Cooling Discuss all of the aspects of cooling that you can think of! Radiators, transmissions, electric fans, etc.

Myth Buster Question for You

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #1  
GWW's Avatar
GWW
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 4 spd auto
Myth Buster Question for You

A radiator shop by me stated. "In 50 years he couldn't remember ever seeing an engine run hotter with no thermostat."
So I took mine out on a 103 degree day and it made no difference. My neighbor stated he has had an engine boil over with no thermostat. The myth is does the water move to fast through the system to cool with the stat out?
Busted?
Plausible?
Confirmed?
GW
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #2  
5678TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Maui, Hawaii
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

the water must be able to stay in the radiator for a bit to properly cool.. thats what the fins on the radiator are for.. so yes, without a thermostat the water does move a tad too quickly.. when it moves too quickly, the radiator doesnt get enough time to cool the water and therefore, some people's motor will run hotter..

thats what i think
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 10:28 PM
  #3  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Yea, that's the theory at least, it moves too fast to cool. Unfortunately it dies off at theory

As your mechanic, yourself, and myself can confirm - it's a myth. I've certainly never seen it happen either. When my t-stat stuck open on both my cars, it ran super cold, and never warmed up. When a buddy removed his t-stat, it was a very cold winter for the next owner....
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 12:52 AM
  #4  
GWW's Avatar
GWW
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 4 spd auto
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Maybe it's the Fresno weather 100+ most of the summer but with the stat out my car warms up normally and runs at the same temp regardless, about 225-230d. Winter yes it never warms up with the stat out or too cold a stat. Honestly I'm leaning towards plausible but there has to be special circumstances.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 01:45 AM
  #5  
F-Body Demon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: Nashville
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Id say its abit of both, smokey yunick did say that he ran without thermostats in his cars. HOWEVER he did put washers in as "Restrictors" to slow the flow.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:57 AM
  #6  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Originally Posted by GWW
My neighbor stated he has had an engine boil over with no thermostat.
A lot of people think they've seen that, always on downflow radiators. You figure out the connection.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 03:07 AM
  #7  
jaredi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Louisville KY
Car: 97 Z71
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 4L60E
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

IIRC the insertion of washers in place of the T-Stat was to slow the flow to stop it from cavitating at certain areas of the block. The fear is that some areas the coolant is prone to cavitate and create a hot spot on the block.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 03:28 AM
  #8  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Sort of... the restrictor is supposed to allow some pressure to be built up in the block to discourage steam pockets from forming.
----------
Originally Posted by 5678TA
when it moves too quickly, the radiator doesnt get enough time to cool the water
If that was true, then by the same token the water wouldn't be spending enough time in the block to get hot either.

Last edited by Apeiron; Aug 3, 2007 at 03:29 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 03:50 AM
  #9  
2tonedmaro89's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: oviedo, FL
Car: '91 RS
Engine: 5.0L gross *** tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

go post it on discovery.com....they say to go on there if you have any myths for them
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #10  
jaredi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Louisville KY
Car: 97 Z71
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 4L60E
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Originally Posted by Apeiron
Sort of... the restrictor is supposed to allow some pressure to be built up in the block to discourage steam pockets from forming.
Thats the ticket! Steam pockets thats what I was trying to remember. It seems to me though that when the system got up to temp and pressurized it would build up all the pressure it needed.


Originally Posted by Apeiron
If that was true, then by the same token the water wouldn't be spending enough time in the block to get hot either.

Thats the same idea that one guy had when he said "Think of holding a torch on a copper water pipe, when the water is flowing faster it doesn't have time to heat up." But the idea is not to heat up the water, it is to cool down the pipe (block).
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #11  
bntyhntr00's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: TPI 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT POSI 3.83
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

For the most part the thermostat is not going to do anything that would make the engine run hotter. It will however not allow the motor to reach operating temp as quickly as it should- because it is not and issue of the system not being able to cool itself it's a matter of optimum running temp for the motor. Regarding pressure that is what the radiator cap is there for. because a good thermostat will actually have a bleed hole in it to help expedite the warm up period. And that is one of the other reasons that people end up going with thermostats rated at higher degree because some engines run better when hotter. The only reason to run a thermostat is that it will keep the motor within the optimum operating range where as without it the motor will essentially have a longer warm up cycle
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #12  
jimdutro's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach, Ca.
Car: 1988 Iroc
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt 3.27
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

