DFI and ECM Discuss all aspects of DFI (Digital Fuel Injection), ECMs (Electronic Control Module), scanners, and diagnostic equipment. Fine tune your Third Gen computer system for top performance.

Any Aftermarket Seq. fire ECM's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2003 | 12:11 AM
  #1  
92RS shearn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Car: 92' RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9-bolt
Any Aftermarket Seq. fire ECM's?

I did a search looking over the info for the Holley Commander 950 ECM. I was wanting to build an engine with the Stealth Ram but am not sure if the 950 is the best way to control it. For one it is a batch fire system, would prefer a sequential pattern.

It also looks as though accels' system which is also batch.
Basically I am looking for a system that is easy to control and change, is flexible (if I one day decide to power charge or go with N20). But also one that doesn't have limited features that prevent you from changing things that you may want to.

And of course all at a reasonable price
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2003 | 02:05 PM
  #2  
Zac's92's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 278
Likes: 2
From: San Luis Obispo California
Accel 7.0 can be run as sequntial but unless you are reving the **** out of the thing you aren't going to notice a difference.


Zac
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2003 | 06:35 PM
  #3  
biggtime's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Accel is the way for you to go. DFIV7 can be run sequential (although no major benefit except emissions) If in the
future you decide to go nitrous it has the enrichment/ timing program built in. It also has the capability to go wideband. We
did a sequential tunedport with a p1sc but ended up going back
to batch. The dual sync distributer from accel is a disaster right
now. The wires are to small and keep breaking.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2003 | 12:19 AM
  #4  
92RS shearn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Car: 92' RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9-bolt
I am surprised. I would have thought that there would have been a more significant benifit to seq. over batch.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2003 | 01:39 AM
  #5  
Zac's92's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 278
Likes: 2
From: San Luis Obispo California
you really only need seq. for higher rpm's
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2003 | 12:00 PM
  #6  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
With the larger injectors I find batch better.
With huge may SEFI would be needed.
I'm running 55 PPH injectors in my 231 V6.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 09:14 AM
  #7  
Kenwood's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: PT88 Turbo DART 406
Transmission: th400
Axle/Gears: 9" ford
Just to add fuel to the fire

FAST has sequential systems...And are easier to tune...ALSO if you wanted to run batch now and would want sequential later They will upgrade it for you...And they also have an individual cylinder timing/fuel rate option....You can essentially Tune each cylinder individually*** that can help if your using say a front feeding manidfold where NA the closer cylinders get MORE air...**

Electromotive TEC3 is Batch/Staged/and sequential...at the click of the mouse to change it.. From what Im told it supposed to be fairly user friendly..
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 08:31 PM
  #8  
FAST LiFE's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 221
Likes: 11
From: SF, CA
If you are worried about fuel distribution through the Stealth Ram because it is a front feeding manifold, you can run a DFI VIC (Variable Injector Controller) that runs off batch fire but can add trim to each individual injector up to 25%. The TPIS Miniram I run has always had a problem with the rear cylinders running more than the front cylinders. I lean out the entire fuel map on my DFI till the rear injectors run where they’re supposed to be but that would lean out the front cylinders. I use the VIC to add about 8% more fuel to number 1 and 2 cylinders, about 5% more to 3 and 4, 3% to number 5 and 6 and 7 and 8 are left at around 0 – 1%. Hope this helps.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2003 | 03:58 PM
  #9  
Kenwood's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: PT88 Turbo DART 406
Transmission: th400
Axle/Gears: 9" ford
Yeah that works fine as a band aid BUT I would not advise that someone go find or BUY an OLDER batch system and then add a 500 dollar injector controller...Typically something BAtch like a HAltech or gen 6 dfi get around 600 used...so for 1,100 they have an OLD .."limited" system...or for a few hunderd more they have much newer and better technology..

The vic is good for what you are talking about or running larger injectors with a stock ECU or OLD ECU you already have but I would not advise someone to go buy an OLD system and all the equipment and headaches with add ons to make it work..The differences in dollars at that point dont makje it worth it...I mean You could buy a FAST system WITHOUT WB02 for the same money...DIfference is later on if you want WB02 or SFI or individual cylinder timing/fuel control you just buy the upgrade..

Basically GOOD idea if you have an old or stock ECU and dont plan on ever running faster....

Bad idea if your deciding on buying a new setup..Because the cost difference does not make it worthwhile....


Im sure many will argue with me...but if the ultimate answer was to run GEN 6 or stock with a VIC then everyone in the racing world would not be buying $5000 Motec sytems..and accell would have had no reason to develop gen7 dfi..
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 06:02 PM
  #10  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
I've run the same ecm and code in Batch and SEFI.
Some of the oems allow for switching things in the code to do that.

So far Batch has been better for drivibility then SEFI.
My theory is that with firing the injectors twice as often provides better atomization. But, this is for off road use.

I'm using 55 PPH injectors on a little 231 turbo car.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
J-money
Suspension and Chassis
15
Jan 4, 2019 09:45 AM
skeltor
DFI and ECM
17
Feb 2, 2016 10:37 AM
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
sahlomonic
Electronics
7
Sep 20, 2015 07:15 PM
Ranbo108
Tech / General Engine
14
Sep 9, 2015 12:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.