Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
Hey guys, I purchased the front c5 hybrid kit with 12 inch rotor from Ed along with the rear PBR 12 inch last August. I got the kit in Decemeber and slowly worked on to where I was able to finally take it out the other day. I have a problem but will mention that further down the thread when I post a picture of it.
These first pictures show the stock front and new rotor as well as the calipers.
These first pictures show the stock front and new rotor as well as the calipers.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
That lower control balljoint was a pain in the ***, I tried the BFH method and there was no way in hell it was coming out, I was finally able to go rent a C-clamp style remover tool and it came right out and the new ones in.
The new spindles were nice but with one problem. I guess they are heat vanes on the actual caliper themselves, but one of the vanes was hitting the spindle to where I couldn't line the mounting holes up so I had to files some metal away from the spindle and it was finally able to mount.
The new spindles were nice but with one problem. I guess they are heat vanes on the actual caliper themselves, but one of the vanes was hitting the spindle to where I couldn't line the mounting holes up so I had to files some metal away from the spindle and it was finally able to mount.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
The rear was much more work. I pulled the drums off and my buddy actually came over for the rear for a little bit. We ripped out all the old drum guts and he got under the car and took the dif cover off and pulled the carrige bolt and clips as I pulled the axles out. From that point I was on my own again.....friends.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
The drum backing plate was ON THERE. It took me probably 30 minutes atleast on each side to slowly remove the bolt with a breaker bar. From this point on I had pics of all the new stuff and mounting plates but went to put them on the computer and some how deleted them before putting them on. Sorry. The porportioning valve went in pretty easy.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
I just took these pics today after I took it out real quick. I also did a full tuneup this morning including...coil, wires, cap and rotor, optima battery, 160 degree stat. The car looks great but isnt perfect yet.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
THE PROBLEM!!!
So, I took the car out and started driving to break the pads in. I would hit the brakes and the fronts would jsut lock up and the backs were not doing anything it seamed like. It seems like you need hardly any pressure on the pedel and the fronts want to lock. The fronts were wearing perfect but as you can see in the picture, the rear pads are contacting the whole pad on the rotor, only at the top. The reverse side of the rotor is perfect though. Both sides have the same problem. Also, I am starting to hear grinding noises coming from the rear. I took the wheels off, spun the axles and nothing was rubbing, it seemed fine, spun freely. Out them on took it out again and same problem. The front left actualy started to run had on sumthing as well until I tapped the brakes and it stopped but the rears still rubbing. I went to back it in the garage and the noise was even worse. I looked at it again and it kinda seems like the bottom of the caliper is real close to the rotor to where the other wheel looks a little more free. I have no clue what to do and it really makes me angry that I am having all these problems.
Also, when I went to change the rear line spliter to the axle, I broke the body line and had to replace the whole thing which sucked. I bought a stainless steel one from classic industries and put ital together and the spliter Ed ave me broke so right now I have the stock one back in there and am still waiting an email from Ed in which he hasnt responded yet.
If anyone has any idea why the pad isnt contacting the rotor please help me out. I been doing some searching on this but I am not really finding any answers except for the parking brake which isnt working either. I believe I gotta cut down a couple coils onthe return spring.
So, I took the car out and started driving to break the pads in. I would hit the brakes and the fronts would jsut lock up and the backs were not doing anything it seamed like. It seems like you need hardly any pressure on the pedel and the fronts want to lock. The fronts were wearing perfect but as you can see in the picture, the rear pads are contacting the whole pad on the rotor, only at the top. The reverse side of the rotor is perfect though. Both sides have the same problem. Also, I am starting to hear grinding noises coming from the rear. I took the wheels off, spun the axles and nothing was rubbing, it seemed fine, spun freely. Out them on took it out again and same problem. The front left actualy started to run had on sumthing as well until I tapped the brakes and it stopped but the rears still rubbing. I went to back it in the garage and the noise was even worse. I looked at it again and it kinda seems like the bottom of the caliper is real close to the rotor to where the other wheel looks a little more free. I have no clue what to do and it really makes me angry that I am having all these problems.
Also, when I went to change the rear line spliter to the axle, I broke the body line and had to replace the whole thing which sucked. I bought a stainless steel one from classic industries and put ital together and the spliter Ed ave me broke so right now I have the stock one back in there and am still waiting an email from Ed in which he hasnt responded yet.
If anyone has any idea why the pad isnt contacting the rotor please help me out. I been doing some searching on this but I am not really finding any answers except for the parking brake which isnt working either. I believe I gotta cut down a couple coils onthe return spring.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 135
Likes: 3
From: Edinburg, Texas
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
I'm having the same problem on mine. I switched the prop valve and have not been able to get the rear calipers to hook. I have the LS1 setup all around with a 4th gen rear. We bled the system and still have not been able to get it to work. I just sent the car out for paint to I'll get back at the problem when I get it back.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
I'm having the same problem on mine. I switched the prop valve and have not been able to get the rear calipers to hook. I have the LS1 setup all around with a 4th gen rear. We bled the system and still have not been able to get it to work. I just sent the car out for paint to I'll get back at the problem when I get it back.
