DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

AUJP.BIN inital spark advance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2001 | 09:23 PM
  #1  
John Millican's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
AUJP.BIN inital spark advance

The AUJP Bin has an inital spark advance of 6°. Is this to match the base timing of the engine or should I set the base timing to 0°?

If I set the base to 6° and leave the initial timing in the Prom at 6° would the real timing at idle be 12°?

Also the maximum spark advance is 41.8°, this seems a little high compared to the old school way of thinking with 36-38° total timing. What gives?

------------------
86 Camaro Sport
383 Speed-O-Motive Crate Engine, Raptor 700R4 Tranmission, Trick Flow Twisted Wedge G2's, 58mm Accel TB, 3.73 Auburn Pro, SLP Cold Air Induction and Headers, Hooker Cat-back, Serpentine Belt Setup, Dual IROC Fans, Jamex springs, 16" IROC Rims, 36mm/24mm Sway Bars, Global West Steering Brace. Hotchkis Rear LCA's,Panhard Bar and SFC's.
My Camaro Project
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2001 | 09:53 PM
  #2  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
The AUJP Bin has an inital spark advance of 6°. Is this to match the base timing of the engine or should I set the base timing to 0°?
</font>
Used to match the base timing that you set at the distributor. As an example ... my distributor is set to have initial base timing at 10º BTDC. I have the constant for the intial timing also set to 10º. This is so the computer KNOWS where you set the timing. The ECM has no way to detect WHERE you set the base timing. Thus, it uses a preset constant.

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
If I set the base to 6° and leave the initial timing in the Prom at 6° would the real timing at idle be 12°?
</font>
No. As mentioned above

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
Also the maximum spark advance is 41.8°, this seems a little high compared to the old school way of thinking with 36-38° total timing. What gives?
</font>
You are thinking in terms of WOT only. However, that value is used for more than just WOT. Think part throttle too.

Tim

------------------
TRAXION's 1990 IROC-Z
Best Time = 12.244 @ 112.51mph (1.778 60' / 7.819@88.32mph in the 1/8)
All Natural. No Force. No Drugs. Stock Bottom End. Stock Body Panels.
Gunning for NA 11's with bigger cam, bigger stall, and bigger exhaust.
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Moderator: PROM board at thirdgen.org
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2001 | 10:02 PM
  #3  
John Millican's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Thanks for the quick response. It makes much more sense now.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2001 | 10:14 PM
  #4  
GMTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 2
From: Vereinigten Staaten
Car: Take
Engine: Your
Transmission: Pick
Well, I think I disagree. If you look at the stock timing for a 305, its 0*, but if you look in the chip, its set at 6*. So the computer will use a base timing of 6* ASSUMING that the dist is set at TDC (0*). Now if you crank your distributer to 6*, and the computer thinks it is advancing it to 6*, 6+6=12.

------------------
If you live in Southeastern US, check us out!
South East Thirdgen

GM Master Tech
ASE Master Tech + L1

Savannah, GA

'87 Trans Am
S/D TPI retrofit including functional PassKey,
22# injectors,
Whatever chip I feel like burning,
JET AFPR, Ported Plenum,
TB Coolant Bypass, Custom Cold Air,
SSM SFC, KYB Shocks, Boxed LCAs, Wonder Bar,
8mm Accel wires,
Flowmaster Exhaust,
16" GTA rims,
Corvette Servo,
3.73 Posi
4wheel Disc Brakes
Summit 1-5/8" headers, 2.5" Dynomax catback.

Best 1/8: 9.519@72.74

'97 Bonneville SSE
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2001 | 09:05 AM
  #5  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
According to my 1991 GM Shop Manual, the TBI is 0* and the TPI (305 & 350) is 6*BTDC. But as Tim said it is really irrelevant as long as the base timing in the eprom matches what you set your distributor is set to. If it does not match, the Total Spark Advance will be off by the difference between the two.

Reply
Old Jun 17, 2001 | 08:54 PM
  #6  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
You can disagree but its true! What Glenn said also backs up what I have explained.

Tim

------------------
TRAXION's 1990 IROC-Z
Best Time = 12.244 @ 112.51mph (1.778 60' / 7.819@88.32mph in the 1/8)
All Natural. No Force. No Drugs. Stock Bottom End. Stock Body Panels.
Gunning for NA 11's with bigger cam, bigger stall, and bigger exhaust.
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Moderator: PROM board at thirdgen.org
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2001 | 05:44 AM
  #7  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by GMTech:
Well, I think I disagree. If you look at the stock timing for a 305, its 0*, but if you look in the chip, its set at 6*. So the computer will use a base timing of 6* ASSUMING that the dist is set at TDC (0*). Now if you crank your distributer to 6*, and the computer thinks it is advancing it to 6*, 6+6=12.
</font>
Various manuals manuals have all sorts of errors in them. some on purpose, some out of a writter not knowing any engineering (ie magazine writters are classic examples of this.
Timing on the engine should match the chip period.

Reply
Old Jun 18, 2001 | 08:17 PM
  #8  
John Millican's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Thanks for all the educated responses. I tried both. First I set base to 0° and told the prom the initial was 9.8°. It did not run very well, noticable even without going to the track. I then set base and prom initial to 9.8° and the response was great, engine ran smoother and better response.

------------------
86 Camaro Sport
383 Speed-O-Motive Crate Engine, Raptor 700R4 Tranmission, Trick Flow Twisted Wedge G2's, 58mm Accel TB, 3.73 Auburn Pro, SLP Cold Air Induction and Headers, Hooker Cat-back, Serpentine Belt Setup, Dual IROC Fans, Jamex springs, 16" IROC Rims, 36mm/24mm Sway Bars, Global West Steering Brace. Hotchkis Rear LCA's,Panhard Bar and SFC's.
My Camaro Project
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
Jun 20, 2024 07:21 PM
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
MM2Robinson
Electronics
39
Oct 1, 2017 09:16 AM
Jorlain
Tech / General Engine
6
Oct 8, 2015 01:57 AM
Jlanz55
Tech / General Engine
3
Sep 9, 2015 09:09 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.