well I have gone through a number of posts and the sticky which talks about the 6e not having the bpw table. but, I can't seem to see any mention if it is just part of the programming that has never been hacked or if it simply uses another method of determaning this in the 6e.


what really makes the 6e so much better than 32b? I seemed to have missed why it is better. it is just said a countless amount of times that it is better

 

i'll try to see if i get this right...if i say something wrong, and you (other readers) know, please correct me.

so the main reason the 32B gets upgraded is becuase its sort of like running window 98, then upgrading to XP. Its just later software that has alot of refinement, leading to better driveability.

the 6e code does not have the BPW table--your question is valid, I technically do not know if someone has actually found the bpw table, but it is not used. but the 32b really didn't use it anyway. the MAF tables are used in both, 32b just has the option.

the 6e has the cold start fueling added into the code, so in retrofit applications, it's less hardware to install. in the case that your original parts are broke, and you can't find new ones it makes this easier.

i believe that the aldl code is also more stable. people are under the impression that the 8192 baud rate only works with 6e, but that is not true. I have used it on my 87 iroc, but it tends to be buggy, whether its the code or the ecm, or the scanning software, I have no idea, but the 6e is just more stable.

last but not least (and there is probably more), I have found that the idle logic seems to be more stable as well.

so thats it in a nutshell. either one will work, it just depends on where you are starting from.