turning 305 into 383
turning 305 into 383
ya, can you turn a 305 into a 383? i know all it is is the length of the piston arms & a few other things....so can i do it? i've found kits for 500-1000 bucks. And i figure, if i can, why not..
I'd probably also have it bored 30 or 60 over.
Would i have to get new heads? If so.. would aluminum or iron/steel(whatever) be better/more durable/easyier to port & polish.
I'd probably also have it bored 30 or 60 over.
Would i have to get new heads? If so.. would aluminum or iron/steel(whatever) be better/more durable/easyier to port & polish.
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 170
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 91 Z28/99 WS6/02 WS6
Engine: All 350's :)
Transmission: 700R4 & 2 Tremec T56's
Are the bores on 305 and 350 different? I read 2 differing texts on the matter - the latest one I read said that a 305 had a 3.74" bore and a 350 had a 4.0" bore - is that correct?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Sharonville OH
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
we had a big discussion on a similar topic and the general consensus was that if you had the 305 block bored and sleeved you could take it out to a 4" bore. Not that it is in any pratical nor do i think anyone has done it but it is "possible". Any way just get a bore kit - that would be a 350 block BTW.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: South NJ
Car: 1988 Mustang GT
Engine: 302
Transmission: T5
Originally posted by radiateu2
you are correct on the bore sizes and that without boring them over. Boring over doesnt raise the CI very much it is the length of the stroke is what significantly changes the CI
you are correct on the bore sizes and that without boring them over. Boring over doesnt raise the CI very much it is the length of the stroke is what significantly changes the CI
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: GM T56
Originally posted by dans82bird
a 305 and 350 share the same stroke, the bores are different... which is what increases the CI
a 305 and 350 share the same stroke, the bores are different... which is what increases the CI
And in the formula : Bore x Bore x Stroke x .7854 x Number of cylinders there are two "Bores" so that's going to make more of a difference than stroke unless, you figure the stroke can be increased more than the bore (I.E. 3.48->3.875 vs 4->4.060)-Rippin
what do you have to do to get a 383 out of a 350 you have to stroke it. Boring alone will not get you there. The equation is bore size x stroke distance x the number of cylinders. What is the most CI you can get when you bore a 350 .060 over is only approximately 360 Cu In wow a 10 CI difference now calculate that with a 4.00 stroke and see what ya get.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Sharonville OH
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
I you bore a 350 out to 4.185 you will get 383ci. The reason you get more cubes from stroking a 350 is that chevy made the blocks for more room to stroke than to bore. This ins't universally true. Some 283s can be bored to 302 and some 396s can be bored to 427. Shrug. On a 350 the max you can bore it to is 360. But put the 350 crank into a 400 blockthat is bored .060 over and boom all bore 383. THe same goes for a 400 crank in a .030 over 350... 383 cubes.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 2
From: New Palestine, IN (Just East of Indy)
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T5, 3.23 posi
Ok, back to the original question...
You will need a 350 block as you know already, and a 3.75" stroke crank. You can either use a 400 crank and cut the mains down or get a crank made specifically for a 383 (probably the cheapest and easiest way to go). I think the cast 383 cranks from Eagle go for about $200. You can use either 5.7" or 5.565" rods (most common, but longer rods can be used as well). With 5.565" rods you can use pistons from a 350, but with 5.7" rods you will need "383" pistons.
I would probably be a good idea to get the block bored .030" to clean it up and get it honed w/ a tq plate. Also I would get the rotating assemly balanced. That's another thing, most 383 cranks are externally balanced so you will need an ext. balance flywheel/flexplate and damper. Internally balanced cranks are availible, but more exspensive. They allow you yo use a neutral balanced damper and flywheel/flexplate.
You don't have to get new heads, but I would reccomend it. A set of preped Vortecs are good for a budget motor, Iron Eagles are also nice, but a bit more. Pro Topline makes good heads that are very good for the price. AFR's are top of the line in my book, but they will cost you...
If you can get aluminum heads they allow you to run more compression and they are easier to port since aluminum is a softer metal than cast iron, but it also makes it easier to mess up. A little chatter from a carbide cutter will wreak havoc on an aluminum head. If using a cutter on aluminum you will need to keep it lubed with light oil to prevent chattering. With aluminum heads you will also need a gasket that does not brinnel (indent) aluminum.
Wow, that was a lot of typing... Hope it helps, anymore ?'s let us know...
You will need a 350 block as you know already, and a 3.75" stroke crank. You can either use a 400 crank and cut the mains down or get a crank made specifically for a 383 (probably the cheapest and easiest way to go). I think the cast 383 cranks from Eagle go for about $200. You can use either 5.7" or 5.565" rods (most common, but longer rods can be used as well). With 5.565" rods you can use pistons from a 350, but with 5.7" rods you will need "383" pistons.
