Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
I'm running a 1227730, with a NB O2 sensor, and my own modified BIN. Is there any benefit to going to the s_aujp v4?
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
in my opinion, yes.
a few things i can think of off the top of my head.
you can set it up to use Z69's extended upper VE table & you get much better resolution, from 1600 to 3200 RPM it increases by 200 RPM instead of 400 RPM. from 3200 to 6400 it increases by 400 RPM.
map increases by 5 kpa from 20 to 100 kpa.
if you get a wideband, you can input it to the data stream for logging with minor changes to the ECM.
i haven't had a chance to play with it, but it looks like there is a useable open loop idle qualifier in it.
there are also more things defined in V4.
if you do try V4, there are 2 separate files at moates you need to get. be certain to read all the documents for it, there are a good many changes.
a few things i can think of off the top of my head.
you can set it up to use Z69's extended upper VE table & you get much better resolution, from 1600 to 3200 RPM it increases by 200 RPM instead of 400 RPM. from 3200 to 6400 it increases by 400 RPM.
map increases by 5 kpa from 20 to 100 kpa.
if you get a wideband, you can input it to the data stream for logging with minor changes to the ECM.
i haven't had a chance to play with it, but it looks like there is a useable open loop idle qualifier in it.
there are also more things defined in V4.
if you do try V4, there are 2 separate files at moates you need to get. be certain to read all the documents for it, there are a good many changes.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
Sounds like a plan....
As soon as I get energetic enough to start modifying again. I guess I'd have to paste all my spark and fuel tables over eh? I'd better be energetic to get that going.
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Car: 1990 IROC-Z Coupe
Engine: 383
Transmission: T56
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
I'm running super AUJP 4 with AXCN tables and I noticed much better drive-ability with my 6 speed. Before it would infrequently drop idle very low and almost stall with the clutch in. Runs much smoother now.
DO IT!
DO IT!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
Ok, what's the scoop?
I haven't played with my autoprom and bins for probably a year.
I downloaded the two *.zip files from Moates.net....
What is it that I have here? I found an ADS file and a XDF file, and a BIN...ok, that's easy enough. I just need a little guidance to get going. anything special here? or do I just do the "difference tool" action to modify my own BIN?
I downloaded the two *.zip files from Moates.net....
What is it that I have here? I found an ADS file and a XDF file, and a BIN...ok, that's easy enough. I just need a little guidance to get going. anything special here? or do I just do the "difference tool" action to modify my own BIN?
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
you want to use all 3 together.
i could easily be wrong, but i don't think compare will work quite right between a stock bin & V4. besides the stuff that has been added, i believe there are some things that have been moved in V4 vs the stock bin & the other S_AUJP bins.
if you want to use Z69's hi-res extended VE table, you must check the box for it in Flags/Switches. there is another box if you want to use his extended PE table.
i don't know how well copy & paste would work for transferring the VE & spark tables from you old bin into V4. i manually entered them in mine.
also, get the latest version of ScannerPro & load JP's files for it.
i could easily be wrong, but i don't think compare will work quite right between a stock bin & V4. besides the stuff that has been added, i believe there are some things that have been moved in V4 vs the stock bin & the other S_AUJP bins.
if you want to use Z69's hi-res extended VE table, you must check the box for it in Flags/Switches. there is another box if you want to use his extended PE table.
i don't know how well copy & paste would work for transferring the VE & spark tables from you old bin into V4. i manually entered them in mine.
also, get the latest version of ScannerPro & load JP's files for it.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
Man, I fell behind fast....
I quit playing around for a few months and things go right by me!! Couple more questions:
"also, get the latest version of ScannerPro & load JP's files for it."
OK, what is ScannerPro? Do I need it for my Autoprom? and, what are "JP's files"....
"also, get the latest version of ScannerPro & load JP's files for it."
OK, what is ScannerPro? Do I need it for my Autoprom? and, what are "JP's files"....
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
OK, I burned a chip...
I'm going to try and see how it runs on the original settings on my stock RamJet 350. All I did was turn off VATS, set it for a Manual Tranny, set the Launch Retard flag, and set the Extended Z69 VE Table...
