Brakes Looking to upgrade or get the most out of what you have stock? All brake discussions go here!

Castle Nut TQ on Front Spindles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #1  
Bens3rdGen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: LA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: Holley MPFI, AFR 195, Hot Cam=375HP
Transmission: T-56
Castle Nut TQ on Front Spindles

I just need to know how much I should tighten the castle nut for front spindle/disc brake assembly.

Last time I just went hand tight plus whatever I needed for the cotter pin but when I took em off this time they seemed looser.
Maybe they were just worn out, not sure. Thx.

Ben
91 Camaro RS
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #2  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
you tighten it to a set preload on the bearing, no idea what it is, i guess at it. then install the key, sounds like you did it right before. was there any wear or damage to the bearings?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #3  
Bens3rdGen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: LA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: Holley MPFI, AFR 195, Hot Cam=375HP
Transmission: T-56
Not that I could tell. I guess they are cheap anyway, if I screw them up I'll just get new ones again. Thx
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #4  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Torque is 12 ft/lbs... barely amounts to nothing.

And you don't want to tighten the castle nut so you can put the pin in. You should be loosening the castle nut to put the pin in. While you're spinning the wheel forward, tighten to 12 ft/lbs. Then break the nut free, hand tighten, and try to put the pin in- if it doesn't line up, loosen the nut until the pin slides in.

When you took the nut off, it was looser because it should've been. Re-check your bearings for endplay after driving the car for a little bit, they'll have loosened up. Loose wheel bearings also affect braking and handling! I usually try to re-check mine about a week after I pack 'em. (I repack my bearings whenever I change the front brake pads; done that since '94.)
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 09:37 AM
  #5  
vsixtoy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by TomP
and try to put the pin in- if it doesn't line up, loosen the nut until the pin slides in.
Every thing you said was great Tom until I read this. I have to step in and correct this- You want to err on the "tighter" side.
Spin the rotor as you are snugging the castle nut making sure it is still spinning freely (I use a set of Channel-lock pliers). Just snug it with the pliers where all play is out of the castlenut. THEN, position the cotterpin into place. If it is not lining up, THEN TIGHTEN the castle nut slightly more to the next cooterpin alignment hole WHILE SPINNING THE ROTOR FREELY. If any bind slows the rotation of the rotor, you have the castle nut too tight.

Too tight and you will burn the bearing up.
Too loose and you will prematurely wear them from sloppy endplay.

They will always loosen from wear over time, not tighten. SO err on the tighter side.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #6  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
LOL, well you know me, I always go by the GM service manual! So if I were to tighten it just enough to get the pin to slide in, if it was overtightened, I'd be able to feel it binding by spinning the wheel?

Or would it only bind slightly... and that I'd be able to tell by quickly spinning the wheel forward, tightening the nut that extra little bit to slide the pin in, and see if the wheel stops abnormally?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 08:06 PM
  #7  
vsixtoy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
I would recommend it be tested without the load of the wheel on the rotor. The extra enertia of the tire and rim will make it harder to judge. Just tighten the nut with only the rotor weight spinning on the spindle, its much easier to see binding due to accidental overtightening.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #8  
Bens3rdGen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: LA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: Holley MPFI, AFR 195, Hot Cam=375HP
Transmission: T-56
Thanks a lot guys. Your Awesome.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 12:23 AM
  #9  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Thanx Dean; I'll try that out on my next brake job!
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #10  
firehawkslplus's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio,Tx
Car: 91 Firebird Dark Green
Engine: 350 Victor Jr. 2V 2000 CFM TB EFI
Transmission: 700R4 BM 2500 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Zexel torque sensing Posi
I would have to go with TomP on this one. Back in the early 80's I was taking frontend n brake coarse at a local VOC college. We were taught to snugup the bearing while spinning the the rotor /drum then to back it off to the next castle slot. The reasoning was this, HEAT.
The frt, bearings are carring the heavy end rolling and side loads, both generate it.
Then there is conduction from the brakes. All that forward kinetic energy gets turned into heat every time you hit the brakes.
All this means theres going to be some expansion and the clearances would tended to tightenup.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2005 | 12:15 AM
  #11  
nape's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: SW Chicago 'burbs
Car: American Iron Firebird
Engine: The little 305 that could.
Transmission: Richmond T-10
Axle/Gears: Floater 9" - 3.64 gears
I've always heard it as TomP's way as well.

Not to say that vsixtoy's method is wrong, but I can see where it would be beneficial to different scenarios.

Using TomP's method you would have less rolling resistance, albeit a small amount, but with vsixtoy's method you would have less chance of wearing out the bearings when heavy loads are put on them [cornering].
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 06:27 AM
  #12  
greezemonkey's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 4
From: The "D"
Car: A Portly 85 Z28
Engine: 4.530 X 4.250 BBC
Transmission: under rated for this application
Axle/Gears: also under rated
it`s as easy as 1..2..3
Attached Thumbnails Castle Nut TQ on Front Spindles-wb.2.jpg  

Last edited by greezemonkey; Jan 5, 2005 at 06:31 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM
MoJoe
Fabrication
14
Aug 19, 2017 07:12 PM
redmaroz
Suspension and Chassis
9
Apr 25, 2017 07:14 AM
Scamo-2.8
Third Gen Association of Ontario
10
May 20, 2016 07:01 PM
1992rs/ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Jan 28, 2016 09:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.