Car Audio Car audio related questions and helpful hints for building the best sound system for your car or getting the most out of what you have.

Speaker box material & thickness

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2023 | 07:54 AM
  #1  
EDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 82
From: Mississauga, Ontario Canada
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Speaker box material & thickness

Would 1/2" Birch suffice for two 10's in a ported enclosure. Trying to keep the weight down a bit from 3/4 MDF
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2023 | 02:26 PM
  #2  
theraymondguy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 488
Likes: 116
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by EDGE
Would 1/2" Birch suffice for two 10's in a ported enclosure. Trying to keep the weight down a bit from 3/4 MDF
Motor force is a concern, are we talking 150W subs or 1500W?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2023 | 08:51 AM
  #3  
EDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 82
From: Mississauga, Ontario Canada
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by theraymondguy
Motor force is a concern, are we talking 150W subs or 1500W?
Twin 150 fosgates with a single channel mono amp
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2023 | 07:37 PM
  #4  
theraymondguy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 488
Likes: 116
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by EDGE
Twin 150 fosgates with a single channel mono amp

Typical loading, side by each I believe you’d be alright, some bracing between the woofers and in the corners off the box would help to stiffen things up. Having a doubled front plate (married with glue) would be of benefit as well.

Ensure your front and back plate extend over the remaining pieces so that they’re better supported. Remember that the glue is doing all the holding once it’s cured, don’t be shy.

Or be lazy and just put in a baffle board lol.😝
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2023 | 08:14 PM
  #5  
EDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 82
From: Mississauga, Ontario Canada
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by theraymondguy
Typical loading, side by each I believe you’d be alright, some bracing between the woofers and in the corners off the box would help to stiffen things up. Having a doubled front plate (married with glue) would be of benefit as well.

Ensure your front and back plate extend over the remaining pieces so that they’re better supported. Remember that the glue is doing all the holding once it’s cured, don’t be shy.

Or be lazy and just put in a baffle board lol.😝
Lol. I thought about the baffle board but my subs aren't infinite baffle.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2023 | 09:23 PM
  #6  
theraymondguy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 488
Likes: 116
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by EDGE
Lol. I thought about the baffle board but my subs aren't infinite baffle.
Just as all camshafts are turbo camshafts, all subs are infinite baffle.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2023 | 09:54 AM
  #7  
EDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 82
From: Mississauga, Ontario Canada
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by theraymondguy
Just as all camshafts are turbo camshafts, all subs are infinite baffle.
I know anyone will work but are they not generally subs with a higher Qt number?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2023 | 08:10 PM
  #8  
theraymondguy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 488
Likes: 116
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by EDGE
I know anyone will work but are they not generally subs with a higher Qt number?

absolutely yes. Sadly modern subs seem to have abandoned Qt in an effort to operate in the smallest enclosure possible. Alpine JL, Kicker, Rockford, Hertz et all.

You might be better served looking at older subs if IB interests you.

Im currently running Alpine SWS10s, Qt = 0.68. Ideally your looking for 0.70 or higher, however isobaric operation will “stiffen” any subwoofer.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2023 | 10:30 PM
  #9  
EDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 82
From: Mississauga, Ontario Canada
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by theraymondguy
absolutely yes. Sadly modern subs seem to have abandoned Qt in an effort to operate in the smallest enclosure possible. Alpine JL, Kicker, Rockford, Hertz et all.

You might be better served looking at older subs if IB interests you.

Im currently running Alpine SWS10s, Qt = 0.68. Ideally your looking for 0.70 or higher, however isobaric operation will “stiffen” any subwoofer.
My Rockford's are 4.9. For a ported enclosure I need 1 cuft per driver. I have two. I have a sealed 3/4 MDF box in there now but it's very heavy and I'm not really liking the sound. Always preferred a ported enclosure over sealed. This is why the IB interested me. The weight reduction.
​​
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2023 | 11:45 AM
  #10  
theraymondguy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 488
Likes: 116
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by EDGE
My Rockford's are 4.9. For a ported enclosure I need 1 cuft per driver. I have two. I have a sealed 3/4 MDF box in there now but it's very heavy and I'm not really liking the sound. Always preferred a ported enclosure over sealed. This is why the IB interested me. The weight reduction.
​​
Wish me luck Edge,

With port and woofer displacement accounted for,
0.85 cu ft 1/2” birch with 3/4” front plate for isobaric clamshell mount. The thinking is that I can get decent cuts off of the bench saw, tight gaps and small dimensions (24x11x9x7) will allow the box to be strong enough. One 3” brace front to back boxes in the woofer and a slim brace along the angled section for a little more surface area (instructions are in the faq, about 70 posts deep).

33 Lbs assembled with 2 10” woofers. The box without the top is 10 Lbs.



Last edited by theraymondguy; Dec 24, 2023 at 12:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2024 | 06:25 AM
  #11  
91formula_WS6_5's Avatar
Junior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 38
Likes: 10
From: Nova Scotia
Car: 91 Formula WS6
Engine: L98 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Any pics of the finished product?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2024 | 12:00 PM
  #12  
EDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 82
From: Mississauga, Ontario Canada
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Re: Speaker box material & thickness

Originally Posted by theraymondguy
Just as all camshafts are turbo camshafts, all subs are infinite baffle.
Well Sir, you were 100 percent bang on. My "not IB" speakers are now on an open back baffle board and it pounds more than it ever did in the box. A lot more. Crushingly more actually.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SNET Telly
Car Audio
2
Jan 2, 2011 02:18 AM
popballz
Car Audio
5
Nov 9, 2007 01:54 AM
Bill/T/D/Y
Car Audio
3
Nov 28, 2006 07:41 PM
MIKERC
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
12
Jul 21, 2006 12:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.