Car Audio Car audio related questions and helpful hints for building the best sound system for your car or getting the most out of what you have.

Check out my new sub box!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 04:13 PM
  #1  
82firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 2
From: North Canton, Ohio
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: sbc 307
Transmission: 200
Check out my new sub box!

I set my new sub box into place today just to see how it'd fit. I'm going to paint it when I paint the car, now all I need to do is find some good subs with nice looking magnets to invert- let me know your suggestions.





Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #2  
fireturd350's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Looks pretty cool! :lala:
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #3  
18inchboyds's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3
From: Amsterdam , NY
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: vee eight
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 4.10 gears
looks sweet , its fiberglass i assume? and did u do it yourself?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
nice... id say that RE xxx subs look good , so do audiobahn subs if you're into flames
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 07:31 PM
  #5  
82firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 2
From: North Canton, Ohio
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: sbc 307
Transmission: 200
Yes its fiberglass, and no I didnt not make it myself. I bought it off of a guy who had it in his 4th gen T/A. I think I'm going to fill those emtpy holes with Alpine Type-Rs or Infinity Kappa Perfects.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #6  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
make sure you don't put the subs in backwards... that looks ricediculous... plus they don't sound as good IMO... but the box looks nice, and good luck on finding some good subs.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 09:15 PM
  #7  
82firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 2
From: North Canton, Ohio
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: sbc 307
Transmission: 200
Well they will have to be inverted because the way the box was designed, the depth is very shallow. They won't sound any different inverted and besides what's so "ricediculous" about inverted subs?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 04:34 AM
  #8  
ddn69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
the square in the middle looks kinda unfinished. I say clean it up a little bit, and stick some nice subs in and itll look better. I think it looks kinda rushed. It prolly could have looked alot better...

It might just be that its not tan and the interior is kinda taken apart.....U plan on painting it again?

Nate
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 10:58 AM
  #9  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
subwoofers are intended to project sound from the outside surface.. I guess it wouldn't make much difference... but the simple design of it is being mis-used...

that aside.. haven't you noticed that pretty much any import driving around is full of reversed subs?

If that's what you're into... then by all means, no one will try and stop you.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 03:45 PM
  #10  
fireturd350's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
There's nothing wrong with inverting a sub as far as I know. Mainly it's more for show. Some people like to show off the baskets or magnet sizes.

Only time I would consider it would be if the box was so small I couldn't fit the baskets in it normal. Which I did at first for my box until I realized it was not an option.

I've read somewhere that you must also switch the polarity when inverting subs, but that was an internet webpage. I would not trust it. Maybe Jim or another member how knows for sure can post about that.

If you want to see some crazy stuff look at:

http://jlaudio.com/tutorials/isobarik/index.html
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 03:48 PM
  #11  
fireturd350's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
BTW what size of subs fit in that box? The cut outs look fairly small.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #12  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
that would explain why my deck can reverse the polarity of the subs... but they don't sound much different... but as far as the physics go, you would want to reverse the sub
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 03:53 PM
  #13  
fireturd350's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Yeah far as I see it I would assume the basket structure and magnet would get in the way. But for a project like this there's not really any other choice unless you can find a 8" sub that's 2 inches deep or whatever.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #14  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
the way I see it.. if the box is too small for your woofer to fit in.. it's just too damn small... but I'm really interested in how this setup sounds.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 06:04 PM
  #15  
82firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 2
From: North Canton, Ohio
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: sbc 307
Transmission: 200
The cutouts are for 12" subs, they will be inverted, and I will like them whether you will or not!

Here's a pic of the box (with inverted subs) in the guy's car I bought it from.
Attached Thumbnails Check out my new sub box!-dsc00377.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 06:44 PM
  #16  
fireturd350's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Yeah I've seen that before. I actually thought about building a clone of that box for my 18s at the time.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #17  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
im curious... what goes in the well if your sub box is in the back seat?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 01:46 PM
  #18  
davidb's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: atlanta ga.
Car: 92 t/a
Engine: 350
look at my new ghetto box

passengers....
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #19  
TraviZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
the go-juice bottle?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #20  
82firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 2
From: North Canton, Ohio
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: sbc 307
Transmission: 200
Originally posted by ScrapMaker
im curious... what goes in the well if your sub box is in the back seat?
I put the passengers in the well, duh! Actually passengers aren't really an issue; I'm not building this car to be a taxi anyhow.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 07:02 PM
  #21  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Just becuase i have my car full of ppl almost everyday doesnt make me a taxi driver...... although ive been contemplating getting beaded chair covers
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 04:00 PM
  #22  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
heh, so your well is empty and your back seat is full of speakers... that's classic...
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #23  
82firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 2
From: North Canton, Ohio
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: sbc 307
Transmission: 200
I think you're classic.. heh.

