Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

It only took one year.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #1  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
It only took one year.

My home-rebuilt carb is set up exactly as you guys have suggested, but I still idle rich after warmed up. New computer temp sensor, new tps, new vacuum sensor, etc. Idle mixture needles are set very lean at 2 1/2 turns from seated position. Solenoid travel and positions are set [with micrometer] as instructed. TPS is set to correct voltage.

SO, I FINALLY ORDERED A REBUILT COMPUTER AND THERMOMASTER [ONLY ONE THAT SUMMIT HAD] CHIP. PLUS THE SUGGESTED 160 DEGREE THERMOSTAT.

Wish me luck. I recall reading that when one has exhaust work, the arc-welding machine can fry computer chips.

Read this years ago. Could this be what occured when I replaced the cat?

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 04:57 PM
  #2  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
I installed the items.

Et Viola'!

We have closed-loop with a dwell reading that floats between 25 and 30 degrees on the six-cylinder scale.

(EDIT THIS EVENING!!!!!!
Idling in park was perfect, but driving down the avenue lead me to choke on the fumes at eack stoplight.
So, how did I screw up???????????)

Back to the upbeat post, before I discovered this bug-
Now I have to see how she drives, cold-starts, and if she continues to work properly. And, if she can still use 87 octane, as before. It is a pleasure to watch the dwell change while turning the idle-air-bleed screw, or when you create an artificial vacuum leak.

This was one big p.i.a. and thanks for your support.

One Q- It will not tolerate the idle mixture screws to be any further out than 2 1/2 turns. Any more, and the idle goes smelly. This o.k.?

Back to the edit: Where do I need to retrace my adjustment steps?

PLEASE HELP ME.

Seth

Last edited by NoTransistors; Jul 21, 2006 at 09:23 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #3  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
I edited my previous post, but none of the 50 people who read it know that I am still having trouble, because , well they don't. So please take a look at my post, with the edits.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #4  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Been waiting for you to post back with news...You should be able to drive the car with the dwell meter connected, wires running under the hood through the pass window. If your cables aren't long enough you can rig an extension. This will allow you to see what the computer's trying to do to the mixture when you smell fumes.

Carb should be fine at 2 1/2 turns out.

Keep in mind that the computer adjusts dwell based on oxygen reading not true A/F ratio. If it's sensing too much O2 in the exhaust stream on the driver's side bank it will richen the mixture. Sometimes a mis-fire or stumble will result in a dwell peak. I did a cam swap once and couldn't get the dwell to stay the same. Discovered my y-pipe collector had come loose (probably while running rough with cam break-in) and was intermittently leaking and confusing my O2. Course my O2 is in the Y because I have hedders.

I suspect you're just dropping out of closed loop though and the dwell meter should show that.

Good Luck and let us know how it turns out.

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2006 | 10:35 AM
  #5  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Mike,

Idling in driveway now.

Dwell is hovering around at 30 degrees.
Idle mix screws now at 2 turns.
Running rich.
You state that it all depends on the O2 sensor.
Newish Bosch unit.
I hear no miss at idle.

I have a leak, where?
Original iron exhaust manifold.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #6  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
It's highly unlikely you have a leak that could affect your O2 readings without being aware of it, especially with stock manifolds.

With your idle mixture screws 2 turns out, how many turns out on idle air bleed? They're commonly around 3-4 turns out on each, but that's not a hard-fast rule.

You can check for a miss at idle by pulling each plug wire and noting if there's a change in idle quality.

O2 sensors can "report lean" as they fail but I wouldn't replace a new one until I'd checked everything else. Isn't this the second one already?

If driveability is fine and dwell is responding correctly you may want to put some miles on it, run a few gallons through and check your mileage.

There's also the off chance that something on the side of the carb that feeds the pass side bank is off. The ECM only looks at driver side bank for O2.

Keep in mind that this ECM doesn't come with a pre-programmed A/F map. It writes and re-writes one as it goes based on O2 readings. It uses TPS and MAP sensor readings to make instantaneous changes to mixture based on it's A/F map then re-writes it's A/F map if needed based on O2. This is a pretty quick process at idle but could take some miles driving for the full spectrum of TPS/MAP settings. So when test driving after adjustments be sure to give it a little more than a "once around the block".
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #7  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Mike,

The air bleed screw is about one turn short of the bottom.
For six years, I have had an intermittant noise that sort of sounds valvish, and from only one at that. I still have no idea what it is, as it comes and goes w/o rhyme or reason. Not a peep all winter. I thought it was fan clutch, timing, heat stove flap, egr solenoid valve, heat riser flap, etc. Still have no idea.

