Why is fuel pressure modulated by vacuum?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 406 Stealth Ram
Transmission: 700R4
Why is fuel pressure modulated by vacuum?
What is the purpose of varying the pressure based on vacuum? Wouldn't tuning VE make more sense if you had constant fuel pressure? Maybe I'm just totally missing something, but it seems to me like the vacuum modulated fuel pressure regulator, and the MAP/RPM VE tables are trying to accomplish almost the same thing. Thanks, and please do let me know if I'm way off base here.
Thanks!
Scott
Thanks!
Scott
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
On a port injected engine a vacuum referenced fuel pressure regulator maintains the same differential pressure across the injector.
IOW, the fuel pressure between the input of the injector and the discharge nozzle of the injector is held constant. The lower the manifold pressure the lower the fuel pressure is.
This keeps the fuel flow throguh the injector constant even as the manifold pressure changes.
RBob.
IOW, the fuel pressure between the input of the injector and the discharge nozzle of the injector is held constant. The lower the manifold pressure the lower the fuel pressure is.
This keeps the fuel flow throguh the injector constant even as the manifold pressure changes.
RBob.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
At WOT when the vacuum is essentially zero, there's atmospheric pressure in the intake. If the fuel pressure is say 60 psi above atmospheric, the pressure difference between the fuel and the intake is 60psi. At cruise there might be 20 inches of vacuum in the intake, which is about -10 psi. The pressure difference between the fuel and the intake is now about 70 psi, unless the fuel pressure is reduced.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
btw, this is also why TBI and carbed cars dont NEED vacuum modulated regulators.
they're above the throttle blades, so the pressure is not effected by vacuum. so theres no need to compensate.
athough some TBI guys are running them, but for diffrent reasons..
they're above the throttle blades, so the pressure is not effected by vacuum. so theres no need to compensate.
athough some TBI guys are running them, but for diffrent reasons..
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Right, in a carbed car the fuel in the bowl isn't pressurized at all. It's the difference between the atmospheric pressure on the fuel in the bowl and the reduced pressure in the venturi that moves the fuel.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
It still doesn't make it easier to tune part throttle when you have the fuel pressure dropping and increasing due to vaccum fluctuations.
If the fuel pressure was constant at all times with-out any negative effects, it would make VE and other tables easier to tune, IMO.
If the fuel pressure was constant at all times with-out any negative effects, it would make VE and other tables easier to tune, IMO.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by 1bad91Z
It still doesn't make it easier to tune part throttle when you have the fuel pressure dropping and increasing due to vaccum fluctuations.
If the fuel pressure was constant at all times with-out any negative effects, it would make VE and other tables easier to tune, IMO.
It still doesn't make it easier to tune part throttle when you have the fuel pressure dropping and increasing due to vaccum fluctuations.
If the fuel pressure was constant at all times with-out any negative effects, it would make VE and other tables easier to tune, IMO.
ahh.
but it IS constant.
constant to the relative pressure of the intake manifold.
this means that a 30ms pulse will spray the same amount of fuel at any MAP point.
if you left it constant to the relative pressure of the atmosphere, at WOT it would be spraying less then at idle.
so your idle pulsewidths would be absolutly tiny.. too small.. and your injectors would ahve to be larger to spray the correct amount of fuel at WOT.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Its to make the control output of the injector "Linear" so that increase of the pulse width by a certain amount will result in a proportional amount increase in fuel delivery.
Without a straight line output of fuel Vs pulse width, the control would be much more difficult to get the desired amount.
Trying to tune a non linear device curve is a real PITA.
It can be done via lookup tables, and specific calibration points, etc but if conditions change the lookup is shifted and the accurracy is lost.
Not to be confused with repeatability, devices can be non-linear yet have excellent repeatability.
Jp
Without a straight line output of fuel Vs pulse width, the control would be much more difficult to get the desired amount.
Trying to tune a non linear device curve is a real PITA.
It can be done via lookup tables, and specific calibration points, etc but if conditions change the lookup is shifted and the accurracy is lost.
Not to be confused with repeatability, devices can be non-linear yet have excellent repeatability.
Jp
Supreme Member

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
From: Johnstown, Ohio
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Originally posted by Apeiron
At WOT when the vacuum is essentially zero, there's atmospheric pressure in the intake. If the fuel pressure is say 60 psi above atmospheric, the pressure difference between the fuel and the intake is 60psi. At cruise there might be 20 inches of vacuum in the intake, which is about -10 psi. The pressure difference between the fuel and the intake is now about 70 psi, unless the fuel pressure is reduced.
At WOT when the vacuum is essentially zero, there's atmospheric pressure in the intake. If the fuel pressure is say 60 psi above atmospheric, the pressure difference between the fuel and the intake is 60psi. At cruise there might be 20 inches of vacuum in the intake, which is about -10 psi. The pressure difference between the fuel and the intake is now about 70 psi, unless the fuel pressure is reduced.
So, anytime the vacuum fluctuates, so does the fuel pressure, but at any point, the pressure differential IS THE SAME. Really, when the fuel pressure rises due to low vacuum, it really isn't increasing, even though it looks like it to a gauge.
Many people running Turbo's and SC's tend to forget this, and it is much more important then!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM





