Dilema
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
Dilema
Well, here is my problem. I haven't had a system for about a year and a half (and it was pretty crappy anyway). Well, i just bought my new daily driver (96 Dodge Avenger.. love the car and gets 35mpg) and it came with a system.. Really crappy head unit, decent amp, and two crappy pioneer subs. Well, a week into owning it, the subs go... and now i have the system crave again.. ah!
I was planning on building system for my camaro in the spring or the summer, but i figure this will do for a good time. I currently have the crappy head unit, a dual 12" bandpass box (bleh), and a power acoutic amp.. the amp has the following specs:
# 2 CHANNEL 1,200 WATT AMPLIFIER
# 1,200 watts peak output
# 250 x 2 watts RMS @ 4 ohm
# 300 x 2 watts RMS @ 2 ohms
# 600 x 1 watts RMS bridged mono
# Full Mosfet Power Supply
# PWM Circuitry
# Full Selectable Crossover Hi/Full/Low
# Three Way Protection Circuit
# Tri-Mode Capable
# Variable Low Pass 40Hz-120Hz
# Variable Hi Pass 150Hz-1.5Khz
# 18dB Bass Boost @ 40Hz.
# Frequency Response: 10Hz to 30Khz
# S/N Ratio:97 db
# THD: 0.02%
# 2 ohm Stable Stereo
# System Distress Indicator
# High/Low Level inputs With Floating Ground
Is this somewhat decent? For a few months? And what amp(s) would you suggest for about 500-1000RMS per sub?
I need to get some new subs.. what would you guys suggest? I want to have at least 500RMS per sub if not 1000RMS per sub (at one point).. I was looking at Infinity Kappa Perfects but they only go to about 375RMS..
I am hoping to be able to use the bandpass box and the power acoustic amp for the winter and upgrade next year.. but i want to get some good subs that will last me and will work fine with bandpass (not optimal, but good on roughly on 300RMS each) and then still be fine when I upgrade to more a couple of stompers. Is this possible?
One last question.. what brand of head units would be a good choice.. I like the design of some of the Xplod head units, but it seems that no one here seems to like them...
Educate me guys.. been out of the system scene for quite some time and i forgot most of what i knew..
I was planning on building system for my camaro in the spring or the summer, but i figure this will do for a good time. I currently have the crappy head unit, a dual 12" bandpass box (bleh), and a power acoutic amp.. the amp has the following specs:
# 2 CHANNEL 1,200 WATT AMPLIFIER
# 1,200 watts peak output
# 250 x 2 watts RMS @ 4 ohm
# 300 x 2 watts RMS @ 2 ohms
# 600 x 1 watts RMS bridged mono
# Full Mosfet Power Supply
# PWM Circuitry
# Full Selectable Crossover Hi/Full/Low
# Three Way Protection Circuit
# Tri-Mode Capable
# Variable Low Pass 40Hz-120Hz
# Variable Hi Pass 150Hz-1.5Khz
# 18dB Bass Boost @ 40Hz.
# Frequency Response: 10Hz to 30Khz
# S/N Ratio:97 db
# THD: 0.02%
# 2 ohm Stable Stereo
# System Distress Indicator
# High/Low Level inputs With Floating Ground
Is this somewhat decent? For a few months? And what amp(s) would you suggest for about 500-1000RMS per sub?
I need to get some new subs.. what would you guys suggest? I want to have at least 500RMS per sub if not 1000RMS per sub (at one point).. I was looking at Infinity Kappa Perfects but they only go to about 375RMS..
I am hoping to be able to use the bandpass box and the power acoustic amp for the winter and upgrade next year.. but i want to get some good subs that will last me and will work fine with bandpass (not optimal, but good on roughly on 300RMS each) and then still be fine when I upgrade to more a couple of stompers. Is this possible?
One last question.. what brand of head units would be a good choice.. I like the design of some of the Xplod head units, but it seems that no one here seems to like them...
Educate me guys.. been out of the system scene for quite some time and i forgot most of what i knew..