One good thing---This Thermomaster chip provides excellent drivability.

Thanks,

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #8  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
IAB down is trying to richen mixture (allowing less air in), idle screws in is leaning mixture (allowing less fuel). You may want to average out the two by turning mixture screws 3-4 turns out and opening IAB a turn or two. This is closer to the stock settings. If the dwell is only happy where it's at I wouldn't fret too much about it.

I pretend not to hear funny noises when driving mine.

I've been chasing down a lean stumble all day and I think I've only been able to determine that it's NOT my carburetor. At least it only got to 90 degrees today.

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2006 | 10:22 PM
  #9  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Mike,

The rain cooled things down a bit, and with the windows down, A.C. off, I was gagging all the way home. Each stop light was a challenge to breathe.

***Yesterday, the solenoid was adjusted as per the posted instructions. They are on the shelf in the garage, but I can tell you that I used the steel rod that pulls out of the dial caliper to measure the plunger travel, after setting the, I think it was lean stop, four turns up from the bottom.

Does this need further tinkering? Perhaps beginning from a point one full turn lower? Or am I wasting my time with that? I still know so very little about this system.

WHY IS THIS SO FREAKING DIFFICULT??????

Thanks Again,

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #10  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
First make sure the ecm is controlling mixture and that the carb has the right amount of range before tinkering with the rich/lean stop. Hook up the dwell meter like I said before and set it in the seat next to you. When you notice the rich condition check it for:
1) If dwell meter is pegged full lean you'll know the ecm is attempting to correct a rich condition that is beyond it's ability to compensate for. Then play with rich/lean stop or look for a carb problem.
2) If the dwell meter is not ranging you've gone out of closed loop. If you see this, I'd look at CTS. It can be shorted out to tell the ecm temp's met.
3) If the dwell meter is ranging properly the ecm "thinks" the mixture is correct. If this is the case, I'd pull plugs and look for a cylinder(s) running rich.

Plug all the vaccuum ports and vent ports for the charcoal system before doing any more tests. It can fail and cause weird problems too.

Good luck, I'm still working on mine too.

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:25 PM
  #11  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
It is hard to maintain patience at this point.

Mike,

This deserves a bloody strong Bloody Mary.

Brought the mixture screws out to 3 1/2 turns.
Discovered the pigtail near the evaporator. Really never knew about it.
Chocked wheels, put in gear, set dwell to float around 30 degrees. Floats several degrees in either direction.

Back to stinksville, after a short drive. O2 sensor is most probably giving false reading, you have suggested. Put in brand new Bosch unit. Same s**t. It would seem that there is a leak anywhere from the exhaust ports to the O2 sensor.

The AIR pipe holes have been blanked off for years. The air pump pumps only into the cat, and the diverter valve is altered to work w/o a computer signal [to switch between the chrome pipes and the cat], simply relying on vacuum to prevent backfire.

Valve cover gaskets [crancase venting] are recent.
Did you know that this egr solenoid valve buzzes with car idling in gear [not neutral] ?

You say to pull the plugs. I think that this would be futile, as all are blackened by the rich mixture. When changed last year [along with H.T. wires] they were all clean after a long run and no idling to foul them. The computer issue did exist then.

Also, both sides of the carb dump into a common opening in the intake manifold. If the right side of the carb has issues, then it would logically affect both cylinder banks.

No wonder people go the Holley/ Mallory route, but I refuse to do that.

I would unhook the charcoal cannister, but the temp-valve that dumps it is busted, so it is sort of already not connected to carb.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #12  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Drive it with the meter hooked up. See what it's doing.

You can check your plugs on the driver's side to see if there's evidence of mis-fire.

Your stock manifold is dual-plane and although there may be a small cut-out between the two sides under the carb, they're essentially split.

EGR shouldn't cause a problem, but you can disconnect it so it doesn't buzz and take it out of the equation.

Your charcoal canister should be connected to the fuel tank vent and the bowl vent for the carburetor. If it's not hooked up, the fumes from one or the other (or both) have to go somewhere. Could this be what you're smelling?

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #13  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Mike,

Gotta do the lawn. Will play after dinner. The evap cannister holds raw gas. What I smell is burned gas; lots of it. Canister vapors are in canister, but when I trick the temp valve into venting it, nothing seems to change.
A 'Q'- If there is a mis-fire, this would reduce vacuum, and leave unburned fuel, raising O2. If a valve, it would not change O2, but would reduce vacuum.

