DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

85 corvette's "special" injector size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 11:57 PM
  #1  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
85 corvette's "special" injector size?

I had found a few resources that state that the 85 corvette ran a lower fuel pressure than any other TPI application. I seem to remember that it might have also had a different injector size. I know this is a strange request but I cant seem to find a single one of these resources now. Does anyone else know of this 85 vette only oddity? I seem to remember it being an odd size for a 350, like 19 pounds or something like that.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 12:19 AM
  #2  
3.8TransAM's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
GM ran almost all the early port setups(ie 85 only, or close to it(buicks excepted)) at roughly 35 psi. Due to hot start issues and the ensueing driveability issues this was later raised to the "standard" 43.5. All the early cars were recalled and refitted with new updated chips and a new regulator to bring the psi up to 43.5 like the newer cards
later
Jeremy
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 01:55 AM
  #3  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
I had no idea, cool thanks

Im mainly trying to figure out what the oddball size of the injectors they had was. Does anyone know?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 07:19 AM
  #4  
3.8TransAM's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
far as i know, they were 22#
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #5  
SBNova's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland,Florida
85 vettes supposedly have 24 lb injectors, and are the only (early c4 anyway) year to have factory forged pistons too. A CF member recently disassembled his 85 and had factory TRW forged.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 01:25 PM
  #6  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
so they have 24's instead of the 22's the rest of the years had?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 06:47 AM
  #7  
SBNova's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland,Florida
Yup, thats what I have heard. I will try to find something and post a link if I am successful.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 11:20 AM
  #8  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
well that seems like maybe it was the "weird" size that I couldn't remember, thanks alot
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #9  
Morley's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 2
Yes, the 85 Vette used 24# injectors running at 36 PSI, VS the 305's 19# @ 43 PSI. And the later years all used 22# @ 43 PSI (in 350's)
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 12:32 PM
  #10  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
thanks guys that sounds just like what I was trying to remember. I will apply this info in the repairs/modification of the vette.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 09:28 AM
  #11  
Bluevette85's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Latham, NY
Car: 85 Corvette
Engine: 355 Superram
Transmission: 700R4 Transgo Shift Kit
My 85 vette has 24 lbs injectors with a stock fuel pressure of 39 psi with the vacuum line disconnected from the regulator.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 10:57 AM
  #12  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Parts counter stuff all have the same part number for the replacement injectors. They say it's the same bosch number for 85 vette as it is for the camaro and newer tpi vettes . So waht's up with that?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 01:06 PM
  #13  
Morley's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 2
Originally posted by JPrevost
Parts counter stuff all have the same part number for the replacement injectors. They say it's the same bosch number for 85 vette as it is for the camaro and newer tpi vettes . So waht's up with that?
Heh, they also said that a double stacked diaphram EGR valve would fit my TPI engine. Total heighth of teir EGR is about 5" and the total clearance between the base and plenum is about 3"....In short, they all have cranium rectumitus.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 01:35 PM
  #14  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
parts counter also says there are no 1991-1992 camaro RS's with 350

parts counter also says that the piston rings in my 91's 350 are 5/64", 5/64", 3/16" instead of the 2.0mm, 1.5mm, 4.0mm they actually are.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #15  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
parts counter also says there are no 1991-1992 camaro RS's with 350

parts counter also says that the piston rings in my 91's 350 are 5/64", 5/64", 3/16" instead of the 2.0mm, 1.5mm, 4.0mm they actually are.
I can't explain the rings but the RS I can. First of it isn't an RS. It's actually a z28 with the RS appearance package. So the way I see the B4C's is just a z28 with RS badges and spoiler, everything else is Z28 standard. A nice sleeper .
Why are your rings metric?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #16  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Originally posted by JPrevost
I can't explain the rings but the RS I can. First of it isn't an RS. It's actually a z28 with the RS appearance package. So the way I see the B4C's is just a z28 with RS badges and spoiler, everything else is Z28 standard. A nice sleeper .
Why are your rings metric?

that makes no sense, or better yet you tell me which makes more sense:

it is a Z-28 with RS badges, and without the Z-28 hood, and without the z28 hood scoops, and without the Z28 decklid, and without the Z28 wing...

or

it is a RS with a 350

not a hard one to figure

metric rings? well I cant claim to be an expert there but some of the resources I have checked say it is a 90 up thing for cars and trucks with 350's
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #17  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
I was under the impression that the B4C was a 1LE optioned car (z28 only) so it had upgraded suspension, wheels, brakes, etc. The RS was only the apperance, nothing else. The struts were bilstiens (not an RS option, only Z28). See where I'm coming from? So it's like the glass half empty or half full. I see cars as a drivetrain/suspension and then body, not vice versa like most. Then again I'm a VERY technical person.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 06:59 AM
  #18  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Interesting about the '92 MY, the RS was the base model. It wasn't any option at all, just the most basic Camaro that could be purchased.

The B4C is a law enforcement option. Else the only way to get a 350 was to purchase a 'lettered' car.

RBob.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
15
Nov 10, 2015 06:17 AM
69 Six Pack
Camaros for Sale
13
Oct 5, 2015 07:51 PM
bamaboy0323
Tech / General Engine
25
Sep 3, 2015 06:07 AM
litemupp
Southern California Area
2
Aug 23, 2015 10:09 PM
knight72
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
Aug 10, 2015 09:32 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.