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: Readington, NJ
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt w/ 3.73
Re: Dilema
Originally posted by Rabbitt
Well, here is my problem. I haven't had a system for about a year and a half (and it was pretty crappy anyway). Well, i just bought my new daily driver (96 Dodge Avenger.. love the car and gets 35mpg) and it came with a system.. Really crappy head unit, decent amp, and two crappy pioneer subs. Well, a week into owning it, the subs go... and now i have the system crave again.. ah!
power acoutic amp
# 250 x 2 watts RMS @ 4 ohm
# 300 x 2 watts RMS @ 2 ohms
# 600 x 1 watts RMS bridged mono
Is this somewhat decent? For a few months? And what amp(s) would you suggest for about 500-1000RMS per sub?
I need to get some new subs.. what would you guys suggest? I want to have at least 500RMS per sub if not 1000RMS per sub (at one point).. I was looking at Infinity Kappa Perfects but they only go to about 375RMS..
I am hoping to be able to use the bandpass box and the power acoustic amp for the winter and upgrade next year.. but i want to get some good subs that will last me and will work fine with bandpass (not optimal, but good on roughly on 300RMS each) and then still be fine when I upgrade to more a couple of stompers. Is this possible?
One last question.. what brand of head units would be a good choice.. I like the design of some of the Xplod head units, but it seems that no one here seems to like them...
Well, here is my problem. I haven't had a system for about a year and a half (and it was pretty crappy anyway). Well, i just bought my new daily driver (96 Dodge Avenger.. love the car and gets 35mpg) and it came with a system.. Really crappy head unit, decent amp, and two crappy pioneer subs. Well, a week into owning it, the subs go... and now i have the system crave again.. ah!
power acoutic amp
# 250 x 2 watts RMS @ 4 ohm
# 300 x 2 watts RMS @ 2 ohms
# 600 x 1 watts RMS bridged mono
Is this somewhat decent? For a few months? And what amp(s) would you suggest for about 500-1000RMS per sub?
I need to get some new subs.. what would you guys suggest? I want to have at least 500RMS per sub if not 1000RMS per sub (at one point).. I was looking at Infinity Kappa Perfects but they only go to about 375RMS..
I am hoping to be able to use the bandpass box and the power acoustic amp for the winter and upgrade next year.. but i want to get some good subs that will last me and will work fine with bandpass (not optimal, but good on roughly on 300RMS each) and then still be fine when I upgrade to more a couple of stompers. Is this possible?
One last question.. what brand of head units would be a good choice.. I like the design of some of the Xplod head units, but it seems that no one here seems to like them...
Sub: jl's xw3v2's are good all around subs. If you're looking for decent thump for the buck look into kickers/alpines. Do a search and you will come up with tons of answers. Your best bet is to buy the sub(s) you're going to end up with now and underpower them with your current amp until you're ready to upgrade it.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
meh, i just thought i'd aim high so i can have the adjustability..
so do you think this amp would do me fine for two subs then?
so do you think this amp would do me fine for two subs then? Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
Re: Re: Dilema
Originally posted by Gummie
Your best bet is to buy the sub(s) you're going to end up with now and underpower them with your current amp until you're ready to upgrade it.
Your best bet is to buy the sub(s) you're going to end up with now and underpower them with your current amp until you're ready to upgrade it.
