Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Rejetting for power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2016, 02:51 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
JoeMonte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bangor, Maine
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Engine: 360ci sbc
Transmission: T-5 non-WC
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Rejetting for power?

Hey guys, I have a 1985 Pontiac Trans Am WS6, and it has the LG4 engine and t-5 transmission. I recently put a set of hooker headers on and plan to get a new camshaft within the next few months with upgraded valve springs. I was wondering if rejetting my quadrajet a bit richer would help with driveability/power, seeing as whenever I start the car until I've driven it for a bit it stumbles on its face whenever more than 65-70 percent throttle is given. Knowing that this engine was designed for fuel economy (which I am not getting), would running a little richer be a good way to go with more airflow in and out of the engine? Thank you.
Old 08-18-2016, 02:08 PM
  #2  
naf
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 5,291
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 52 Posts
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Rejetting for power?

The electronic qjet will self adjust the mixture for the primaries fine. Provided it's functioning correctly and the dwell has been set correctly you should be good.

A change in secondary rods and hanger is usually a good thing though. There's a tech article here somewhere.
Old 08-23-2016, 12:18 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High plains of NM
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Rejetting for power?

I find that most carbs are running way too rich.
Old 08-23-2016, 07:14 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 9,164
Received 634 Likes on 534 Posts
Re: Rejetting for power?

The best thing you can do is install a wide band O2 sensor. That will answer all of your questions.
Old 08-23-2016, 04:21 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High plains of NM
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Rejetting for power?

Originally Posted by skinny z
The best thing you can do is install a wide band O2 sensor. That will answer all of your questions.
That's what I did. Makes tuning a breeze.
A vacuum gauge and a wide band O2 and almost over night you are now a carb tuning master.
With a vac gauge and wide band gauge every little pop or stumble is explained, those 2 pieces of instrumentation remove about 98% of the guess work from tuning a carb.
Old 08-24-2016, 09:42 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 9,164
Received 634 Likes on 534 Posts
Re: Rejetting for power?

I've taken it a step further and also have an Innovate LM-1 data logger. I've added a MAP sensor and can monitor RPMs, AFRs and engine load. Lots of interesting data collected and it really helps with the tuning process. I've a Barry Grant vacuum secondary carb that's been modified for greater adjustability too. High and low speed air bleeds as well as the idle circuit air bleed now all have screw in jets.

Last edited by skinny z; 08-24-2016 at 09:51 AM.
Old 08-24-2016, 09:48 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 9,164
Received 634 Likes on 534 Posts
Re: Rejetting for power?

Originally Posted by JoeMonte
... I was wondering if rejetting my quadrajet a bit richer would help with driveability/power, seeing as whenever I start the car until I've driven it for a bit it stumbles on its face whenever more than 65-70 percent throttle is given. Knowing that this engine was designed for fuel economy (which I am not getting), would running a little richer be a good way to go with more airflow in and out of the engine?
Rejetting may worsen the situation depending on where you're at now. That's why a wide band is so important. If your fuel economy sucks with a QJet, then chances are you're much too rich at part throttle. The stumble you experience at part throttle tip in could be attributed to the air valve being improperly adjusted.
You could very easily be rich in one range of operation and lean in another. Those with more experience with the QJet may have better insights (my tuning with them is very dated as I haven't run one in decades) but whatever the situation, you're really flying blind without an AFR gauge.
Old 09-16-2016, 12:13 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
JoeMonte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bangor, Maine
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Engine: 360ci sbc
Transmission: T-5 non-WC
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Rejetting for power?

Originally Posted by skinny z
Rejetting may worsen the situation depending on where you're at now. That's why a wide band is so important. If your fuel economy sucks with a QJet, then chances are you're much too rich at part throttle. The stumble you experience at part throttle tip in could be attributed to the air valve being improperly adjusted.
You could very easily be rich in one range of operation and lean in another. Those with more experience with the QJet may have better insights (my tuning with them is very dated as I haven't run one in decades) but whatever the situation, you're really flying blind without an AFR gauge.
correct me if I'm wrong but the o2 sensor I just replaced when I installed my headers was a narrowband and only reads lean and rich. So, if down the road I get a wideband (seeing as they aren't very cheap) I would have to have a bung welded into perhaps the passenger side header collector or maybe further upstream of my current one? Is it possible to replace the narrowband with a wideband and still keep the computer happy and maybe run a gauge into the passenger compartment? I'm not super techy when it comes to wiring, (I wired up a tach, only took me about 6 hours and way too many zip ties)

additionally, I have always had a cel on, except for occasionally when there is a cold start and it kicks onto the far high idle. One time while I was trying to figure it out I wiggled the kinda gacked connection for the choke heater relay and it jumped onto high idle and the cel went away. Not sure if this is relevant, thanks.
Old 09-16-2016, 12:45 PM
  #9  
naf
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 5,291
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 52 Posts
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Rejetting for power?

The LG4 ECM will not be able to read the wide band O2
Old 09-16-2016, 10:16 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High plains of NM
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Rejetting for power?

The oxygen sensor plugs into the gauge, the gauge needs an ignition on +12v source and a ground. All you have to do is figure out where to get the key switched 12v power and run the wires.
Old 09-27-2016, 08:40 AM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
JoeMonte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bangor, Maine
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Engine: 360ci sbc
Transmission: T-5 non-WC
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Rejetting for power?

Ok, when I found a guy to help me weld up a y pipe, (which believe it or not gave me significant butt dyno gains and now seems to rev much much easier at higher rpm like 5000-5300) he said it was clearly running crazy rich. When I bring it back to have a hole in the floorboard patched he said he would fix my carb, check the vacuum advance, and maybe do a compression test. He is a Quadrajet guru, and knows them inside and out. The quadrajet on my LG4 is a 750cfm unit, correct?
Old 09-27-2016, 09:24 AM
  #12  
naf
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 5,291
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 52 Posts
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Rejetting for power?

Originally Posted by JoeMonte
he said he would fix my carb, check the vacuum advance, and maybe do a compression test. He is a Quadrajet guru, and knows them inside and out.
Don't expect too much of this GURU. Your LG4 does not use vacuum advance (which someone with some experience should know).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abubaca
Tech / General Engine
28
12-16-2020 01:02 PM
Bowtieman1970
Electronics
3
08-17-2016 02:50 AM
propaintball96
Members Camaros
3
03-25-2016 11:48 AM
1988
Engine Swap
6
03-24-2016 08:09 AM
krisb410
TBI
5
03-17-2016 05:51 PM



Quick Reply: Rejetting for power?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.