body/engine mods to them. Those GT500 tailights are from the t-birds that went to the cougars that ended up on the GT500. Whatever hood/GFX/wheel changes shelby made was done by his hand and his staff of highly skilled and educated designers not some hot glue card-board cutters! Then when they began producing the 21 century elanors they were once again designed by guys like Foose and Shelby, they were not replicas, they are entirely different cars, they only resemble the old elanors. Those base cars start at $120,000. So how could anyone compare the mustang pictured above to the pieced together firebird? thats ignorant. Show me a $100,000 TransAm designed by Chipfoose with body kits and what not and then compare it to the elanor.
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #44  
TheScaryOne's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 3
From: Tucson, Arizona
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: L98 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW
I just dislike the new TA's. They look too.... Bubbly. I don't mind the hump hoods, because those actually serve a purpose of giving you more room over your engine, and I know the Ram Air hoods *can* be functional but most I've seen aren't.
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #45  
Psycho_91Camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 3
From: Torrance, CA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: THE LT1 SWAP SHALL BEGIN!!!!
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: LSD! =(
Rice is rice,




Originally Posted by TorqueWolf
Would i put a body kit on my car? Sure, just not that one. The Trans am has a body kit and it looks good doesn't it? Bodykits don't have to look as riced out as that one. If i have to I will design and build something myself. something that flows with the lines of the car and doesn't destroy it.
I'm trying to keep an open mind and not limit the car to its absolute stock form. If GM had that same mentality in the late 80s then we wouldn't have the 91-92 style groundfx, body kit, whatever you want to call it. Just because you wanna call anything different "rice".




Non stock body kits CAN be a good thing! Or is this rice to?
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #46  
AC's Avatar
AC
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,680
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: Used to drive a camaro
Holy crap I just vomitted on my keyboard.....My , is the purple/marroon car and that white turd burner both belong to the kind of people that gave our cars bad names back in the late 80's. Oh well, just my
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #47  
3vi1p3nguin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 125
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Car: 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350 4bbl
Transmission: T-5
honestly, the maroon kit isnt that bad, its different, but I kind of like it. that white one, thats just gross
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #48  
gon8go's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: windsor, on canada
Car: 89 trans am ws6
Engine: lb9 5.0
Transmission: 5spd
Axle/Gears: 3:09
save that s**t fot your civic.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM
SiCkRs
Members Camaros
32
Jul 1, 2018 04:53 AM
italiano67
Tech / General Engine
8
Dec 11, 2016 09:21 AM
Mickeyruder
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 2, 2015 02:45 PM
crazynights
Transmissions and Drivetrain
10
Aug 21, 2015 06:53 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.