thats the plan Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: DeBary, FL
Car: 88 firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: Stock-auto
In general, it is safe to stay away from sony
H/Us:
Pioneer
Eclipse
Alpine
All three are great, and fairly common to local audio shops, go and try all of them out, Alpine and Pioneer probably have the most range (ie have some cheaper but still good stuff- to really good and expensive stuff) whereas eclipse is generally higher priced
H/Us:
Pioneer
Eclipse
Alpine
All three are great, and fairly common to local audio shops, go and try all of them out, Alpine and Pioneer probably have the most range (ie have some cheaper but still good stuff- to really good and expensive stuff) whereas eclipse is generally higher priced
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
alrighty then.. i'll look those up in a little bit, but if i could ask.. do any of those have a small button amount to high feature ratio? as in, lots of features that require the remote to access? I actually like that (IE, i dont like my head unit cluttered up with buttons like 1-6 presets and every other little feature u could just go into a menu to access)
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: DeBary, FL
Car: 88 firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: Stock-auto
One thing some people like about Alpine, some really dont like however, is that nearly ALL their headunits looks the same, here is a picture of one:
Eclipse headunits tend to be very similar as well, you will find the widest aesthetic variety in Pioneer
Eclipse headunits tend to be very similar as well, you will find the widest aesthetic variety in Pioneer
Last edited by fishboy; Oct 12, 2005 at 04:04 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: DeBary, FL
Car: 88 firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: Stock-auto
I think that Pioneer usually looks the most cluttered because of multiple presets and *****, also many eclipse h/us have dual ***** as well. As you can see from the picture (and from other Alpine products) I think the layout is fairly evenly distributed, I dislike the dual ***** and thus I appreciate Alpine using the single "menu" **** to control most things. Here is a pic of an Alpine that is usully around $350-400
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
i like the eclipse one.. not a big fan of the Alpine uniformity.. I have liked some of the pioneer head units.. they just have so many buttons.. too cluttered.. same with the alpine, i find them too cluttered..
my old sony deck had a source button, an off button, up and down volume.... and thats it, and u could almost not tell they were there.. otherwise, it was all remote, including track changes... but, alas, i dont see that in other brand than sony, so i guess i'll give up on that ideal.. lol
any other brands to stay away from?
my old sony deck had a source button, an off button, up and down volume.... and thats it, and u could almost not tell they were there.. otherwise, it was all remote, including track changes... but, alas, i dont see that in other brand than sony, so i guess i'll give up on that ideal.. lol
any other brands to stay away from?
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: Readington, NJ
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt w/ 3.73
Originally posted by Rabbitt
i like the eclipse one.. not a big fan of the Alpine uniformity.. I have liked some of the pioneer head units.. they just have so many buttons.. too cluttered.. same with the alpine, i find them too cluttered..
my old sony deck had a source button, an off button, up and down volume.... and thats it, and u could almost not tell they were there.. otherwise, it was all remote, including track changes... but, alas, i dont see that in other brand than sony, so i guess i'll give up on that ideal.. lol
any other brands to stay away from?
i like the eclipse one.. not a big fan of the Alpine uniformity.. I have liked some of the pioneer head units.. they just have so many buttons.. too cluttered.. same with the alpine, i find them too cluttered..
my old sony deck had a source button, an off button, up and down volume.... and thats it, and u could almost not tell they were there.. otherwise, it was all remote, including track changes... but, alas, i dont see that in other brand than sony, so i guess i'll give up on that ideal.. lol
any other brands to stay away from?
Older alpines are still amazing units. How can you say that they look cluttered as compared to the eclipse pictured in this thread? They have a much more simplistic/non flashy design in that they choose a color scheme and stick to it. Nothing sharply contrasts or really stands out. red white blue black = ugh (IMO
). I am by no means saying that Eclipse makes a bad product; I am just saying that the model pictured in this thread doesn't look all that appealing. Actaully, after going through all of their models, I don't find any very appealing 
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
/quote/ Is this somewhat decent? For a few months? And what amp(s) would you suggest for about 500-1000RMS per sub?
I need to get some new subs.. what would you guys suggest? I want to have at least 500RMS per sub if not 1000RMS per sub (at one point).. I was looking at Infinity Kappa Perfects but they only go to about 375RMS..
/-quote/
That amp is just fine for the car you got, will make your ears hurt at loud levels, and if you dont plan on doing comps, your set.
New subs, stay away from sony, pioneer, and ANY best buy or circut city brand, there ALL ****, regardless of the brands. Those companys give them very low end models so BB and CC can sell them cheap.
Go online, www.thezeb.com is a very good site, and look for 2 400watt max, 250rms subs, it will match your amp. if you get 2 500 watt subs, it will be seriously underpowered, and you will end up unsatisfied.
If you get 2 250watt rms 12 inch subs, it will be bout 15% louder then 2 250watt rms 10 inchers, being that it has that much more surface area, and same for the 15's. The 15's are going to be a bitch in these birds though.
