leaning out at wide open throttle
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
You should get your "part throttle" as close as possible to 128/128 before even attempting your WOT fuel settings. This seems to be the most common error "beginners" make with eprom burning; they concentrate on WOT and forget about part throttle. You may find that your part throttle is so overly rich that EVEN reducing your PE%add vs RPM to zero it STILL runs too rich.
But to answer your question, to lean your engine at WOT, you would reduce the amount of fuel added as a particular RPM range.
But to answer your question, to lean your engine at WOT, you would reduce the amount of fuel added as a particular RPM range.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Glenn91L98GTA:
You should get your "part throttle" as close as possible to 128/128 before even attempting your WOT fuel settings. This seems to be the most common error "beginners" make with eprom burning; they concentrate on WOT and forget about part throttle. You may find that your part throttle is so overly rich that EVEN reducing your PE%add vs RPM to zero it STILL runs too rich.
But to answer your question, to lean your engine at WOT, you would reduce the amount of fuel added as a particular RPM range.</font>
You should get your "part throttle" as close as possible to 128/128 before even attempting your WOT fuel settings. This seems to be the most common error "beginners" make with eprom burning; they concentrate on WOT and forget about part throttle. You may find that your part throttle is so overly rich that EVEN reducing your PE%add vs RPM to zero it STILL runs too rich.
But to answer your question, to lean your engine at WOT, you would reduce the amount of fuel added as a particular RPM range.</font>
what would add more fuel......increasing the percentages?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Car: '87 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 385 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Yep, increasing the percentage adds more fuel. As Glenn stated, you want to tune in your part-throttle block learns first so that you have an accurate baseline for your WOT tuning. If you've changed injectors (which I'm sure you have running a 406), you need to make sure the injector constant matches what the injectors flow at whatever fuel pressure you're running. If they're Ford SVO injectors, keep in mind that Ford rates their's at 38 psi while you're probably running several more psi than that. SVO 24# injectors flow about 26#/hr of fuel at normal GM pressures.
If your block learns are all high or low in nearly all of the block learn cells, you can use the injector constant to make a global change that would affect all of the BL cells. You can then use the MAF tables to fine-tune certain areas where your BL cells are higher or lower than 128. Once that's done, now you can accurately tune your WOT tables. I worked on the RPM table first to get my O2 curve in a flat line, then lowered it as a whole using the WOT vs. coolant temp table.
------------------
Greg Westphal
'87 IROC 305TPI/A4
If your block learns are all high or low in nearly all of the block learn cells, you can use the injector constant to make a global change that would affect all of the BL cells. You can then use the MAF tables to fine-tune certain areas where your BL cells are higher or lower than 128. Once that's done, now you can accurately tune your WOT tables. I worked on the RPM table first to get my O2 curve in a flat line, then lowered it as a whole using the WOT vs. coolant temp table.
------------------
Greg Westphal
'87 IROC 305TPI/A4
appreciate it Greg, That'll give a great starting place.
Yes, I am running ford 24lb svo fuel injectors, thanks for adding that in. They were alot cheaper.
by the way how do I need to adjust the single fire and double fire.... both to 26 lbs.
Yes, I am running ford 24lb svo fuel injectors, thanks for adding that in. They were alot cheaper.
by the way how do I need to adjust the single fire and double fire.... both to 26 lbs.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Car: '87 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 385 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Ooof, 24# injectors on a 406?!? I'd put in 30#'ers in there to be safe. Have you calculated your duty cycle with the injector pulse widths you're getting?
You only need to adjust the double-fire injector constant, although you could adjust both to the same number since the single-fire constant is ignored. Which tuner program are you using? I know that GMEPro, TunerCat, and WinBin all have the injector constants...
------------------
Greg Westphal
'87 IROC 305TPI/A4
You only need to adjust the double-fire injector constant, although you could adjust both to the same number since the single-fire constant is ignored. Which tuner program are you using? I know that GMEPro, TunerCat, and WinBin all have the injector constants...
------------------
Greg Westphal
'87 IROC 305TPI/A4
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by GregWestphal:
...I worked on the RPM table first to get my O2 curve in a flat line, then lowered it as a whole using the WOT vs. coolant temp table.
</font>
...I worked on the RPM table first to get my O2 curve in a flat line, then lowered it as a whole using the WOT vs. coolant temp table.
</font>
The lightbulb just clicked on. When running at WOT the output from my O2 sensor always drops over the course of a pass, indicating lean out. I had assumed this was because the chip was incrementally leaning the AFR with RPM. This has been proven false upon review of the BIN file. What's really happening is that my MAF is under-reporting airflow due to the removal of the screens and fins, resulting in injector pulsewidths that are too low. Now you've given me a parameter (O2 output @ WOT) I can monitor to tweak the MAF scalars at high air flow rates.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Z-BOSS:
I don't think it's running too rich at wot, I didn't mention it's 406 tpi with mass air.
what would add more fuel......increasing the percentages?</font>
I don't think it's running too rich at wot, I didn't mention it's 406 tpi with mass air.
what would add more fuel......increasing the percentages?</font>
I'm using the tuner cat 6E tdf file. I got the 24lbers reasonable. I haven't found a set of 30's yet. I got a buddy running the exact set up except with a speed pro. He was able to get by on 24lbers until he started spraying a little gas. Then he went to 30's. A matter of fact I bought his old injectors. I really don't know how to calculate the duty cycle.... I'll look it up though.
Even with a 406 it's a mild set up. A custom comp roller cam with about 272 adv duration , .510, 540 lift. with g2 trickflow heads. nice quiet idle....
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Car: '87 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 385 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Hmmmm, with a mild cam like that and not revving too high, you should be fine with 24# injectors for now. Since the time available to inject fuel is less with more revs, you have a greater chance of maxing out your duty cycles with more revs than more cubic inches, although either one or a combination thereof will do it.
------------------
Greg Westphal
'87 IROC 305TPI/A4
------------------
Greg Westphal
'87 IROC 305TPI/A4
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by GregWestphal:
Hmmmm, with a mild cam like that and not revving too high, you should be fine with 24# injectors for now. Since the time available to inject fuel is less with more revs, you have a greater chance of maxing out your duty cycles with more revs than more cubic inches, although either one or a combination thereof will do it.
</font>
Hmmmm, with a mild cam like that and not revving too high, you should be fine with 24# injectors for now. Since the time available to inject fuel is less with more revs, you have a greater chance of maxing out your duty cycles with more revs than more cubic inches, although either one or a combination thereof will do it.
</font>
Thanks for the replies Greg, nice hearing from a mass air guy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
morrow
Suspension and Chassis
78
Jan 13, 2024 12:29 PM
TheTraut88
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Sep 7, 2015 05:22 PM
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM





