I figured since I am having trouble choosing between each one because of the body, it could be in this section.

I love both, but I can only have one, since my second camaro got stolen last week I need your guys help in choosing what I get next

so on with tha show! vote and give an explanation why you chose that car, hey you might make my decision for me!

 

Get the IROC with t-tops. Thats my choice cause camaros look the best

 

IROC'S just look tougher.

:hail:IROC-Z

 

GTA's are much more badass... theres like 300,000,000,000,00 IROC's on the road today, but when ya see a real GTA is like, "WOW!".

(just bustin camaro guys' ***** a bit )

 

The IROC-Z definetly.

 

Either. Just make sure its black

 

Just wanna make a correction here for you.

IROC-Z: 85-90
GTA: 87-92 (was correct)

 

Are you into stock or modded? I like both IROCs and GTAs both ways, but my favorite would have to be a black 88-90 IROC with a turbo hood. But either way you go it's a win-win situation if you ask me.

 

oh you mis understoof twentygr8, those are the years i want, i dont want an 85 or 86 IROC .

i want to stay within the 87-92 range.

looks like IROC is winning, I voted for an IROC also

 

GTA (I like the 91-92s)

 

GTA, ALL THE WAY!!

 

My thoughts exactly...maybe this will help you decide

 

91-up style!

 

Much obliged.

:hail:IROC-Z

 

gta, or even a good t/a

 

I would go for the 91-92 GTA for those choices, If you want a camaro go for a 82-84, IMHO think its the best years of the camaro, except for the 1st gens, Im not much for IROCS though, The nose has to look good, the 87-90 noses look weird on the TA, like they have way too big of a "chin" up front, and btw, I own a big chin 88 GTA, so the TA owners dont get pissy, and the only thing I dont like on the Irocs are the nose and the "IROC" going down the side. If you get a IROC, get an 82-84 nose and front Gfx, they will have to moded a lil to fit though, the gfx at least. just my opinion

 

IROC

 

keep it up guys, man this is one hard *** deicsion!

how about the specs, what are the differences between the two besides looks? i know GTA trans am have L98 engines so I'll get a 5.7 liter for sure.

give me some pro's and cons on each car

 

It is reasons like this I have taken the Trans Am into consideration, pure aggresivness!


I love your ride.

 

If it were a choice I had to make I would choose GTA. But then again, I am a Firebird nut.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 87_Camaro
how about the specs, what are the differences between the two besides looks? i know GTA trans am have L98 engines so I'll get a 5.7 liter for sure.

give me some pro's and cons on each car

So then you would have to get an 87-90 IROC-Z. The 5.7 started in both cars in 87. The Camaros have better intakes, are lighter than GTA's, have sharper higher G handling, and are rated with slightly more HP and TQ because of that intake. The GTA's are slightly more aerodynamic, have a smoother ride, and have more comforts interiorwise. The Camaro looks and feels like a no-nonsense musclecar and the GTA looks and feels more like a sportscar with 2 extra seats.

 

WOW, i was thinking about getting an iroc for my second car, i think i am going to get the GTa now, so i need soem help though, whats the difference between a trans-am and a GTA? thanks

 

GTA is an option package for the Trans Am, I guess it gives you the securness of getting a 5.7 for sure

other then that and the badges I don't really know.

 

Thats only true to an extent. In 87, GTA WAS an option package, but in 88-92, the GTA was a seperate entity from the base Trans Am all together. 5.7 litres are standard equipment, but the lb9/t5 combo was also available.

 

i'm an automatic man myself

 

only difference between TA and GTA is the TA has some more standard options, doesnt have the fender vents, came in different colors, different rims

But as far as I know you could have everything on a GTA on a T/A as an option, except maybe the delete of the fender vents, it just wouldnt have the GTA badges.

and the TA/GTA do look more aggresive, look at the other one, and mine...maybe its just the hood though.

 

Nah, the Camaro definetly looks more aggressive. They seem attract more attention also, around here anyway.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 1stgenracer
WOW, i was thinking about getting an iroc for my second car, i think i am going to get the GTa now

O.......K?!

so i need soem help though, whats the difference between a trans-am and a GTA? thanks

Technically, the engine and more options, thats it.

 

I disagree.

Nothing against the Camaros of course. But assuming stock setup, I think the birds look a tad more aggressive.

 

Its pretty much opinion, but you'll find it to be the majority feels the same about it.

 

Dude, If you can find an unabused gta here in tucson that looks great, GET IT! I see so many irocs and when I see the gta's that are nice, it's a total head turner!!

P.S. Irocs do look more tough!!!

 

1987 Z28

 

I would say they both look tough...I think the GTA s look very mean from the front when the lights are down.

But....When the lights are up I would give it to the Z's . Just the way they are angled (on the GTA) makes it look less agressive.


Nate

 

Definitley the GTA. I agree with whoever above said that there are 300,000,000,000,000 Camaro's running around. I will see 5 IROC's for every GTA, if you could get a nice, strong original GTA you'd definitley turn more heads. Besides, the interiors in the Pontiacs are soooo much better than in the Chevy's, its no comparisson. Find a 91-92 GTA, there will hardly be anyone around with the same car.

 

AND GTA PULLS AHEAD!!!! YEEEEHAAAAAAAAAW!!!! Bout time people realized whats up!
... ok im done now...

 

wow the tables have turned! GTA is in the lead now.


man this is a really hard decision, i need more convincing.

 

Both nice rides.BUTTTTTTTT...............
GTA!

 

So you want convincing? You got convincing!

 

Yeah, lemme try that again...

 

some more...

 

Hey... you asked for it!

 

lol, this is funny. See, this is what I'm talking about. Friendly debate between the two. No "my [thirdgen] beats the snot out of your [thirdgen]!!!" Just polite but firm opinions on preference.

I like them both. I just think a 91-92 bird would take the cake for me. But maybe I'm biased (sig) ;-) Even though my poor baby is sick right now :-( (see tech board)

 

UUUGGGGHHHHHH!!!

"87 creams his pants"

man this is a visual overload, I just don't know!

 

Yeah...I love my ride too. But the car isn't mine. I've got a red GTA to match it...but no hood as yet (RAII style). This car is my car's clone in about a year.

GTA all the way!!!

 

"GTA"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Yeah, what he said! Although I may be a bit biased

 

Ya got great taste in music ... cars, however, is another story... :sillylol:

BTW... ever get to jam with that bassist ya found?

 

Here's the car to get dude:

http://iroc.fbody.com/images/CAMARO2b.jpg

http://www.iroc-z.com/1985pages/1985...y/1985pic3.htm

http://www.iroc-z.com/1989pages/1989.../1989pic42.htm

http://www.iroc-z.com/1988pages/1988.../1988pic15.htm