I need to get some new subs.. what would you guys suggest? I want to have at least 500RMS per sub if not 1000RMS per sub (at one point).. I was looking at Infinity Kappa Perfects but they only go to about 375RMS..
/-quote/
That amp is just fine for the car you got, will make your ears hurt at loud levels, and if you dont plan on doing comps, your set.
New subs, stay away from sony, pioneer, and ANY best buy or circut city brand, there ALL ****, regardless of the brands. Those companys give them very low end models so BB and CC can sell them cheap.
Go online, www.thezeb.com is a very good site, and look for 2 400watt max, 250rms subs, it will match your amp. if you get 2 500 watt subs, it will be seriously underpowered, and you will end up unsatisfied.
If you get 2 250watt rms 12 inch subs, it will be bout 15% louder then 2 250watt rms 10 inchers, being that it has that much more surface area, and same for the 15's. The 15's are going to be a bitch in these birds though.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
i meant i like the button layout on the eclipse, the colors on that one are horrible.. tho some of thier others (colorwise) arent so bad.. I really like the color of that particular alpine deck, tho.. anyone have any opinions on Kenwood decks?
wouldnt it be better to buy 500w subs if i want 500w per channel next year and get better amps?
also, what do u think of Power Acoustik amps and capacitors
wouldnt it be better to buy 500w subs if i want 500w per channel next year and get better amps?
also, what do u think of Power Acoustik amps and capacitors
Last edited by Rabbitt; Oct 12, 2005 at 09:50 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
I personally dont like PA amps, though they are rated good. if you have the cash, go for i.
Dont get too big of subs if you dont have the amp to back it up, if you want a bigger amp, save up and buy another of the same exact amp, run them bridged. thatll work out nicely and wont be as expensive as replacing that 600w amp with a 1000 watt one.
Dont get too big of subs if you dont have the amp to back it up, if you want a bigger amp, save up and buy another of the same exact amp, run them bridged. thatll work out nicely and wont be as expensive as replacing that 600w amp with a 1000 watt one.
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
depends on the subs coil, and how its wired.
if you wire 2 4ohm in series, i beleive it makes it a total of 2 ohm.
if you wire 2 2ohm subs in parallel, it makes it a total of 4 ohm.
^ i may have that backwards, not lookin it up right now
if you wire 2 4ohm in series, i beleive it makes it a total of 2 ohm.
if you wire 2 2ohm subs in parallel, it makes it a total of 4 ohm.
^ i may have that backwards, not lookin it up right now
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
lmao, i didnt even notice the spelling, i was asking what the hell u were talking about...
the
was me being a goof, not in the know... lol
the
was me being a goof, not in the know... lol Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
oh, its the way you wire up the terminals.
series would be from the + on the amp, to the - on the first sub, the + on the first sub to the - on the second sub, and the + on the second sub to the - on the amp.
parallel would be from the + on the amp, to the + on the first sub to the + on the second sub, then, the - on the amp, to the - on the first sub, to the - on the second sub.
have fun with that info
series would be from the + on the amp, to the - on the first sub, the + on the first sub to the - on the second sub, and the + on the second sub to the - on the amp.
parallel would be from the + on the amp, to the + on the first sub to the + on the second sub, then, the - on the amp, to the - on the first sub, to the - on the second sub.
have fun with that info Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Richland, WA
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 94 383 LT-1
Transmission: Tremec 3550
You got it backwards...
Series is additive
4ohm + 4ohm in S= 8ohm
Parallel is fractional (correct me if I'm wrong)
4ohm + 4ohm in P = 1/4 +1/4 = 2ohm
So I don't see how adding another amp of the same type will help. Seeing that most amps give double the 4ohm rating at 2 ohm adding another amp will double the watts but also double the load.
So instead of one amp pushing 600 watts into a 2ohm you will have 2 amps pushing 300 watts into 2 seperate 4ohm loads. I know you said bridge them but I didn't think you could bridge just any old amp that way.