No?

Thank You,

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #14  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
I know the smell too, just shooting in the dark.

Yes a mis-fire will allow unburned fuel and O2 into the exhaust stream and will confuse the O2 sensor, vaccuum may be reduced slightly-the motors still working as an air pump. I'm deducing (or inducing?) here, never really hooked up a vaccuum guage to a mis-firing engine. A valve that does not open at all should have no affect on O2 readings (nothing in-nothing out either intake or exhaust), but the efficiency of the pump is lessened. A valve that is not opening completely or not closing completely can cause some weird things.

Let me know how the dwell thing goes while driving.

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 10:27 PM
  #15  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
The lawn is beginning to resemble a jungle,

Because I was out all day ferrying my girlfriend around the city.

Now, back to something completely different. [Monty Python]

Exhaust was bad, right from start of closed-loop mode.
At g.f.'s house, dwell was good, exhaust was not.

While driving, check-engine light lit. Code 55.
From this time on, exhaust was seemingly clean; dwell hovering around 30 degrees. And get this- The computer was adjusting for FOUR FULL TURNS of the mixture screws.
Also, I found at this time, that tightening down on air filter nut kills dwell. A wire or hose is bad or loose. This does not solve the code 55, though. The engine light comes on immediately upon starting. No resetting for this problem.
My 'new' computer is bad? I still have the old one, which is possibly good, as I always felt in my gut that it was the chip. The new comp is Standard Motor Products and if faulty, I can possibly deal with them, as their location is within NYC. Got the computer from Rock Auto, over the 'net; they are not in NYC, for certain.

EDIT on Tues A.M.: Reinstalled old computer. No codes. The seller of the rebuilt sent a FedEx label, and is refunding my $$. Replaced all vacuum pipes and tees that connect to base of carb.Used whatever junk was in garage. Holds dwell in driveway. Will go to FedEx later to see if my eyes water.

Thanks,

Seth

Last edited by NoTransistors; Jul 25, 2006 at 02:35 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #16  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
I don't want to put a whammy on it,

But I need to say that my exhaust remained clean all day. No watery eyes or irritated throats. You can now smell exhaust from other vehicles.

So, I need to thank you all for your help, especially Mike.

I'll certainly let you know if the hydrocarbons return.

BTW, the Thermomaster chip rocks, but I am concerned that I have yet to experience the torque converter lock up. These early 700R4 trannys need it for full fluid flow.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 07:01 AM
  #17  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Good to hear. Keep an eye on your mileage and let me know how it goes. You say you got the last thermomaster chip from Summit?

On your torque converter you can place a test light in the A and F terminal on the ALDL. It will light when power is being provided through the brake switch and go off when the ECM closes the circuit to engage the converter. (It will also go off when the brake switch is opened.) You can jump these terminals to bring it on manually. If your ECM was not seeing a good cts signal it could have been causing the engine to stay in warm up mode (rich) and not allow lockup.

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #18  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Mike comes through once again.

Summit sent chip for '84. Didn't work, which led me to call the factory. Then I called Summit, who had the factory send the correct Thermomaster, and then had FedEx pick up the 'old' one. Great when people stand behind their product.

Will wire in test light. Also, might try to get to the parkway tomorrow, to see just how fast I need to drive to get lock-up.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 04:49 PM
  #19  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
I know, I know, you thought that this thread was gone for good, but,

The stink returned, even though the dwell remained steady at 35 [30 was too stinky].

I had an idea. Went to the one thing not checked. Sure enough, it is the vacuum reservoir. Pull the vacuum source hose, and hold finger over it, and dwell goes up FIVE degrees. The leak is in the can, not the hoses or the A.C. switch assembly. The in and out hoses are now just pushed together. Dwell is near steady at 35 degrees [readjusted the bleed screw].

Only a drive will reveal if this helped. Between this temporary fix, and the repair of the pcv hose assembly, well who knows. I will cross my fingers. Apparently this oxygen-sensor based system is very sensitive to air leaks, where they don't belong.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #20  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
It only gets data from one bank. So if that's the bank that's running lean, it'll fatten up the mixture for the whole thing.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #21  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Yeah, I always like to plug all vaccuum sources at the carb to eliminate them when troubleshooting stuff like this. A vaccuum source on the right side of the carb=driver's side bank lean. Your code 55 had me worried that it wasn't the CTS (as I thought) as that's a lean trouble code too. Let me know, I'm losing sleep already on this one.

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 11:26 PM
  #22  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Mike,

Leave it to the engineers at General Moron [you like that one?], to devise a system that richens up the mixture when a vacuum leak occurs.

