Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Well to day Ive started my swap and Ive got the top of the motor stripped and all the accessories and pullies and such removed.....Heres the question(s), out the top or bottom? If I go out the top Im gonna use the a comealong attatched to a reinforced beam overhead....cant use a picker on a sloped gravel driveway, it wont roll without risking tipping it over.....if I go out the bottom what all will be involved in that.....Im just trying to figure the pros and cons of each, and I would like to leave the trans in the car if possible so I wont have to bleed the clutch system....Any thoughts/suggestions?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
So Ive read, BUT If I leave the trans in the car how hard will it be to reallign the input shaft on the clutch? What about if you are not using a picker? on the other note if I go thru the bottom, can I just pull the motor? will I have to remove any steering componets?
Any one want to chime with a basic step by step for the bottom drop? IVE SEARCHED
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
If you take it out the bottom you'll have to take the front suspension and brake lines apart.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
But not the steering center link and such, rite? swaybar? I need to take a better look under my car.......I dropped a few FWD cars motor and trans thru the bottom and we just unbolted the calipers and moved them outta the way.....I really dont want to pull the trans due to the hyd. clutch assembly....can you pull just the motor thru the bottom?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
I have yet to figure out how to re-attach my motor to my tranny while in the bay. I have always had to pull the tranny, attach, then install the assembly. However, with a hydraulic clutch, it's WAY EASIER. You can just push the clutch, then slide them together, and let out the clutch.
Pulling out the bottom would involve removing the K-member, which is what I would call an absolute disaster.
Pull from the top. Remove your hood, and go to town. A come along and a re-enforced ceiling beam? Ok, as long as you're confident in that? I guess then you'd just move the car out of the way, and put the engine down on a stand?
Pulling out the bottom would involve removing the K-member, which is what I would call an absolute disaster.
Pull from the top. Remove your hood, and go to town. A come along and a re-enforced ceiling beam? Ok, as long as you're confident in that? I guess then you'd just move the car out of the way, and put the engine down on a stand?
Trending Topics
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
I'd rent a chain block, a comealong will be a nightmare to use.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Ok after taking a good look at the car Ive come to the conclusion that the centerlink, and pitman/idler arm will have to come out to remove the motor from the bottom......Im not liking that
exactly
2 4x6s across an 8 foot gap and then roll the car out from under the motor swingin......
2 4x6s across an 8 foot gap and then roll the car out from under the motor swingin......
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LS1
Transmission: LS1 T56
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Im going to take it out of the bottom simply because im doing an LS1 swap.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Do you usually need to run a load leveler when pulling the engine and trans together?
I gotta pull my 327/TH350 this weekend as well
I gotta pull my 327/TH350 this weekend as well
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 914
Likes: 29
From: Las Vegas
Car: '88 Trans Am
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: Slushbox
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
If you have a manual tranny you will have to align the splines with the clutch anyway so with the complete drivetrain out do your work mate the two reinstal......from the top
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 574
Likes: 2
From: Muscatine IA
Car: 91 Firebird Formula
Engine: 383
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, 9inch
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
and he me up if you need help. im close and my weekends are always wide open
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 276
Likes: 9
From: Beautiful Coastal New Jersey
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Auburn posi 3.73
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Unbolt the slave cylinder from the bell housing and move it out of the way. Then disconnect any harness thats hooked up to the trans and pull the whole mess out the top. Thats what I did anyway. I think its easier to line up the input shaft with the clutch disc when everything is out of the car.