Series is additive
4ohm + 4ohm in S= 8ohm
Parallel is fractional (correct me if I'm wrong)
4ohm + 4ohm in P = 1/4 +1/4 = 2ohm
So I don't see how adding another amp of the same type will help. Seeing that most amps give double the 4ohm rating at 2 ohm adding another amp will double the watts but also double the load.
So instead of one amp pushing 600 watts into a 2ohm you will have 2 amps pushing 300 watts into 2 seperate 4ohm loads. I know you said bridge them but I didn't think you could bridge just any old amp that way.
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
hmm, thought i had it backwards...
sayin to get the same amp, and run one sub per amp, it will be an easier install, and cheaper. if it dont have the option for parallel, you can split the rca wires so their getting the same feed.
sayin to get the same amp, and run one sub per amp, it will be an easier install, and cheaper. if it dont have the option for parallel, you can split the rca wires so their getting the same feed.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
ouch.. have u seen how big these gothic series power acoustik amps are? two would be insane
lets say i wanna push 500w rms per sub for two subs.. would a single 5farad cap do me?
lets say i wanna push 500w rms per sub for two subs.. would a single 5farad cap do me?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
or, how about this cap? http://cgi.ebay.com/POWER-ACOUSTIK-P...QQcmdZViewItem
20 farad for 150
i just checked out power acoustik decks... eeeew
20 farad for 150
i just checked out power acoustik decks... eeeew
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
hmm, i say stay away from caps, they are just a bandaid to power problems. Your better off spending 150 bucks on a bigger altinator, an extra battery, and an isolater
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
really? so a 140a alternator and an extra battery would be better (supply a more constant power band hopefully near 14.4 or best that i can get) than that cap?
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
your power will prob be around 13.6ish, and yes, its better to have more amps behind you then a storage container.
The cap is bad, because once you discharge it with one low bass hit, it still needs the power from the battery, which you were trying to advoid doing, therefore putting an extra load on the batt and alt, and lowering your amps and volts
The cap is bad, because once you discharge it with one low bass hit, it still needs the power from the battery, which you were trying to advoid doing, therefore putting an extra load on the batt and alt, and lowering your amps and volts
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
makes sense..
what would be a desirable frequency response range and S/N ratio? i dont really know too much about what those numbers represent.. anyone care to educate?
i mean, if the amp i have will work more than fine for a single amp bridged, then i may just buy a second one and get the two subs i decide on
what would be a desirable frequency response range and S/N ratio? i dont really know too much about what those numbers represent.. anyone care to educate?
i mean, if the amp i have will work more than fine for a single amp bridged, then i may just buy a second one and get the two subs i decide on
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
Freq response would be if you built a ported box, and a good range is from 36-32 htz. But, sence you know nothing about it, and it is a PITA to calculate and for a new person to build correctly, you should build a sealed one. they have better rounded out performance too. Lacks in a few freq;s, but overall, its rounded out pretty good.
S/N ratio?
S/N ratio?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
"S/N Ratio:97 db" is one of the specs for my amp..
i guess i will read up good on all of these different specs
also, what is the use of a bandpass box?
i guess i will read up good on all of these different specs

also, what is the use of a bandpass box?
Last edited by Rabbitt; Oct 12, 2005 at 11:42 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, new york
Car: 1991 firebird
Engine: V8 305
Ok, i reconise that, the lower the s/n ratio, the better it is. If its 86db, its better then 94db, so on.
Bandpass box's sucks major ***, dont even think about them. get a good sealed box or make one.
Bandpass box's sucks major ***, dont even think about them. get a good sealed box or make one.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
so lower the better for bass? higher the better for highs? or am i getting that mixed up?
dont bandpass boxes make more (but ****ty) bass with ****ty subs? isnt that their purpose?
dont bandpass boxes make more (but ****ty) bass with ****ty subs? isnt that their purpose?
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, MD
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by xunedeinx
Ok, i reconise that, the lower the s/n ratio, the better it is. If its 86db, its better then 94db, so on.
Ok, i reconise that, the lower the s/n ratio, the better it is. If its 86db, its better then 94db, so on.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crazy3rdgen
Transmissions and Drivetrain
10
Mar 8, 2005 11:07 AM