I guess I'll find out tomorrow how it does...
I guess I'll find out tomorrow how it does...
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Calif
Car: 75 Vette
Engine: 406 TPI
Transmission: 700 R-4
Axle/Gears: 373
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
in my opinion, yes.
a few things i can think of off the top of my head.
you can set it up to use Z69's extended upper VE table & you get much better resolution, from 1600 to 3200 RPM it increases by 200 RPM instead of 400 RPM. from 3200 to 6400 it increases by 400 RPM.
map increases by 5 kpa from 20 to 100 kpa.
if you get a wideband, you can input it to the data stream for logging with minor changes to the ECM.
i haven't had a chance to play with it, but it looks like there is a useable open loop idle qualifier in it.
there are also more things defined in V4.
if you do try V4, there are 2 separate files at moates you need to get. be certain to read all the documents for it, there are a good many changes.
a few things i can think of off the top of my head.
you can set it up to use Z69's extended upper VE table & you get much better resolution, from 1600 to 3200 RPM it increases by 200 RPM instead of 400 RPM. from 3200 to 6400 it increases by 400 RPM.
map increases by 5 kpa from 20 to 100 kpa.
if you get a wideband, you can input it to the data stream for logging with minor changes to the ECM.
i haven't had a chance to play with it, but it looks like there is a useable open loop idle qualifier in it.
there are also more things defined in V4.
if you do try V4, there are 2 separate files at moates you need to get. be certain to read all the documents for it, there are a good many changes.
What is the advantage of a open loop idle
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
Well, that worked fairly well....
I did end up setting the idle vs. temp to a minimum of 700 rpm...600 rpm is just a little low for my manual tranny ramjet 350. What rpm did the manual stock '730 cars idle at? It seemed to idle ok at 600 rpm, but as soon as I moved, let go of the gas, it died a couple of times.
I also would like to know the benefit to open-loop idle? Mine is idling quite well, but every once in a while it wants does some surging.
Another question: Why are there 2 BLM parameters monitored? There's a BLM FINE and a BLM MAIN.....the "BLM MAIN" is the one that appears to match the old value in my old generic 730/8D BIN and associated ADS & XDF.
I also would like to know the benefit to open-loop idle? Mine is idling quite well, but every once in a while it wants does some surging.
Another question: Why are there 2 BLM parameters monitored? There's a BLM FINE and a BLM MAIN.....the "BLM MAIN" is the one that appears to match the old value in my old generic 730/8D BIN and associated ADS & XDF.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
open loop idle is mainly for the guys with big cams.
the bigger the cam is, the more the ECM will have problems trying to correct the fuel mixture at idle. if you have a thumper for a cam, you can pretty much forget about the ECM controlling fuel at idle. my cam is stock so i don't really need it, but its nice to have.
i have a 5.7 & have never messed with any of the standard 5.0 bins, so i don't know what they idled at.
i don't have an answer for the BLM FINE, i would guess its another piece of info to help in tuning.
maybe JP or Z69 has a better answer & can shed some light on it.
the bigger the cam is, the more the ECM will have problems trying to correct the fuel mixture at idle. if you have a thumper for a cam, you can pretty much forget about the ECM controlling fuel at idle. my cam is stock so i don't really need it, but its nice to have.
i have a 5.7 & have never messed with any of the standard 5.0 bins, so i don't know what they idled at.
i don't have an answer for the BLM FINE, i would guess its another piece of info to help in tuning.
maybe JP or Z69 has a better answer & can shed some light on it.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Calif
Car: 75 Vette
Engine: 406 TPI
Transmission: 700 R-4
Axle/Gears: 373
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
s_aujpv4 worked quite well considering....
I didn't really do anything to begin with but turn off VATS.
Hopefully someone will share info on the BLM MAIN & BLM FINE question.
My BLM MAIN at idle is at 96. The engine runs really well considering that I haven't adjust anything but the idle vs temp parameter. Now for the long arduous process of getting everything close to 128.
