Ground Efects?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery Alabama were not *******s
Car: 1990 RS coupe
Engine: TBI 305.
Transmission: 700R4
Ground Efects?
Can anyone elaborate as to what trim and year models thes ground effects came on.
I would have done a search but I dont know what they are called so it kind of makes it impposible
I would have done a search but I dont know what they are called so it kind of makes it impposible
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
The fender flare looks like a custom job, however the GFX on that ride were found on 91-92 Camaros.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery Alabama were not *******s
Car: 1990 RS coupe
Engine: TBI 305.
Transmission: 700R4
would those fit on my 90' cause I like that look a whole lot more than those flat ones I have.
Yeah I know the fenders are custom actuallly I was thinking about doing that with mine after I saw it.
Ahhhh the quest to have the most desireable car on the lot.
Yeah I know the fenders are custom actuallly I was thinking about doing that with mine after I saw it.
Ahhhh the quest to have the most desireable car on the lot.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
The vent hideously clashes with the front lines of the car and should've been mounted upside down to fit close to the wheel arch.
As said, all 91-92 camaros got those pieces...
EDIT: On second consideration it doesn't seem to match the lines of the car either way. The way it's mounted seems to be mismatched with the front of the car and if it were upside it would clash with the door/a-pillar.
As said, all 91-92 camaros got those pieces...
EDIT: On second consideration it doesn't seem to match the lines of the car either way. The way it's mounted seems to be mismatched with the front of the car and if it were upside it would clash with the door/a-pillar.
Last edited by iansane; Jul 6, 2004 at 04:52 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 1
From: Massachusetts
Car: candy blue 85 z28
Engine: 305 tpi LB9
Transmission: 700r4 crazy beefed up one
Axle/Gears: ones with teeth
EDIT: On second consideration it doesn't seem to match the lines of the car either way. The way it's mounted seems to be mismatched with the front of the car and if it were upside it would clash with the door/a-pillar. [/B][/QUOTE]
i would of went side to side with them that would change it to upside down and still be facing the right direction, that may work better.......
i would of went side to side with them that would change it to upside down and still be facing the right direction, that may work better.......
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 1
From: Massachusetts
Car: candy blue 85 z28
Engine: 305 tpi LB9
Transmission: 700r4 crazy beefed up one
Axle/Gears: ones with teeth
umm yes like direct bolt on maybe drill a couple holes fro the front if i remember correctly. Try search now lots have been said about them.
Jeff
Jeff
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Originally posted by Aredross
Uhhh yeah like I asked would those Effects fit my 90
Uhhh yeah like I asked would those Effects fit my 90
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