When I lived in Bullhead City, Az. in `75 I was driving a new `75 GMC shortbed 4x4, 350 4 speed and the radiator boiled over when the truck was parked all day! It ran so hot during the summer, I pulled the thermostat and it ran much hotter. Removed the inner workings of the thermostat, reinstalled it and the truck ran cooler. Never seen a car boil over parked since, good reason to have moved.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 07:08 PM
  #13  
jccaclimber's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: 350 0.060" over
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Originally Posted by jaredi
Thats the ticket! Steam pockets thats what I was trying to remember. It seems to me though that when the system got up to temp and pressurized it would build up all the pressure it needed.





Thats the same idea that one guy had when he said "Think of holding a torch on a copper water pipe, when the water is flowing faster it doesn't have time to heat up." But the idea is not to heat up the water, it is to cool down the pipe (block).



If you put a torch by a pipe with flowing water you won't heat the water because there's a ton more water in total than if it was stationary. If you use a fast flowing pipe instead of a equivalent volume vat and the vat boils first its because the pipe is heating more evenly rather than heating a local section past the boiling point with the rest of the water slightly cooler. The pipe with the fast moving water actually picks up MORE energy in heat from the torch even if it boils slower. This is because the heat transfer is based on the temperature difference, larger difference (fresh supply of cool water in pipe), more energy absorption across the entire system (opposed to a local section). Also, convection is based on flow rate, higher flow rate, more heat transfer. This is why your radiator works better on the freeway than when standing still.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #14  
socal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Lake Jackson Tx
Car: 91z,97ws6,98fb,87&90jeep,05 yz250
Engine: 5.0tpi,5.7LT4,5.7LS1,4.2I6,5.7TPI,1
Transmission: t5,4l60e,
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

if the air is to hot for the rad to lose the proper amont of heat then it will never cool down

if the rad loses to much heat it will never warm up

so how effecient is the rad (size, rows, brass/copper or aluminum) pump, air flow to engien bay/rad

how efficient is the motor 500hp vs 200hp the 500hp will put out more heat

it will differ per application so you just have to try for your self to find out. one thing i've seen is to drill 1/8" holes in the thermostat to let some water pass but still cycle with the stat and this can be seen with most aftermarket stats that have a small hole and a piece of brass or some thing to act a a check valve.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 11:44 PM
  #15  
TeknoMaeg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

OK... first off I am going to make a brief statement that I have read a bit of good information and a lot of misinformation. It's not so much that you are wrong... just misinformed or perhaps you made assumptions without proper knowledge.

You can run many cars without a thermostat... many people do it... but you have to keep in mind of a heating principle called Conduction and Convection.

Conduction is passed from solid to solid due to molecular vibration. It's the reason your aluminum heads will swell faster than your iron block. Same reason that ceramic spacers between your head and intake manifold allow for a more dense intake charge. The ceramic slows the vibration, hence slows the heat transfer.

Convection is the transfer of heat from a solid to liquid. It occurs on the thin layer of liquid between the solid and main body liquid. Same reason a bigger cooler works better. More are for the liquid to meet the solid.

Now both convection and conduction are based on the heating and cooling properties of the solids/liquids. Or rather the speed at which each can absorb and dissipate heat.

For example the thermal conductive of Water is 0.61... where as cast iron is numbered at an 80.

Then you have Aluminum at 240 and finally the best conductor, copper at 400. Keep in mind the conductivity of the molecule depends on the heat at which it currently sits.

Most of this is gibberish, I know... I don't follow myself some times.

Simply said... If you have an EXTREMELY efficient water pump but your block does not convect heat as efficiently then you will not cool as efficiently. Same goes for your radiator. If you have an inadequate cooling source, radiator, fluid or your engine simply generates too much heat... you will not get the full benefit of your cooling system if the flow is not slowed by a restrictor or thermostat.

It all depends on the engine and all the efficiencies of the parts.

You can have a top notch radiator but it the coolant is flowing too fast, it will not convect and conduct the heat away from your block fast enough. Same goes for if your radiator is weak or blocked in parts. it won't radiate heat away and out of the coolant.

Do you need a thermostat? No....

Would a small restrictor help you? I think in this case it would.

If it doesn't then you cooling system has bigger issues...