I noticed that there are multiple options for a WB O2 Sensor. Is there a "preferred" WB O2 Sensor for this BIN? Something that may function better?
Hopefully someone will share info on the BLM MAIN & BLM FINE question.
My BLM MAIN at idle is at 96. The engine runs really well considering that I haven't adjust anything but the idle vs temp parameter. Now for the long arduous process of getting everything close to 128.
I noticed that there are multiple options for a WB O2 Sensor. Is there a "preferred" WB O2 Sensor for this BIN? Something that may function better?
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
The WB code was added to allow any of the units listed to be run. None are considered better by the code. Just a way to scale each of the default outputs to end up with 10 to 20 AFR readings.
The BLM "fine" is part of the stock $8D code, its not something added in the S_AUJP.
The Value is used as a multiplier of the Main BLM that generates thevalue that is actually subtracted from the BPW. The Fine adjust is derived by calculations from air flow and proportional gains.
I'm not real clear on it but thats what I see from looking at it quickly.
The "launch mode" doesn't function for some reason so don't waste fuel on it.
I'm hopeing to get some time soon to dig into it and see what I did. I find no ill effects from it in my car or on the bench, just doesn't retard timing like it was supposed to. Soemthing else to figure out.
The OL idle is nice if you just can't get good vacuum or fuel distribution at idle when closed loop is active. Can set it so when you come to a stop your idle can be "manually" setup to run smooth without the BLM adjusting it constantly richer.
HTH
The BLM "fine" is part of the stock $8D code, its not something added in the S_AUJP.
The Value is used as a multiplier of the Main BLM that generates thevalue that is actually subtracted from the BPW. The Fine adjust is derived by calculations from air flow and proportional gains.
I'm not real clear on it but thats what I see from looking at it quickly.
The "launch mode" doesn't function for some reason so don't waste fuel on it.
I'm hopeing to get some time soon to dig into it and see what I did. I find no ill effects from it in my car or on the bench, just doesn't retard timing like it was supposed to. Soemthing else to figure out.
The OL idle is nice if you just can't get good vacuum or fuel distribution at idle when closed loop is active. Can set it so when you come to a stop your idle can be "manually" setup to run smooth without the BLM adjusting it constantly richer.
HTH
Last edited by JP86SS; Feb 9, 2008 at 09:10 PM. Reason: Clarified Fine statement
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
TIA,
Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 6
From: USA
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt BW
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
just to faclilitate the switchover to S_AUJPv4 with my existing setup, how do I set it to use the factory stock O2 sensor?
I didn't see anything that looked like stock O2 sensor under the options.
or, does S_AUJPv4 have to be used with a WBO2 sensor?
thanks.
I didn't see anything that looked like stock O2 sensor under the options.
or, does S_AUJPv4 have to be used with a WBO2 sensor?
thanks.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
there is nothing to change to use the stock O2 sensor in V4.
the talk about using a wideband with V4 is for data logging it in TunerPro.
if you use a wideband & don't have a NB O2, then you have to use the NB output on the WB controller to the NB input on the ECM.
the talk about using a wideband with V4 is for data logging it in TunerPro.
if you use a wideband & don't have a NB O2, then you have to use the NB output on the WB controller to the NB input on the ECM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
I'm impressed with this s_aujp v4....
Car ran as well as it has since I started play with chip burning. And that's without adjusting the VE tables. I was tweaking a chip last night....gonna go put it in as soon as it gets a little warmer around here. I'll try to get in a long drive and record it all....
Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 6
From: USA
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt BW
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
I'm trying to figure out how to do the TCC Coast Release Disable in S_AUJP V4. it's currently set to E255. what do I set it to, to disable the TCC Coast Release? "0101"?
I've set my AUJP V3 to disable the coast release and I'd like to keep that feature.
----------
sorry, I just scrolled down far enough in the documentation PDF to find it.
my apologies.
I've set my AUJP V3 to disable the coast release and I'd like to keep that feature.
----------
sorry, I just scrolled down far enough in the documentation PDF to find it.
my apologies.
