DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

FWIW, burning flash PROMs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #1  
GMTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 2
From: Vereinigten Staaten
Car: Take
Engine: Your
Transmission: Pick
FWIW, burning flash PROMs.

I have been out of the PROM burning loop for quite a while now. I was having trouble getting AT29C256 EEPROMs to burn on my laptop. No matter what I tried, it would not work. I modified my MemCal with a low profile ZIF socket so that my 29C256 chips could be interchanged if need be. I could easily program it with all FF's, but it would never take a regular .bin file, no matter how many times I tried, no matter how many "adjustments" I made to the laptop.

Well, I decided I wanted to get back into burning to unlock the true potential of the mods I have done to my car over the last year and a half, and upgraded my old version of Pocket Programmer, version 1.12, to Pocket Programmer II, version 1.47, and now it burns the chips flawlessly. It erases in no time, and programs the entire .bin file the first time, no errors! Its great.

Long story short, if your having trouble burning EEPROMs (Flash PROMs), and you are using Pocket Programmer, try the latest version of there software. I didn't do any tweaking to the computer. As soon as I installed the software, the chips worked immediatly
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #2  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,675
Likes: 314
Good to see you're still with us. Guess I'd better be checking my software version before dropping in any 29x DIPs...
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2003 | 08:47 PM
  #3  
NastyL98_T/A's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
can you send me the newer version of the software? As you can tell by my other post, I'm having lots of trouble burning my at29c256 chips. I'm banging my head against the walls over, and over, and over, and ov.......you get the idea
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 11:17 AM
  #4  
NufNuffZ28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 68
From: NC
Car: 1987 Iroc
Engine: 357 Single plane and a Ysi vortech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9"
I am having the same problem, but have one question. How do you erase the chip before you rewrite it? I thought it just wrote over the existing .bin

Thanks

Chris
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 11:47 AM
  #5  
bnoon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: West Des Moines, IA
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Originally posted by NufNuffZ28
I am having the same problem, but have one question. How do you erase the chip before you rewrite it? I thought it just wrote over the existing .bin

Thanks

Chris
Fill the buffer with "FF" and program the device. Wait a few seconds for it to program... Do a "Blank check", then load the buffer with your .bin file and program the device again. Reburns take mere minutes tops with the 29 series chips.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 04:14 PM
  #6  
Ed Maher's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 10
From: Manassas VA
Car: 04 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12 T56
Actually, NuffNuff is right. You don't need to erase flash chips to put a new bin on them. I have never bothered to burn a chip to FFs before putting my data on them. Doesn't make sense to me to waste write cycles for no good reason.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 04:35 PM
  #7  
bnoon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: West Des Moines, IA
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Perhaps it's just my OS (ME) on a P-III 600 MHz machine then, but I've had maybe 5-6 out of ten tries at doing it without erasing fail on the PP2 and newest release software. Not one failure to write the chip if erased first and never a failed erase "FF" fill. As always, YMMV...
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #8  
NastyL98_T/A's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
Me email address is NastyL98TransAm@yahoo.com
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #9  
Ed Maher's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 10
From: Manassas VA
Car: 04 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12 T56
Weird. I use an old version 1.34 of the windows software, and have run it on everything from a win95 PI 166, W98 laptop at a few hundred mghz, and a 1.7ghz XP machine. Never had a problem writing over a bin.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 10:04 AM
  #10  
bnoon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: West Des Moines, IA
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Yeah, it is weird... I just got my Compaq 486 laptop back last night (OS reloaded because of a virus, which killed the CD ROM drive access) and it runs Win 95... it burns C29's right over the top without erasing first. Oh well... I guess Micron PC just does something different to their P-III desktop machines or something...

Originally posted by NastyL98_T/A
Me email address is NastyL98TransAm@yahoo.com
If you already have a version of their software, get updates here...
http://xtronics.com/memory/EPROM.htm#Upgrades

Last edited by bnoon; Jun 10, 2003 at 10:09 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 11:45 AM
  #11  
tpi_roc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
From: Orygun
I ran into a problem of not being able to pull bin's from the chip with the PP software


a software update took care of that issue

Stay on top of updates guys
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #12  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,675
Likes: 314
Originally posted by Ed Maher
...Doesn't make sense to me to waste write cycles for no good reason.
Ed,

I understand your point. the system should work as advertised. However, "waste" may be a bit extreme if it works for him. After all, most 29C* DIPs have a rated W cycle of at least 1M. I can't imagine burning any one device that many times. You PP-II will die before then...
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 12:14 PM
  #13  
NufNuffZ28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 68
From: NC
Car: 1987 Iroc
Engine: 357 Single plane and a Ysi vortech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9"
Originally posted by Vader
Ed,

I understand your point. the system should work as advertised. However, "waste" may be a bit extreme if it works for him. After all, most 29C* DIPs have a rated W cycle of at least 1M. I can't imagine burning any one device that many times. You PP-II will die before then...