I would probably be a good idea to get the block bored .030" to clean it up and get it honed w/ a tq plate. Also I would get the rotating assemly balanced. That's another thing, most 383 cranks are externally balanced so you will need an ext. balance flywheel/flexplate and damper. Internally balanced cranks are availible, but more exspensive. They allow you yo use a neutral balanced damper and flywheel/flexplate.
You don't have to get new heads, but I would reccomend it. A set of preped Vortecs are good for a budget motor, Iron Eagles are also nice, but a bit more. Pro Topline makes good heads that are very good for the price. AFR's are top of the line in my book, but they will cost you...
If you can get aluminum heads they allow you to run more compression and they are easier to port since aluminum is a softer metal than cast iron, but it also makes it easier to mess up. A little chatter from a carbide cutter will wreak havoc on an aluminum head. If using a cutter on aluminum you will need to keep it lubed with light oil to prevent chattering. With aluminum heads you will also need a gasket that does not brinnel (indent) aluminum.
Wow, that was a lot of typing... Hope it helps, anymore ?'s let us know...
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
Originally posted by radiateu2
The equation is bore size x stroke distance x the number of cylinders.
The equation is bore size x stroke distance x the number of cylinders.
its Bore Diameter (inch) x Bore Diameter (inch) x Stoke (inch) x Number of cylinders x constant (~.7857) = Cubic Inchs
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Technically, displacement is the difference in the volume of the cylinder with the piston at the bottom of its travel minus the volume with the piston at the top of the cylinder, times the number of cylinders. Since the volume of the cylinder above the piston at TDC is the same at both TDC and BDC, it can be subtracted and hence the equation simplified.
Volume of a cylinder is area of the base time height. Translated, bore radius squared, times pi, times the stroke length. Times # of cyls = total displacement.
This "constant" to which you refer is pi/4 (which is closer to .7854). Hope you can figure out where that came from...
Now, does everyone understand why you can't make a 383 out of a 305 block? And, why you can't make a 383 out of a 350 block bored to 4.185"?
Volume of a cylinder is area of the base time height. Translated, bore radius squared, times pi, times the stroke length. Times # of cyls = total displacement.
This "constant" to which you refer is pi/4 (which is closer to .7854). Hope you can figure out where that came from...
Now, does everyone understand why you can't make a 383 out of a 305 block? And, why you can't make a 383 out of a 350 block bored to 4.185"?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Sharonville OH
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
(4.185/2)^2*pi*8=382.95702172949812751411719655425
rounded to 383 to make it easier to digest. you're dumb
rounded to 383 to make it easier to digest. you're dumb
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
How to turn a 305 into a 383, in 3 easy steps:
- 1. Throw 305 block (3.736" bore) away.
- 2. Acquire 350 block (4.00" bore) and bore it .030", a typical maintenance bore.
- 3. Install a 3.75" stroke (400 stroke) crank, with the right combination of rods and pistons to yield a total rotating assembly height of 9.000".
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Cronic3rd
(4.185/2)^2*pi*8=382.95702172949812751411719655425
rounded to 383 to make it easier to digest. you're dumb
(4.185/2)^2*pi*8=382.95702172949812751411719655425
rounded to 383 to make it easier to digest. you're dumb
and if i bore a 4 cyl 3 inches over, its a 383 too!!
just because you can do the math doesnt mean its somthing that can be done in real life. its when people post stupid crap like what you posted in this thread that other people like anubiscougar get mislead in thinking they can make their 305s into 350s or 383s......
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Sharonville OH
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
ust because you can do the math doesnt mean its somthing that can be done in real life. its when people post stupid crap like what you posted in this thread that other people like anubiscougar get mislead in thinking they can make their 305s into 350s or 383s......
BTW I need to apaligise for the late 2 words of my previous post. I was drunk and they are pretty inlfamitory.
whoa... I dont know what ineed to get through this thread, high waters or a flame suit... maybe a little of both.
basic volume measurments...
volume of a cyl = pi*r^2
THEN multiply by the stroke of the crank
now, multiply times the number of cyls...in this case 8...
there is more then one way to skin a cat. both ways will net you the same answer. happy? And yes the 350 and 305 share stroke, but not bore.
basic volume measurments...
volume of a cyl = pi*r^2
THEN multiply by the stroke of the crank
now, multiply times the number of cyls...in this case 8...
there is more then one way to skin a cat. both ways will net you the same answer. happy? And yes the 350 and 305 share stroke, but not bore.
Last edited by bigals87z28; Nov 7, 2003 at 02:26 PM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Cronic3rd
what is exactly so hard about putting a 350 crank into a 400 block with a .060 overbore? People do it all the time it is just usally with a .030 overbore. Granted the cracked idea about boring a 305 to 4" and sleeving it was bad advice but i stated so in my post. I also never said that a 350 could be bored to 4.185 (it can just not with a factory block). shrug.
BTW I need to apaligise for the late 2 words of my previous post. I was drunk and they are pretty inlfamitory.
what is exactly so hard about putting a 350 crank into a 400 block with a .060 overbore? People do it all the time it is just usally with a .030 overbore. Granted the cracked idea about boring a 305 to 4" and sleeving it was bad advice but i stated so in my post. I also never said that a 350 could be bored to 4.185 (it can just not with a factory block). shrug.