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 3
From: NY
Car: 88IROC, 91Z28 + parts cars
Engine: 355, 408
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1, 9" w/ 4.56 and spool
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
How tight are the pads sitting in the carrier in the rear? Looks like the outers might be crooked or just binding up. Had that issue with vehicles at work. It's always been resolved by a full disassembly, clean everything and some brake grease on the hardware (little pieces of metal the pads ride in). Hope that helps.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
How tight are the pads sitting in the carrier in the rear? Looks like the outers might be crooked or just binding up. Had that issue with vehicles at work. It's always been resolved by a full disassembly, clean everything and some brake grease on the hardware (little pieces of metal the pads ride in). Hope that helps.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 14
From: Northern CT
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
Your rotors are on backwards
. Just wanted to let you know. The vanes are supposed to cut into the pad. Thats what helps drilled and slotted rotors stop the car quicker. You have them the opposite way.
I'm sure thats not your problem but it can't hurt to swap them around!
. Just wanted to let you know. The vanes are supposed to cut into the pad. Thats what helps drilled and slotted rotors stop the car quicker. You have them the opposite way. I'm sure thats not your problem but it can't hurt to swap them around!
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
Your rotors are on backwards
. Just wanted to let you know. The vanes are supposed to cut into the pad. Thats what helps drilled and slotted rotors stop the car quicker. You have them the opposite way.
I'm sure thats not your problem but it can't hurt to swap them around!
. Just wanted to let you know. The vanes are supposed to cut into the pad. Thats what helps drilled and slotted rotors stop the car quicker. You have them the opposite way. I'm sure thats not your problem but it can't hurt to swap them around!
So with that said, I actually had them like you said but then decided to put them how ED had labeled them.
I also did a lot of vette searches and stuff and they were more than most facing like mine are now.
Thanks for the info though.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 14
From: Northern CT
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
huh, well if thats how they were labelled then i guess thats right. ive always seen them going the other way. now i want to do research on this too! haha anways good luck with the original problem.
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Manahawkin/Hackensack, NJ
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi BW 9 Bolt
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
the rear pads are contacting the whole pad on the rotor, only at the top. The reverse side of the rotor is perfect though. Both sides have the same problem. Also, I am starting to hear grinding noises coming from the rear.
I looked at it again and it kinda seems like the bottom of the caliper is real close to the rotor to where the other wheel looks a little more free.
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Manahawkin/Hackensack, NJ
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi BW 9 Bolt
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
By any chance did you leave a c-clip out of the axle?
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Manahawkin/Hackensack, NJ
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi BW 9 Bolt
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
It almost sounds like the caliper brackets crooked. The piston side gets full contact and the outside pad is only getting contact on the top like if the bracket was crooked the TOP of the OUTER side of the caliper would recieve the most clamping force only using the topside of the pad> Also could cause the PISTON SIDE pad to hang up on the lower portion of the pad it cause your grinding noise.... Where did you find the info on the ls1 rear disk EBRAKE solution??
raffi4 - I did indeed put the c-clips back in.
Flynbye is indeed slacking. The distribution block I had broke and I emailed to get a new one sent as well as questions on the e brake and I have still yet to recieve any kind of answer.
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Manahawkin/Hackensack, NJ
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi BW 9 Bolt
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
Yea well anyways i just did the same upgrade to the front and have the rears(yet to be installed) and damn!! with hawks pads the car comes down from 85-10 in a blink of the eye cant wait to put the rears and adj. prop valve then you could really be eatin the dash =) I had a 02 WS6 with same rotors/lines/pads and the pedal feel is a little different but my IROC is 3 or 4 hundred pounds lighter maybe more and it def slows down faster but the 245 tires compared to 275 is making it alot easier to lock up the fronts...
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Manahawkin/Hackensack, NJ
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi BW 9 Bolt
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
I just notice Hawks sells the ebrake cables for lt1/ls1 rear end swap suprised no one has mentioned that. Im assuming it wil work with the rear brake swap.
http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/li...ebird-1-2.aspx
http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/li...ebird-1-2.aspx
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 64
From: Trumbull CT
Car: 87 TA clone
Engine: 70/70 Turbo 5.3 LS
Transmission: bullet proof 2004R
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
brakes look nice. sry about the problems. any idea how much weight uve added with the larger brakes? id say uve added a minimum of 50lbs.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
I have no clue, I do know the original stuff, like the rear drums were probably heavier.... not sure about the front, the new stuff is aluminum instead of iron too...so it may be close.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 64
From: Trumbull CT
Car: 87 TA clone
Engine: 70/70 Turbo 5.3 LS
Transmission: bullet proof 2004R
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
gotcha, my aluminum SSBC force 10 calipers are super light compared to the stockers.
how much did the fronts set u back?
how much did the fronts set u back?
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Manahawkin/Hackensack, NJ
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi BW 9 Bolt
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.

Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Ohio
Car: 1992 RS, 2000 Z28
Engine: LO3 with TPI Swap, LS1
Transmission: 700-R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 with TruTrac LSD
Re: Brake upgrade finished.......minus the problem.
I'm assuming you've already solved this problem as it is a year later already.
Just in case you haven't, you do know that the proportioning valve is different on the cars with rear disk brakes, right? If you're running a prop valve from a drum brake car on your disk brake swap, this may be your problem. You'll probably want to find one out of a 4th gen or even a 1LE or IROC car. A bit more tough to find one out of a 1LE, of course.
Just in case you haven't, you do know that the proportioning valve is different on the cars with rear disk brakes, right? If you're running a prop valve from a drum brake car on your disk brake swap, this may be your problem. You'll probably want to find one out of a 4th gen or even a 1LE or IROC car. A bit more tough to find one out of a 1LE, of course.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