About how many burns is W cycle? Just wondering. I've got about 12-15 on my chips.

Chris
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 03:22 PM
  #14  
RedIrocZ-28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Car: Iroc-Z
Engine: 355 AFR'd HSR
Transmission: 700R4
ALERT! n00b question

When burning the 29C stuff, don't you have to double the .bin file so it reaches the 256 end of the buffer since we all have 128 stuff? If so, how do you do it? I haven't used mine yet because I haven't been able to find the post that explained it again.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #15  
tpi_roc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
From: Orygun
You only have to double the bin if you're using a 165
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #16  
RedIrocZ-28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Car: Iroc-Z
Engine: 355 AFR'd HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by tpi_roc
You only have to double the bin if you're using a 165
H-O-W?

I am running Win XP if it matters. I seem to remember that it did.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 08:19 PM
  #17  
SATURN5's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Make sure your bin file is located on C:\

in DOS or DOS window..

copy /b 16K.bin +16K.bin 32K.bin

cheers, BW
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 08:19 PM
  #18  
NastyL98_T/A's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
You have to 'stack' the .bin file. GMECM edit has a stacker built into the software. You put in the size of the file, and the size of the chip. ex) on a 165 ECM you enter the size of the file as 16k and the desired file size of 32k and rename the output file and it will stack it for you. OR you can have the PP2 start the 16k burn at a certain spot on the chip so it only burns the 16k worth of information on the top half of the eprom. Very hard to explain in words from one newbie (myself ) to another and it make sense.....but I tried.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 08:20 PM
  #19  
MikeT 88IROC350's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 786
Likes: 2
From: Guilford, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 w/TransGo
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73s
If you are using the Windows version of PPII software, you can just initally program your 256's with all FF's first, then take your 16k bins (for 165 ecms) and start the program at address 4000. I am sure there is a post on this exact subject.

I am running Win ME on a 475mhz system, and it works good for me. I was using the "double the 16k bin" method before I got the WinPP2 software. But the windows version (1.74) is sweet, not sure what the latest really is.

Also, when I did start the burn at 4000, seemed like it took a long time (too long) to flash, compared to starting at 0 with a doubled up bin. Then I started having other PC problems, ended up reformatting hard drive and reloading everything. Now she flashes from 4000 in about a minute.

Just my 2 cents.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2003 | 09:53 AM
  #20  
bnoon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: West Des Moines, IA
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
I've also noticed that it can take a while longer to program if you move the mouse cursor while it's programming. As long as nothing is moved, it takes maybe ten seconds or so for a burn to program. Once the mouse moves, it lengthens out to 45 seconds or longer.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 03:27 PM
  #21  
383 rocket bird's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Columbus,Cleveland
Few questions, when you program a flash chip with a 165 bin, do you set the device start or buffer start to 4,000? Also when you are taking a bin from a flash chip that is only 16K and trying to read it with tunercat do you have to set the buffer start to 4,000 when you save it to your hard drive so tunercat sees the correct file size? Thank guys. -John
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 07:48 AM
  #22  
NastyL98_T/A's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
When burning a eprom for a 165 ECM you can start at 4000, but it's just as easy to "stack" the bin if your software is equipped with that feature. That way you don't set the PP2 software to start a 4000 then burn something other than a 165 eprom and end up only putting half of the bin on the chip.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
junior419
TBI
14
Apr 7, 2025 11:35 AM
RS Reaper
Electronics
4
Oct 17, 2018 07:52 PM
Thornburg
Aftermarket Product Review
10
Oct 6, 2015 12:04 PM
lewandom
Electronics
2
Oct 1, 2015 08:15 AM
MitcherNeaf
DIY PROM
3
Sep 24, 2015 09:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.