BTW I need to apaligise for the late 2 words of my previous post. I was drunk and they are pretty inlfamitory.
whats hard about it? well as long as you can find a 400 block that doesnt have too much core shift you can do that bore.. (alot of them cant go out that far.... walls too thin in places)
matter of fact, i had a 400 that was .60 over.... wasnt a performance motor, but we wernt stupid, so we didnt take away cubic inches.
name one fuggin good reason you would want to destroke the 400.
and i mean in the real world, not theory. because i can make a 400SBC spin just as fast as your 3xx SBC... and make more power doing it.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
and just FYI, the motown block can go out to a 4.200 bore with a .250" wall thickness remaining.
and a 4" stroke, with no clearancing.
and a 4" stroke, with no clearancing.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by bigals87z28
basic volume measurments...
volume of a cyl = pi*r^2
now, multiply times the number of cyls...in this case 8...
there is more then one way to skin a cat. both ways will net you the same answer.
basic volume measurments...
volume of a cyl = pi*r^2
now, multiply times the number of cyls...in this case 8...
there is more then one way to skin a cat. both ways will net you the same answer.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
Originally posted by bigals87z28
whoa... I dont know what ineed to get through this thread, high waters or a flame suit... maybe a little of both.
basic volume measurments...
volume of a cyl = pi*r^2
now, multiply times the number of cyls...in this case 8...
there is more then one way to skin a cat. both ways will net you the same answer. happy? And yes the 350 and 305 share stroke, but not bore.
whoa... I dont know what ineed to get through this thread, high waters or a flame suit... maybe a little of both.
basic volume measurments...
volume of a cyl = pi*r^2
now, multiply times the number of cyls...in this case 8...
there is more then one way to skin a cat. both ways will net you the same answer. happy? And yes the 350 and 305 share stroke, but not bore.
volume of a cylinder is pi*r^2*h
height is the stroke
.just a little math refresher
Originally posted by bigals87z28
whoa... I dont know what ineed to get through this thread, high waters or a flame suit... maybe a little of both.
basic volume measurments...
volume of a cyl = pi*r^2
THEN multiply by the stroke of the crank
now, multiply times the number of cyls...in this case 8...
there is more then one way to skin a cat. both ways will net you the same answer. happy? And yes the 350 and 305 share stroke, but not bore.
whoa... I dont know what ineed to get through this thread, high waters or a flame suit... maybe a little of both.
basic volume measurments...
volume of a cyl = pi*r^2
THEN multiply by the stroke of the crank
now, multiply times the number of cyls...in this case 8...
there is more then one way to skin a cat. both ways will net you the same answer. happy? And yes the 350 and 305 share stroke, but not bore.
fixed her
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Car: 89 TA
Engine: 413 TPI
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Mr. Dude_1, "name one fuggin good reason you would want to destroke the 400.
and i mean in the real world, not theory. because i can make a 400SBC spin just as fast as your 3xx SBC... and make more power doing it."
I work with a guy that has circle track cars and he told me that the most ideal rev engine for power in a SBC would be a 377 which is a 400 downstoked. He has built a couple stroked 42x something or other and he said that they dont rev enough and dont come off the turns fast enough. Thats why he said he would like to build a 377. What you think. Dont bite my head off just what my buddy told me and he knows his stuff.
and i mean in the real world, not theory. because i can make a 400SBC spin just as fast as your 3xx SBC... and make more power doing it."
I work with a guy that has circle track cars and he told me that the most ideal rev engine for power in a SBC would be a 377 which is a 400 downstoked. He has built a couple stroked 42x something or other and he said that they dont rev enough and dont come off the turns fast enough. Thats why he said he would like to build a 377. What you think. Dont bite my head off just what my buddy told me and he knows his stuff.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
CI formula for a 350:
4.00 x 4.00 x 3.48 x 8
Multiply the CI by 16.38 to get displacement in CCs.
4.00 x 4.00 x 3.48 x 8
Multiply the CI by 16.38 to get displacement in CCs.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: South NJ
Car: 1988 Mustang GT
Engine: 302
Transmission: T5
Originally posted by radiateu2
OH DAN you still need to stroke a 350 to increase the CI to 383 hence the stroke is what increases the CI SIGNIFICANTLY.
OH DAN you still need to stroke a 350 to increase the CI to 383 hence the stroke is what increases the CI SIGNIFICANTLY.
Last edited by dans82bird; Nov 25, 2003 at 05:41 PM.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by Air_Adam
CI formula for a 350:
4.00 x 4.00 x 3.48 x 8
CI formula for a 350:
4.00 x 4.00 x 3.48 x 8
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mhatfield 14
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 24, 2015 07:48 AM
db057
TBI
10
Aug 11, 2015 10:11 PM