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
I pulled a 305/700R4 as one piece out the top of a parts car. I wouldn't do it that way again. You've got to anchor the hoist to the engine because that's what you can get at, and with the weight of the 700R, the load ends up with the transmission hanging down. It's really easy to just drop the transmission from the bottom, then pull the engine out the top. A T5 would weigh less and probably would be easier to deal with, but you've gotta get under the car to unbolt the tranmission mount, torque arm, etc. You can get most of the bellhousing bolts from the top. What difference do the other 2 or 3 bellhousing bolts make?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Ok after taking a good look at the car Ive come to the conclusion that the centerlink, and pitman/idler arm will have to come out to remove the motor from the bottom......Im not liking that
From experience, I can say out the bottom is easiest, but a sloped gravel driveway kills that because youll have to slide the powertrain out. Usually I use wheel or furniture dollies to do this. The small wheels dont like to roll on gravel and the slope aspect makes everything dangerous. For your situation, Id yank it from the top
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
One more question, can I just unbolt the bellhousing from the trans and pull the bell with the motor?.....4 easy to remove bolts and done.....and Pocket wouldnt the motor have to move back a bit to clear the center link to do the bottom drop? From the way it looks the centerlink is right in the way....howd you miss it?
Last edited by RedRokkit; Feb 19, 2010 at 04:29 PM.
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Out the top. You can just leave the bellhousing attached to the transmission, but once the transmission is out of the way the engine to bellhousing bolts are cake. Putting it back in with the transmission attached is my favorite way. It isn't that complicated to assemble under the car, but the first time I did it I ended up pulling the motor back out to attach the transmission and put it back in as a unit.
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Out the bottom means remove the K-member. You literally go strait down with everything and dont go anywhere near the steering linkage
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
You're right, it is easier from the top only took 4 hours start to finish.

Thanks for all the help guys.

Thanks for all the help guys.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
were your kids mad that you took apart their swing set?
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,414
Likes: 2,083
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
I was thinking that looked pretty stout, and then I noticed the gap from the joint in the overhead span....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Last edited by RedRokkit; Feb 21, 2010 at 01:08 PM.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,414
Likes: 2,083
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
I'm talking about the vertical line about midway through the top span. Looks like a lap joint. Maybe a thick pencil mark instead?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
kinda makes me want to beef up the rafters in my garage and attach a winch..
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
OHHHHH..... naw man thats the cable for the comalong that you are seeing, I think?.... the beam is one solid 10ft 4x6
but for real if you gimmie the distance Ill tell you what will work for a beam, DONT add weight to a load bearing member of a structure.
whats a winch????
Last edited by RedRokkit; Feb 21, 2010 at 11:27 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LS1
Transmission: LS1 T56
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
do yourself a favor and pick up an engine lift. they are fairly cheap
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
second, I dont pull motors all that often, and when I do they are usually FWD and they come out the bottom, therefore I use an A FRAME because they are SOOO much easier and lift way so much better and higher than a "cherry picker"...
Third Define fairly cheap, I did - between the comealong, the straps, and the lumber, I have about $35 invested, thats $115 more that I have to spend on my car instead of tools....You cant drive a motor lift, JACKO
Forth, I picked up my car (front tires off the ground) WITH THE MOTOR STILL IN IT......Try to do that with a motor crane.
Fith, Motor cranes are a PITA to use on GRAVEL!!!! WHY WOULD I SPEND 3X THE $$$ TO MAKE THINGS MORE DIFFICULT??????
This is not my first rodeo cowboy, just my first 3rd gen....and I have and engineering degree....I know WTF Im doing.....not all of us **** $$$ away without thinking about easier, cheaper, solutions....
Do yourself a favor BUILD AN A FRAME!!!!!
Last edited by RedRokkit; Feb 22, 2010 at 12:26 AM.
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Forth, I picked up my car (front tires off the ground) WITH THE MOTOR STILL IN IT......Try to do that with a motor crane.
Fith, Motor cranes are a PITA to use on GRAVEL!!!! WHY WOULD I SPEND 3X THE $$$ TO MAKE THINGS MORE DIFFICULT??????
This is not my first rodeo cowboy, just my first 3rd gen....and I have and engineering degree....I know WTF Im doing.....not all of us **** $$$ away without thinking about easier, cheaper, solutions....
Do yourself a favor BUILD AN A FRAME!!!!!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Car: 1984 Trans Am, 1986 Fiero SE
Engine: 5.0 H.O., 2.8
Transmission: T5, M4 Muncie
Axle/Gears: 3.73 disc posi, CAVALIER AXLES!!