If you think I am wrong... please read this first.
http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~allan/heat_trans/page2/page2.html
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #16  
socal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Lake Jackson Tx
Car: 91z,97ws6,98fb,87&90jeep,05 yz250
Engine: 5.0tpi,5.7LT4,5.7LS1,4.2I6,5.7TPI,1
Transmission: t5,4l60e,
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

i agree just to lazy to explain it all out and look things up but thats the Jamie Hinamen sientific way of saying it
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #17  
TeknoMaeg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Originally Posted by socal
i agree just to lazy to explain it all out and look things up but thats the Jamie Hinamen sientific way of saying it
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 07:41 PM
  #18  
GWW's Avatar
GWW
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 4 spd auto
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Well, thanks everyone it sure seems as if under very special circumstances it could happen so it shouldn't be ignored-especially if your modified, hot weather, loss of air flow due to coolers or ram air ducting etc. I don't think it's happened to me, maybe my friend who says it has but then you've got to see his cars. They definetly fall under the not in prime condition category. Perhaps I will send this to the Myth Buster show.
GW
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #19  
allencr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Originally Posted by TeknoMaeg
You can have a top notch radiator but it the coolant is flowing too fast, it will not convect and conduct the heat away from your block fast enough.

If you think I am wrong... please read this first.
http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~allan/heat_trans/page2/page2.html
Yes, you're wrong. Do you have anything else that might offer the slightest bit of proof that a faster flow will pickup engine heat, which the radiator is unable to dissipate. I've looked at the site, and there is nothing in it even close to confirming your 'coolant too fast' Myth, except for a small section 'Nucleate Boiling of Coolant' on page http://www.engr.colostate.edu/%7Eall...ge8/page8.html
Nucleate Boiling of Coolant

The heat fluxes and surface temperatures near the exhaust manifold and port are high enough so that nucleate boiling can occur in the coolant at those locations. The boiling heat transfer coefficients are much larger than single phase forced convection, so that the metal temperatures are lower.

For heat fluxes of the order of 1.5 MW/m2 and above, the resulting surface temperature of the cooling jacket will be about 20 to 30 C above the saturation temperature , typically, 130 C (400 K). The convection boiling process is very complex, as bubbles formed on the jacket surface are swept downstream and condense in cooler fluid. The surface temperature of the jacket throughout the engine block will be fairly uniform. The saturation or boiling temperature can be raised by increasing the pressure or by adding an additive with a high boiling point, such as ethylene glycol.

The design of the cooling passages in the engine block and head is done empirically. The primary design consideration is to provide for sufficient coolant flow at the high heat flux regimes, such as the exhaust valves.
This is a real problem that a restriction can cure by upping pressure, but is commonly mistaken & continues the myth.

If you can find anything from any manufacturer or troubleshooting guide
about a missing thermostat being responsible for anything other then LOW temp problems, please let us know!



These might help.
http://yarchive.net/car/engine_water_restrict.html
http://www.stewartcomponents.com/tec...ech_Tips_3.htm
http://yarchive.net/car/radiator_diagnosis.html
http://www.grapeaperacing.com/GrapeA...ingsystems.pdf
http://www.radiatorinfo.com/radtip.html
l
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #20  
allencr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Originally Posted by TeknoMaeg
You can have a top notch radiator but it the coolant is flowing too fast, it will not convect and conduct the heat away from your block fast enough.

If you think I am wrong... please read this first.
http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~allan/heat_trans/page2/page2.html
Yes, you're wrong. Do you have anything else that might offer the slightest bit of proof that a faster flow will pickup engine heat which the radiator is unable to dissipate. I've looked at the site, and there is nothing in it even close to confirming your 'coolant too fast' Myth, except for a small section 'Nucleate Boiling of Coolant' on page http://www.engr.colostate.edu/%7Eall...ge8/page8.html
Nucleate Boiling of Coolant

The heat fluxes and surface temperatures near the exhaust manifold and port are high enough so that nucleate boiling can occur in the coolant at those locations. The boiling heat transfer coefficients are much larger than single phase forced convection, so that the metal temperatures are lower.

For heat fluxes of the order of 1.5 MW/m2 and above, the resulting surface temperature of the cooling jacket will be about 20 to 30 C above the saturation temperature , typically, 130 C (400 K). The convection boiling process is very complex, as bubbles formed on the jacket surface are swept downstream and condense in cooler fluid. The surface temperature of the jacket throughout the engine block will be fairly uniform. The saturation or boiling temperature can be raised by increasing the pressure or by adding an additive with a high boiling point, such as ethylene glycol.