I won't have passengers so I'm not worried about the back seats. I'm just curious, what's your sub box look like?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #24  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
nothing fancy... that's why its in the well... because there is a higher chance of carrying passengers than there is of me carrying something small enough to actually fit in that rear well....
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #25  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
i read somewhere on this board that bass will sound deeper the farther away from you it is
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #26  
aaron7's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 7
From: MA, USA
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
True that the well is most useless (the only thing mine was ever filled with before the subs was spare, or not so spare, parts) and I never really carry passengers, but I just want the seats there. If I want an 80's/90's GM with no back seat, I'll buy a vette!
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #27  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
yeah I just figure you might as well utilize the space in the most efficient manner as permitted... but if he really likes the sound of the close-range subwoofers... then more power to him... maybe he can put some (extra) subs in the well for the really deep bass... or some amps or some custom screens or something else.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #28  
SRS914's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: phoenix,AZ
Car: camaro RS
Engine: whimpy 305 on its way out,350 on the way!!
Transmission: 700R
i just have one question why you bashing the guy? is it because he did something you didnt have the ***** to do? it isnt a finished product. maybe he is making it out to be more show like the guy before him..

f-body owners are the worst when anyone does anything out of the normal.. even if it does look good.

Shawn
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 06:43 AM
  #29  
9177's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Topeka
Reverse mounting a sub does nothing to hinder the sound that comes out. All subs do is move air. You should always try standard and reverse polarity in any sub setup to see which one sounds the best (most likely in this case it will be reverse polarity)
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #30  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
so if it doesn't matter if the sub is mounted backwards... and you say all they do is "move air"... then the shape, material, and orientation of a woofer is not important? -- as long as it moves air...right? Hrm I don't agree. I'm pretty sure a woofer has a recessed surface so it can project sound away from the box... you don't see too many woofer surfaces that protrude from the sub casket, do you?

While it's possible you may never hear a difference when the sub is mounted backwards, there are obviously things getting in the way.. such as the casket itself, the magnet and all the voice coils.... all the air has to be redirected around all this stuff, instead of just coming out and projected as originally designed.

same argument when you compare reflecting the bass off the rear hatch window, and having down firing subs... stuff gets in the way... the sound is similar, but there are clear differences in sound.

why not mount all your speakers backwards? all tweeters do is "move air", same with your mid range components...

The only reason I'd do it is for space, like this guys situation.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #31  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
plus whatever he does with the box doesn't really matter, as long as it sounds good enough to him... might as well mount it backwards or whatever the newest fad is... long as it sounds the way he wants.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #32  
19doug90's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
From: Markham
Car: 1990 Camaro
Engine: 355ci
Transmission: TKO-600 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
Well i think it looks hideous in your car, but absolutly amazing in his 4th gen so clean it up a bunch and it should be awesome.

As for it being in the back seat whats wrong with you guys? Hell i pulled my back seats out and havent replaced em with anything because i HATE driving people around. All i want is a girl in the passenger seat. The subs add enough weight anyways who needs another 250 pounds of fat in your back seats.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #33  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
that's true, but if you're gonna have weight in your car you can place anywhere, wouldn't you want it over the rear wheels as much as possible?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #34  
9177's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Topeka
Originally posted by ScrapMaker
so if it doesn't matter if the sub is mounted backwards... and you say all they do is "move air"... then the shape, material, and orientation of a woofer is not important? -- as long as it moves air...right? Hrm I don't agree. I'm pretty sure a woofer has a recessed surface so it can project sound away from the box... you don't see too many woofer surfaces that protrude from the sub casket, do you?

While it's possible you may never hear a difference when the sub is mounted backwards, there are obviously things getting in the way.. such as the casket itself, the magnet and all the voice coils.... all the air has to be redirected around all this stuff, instead of just coming out and projected as originally designed.

same argument when you compare reflecting the bass off the rear hatch window, and having down firing subs... stuff gets in the way... the sound is similar, but there are clear differences in sound.

why not mount all your speakers backwards? all tweeters do is "move air", same with your mid range components...