Last edited by RPOL98; Mar 16, 2008 at 05:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Calif
Car: 75 Vette
Engine: 406 TPI
Transmission: 700 R-4
Axle/Gears: 373
Re: Well, that worked fairly well....
Another question: Why are there 2 BLM parameters monitored? There's a BLM FINE and a BLM MAIN.....the "BLM MAIN" is the one that appears to match the old value in my old generic 730/8D BIN and associated ADS & XDF.
Where in the bin do you find these or are they labled
different
Where in the bin do you find these or are they labled
different
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
The BLM "fine" is part of the stock $8D code, its not something added in the S_AUJP.
The Value is used as a multiplier of the Main BLM that generates thevalue that is actually subtracted from the BPW. The Fine adjust is derived by calculations from air flow and proportional gains.
I'm not real clear on it but thats what I see from looking at it quickly.
The Value is used as a multiplier of the Main BLM that generates thevalue that is actually subtracted from the BPW. The Fine adjust is derived by calculations from air flow and proportional gains.
I'm not real clear on it but thats what I see from looking at it quickly.
Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 6
From: USA
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt BW
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
I just switched over from S_AUJP V3 to V4. it works so fine. it also seems to have solved the high idle issue that I never quite licked yet, more testing to confirm that. I'm pleased. honestly appreciate the hard work that a lot of folks put into this endeavor.
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Car: 1969 Plymouth Valiant Sedan
Engine: Chrysler 340 with '92 TPI
Transmission: A-833 4-speed
Axle/Gears: Chrysler 8.75, 3.23:1
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Wow, after reading this, it seems like I may as well just go ahead and change over from a regular AUJP to S_AUJP... it sounds almost like the magic bin!
With a bunch of help from JP, Hank, and several other folks, I've got my Plymouth running and driving well enough to datalog, but I've got some trouble at part-throttle cruise that I'm having trouble sorting out. My concern is that I don't have enough of the OEM "features" turned off and they're somehow affecting my cruise. Will S_AUJP V4 be set up out of the box with the "features" (basically everything but the stuff necessary to run the engine) turned off, or will it be about the same as stock in this respect? What I'm trying to do is determine if my cruise problems are ECM/tune related, or a problem with the fuel / spark systems.
Any advice towards how S_AUJP V4 is delivered, or how to turn off the extras in the regular AUJP would be greatly appreciated. My 2.5 yr-old loves to help me tinker on the "brooom-brooom" car, but I can't get much tuning done on a regular basis when he's around. The Plymouth has been mostly dormant since last June, but I'm wanting to get her running well enough to go to a local car show in 3 weeks. Not looking for perfection, just an improvement.
Thanks in advance,
Clair
With a bunch of help from JP, Hank, and several other folks, I've got my Plymouth running and driving well enough to datalog, but I've got some trouble at part-throttle cruise that I'm having trouble sorting out. My concern is that I don't have enough of the OEM "features" turned off and they're somehow affecting my cruise. Will S_AUJP V4 be set up out of the box with the "features" (basically everything but the stuff necessary to run the engine) turned off, or will it be about the same as stock in this respect? What I'm trying to do is determine if my cruise problems are ECM/tune related, or a problem with the fuel / spark systems.
Any advice towards how S_AUJP V4 is delivered, or how to turn off the extras in the regular AUJP would be greatly appreciated. My 2.5 yr-old loves to help me tinker on the "brooom-brooom" car, but I can't get much tuning done on a regular basis when he's around. The Plymouth has been mostly dormant since last June, but I'm wanting to get her running well enough to go to a local car show in 3 weeks. Not looking for perfection, just an improvement.
Thanks in advance,
Clair
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
s_aujp v4 is better untweaked...
....than the BIN I was playing with for the last couple of years.
Changes I made on my S-aujpV4:
Turned off VATS
Adjusted Inj to 24# vs 22#(amazing)
tied in my wbO2, monitoring/datalogging.
Set it for Manual Tranny
and some minor tweaking of VE table(so minor I can't even find which cell I made the change in...I suppose I could keep looking)
OUTSIDE the BIN:
I ensured that my timing was set to 6 degrees....