That CODE 55 left with the bath water. I am using my original computer, as that troubled rebuilt is now on its way back to the supplier. The vacuum storage can has a big, but hard-to-see, crack around the connection nipples. I will apply glue or silicone sealer to repair. The vacuum source for this plastic p.o.s. is common to both cylinder banks. Wouldn't it be a kick in the *** if two years of replacing or rebuilding all that crap [and spending $90 on each inspection], was a dumb waste of time/gas/effort/money, as this was the problem all along? Also, I cooked the original chip, by installing it ***-backwards, so I am now beholden to the Hypertech chip. Can't complain about the new chip, though. It works nice, and also eases the burden on the A.C., by working at 160* F. As long as the converter still locks up at some speed or other. I am taking a trip on Saturday, and will check that out then.

I will keep my nose alert, and report back soon.

You are a wonderful bunch of fellow car enthusiasts.

Thanks,

Seth

P.S.- I see that each time I used the word '***', it was replaced with three asterisks. So, in the future, I will use the word 'butt', instead.

Last edited by NoTransistors; Jul 27, 2006 at 11:29 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 06:50 AM
  #23  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
The ECM shouldn't richen the mixture in response to a vaccuum leak anymore than the programmed (normal) A/F ratio. It's still only trying to meet O2 setpoints within the driver's side exhaust stream. A vaccuum leak allows extra O2 into the carb/manifold and the system will respond by adding fuel until the O2 levels are met-up to the richening limits of the system. If this leak is allowing more O2 into the driver's side it will richen the mixture past this setpoint only on the pass side, where no (or less) extra O2 is present. I'm going to have to check whether the vaccuum ports access both plenums or not.

Another possibility is that the extra O2 from the leak is not allowed to mix properly with the extra fuel, burning "lean" and allowing unburnt fuel and O2 past the chamber.

Let me know though. I'm still learning stuff everyday too.

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 10:18 PM
  #24  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Mike,

I drove around all day long.

Not even a whiff of hydrocarbons.

All that trouble over a hidden vacuum leak.

The great news is that it is fixed. Also, the car has never idled as smooth; just like a V8. Oops, it is a V8. Smooth as a baby's butt.

Only engine I ever had that is smoother is a Mopar 440.

Now it is time to attend to the other two leaks- both power steering hoses, and the A.C. compressor.

Thank You So Very Much,

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 11:00 PM
  #25  
Nate86's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
This is somewhat late now that you've seemed to have it worked out, but I noticed you said that you have a Bosch O2 sensor. Coming from personal experience, I would change it out with an AC Delco O2 sensor. I was trying to find the reason why my own car was idling so rough and couldn't find a solution. One day I just got the urge to change out my fairly used (15000 miles or so) Bosch sensor with an AC Delco sensor, just to see if it would affect anything. The car idled a lot smoother with the AC part than the Bosch, and I started getting more miles to the gallon than I did previously with the Bosch part.

I found a thread on these boards a while back that examined how the Bosch sensor makes the car run richer than it should, even when the car is working perfectly. That's when I decided to never run Bosch product in my car again.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2006 | 12:23 AM
  #26  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Thank You.

I think I'll try just that. Still have the factory unit.
As I got the Bosch from Strauss Stores, I can possibly get my money back if this holds true.

Who knows if I am running within N.Y. specs. My nose is good, but not as precise as an emissions sniffer.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2006 | 03:50 AM
  #27  
Burntz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, Nebraska
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: Mild 10:1 355.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
i was just wondering about this all, but do you have an electronic quadrajet? because i do, and its not running all too great, and if ours are the same, this could become very handy in the future.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #28  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Yes, I have the computer-controlled Rochester Quadrajet.

From what I see, a properly-tuned Rochester [computerized or stand-alone], can be considered a top-performing carb. Great idle, improved gas milage over other designs, and suprising durability [mine was 22-years-old before anyone touched it].

Just ask for advice, and we will help.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 12:01 AM
  #29  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Took a 150 mile ride today...

To the Jersey Shore and back. Knock on wood, the car performed flawlessly and odorlessly.
The new chip is nice, but I am not crazy about lock-up. It is not as consistant as before. As long as this early 700-R-4 does not suffer from lack of oil circulation, I really do not care. What do you know about this aspect of the early 700-R-4's?

Gas mileage:
The traffic ranged from stop & go to 80 M.P.H.

Near the Outer Bridge Crossing, there was a 5 mile backup, because a 1956 Buick was lying dead in one of two lanes.

