305 To 388 stroker
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 87 Gta
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
305 To 388 stroker
My friend finally decided to send his block to the machine shop to get everything ready for a stroker kit. He had asked me to make a thread for him to bounce ideas off of you guys since you all have helped me so much.
So far this is what he is thinking:
Bottom end
Heads or the 64 cc version.
Cam
Any input would be nice.
He also is trying to buy from a Northernautoparts.com? I have told him to stick with summit but hes trying to save a little so if you all know of better prices please let us know.
So far this is what he is thinking:
Bottom end
Heads or the 64 cc version.
Cam
Any input would be nice.
He also is trying to buy from a Northernautoparts.com? I have told him to stick with summit but hes trying to save a little so if you all know of better prices please let us know.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
I assume he sent a 350 block to the machine shop, and not a 305 block, right?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 87 Gta
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
yea of course! lol I had a .060 over block so its just getting checked over and what not
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
ok, just checking. The way the original post was worded it sounded like you sent the 305 block to the machine shop expecting it to come back with a whole lot more displacement. 
On to the heads. Those E-Street heads are an entry level head, and because of that, the valve springs (and to a lesser extent the valves) aren't very high quality. Anybody running a real cam needs to replace those springs. Once you do that, those heads wind up costing more than trick flows, which are a superior head all around.
That flat tappet cam may not cause problems with it's modest valve lift, I'm not sure. But, that cam has a healthy intake duration, but a crap-ton of exhaust duration, along with a super tight LSA. To me that sounds like the type of cam that somebody would run on a motor with stock heads that have a poor exhaust flow, maybe even with exhaust manifolds instead of headers, but wants that rumpity sound of a poor idle. I really don't see that as a good performance cam when using good quality aftermarket heads. I'd really look at something with a little less intake duration, a TON less exhaust duration, and a much wider LSA.
But before I get too far ahead of myself, what are his goals for this motor?

On to the heads. Those E-Street heads are an entry level head, and because of that, the valve springs (and to a lesser extent the valves) aren't very high quality. Anybody running a real cam needs to replace those springs. Once you do that, those heads wind up costing more than trick flows, which are a superior head all around.
That flat tappet cam may not cause problems with it's modest valve lift, I'm not sure. But, that cam has a healthy intake duration, but a crap-ton of exhaust duration, along with a super tight LSA. To me that sounds like the type of cam that somebody would run on a motor with stock heads that have a poor exhaust flow, maybe even with exhaust manifolds instead of headers, but wants that rumpity sound of a poor idle. I really don't see that as a good performance cam when using good quality aftermarket heads. I'd really look at something with a little less intake duration, a TON less exhaust duration, and a much wider LSA.
But before I get too far ahead of myself, what are his goals for this motor?
Last edited by Jim85IROC; May 9, 2013 at 03:23 PM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 87 Gta
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
Honestly as far as goals go im not entirely sure. I would guess 400s? as far as power goes. He said he would like to have a nice weekend cruiser thatll turn heads. As far as i was concerned i tried to convince him to twin turbo his to match mine
but he wasnt going for that. Have a better recommendation on cam and head combo?
but he wasnt going for that. Have a better recommendation on cam and head combo? Trending Topics
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
I'm not super familiar with the Darts, but the first thing that jumps out is the huge combustion chamber size. That's going to kill compression.
If he's looking for a street cruiser, you can't beat a 383 (388) with a set of Trick Flow 180s or 195s and a nice cam in the 224/230 112lsa range. It'll idle decent, but still have more than enough cam to sound nowhere near stock, and have a great, usable torque curve which will make it great on the street, and plenty fast at the track.
If he's looking for a street cruiser, you can't beat a 383 (388) with a set of Trick Flow 180s or 195s and a nice cam in the 224/230 112lsa range. It'll idle decent, but still have more than enough cam to sound nowhere near stock, and have a great, usable torque curve which will make it great on the street, and plenty fast at the track.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 87 Gta
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
I wasnt sure on what his Comp. will be at but they do come in the 72 or the 64 size. just trying to stay away from race gas so he can push the 10:1 comp right?
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
flat top pistons with 64cc heads will be right in the neighborhood of 10:1, give or take based on how far in the hole they are, etc. A general rule of thumb is to go with a smaller head volume and then choose your pistons to get the compression you want. Heads with smaller chambers tend to be less detonation prone and make more power.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 714
Likes: 1
From: Pennsylvania
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: Carb'd 383
Transmission: Built T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
Something doesn't seem right with that. It says it uses scat 9000 series parts but my scat rotating kit cost $1000, and the bearings coming with it obviously didnt make up for that $500 difference.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 87 Gta
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
Thats what I was saying, I understand trying to save some money but just doesn't add up
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
Has he done the calculations ?
A big ( longer duration ) cam like you linked drops the effective CR (DCR ) so you need more (higher ) static CR to start with
A big ( longer duration ) cam like you linked drops the effective CR (DCR ) so you need more (higher ) static CR to start with
Last edited by vetteoz; May 10, 2013 at 03:01 AM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 87 Gta
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
I think we decided to hit the 110 or 112 lsa cams instead. As the block is still in the machine shop we will have to wait.
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
Anything that ignores:
http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/Quench
with a piston type or deck height where the piston is way down in the hole is detonation prone no matter what type of material head you use and a high SCR.
Cam selection is dictated by SCR:
http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w..._compatibility
Those guidelines are so the full advantage of ignition timing can be used.That being on iron heads no bigger the a SCR of 9.5 and a DCR of 8.5 or aluminum SCR of 10.5 or again a DCR of 8.5 to 9.0.
We have seen time and again the same mistake on strokers.If the intent is to build a stroker and then try to save money on heads,cam,exhaust,then just don't build the stroker in the first place.Save the stroker money for really good heads on a 355.It's the heads ,where on any SBC,the power is made after a good reliable bottom end is built.
http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/Quench
with a piston type or deck height where the piston is way down in the hole is detonation prone no matter what type of material head you use and a high SCR.
Cam selection is dictated by SCR:
http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w..._compatibility
Those guidelines are so the full advantage of ignition timing can be used.That being on iron heads no bigger the a SCR of 9.5 and a DCR of 8.5 or aluminum SCR of 10.5 or again a DCR of 8.5 to 9.0.
We have seen time and again the same mistake on strokers.If the intent is to build a stroker and then try to save money on heads,cam,exhaust,then just don't build the stroker in the first place.Save the stroker money for really good heads on a 355.It's the heads ,where on any SBC,the power is made after a good reliable bottom end is built.
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
While I am at it.We like to see the correct parts selection for the target .040 with a 0 deck and then use a .039 compressed head gasket.The main reason behind that is so not have to deal with "shim" thin head gaskets where the deck finish has to come into play to seal long term.It is just a more natural progression choosing parts and a deck height allowing a better sealing head gasket of .039 finish setting the .040.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 87 Gta
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
It has nothing to do with not wanting to spend the money. Its shopping around bc as we all know summit isn't always the best or cheapest. That being said im here to get some input on things that are known to work so I or any one else dont steer the kid wrong
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
www.competitionproducts.com
It a pretty good company to work with.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 87 Gta
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 305 To 388 stroker
Already started lol. Thanks for the tip. Just trying to read up as much as possible that way when we talk to the machine shop and parts guy we have a good base to work off of
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UltRoadWarrior9
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
Sep 2, 2015 08:24 PM