The only issue I have left is a surge at idle which I'm suspecting has something to do with my IAC...have NOT played with it...and it only happens sometimes.
Changes I made on my S-aujpV4:
Turned off VATS
Adjusted Inj to 24# vs 22#(amazing)
tied in my wbO2, monitoring/datalogging.
Set it for Manual Tranny
and some minor tweaking of VE table(so minor I can't even find which cell I made the change in...I suppose I could keep looking)
OUTSIDE the BIN:
I ensured that my timing was set to 6 degrees....
The only issue I have left is a surge at idle which I'm suspecting has something to do with my IAC...have NOT played with it...and it only happens sometimes.
Last edited by silvernblack; Mar 29, 2008 at 07:13 PM. Reason: have not played with it
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Car: '87 Camaro LT
Engine: 355 L98
Transmission: T56
Re: s_aujp v4 is better untweaked...
Is there a switch for manual trans or do you just have to change the constants and tables to work with a manual trans?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
manual select option...
At location 18 on the item summary list, entitled:
Option Word 3 - Bit 2 - Manual/Auto Transmission Select
Option Word 3 - Bit 2 - Manual/Auto Transmission Select
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
Well, I marked it "set"....
....I figured that AUJP was for an automatic, and it came "unset", so I "checked" it to "set" it.
I am not sure that is correct(?), but there's a lot of folks around here that are much more knowledgeable than I, and I'm sure someone will let me know if I assumed wrong.
I am not sure that is correct(?), but there's a lot of folks around here that are much more knowledgeable than I, and I'm sure someone will let me know if I assumed wrong.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 508
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Wow, after reading this, it seems like I may as well just go ahead and change over from a regular AUJP to S_AUJP... it sounds almost like the magic bin!
With a bunch of help from JP, Hank, and several other folks, I've got my Plymouth running and driving well enough to datalog, but I've got some trouble at part-throttle cruise that I'm having trouble sorting out. My concern is that I don't have enough of the OEM "features" turned off and they're somehow affecting my cruise. Will S_AUJP V4 be set up out of the box with the "features" (basically everything but the stuff necessary to run the engine) turned off, or will it be about the same as stock in this respect? What I'm trying to do is determine if my cruise problems are ECM/tune related, or a problem with the fuel / spark systems.
Any advice towards how S_AUJP V4 is delivered, or how to turn off the extras in the regular AUJP would be greatly appreciated. My 2.5 yr-old loves to help me tinker on the "brooom-brooom" car, but I can't get much tuning done on a regular basis when he's around. The Plymouth has been mostly dormant since last June, but I'm wanting to get her running well enough to go to a local car show in 3 weeks. Not looking for perfection, just an improvement.
Thanks in advance,
Clair
With a bunch of help from JP, Hank, and several other folks, I've got my Plymouth running and driving well enough to datalog, but I've got some trouble at part-throttle cruise that I'm having trouble sorting out. My concern is that I don't have enough of the OEM "features" turned off and they're somehow affecting my cruise. Will S_AUJP V4 be set up out of the box with the "features" (basically everything but the stuff necessary to run the engine) turned off, or will it be about the same as stock in this respect? What I'm trying to do is determine if my cruise problems are ECM/tune related, or a problem with the fuel / spark systems.
Any advice towards how S_AUJP V4 is delivered, or how to turn off the extras in the regular AUJP would be greatly appreciated. My 2.5 yr-old loves to help me tinker on the "brooom-brooom" car, but I can't get much tuning done on a regular basis when he's around. The Plymouth has been mostly dormant since last June, but I'm wanting to get her running well enough to go to a local car show in 3 weeks. Not looking for perfection, just an improvement.
Thanks in advance,
Clair
I also notice that you have a 4spd car. The S-AUJP .bin is setup for an Automatic, but can be changed over for a stick fairly easily. Alot of things are different between an Auto calibration and a Stick. IAC routines are the big thing.
Do you have your timing controlled by the 7730 or is it off of a mechanical distributer?