I have one third of a tank left and am down several ounces of R-12. But we did not suffer in the heat, as the engine always remained between 160* and 180*.

BTW: The new chip does not cycle the mixture solenoid until the engine is running. No more clicking for the 1st minute the ignition is on, but engine has not yet been cranked.

Seth

Last edited by NoTransistors; Jul 30, 2006 at 12:57 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 09:55 PM
  #30  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Computer threw a Code 13 tonight. Lasted less than a minute. Must be that new Bosch O2 sensor that you have said is possible crap.

Does this sound about right?

Time to reinstall the factory sensor. If the code does not repeat, I will insist on a refund, if I can find the receipt.



Seth
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:26 AM
  #31  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
I've never had problems with the Bosch sensors but I'd swap it out anyway if you already have one to put in.

Code 13, possible TPS sticking/bad O2, maybe the computer's seeing O2 and MAP changes at the same throttle position?

Good news otherwise.

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #32  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
I'll get a tube of electrically-conductive anti-seize lube, before installing the GM sensor.

I forgot to say that the computer threw the code while idling, not driving.

Seth
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #33  
ZimGTA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: twin cities
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700 r
I think that the sensors come with anti-sieze already.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #34  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
My o.e.m. sensor is old and used. There is nothing on the threads.
But,

Seth
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:11 PM
  #35  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally Posted by NoTransistors
Wish me luck. I recall reading that when one has exhaust work, the arc-welding machine can fry computer chips.

it really shouldn't as the juice will current will travel out the negative and then into the positive. current can't flow unless there is both a - and +. for your ECU to fry you would need to have it in the path of the current which it wouldn't be.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 11:17 PM
  #36  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Follow Up For July 10th.

Time to follow suggestion, and install original O2 sensor.
The trouble light came on after re-starting a recently-shut motor [about 5 minutes off]. Light extinguished in about one minute.

Same situation later in evening.

This is what happened once last week, as you see in an earlier posting in this thread.

Also, I found an unused Bosch O2 sensor for a little 4-banger Audi. Are these things compatible with our cars? I have not as yet even compared threaded-end sizes. I ask, because this thing has not only the single black sensor wire, but also a pair of white wires for a heater [ I gather that this is what these are for ]. If the O2 sensor heats faster, it will produce a voltage sooner, and force the computer into closed-loop. If the heater remains on [or can it burn out when wired without a timer ?????? ], the sensor should remain hot enough during idle, to maintain closed-loop. Opened-loop uses more gas, which is so expensive.

P.S.: Except for some pinging [need pricier gas], the new chip is working out just fine. Old was nice, but I did stupidly cook it.

P.S. P.S.: I will repeat what I asked earlier today: Why are my pipes still sooty? Exhaust is odor-free, so emissions are possibly within New York State limits. Is there so much dirt in the engine or pipes?

Seth
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 06:43 AM
  #37  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
I run a heated O2, mainly because it's placed farther from the head in the y-pipe. I've read and been told that the heated O2 will last longer and will be fine without a timer. Got about two years on mine now.

A GM part number for the three wire O2 is 25176708. If you can get a part number for the audi sensor you may be able to cross reference, but it's probably compatible.

You may be able to cure the pinging by backing off base timing, but I wouldn't go past 0 degrees.

May take a while for all the soot to clear your pipes and cat. Give it a month or so then see. As long as you're not staining the pavement behind you. Your well plugs could be leaking down overnight causing it to run rich for the first few seconds (didn't you epoxy them?).

Code 13 right?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #38  
NoTransistors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Car: '83 Firebird S/E
Engine: The Chevy 305. with carburator
Transmission: 700R-4
Thanks once again.

Yes to the Code 13.

And I used no epoxy in the rebuild.

Seth
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #39  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
If your fuel wells are leaking out overnight you'll have a hard start first thing (starter motor running til fuel bowls fill) then an initially rich condition that clears in a few seconds. After it sets for a few days you can manually pump your booster to see if the bowls are empty. I suspect, however, that after some miles your soot should clear.

On your 13, maybe hook the meter to the TPS and make sure the voltage change is somewhat linear throughout its range? Try the heated O2 and it may clear up as well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZZ3Astro
Power Adders
1045
Aug 13, 2019 12:57 AM
MSRed91Camaro
Cooling
22
Oct 6, 2015 01:56 PM
sjorgens
Suspension and Chassis
7
Oct 1, 2015 07:54 PM
mfp189
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
Sep 27, 2015 09:25 AM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.