The only reason I'd do it is for space, like this guys situation.
Thats is right shape doesn't matter. Ever seen a flat cone, or a square cone? How about a dome midrange or tweeter?. The reason why you have to mount tweeters or mids with the cone facing towards you is because high frequencies are directional, low frequencies are non directional. Going off of the reasons of what you have said then the idea of ported boxes, loaded horns, and the various types of bandpass boxes really don't serve a purpose. Each of these utilize both sides of the speaker cone which is what makes them so efficient. The ideas of reflecting actully has to do more with the length of distance the sound has from the speaker to your ear. The more distance (within reason) the more the bas has time to form the bigger sound wave.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 02:31 PM
  #35  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
seems to me that the magnet and stuff on the back of the sub will to an extent muffle the sound, compared to being projected straight outta the normal surface, with zero obstructions.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 03:23 PM
  #36  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
of course.... also electronic motors work more efficiently in one direction as opposed to the other
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #37  
blue82transam's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Ponca City, OK
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5 spd
Not my cup O' tea, but if that is what he likes, then more power to him. I do think Scrap may be right, but the amount of sound deflected or cancelled out by the basket & magnets is probably negligible. Anyway, no biggie I think. I do have to say that I have my poor lone 10" sub in the well still in the truck box from my Explorer. Gotta go with what you have sometimes!!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #38  
shrop's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: elgin, illinois
Car: 92 firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 5spd
just to add a little and to reinforce what has already been said, a bass wave is 15 feet long and no it doesnt matter which way the face. thats why subs sound better in suvs or hatchback because there is more room for the bass wave.

it looks nice, not my style either but whatever blows ur skirtup.

oh ya depending on your budget put JL Audio W7's in they are amazing sounding and the back is simple but clearly stated. very sharp subs. only prob is theyre somthing like 500 each so thats 2k for you and a good amp would be the JL Audio 1000/1 and youll need 2 and theyre 1000k each. sooo 4k?

good luck!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 01:00 AM
  #39  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Are you saying that a bass wave is always 15 feet long? That doesn't make much sense.. what "length" are we discussing? The "wavelength"? I'm almost 100% positive that that's completely dependent on the frequency you are listening to.

here's an interesting read- http://www.realtraps.com/art_waves.htm
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 05:25 AM
  #40  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
the shortest wave your gunna get from a sub is pretty long.. longer than the car so there is no worries there. if you gunna spring for a w7 i think that 2 would suffice in our cars.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 08:17 AM
  #41  
blue82transam's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Ponca City, OK
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5 spd
I have an older JL 10w6 w/ a JL 250x1 mono amp in my trans am... it sounds pretty darn good... can't really hear it outside the t/a..but inside its nice and full. its good that way so I don't draw too big a crowd!!! maybe some day i'll go up to two 10w6's!!!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #42  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
my two 15"s can also do that, sound nice and full inside but not kill the neighborhood... at 1% volume, hahaha... but I like to have the ability to annoy people too... you know, just in case.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #43  
blue82transam's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Ponca City, OK
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5 spd
LOL... or be like my friend and jam to vanilla ice just for the hell of it and see people look to find out where its comming from!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 09:35 PM
  #44  
82firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 2
From: North Canton, Ohio
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: sbc 307
Transmission: 200
W7's are a little much for my budget. I'm looking at either Infinity Perfects or Alpine Type R's. I'm leaning heavily towards the Type R's because they can be had on ebay for about 200 dollars a pair and the RMS wattage would fit just right with the Soundstream VGA600.2 I'm also looking at.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #45  
ScrapMaker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
That's quite funny as I do that too... I'll purposely change the song to Vanilla Ice, or some oldie or something... but nothing is as hilarious is cruising by some 'gangsters' on the east side of Austin, and playing vanilla ice... its basically like saying, "Hell yeah we're white, and we stole rap from you!" -- or at least we tried... I like playing vanilla ice, eminem, lil' wyte and a few underground artists that are hilariously-white... just makes my day.

it's even funnier when you have a system that makes the onlookers jealous, and you're playing some music they really hate... like when I hear people playing country or classical.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #46  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
i jam to queen- mr roboto or the beegees stayin alive if i wanna be funny leaving school. no music is b4 my time
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 09:09 AM
  #47  
Tobias05's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
that's a cool box and and some sharp seats.

The box looks like a giant red bug though

Brandon
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MyRedCamaro
Suspension and Chassis
135
Dec 29, 2015 05:16 AM
snowflake
Tech / General Engine
7
Oct 19, 2015 10:24 PM
backtothe80s
Suspension and Chassis
33
Sep 5, 2015 12:39 AM
BlackphantomZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Aug 22, 2015 01:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 AM.