low end torque, high end power, blah blah blah - Third Generation F-Body Message Boards

Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

low end torque, high end power, blah blah blah

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2009, 05:59 PM   #1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 214
low end torque, high end power, blah blah blah

this has really been bugging me. everyone says that for the street, low end torque is what you want. but if you a a real car enthusiast, than you want more power.

Based on the two third gen cars i've been in, both with sbc swaps, i believe that it is simply a matter of what you can handle and live with.

for example, i build a mild 350 in desktop dyno 2000. it had torque right off the bat and they went downhill after 4000, the hp curve was a bell shape, and significant hp dropped off like a cliff after 5000. Then a built mean 350 with a long duration cam (the one i have) and the power band shifted right 2000 rpm, but peak hp was 100 more, and peak torque happened later, but was also much high.

so what is the big deal with having MORE torque, but later on in the powerband. it seams logical to me that you will only be able to go faster is by getting more air/fuel in the cylinders, and getting the exhaust out in the most efficient way.

for a while, my DD had a 327 with a 292/300 cam in it. i will say that is was bad of the line driving around town, but once the car was moving, it was a whole different story. For a while i had 3.23 gears, and that was bad! but once i got 4.10's . from a 5-10 mph roll, i could stomp on the gas, and the engine would peg at 7000. now my friend had a mild 350 with 3.73's and it will get off the line quick without dumping the clutch at all, and it will lose traction. but sad to say, his car ran a 15.6 in the 1/4.


So what is the big deal with running a 250+ @.050 duration cam if your gear and other components are matched???

all the forums i read about engine builds and swap always deter people from mean cams. if you are looking to build a hot rod, then why not go for it!

now i am ready for what experienced people have to say. I know i will probably get bashed a bit, but i really need to get cleared away.

but i guess it is easier for some to have high revving motors with mean cams when you live in an emissions-free county....
327sleeper88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 06:24 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Madison, SD
Posts: 569
Re: low end torque, high end power, blah blah blah

I think you've oversimplified cam selection..... There's also consideration given to the heads that are on the car, static and dynamic compression, carb or Efi, header and exhaust size,and a host of other things...

Rather then just guess at a cam, or go on with the bigger is better philosopy maybe you could go to Comp Cams and check out their Cam Quest program... It will recomend a cam that is designed to compliment the other components in and on your engine......
radical82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 10:59 PM   #3
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 214
Re: low end torque, high end power, blah blah blah

I guess i should have not left those things out. I would like to assume that you pick a cam along with matching components. Putting a 280/280 adv. in a stock 350 obviously wont work. also, putting some mild cam in a high compression forged motor would be a waste of material. I am just saying that if you are rebuilding an engine, why not go for a little extra umph? Like the motor i am deciding on a cam for, all forged 327, 462 heads, ported, 2.02/1.60 stainless valves, and arp studs throughout.

I am completely aware of the required changes when upgrading to a significant larger cam. I just really need to get a good explanation as to why so many things aren't "street friendly" I guess it also really depends where you live, and where you plan to drive you "daily driver".

just a word of thought.
327sleeper88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:42 AM   #4
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 174
Re: low end torque, high end power, blah blah blah

three cheers for horsepower builds!!!
JamieSweet is offline   Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new to tuning Azrael91966669 DIY PROM 26 06-20-2017 04:04 AM
Cheapest way to a 5.3 swap E Rod LTX and LSX 5 08-28-2015 05:17 AM
84 Iron Duke T4, swap? InfinityShade Transmissions and Drivetrain 15 08-22-2015 08:00 PM
Replacement Headlight Question Fronzizzle Electronics 11 08-19-2015 01:36 PM
Project Torched 2.0? 86White_T/A305 LTX and LSX 0 08-17-2015 12:16 AM

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards >

1982, 305, 350, build, camming, camshaft, camshafts, end, high, line, low, maximum, sbc, selection, torque

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.

All content copyright 1997 - 2014 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Your question will be posted in: