Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

New engine, New carb?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 08:15 AM
  #1  
stupid4901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
New engine, New carb?

I'm gonna be starting a 377 build up for the formula this summer and was wondering if I need a new carb or can I just use the Q-Jet? I want to switch over to a Demon or some type of squarebore for the manifold selection, but it doesn't seem like a straight forward project. Are the Q-jet manifolds decent for a motor that size built to rev to about 8000?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 08:39 AM
  #2  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
If it will really rev to 8000 RPMs, you're looking at about 900 CFM or more to feed it. There are q-jets that will do that, but not yours.

Your stock q-jet, if properly set up, will feed that engine to about 7000 RPMs.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 12:39 PM
  #3  
stupid4901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
So then do I have to lose all the computer stuff in order to get it rev that high?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 01:04 PM
  #4  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'd be more concerned about how you're going to hold the internals together reving that high, and how you're going to get the car moving when it won't have any guts below 3000 RPMs.

6500 is a much more reasonable goal, which the q-jet will most likely support.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
stupid4901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
Ok, I did a bunch of reading and the general consenesus i came up with is that destroked engines will rev high. I don't know if this is true. I want to build an engine that will have high-rev hp for the highway and that type of driving. i don't care about loads of torque down low just enough to keep me moving. is the 377 a bad idea? I've only built 2 engines and neither were destroked so I really don't know about this.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2004 | 09:29 AM
  #6  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
377 is really a specialty racing engine. Sure, it can be made to run on the street, but no SBC that revs to 8000 RPMs can realistically be considered a street engine.

You can think of a 377 as a .155" over-bored 350 (knowing you have to use a siamesed cylinder wall block to get there). The bore/stroke ratio influences RPM behavior to some extent, but cam/induction/exhaust affect it a lot more.

I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "high-rev hp for the highway and that type of driving". An engine that cruises at 75 mph and goes up hills in OD with decent fuel economy is better achieved by a properly built/set-up 350 or 383.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2004 | 12:30 PM
  #7  
stupid4901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
What I meant by that is that on want to have power in the top-end. So I can accelerate faster from 50 and up. Right now my car gets to about 75 and then gradually goes to 85 and then slowly past that. Does this have to do with the revving? Would a 355 work as a more streetable engine?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2004 | 05:34 PM
  #8  
scottland's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
In the long run, a 350 is going to be much more ecconomical and practical. a soild built 350 or 383 will get you from 75mph to 85mph a whole lot faster than your 305 does now.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 09:31 AM
  #9  
Barry85Iroc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Car: 1985 IROC Z-28
Engine: 355
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 3:73
I'd get a new carb. I ran my Q-jet for a short time, and the car ran, and ran well. But when I finally got the 770 Holley on and right, it smoked the Q-jet. TONS more power.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 10:37 AM
  #10  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Your q-jet wasn't set up correctly.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
midge54
LTX and LSX
21
Dec 27, 2019 04:14 PM
Infested
Tech / General Engine
3
May 22, 2018 11:56 PM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Mar 5, 2017 06:37 PM
Streetstuff
Carburetors
13
Sep 7, 2015 02:33 PM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.