What about a knock sensor, is your engine equipped with one?
What about a vehicle speed sensor?
Its hard to determine what the problem maybe, without all the information.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Correct, You should select the type of trans you have.
There are a few tweaks in the code to make the IAC work better with the MT when selected. There are several tables that could benifit from using the MT bins values to make everything good.
I don't have a MT so do not have any solid info on which values work better.
There are a few tweaks in the code to make the IAC work better with the MT when selected. There are several tables that could benifit from using the MT bins values to make everything good.
I don't have a MT so do not have any solid info on which values work better.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Car: '87 Camaro LT
Engine: 355 L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
So should the flag be set or un-set for manual? What actually happens when you change it to manual? Does it ignore all the auto stuff like TCC, 4th gear switch, etc?
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
"F2" in TP will open the item editor where there are notes on most of the functions and what they do.
"b2, Manual/Auto Transmission Select. On=Manual Off=Auto"
Yes, it will bypass all of the TCC stuff, not sure on the 4th gear switch.
Would have to look into that, IDK if any of the MTs have a high gear switch.
"b2, Manual/Auto Transmission Select. On=Manual Off=Auto"
Yes, it will bypass all of the TCC stuff, not sure on the 4th gear switch.
Would have to look into that, IDK if any of the MTs have a high gear switch.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Thanks JP86SS; I've been using TunerproRT for a couple of years and I didn't know that thing about F2.
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Car: 1969 Plymouth Valiant Sedan
Engine: Chrysler 340 with '92 TPI
Transmission: A-833 4-speed
Axle/Gears: Chrysler 8.75, 3.23:1
Re: manual select option...
Ditto on the F2 notes, I need all the explanation I can get in my infrequent efforts, and that will be a big help. Thanks again, JP!
Fast355,
Thanks for the reply. To answer your questions:
The OEM calibration for the AUJP seems to be pretty radically different than what my engine likes, at least judging by the comparisons I've made to my tune over time. The GM engineers really did their job tuning those engines, and the TPI intake really boosts the midrange VE where mine is quite a bit softer - thanks to the short runners on my single plane intake. Cam is pretty mild, a Crane HMV272 that pulls 17" of vacuum @ 800rpm. CR is a smidge over 8:1.
I *BELIEVE* that I've got my .bin set up for the 4-speed, but I need to make the F2 check ASAP. So far, the IAC function seems OK. I've got my minimum idle speed set at the TB, but cold-starts are still handled by the IAC.
I tried running my car on some stick tunes (AXXC, etc), and it wouldn't play well for some reason. CEL/SES was on steady from the moment I fired it up, so I went back to what I knew.
Ignition is all ECM. My timing is fairly mild at this point because I didn't want to introduce any extra weirdness this early in the game.
No knock sensor at this point, but I'm planning on using a 350 unit after I get everything else sorted out. Not a priority at this point.
VSS is present and functional.
I agree that diagnosing an unknown combo via the internet sucks, especially something like "it isn't smooth in the midrange". I think before I get in to a "what's wrong with my tune" thread, I'll try out S_AUJP v4 and see how it does. At this point, I don't see how I can go wrong.
BTW, since you're local, I may see about picking your brain by PM one of these days... Seems like there are several folks in the Metroplex that know their stuff...
Clair
Fast355,
Thanks for the reply. To answer your questions:
The OEM calibration for the AUJP seems to be pretty radically different than what my engine likes, at least judging by the comparisons I've made to my tune over time. The GM engineers really did their job tuning those engines, and the TPI intake really boosts the midrange VE where mine is quite a bit softer - thanks to the short runners on my single plane intake. Cam is pretty mild, a Crane HMV272 that pulls 17" of vacuum @ 800rpm. CR is a smidge over 8:1.
I *BELIEVE* that I've got my .bin set up for the 4-speed, but I need to make the F2 check ASAP. So far, the IAC function seems OK. I've got my minimum idle speed set at the TB, but cold-starts are still handled by the IAC.