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
Shmack2004
Dang I just reread my previous post and I did sorta come off like a (short for Richard)...Which was not my intention, I hate how you cant sense the demenor of a person thru a computer screen.....Im not gonna edit the post though thats the sissy thing to do instead of accepting your actions and owning up to them....I am the kinda guy thats a mix of Morris and Spiccoli (Fast Times FTW!!!) and says things with a chuckle and smile....which is the way I intended my post but I guess it didnt turn out that way....So I will further say that I b An (donkey)......Sorry shmack 2004 did mean to come off half cocked......
Pocket
Ive read and reread a-many of your posts....and Id like to think that you and I are of the same mold.....2 smart guys working on our cars in the dirt.... Ive seen your 3d renderings and I say WOW, because I know first hand the time that went into them....Now I thought that the frame I built was Extremely Stout......Lotsa triangles there Bro... and the beam was posted straight down to solid concrete blocks...... Before I even lifted up my motor, I tested it by lifting the whole front end of the car up to put it on ramps.....and the pickers I looked at were only rated for 1000lbs for $150...eff that I need a cam....And I dont plan on reusing it, its going to be broken down and used on an addition Im building ATM......And please if you see a flaw in the design or materials used point it out, It may look slapped together because I built it by myself, but I actually spent a bit planning and thinking this one out...They teach you to do that at VMI. And I dont care how I type, I know its not perfect I do try to sound better than the "OMG WTH TTY" crap .....Id rather talk. That way people can tell the difference between EFF YOU!!!!! and hahahahah eff yooou hahahaha....... But oh well, the bottom line is that it worked and I couldnt justify the cost of buying or even renting a lift when the $$ would be better spent on my car when I could build one for nearly nothing. And Im not trying to be confrontational or whatever, but come on, it may be a monstrosity but its built better than some Ive seen...check this out

and it actually worked.....so I know that my contraption was gonna.....Talk about scary..... If I built that, Id expect to get flamed, but I think I did a much better/safer job.
Dang I just reread my previous post and I did sorta come off like a (short for Richard)...Which was not my intention, I hate how you cant sense the demenor of a person thru a computer screen.....Im not gonna edit the post though thats the sissy thing to do instead of accepting your actions and owning up to them....I am the kinda guy thats a mix of Morris and Spiccoli (Fast Times FTW!!!) and says things with a chuckle and smile....which is the way I intended my post but I guess it didnt turn out that way....So I will further say that I b An (donkey)......Sorry shmack 2004 did mean to come off half cocked......
Ive read and reread a-many of your posts....and Id like to think that you and I are of the same mold.....2 smart guys working on our cars in the dirt.... Ive seen your 3d renderings and I say WOW, because I know first hand the time that went into them....Now I thought that the frame I built was Extremely Stout......Lotsa triangles there Bro... and the beam was posted straight down to solid concrete blocks...... Before I even lifted up my motor, I tested it by lifting the whole front end of the car up to put it on ramps.....and the pickers I looked at were only rated for 1000lbs for $150...eff that I need a cam....And I dont plan on reusing it, its going to be broken down and used on an addition Im building ATM......And please if you see a flaw in the design or materials used point it out, It may look slapped together because I built it by myself, but I actually spent a bit planning and thinking this one out...They teach you to do that at VMI. And I dont care how I type, I know its not perfect I do try to sound better than the "OMG WTH TTY" crap .....Id rather talk. That way people can tell the difference between EFF YOU!!!!! and hahahahah eff yooou hahahaha....... But oh well, the bottom line is that it worked and I couldnt justify the cost of buying or even renting a lift when the $$ would be better spent on my car when I could build one for nearly nothing. And Im not trying to be confrontational or whatever, but come on, it may be a monstrosity but its built better than some Ive seen...check this out

and it actually worked.....so I know that my contraption was gonna.....Talk about scary..... If I built that, Id expect to get flamed, but I think I did a much better/safer job.