The design of the cooling passages in the engine block and head is done empirically. The primary design consideration is to provide for sufficient coolant flow at the high heat flux regimes, such as the exhaust valves.
This is the real problem that a restriction can cure by upping pressure, but is commonly mistaken & continues the myth.

If you can find anything from any manufacturer or troubleshooting guide
about a missing thermostat being responsible for anything other then LOW temp problems, please let us know!



These might help.
http://yarchive.net/car/engine_water_restrict.html
http://www.stewartcomponents.com/tec...ech_Tips_3.htm
http://yarchive.net/car/radiator_diagnosis.html
http://www.grapeaperacing.com/GrapeA...ingsystems.pdf
http://www.radiatorinfo.com/radtip.html

And we should've read the
[ALSO, we should've read these Important/Useful : common cooling questions Sticky Thread on this before wallowing in this type BS.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/cool...ions-read.html
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/cool...ns-read-2.html

Last edited by allencr; Aug 7, 2007 at 01:23 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 08:28 AM
  #21  
jaredi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Louisville KY
Car: 97 Z71
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 4L60E
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Nice smack down.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #22  
TeknoMaeg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Originally Posted by jaredi
Nice smack down.
Juvenile response at best...

Either way... I was a bit mistaken... the same principle I used to justify my theory was that one that destroyed it. My knowledge on thermodynamics is fair but that is it... fair...

So I was wrong... big deal... now I know more.

Also... registering a new name just to prove me wrong... come on now... I was just trying to help the guy...
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 03:53 PM
  #23  
jaredi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Louisville KY
Car: 97 Z71
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 4L60E
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Am I juvenile that when I don't know for sure about something's accuracy that I either preface it with a disclaimer or keep my mouth shut?

You didn't know, but you spouted it off as truth anyway even after claiming to have known more than any of the rest of us having read all this information and sifted through it all to provide us with the shining beacon of a technical post that you made.

And it was wrong.

So who's making juvenile posts here?

And I'm not sure what you mean about registering a new username, if you're accusing me thats absurd, if I intend to debate someone on anything I'm going to use my own username so everyone will know it was me that brought the tech. This time I didn't have the time to fuss about and do the research.

And BTW, the nice smack down comment wasn't even aimed at you personally, it was directed to everyone I've ever heard spout this logic of "Well if it flows to fast then it won't have time to heat up in the block or cool down in the radiator" It just gets mind numbing. Every time this idea is debunked it pops right back up again with someone else defending it.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #24  
GWW's Avatar
GWW
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 4 spd auto
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

Fellow Third Geners.
I honestly have to say I did not read that sticky before posting and for that I'm sorry. However even after reading it I still found some of the information here new, interesting and fun to think about, downflow radiators, steam pockets...
That's my purpose to come to this site, I enjoy it, cars are my hobby. Too old too fat, and too mean to do much else . I'm sorry I caused a fuss I will be more carefull next time.
If you see it on Myth Busters you'll no where it came from.
Again sorry for the trouble this may have caused, certaintly wasn't my intention. Moderator can lock or delete this post if you feel it's necessary.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #25  
jaredi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Louisville KY
Car: 97 Z71
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 4L60E
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

I thought it was pretty mild. LOL. I guess I'm just used to the corner carvers forums... Its all in the name of good tech.

Apologies if I ruffled some feathers, and props to allencr for bringin the tech and props to TeknoMaeg for at least taking to time to research it and try to help.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #26  
Ford2transam's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Tampa FL
Car: 1983 Trans Am ALL STOCK which is go
Engine: 305low
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: Myth Buster Question for You

I ask a few question before answering:
Built or any aftermarket motor parts? (I guess yes)
the rad is it stock? did the rad shop test it and it and say okie dokie?
But point blank you need to cool it so if their is not a vapor lock in the system i'd say you'd need a larger rad. At the least if your have a 2 core rad get a 3 or 4 core or some nifty after market antifreeze you can find at most auto stores. Without more info this is just a guess, respond with answers i'll give another suggestion
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maroe624
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Apr 16, 2017 08:29 AM
InfinityShade
Tech / General Engine
2
Feb 21, 2016 01:29 PM
Bubbajones_ya
Electronics
4
Aug 31, 2015 12:02 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.