I tried running my car on some stick tunes (AXXC, etc), and it wouldn't play well for some reason. CEL/SES was on steady from the moment I fired it up, so I went back to what I knew.
Ignition is all ECM. My timing is fairly mild at this point because I didn't want to introduce any extra weirdness this early in the game.
No knock sensor at this point, but I'm planning on using a 350 unit after I get everything else sorted out. Not a priority at this point.
VSS is present and functional.
I agree that diagnosing an unknown combo via the internet sucks, especially something like "it isn't smooth in the midrange". I think before I get in to a "what's wrong with my tune" thread, I'll try out S_AUJP v4 and see how it does. At this point, I don't see how I can go wrong.
BTW, since you're local, I may see about picking your brain by PM one of these days... Seems like there are several folks in the Metroplex that know their stuff...
Clair
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Car: '87 Camaro LT
Engine: 355 L98
Transmission: T56
Re: manual select option...
Other than the manual/auto flag (option word 3, bit 2) there's also a manual option scalar set to zero. AXXD (manual bin) is set to 1 but the F2 info says to set it to anything less than zero for manual. Do I need to mess with this? Thanks.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
I see that value at address $8671 and all I have is a note that indicates
"any value except 0 = manual trans"
I do not find anywhere in the code this address is used in AUJP/ANHT so I don't think it will do anything. (There could be an indexed addressing call that I missed when searching the code for the address)
Just the Auto/Manual flag should do it because that is wht Z69's modifications look at.
Try changing it and post up if anything changes.
"any value except 0 = manual trans"
I do not find anywhere in the code this address is used in AUJP/ANHT so I don't think it will do anything. (There could be an indexed addressing call that I missed when searching the code for the address)
Just the Auto/Manual flag should do it because that is wht Z69's modifications look at.
Try changing it and post up if anything changes.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
JP, as you suspected it is an indexed value. Here is where it is used:
RBob.
Code:
LC3C0: LDAB $49,X ; L8671, MANUAL OPT FLAG (MANUAL IF ARG NON - 0)
BEQ LC3C8 ;
;
LDAB L0083 ; VSS TABLE INPUT, MPH * 3.2
BNE LC394 ;
;
LC3C8: CMPA $22,X ; L864A, ENABLE if UNDER SPEED ERR > 75 RPM
BLS LC394 ;
;
LDAA L00FD ; IAC MODE WD
ANDA #$E7 ; CLR b3 & b4 Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
so, what do we set Location 671 to???
for a manual transmission?
0? or something else?
I'm sorta confused after the last 3 messages?
0? or something else?
I'm sorta confused after the last 3 messages?
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Set anything except "0" for Manual. (Make it = 1)
Thanks Rbob for pointing that out.
As usual your knowledge of the code astounds me
I have some more studying to do on this whole Man/Auto stuff.
Thanks Rbob for pointing that out.
As usual your knowledge of the code astounds me
I have some more studying to do on this whole Man/Auto stuff.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Yes, some of the stock and added code for the IAC operation checks that bit.
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Detroit Suburbs
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: Jerico
Axle/Gears: Aluminum 8.6 w/ T2R
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
first highlight an item in constants, flags or tables & then hit F2. it does the same thing if you right click an item in any of those & select Edit Item XDF Info.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,680
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: Used to drive a camaro
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Just re-reading this whole thread again and looking at _v4. I think the resolution enough would be reason enough for me to switch....IF, it had some of the forced induction functionality in it like $59....(that was my attempt at a subtle hint at putting it in!). Great work on this release, honestly. I wish I could use it.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Car: 1969 Plymouth Valiant Sedan
Engine: Chrysler 340 with '92 TPI
Transmission: A-833 4-speed
Axle/Gears: Chrysler 8.75, 3.23:1
Re: Does it mean >0? or <0?
I'd almost wager that a negative number is meaningless in this situation. The description should probably be "zero" or "not zero" rather than < or >.
Clair
Clair
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Benefit to going with s_aujp v4?
Yup! Would have made it easier.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thefirebirdm@n
South Central Region
3
Sep 14, 2015 01:45 PM