Last edited by RedRokkit; Feb 22, 2010 at 10:26 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LS1
Transmission: LS1 T56
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
The load rating for a cherry picker will be significantly higher than that of a simple wooden A-frame, especially one of that design... Even a cheap cherry picker is quite capable of lifting the 2000ish lb front end of a 3rd gen several feet off the ground with everything still attached
Generally the cherry picker remains stationary on an uneven surface while the car is rolled back, much like how you'd get it out with the A-frame too
Based on your temperament, spelling/grammar, and design/materials of that A-frame, Id question that and at least ask where you received it from
Why? My cherry picker fits inside my garage and does the same job without requiring a small crew of guys to move around. I can use it indoors and out, its collapsible so I can take it with me if a friend needs help, and has certified load ratings for infinite uses so it will NOT collapse on a subsequent pull. BTW wood fatigues exponentially faster than steel. Should mine collapse, the manufacture will get a lawsuit. If yours collapses, you'd be up for a Darwin award
Generally the cherry picker remains stationary on an uneven surface while the car is rolled back, much like how you'd get it out with the A-frame too
Based on your temperament, spelling/grammar, and design/materials of that A-frame, Id question that and at least ask where you received it from
Why? My cherry picker fits inside my garage and does the same job without requiring a small crew of guys to move around. I can use it indoors and out, its collapsible so I can take it with me if a friend needs help, and has certified load ratings for infinite uses so it will NOT collapse on a subsequent pull. BTW wood fatigues exponentially faster than steel. Should mine collapse, the manufacture will get a lawsuit. If yours collapses, you'd be up for a Darwin award
anyway I didn't tell you to get the engine to waste your money or make it harder or whatever...I really don't need to say anything else on it because pocket covered it for me lol
I just have a problem trusting anything car related when its made of wood.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LS1
Transmission: LS1 T56
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
well as i said before im planning on going out the bottom mostly because im doing an LS1 swap and from what i read on here its hard to drop the LS1 in because its tight near the k-member. I've gone from the top and bottom so I think both ways are easy. I guess it just depends on what you a comfortable doing.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,414
Likes: 2,083
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?

I have a pretty decent engine hoist. Problem with most commercial hoists is that the reach is too short for a Firebird. I have to put towels between the upright and the car bumper. Not so bad with a small block V8, but it places a lot of stress on the bumper when setting in a big block V8. I have no prayer of setting in both the engine and trans together. The best hoists I have seen were all home made and took up a lot of space when not in use. If I had to do it all over again I would probably get an overhead hoist. It doesn't take up any space on the floor and has lots of other uses.
Last edited by QwkTrip; Feb 22, 2010 at 06:15 PM.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,414
Likes: 2,083
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Easier: Motor out the top or bottom?
I never really thought about taking off the bumper skin. How difficult is it to get lined up again, and is it a one man job?
For me, coming in from the side is even more difficult than the front. No engine stand has legs low enough to fit under my car. If it did, then it gets hung up on the tire before it travels in deep enough to put the engine in place. If I raise the car on jack stands then it is too high to reach far down into the engine bay without climbing all over the fenders. And I don't touch my paint for any reason other then washing and waxing. That's how I keep my car all shiny and pretty.
Like I said, I'd rather have a portable electric hoist. It would be great not having to manually winch the car onto my trailer. The cost doesn't bother me and I'm lazy enough to really enjoy it.
For me, coming in from the side is even more difficult than the front. No engine stand has legs low enough to fit under my car. If it did, then it gets hung up on the tire before it travels in deep enough to put the engine in place. If I raise the car on jack stands then it is too high to reach far down into the engine bay without climbing all over the fenders. And I don't touch my paint for any reason other then washing and waxing. That's how I keep my car all shiny and pretty.

Like I said, I'd rather have a portable electric hoist. It would be great not having to manually winch the car onto my trailer. The cost doesn't bother me and I'm lazy enough to really enjoy it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM










