Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

long tube vs. short tube

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2004, 11:06 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
stroken_camaro9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: my house
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 camaro rs
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
long tube vs. short tube

got a 350 in a 92 camaro runs 12.4 @ 112.9 mph. run open shorty headers. i was just wondering if there would be an advantage to running long tube headers before i spend money and time on it. or am i just fine with the way it is?
Old 08-02-2004, 11:12 PM
  #2  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,211
Likes: 0
Received 375 Likes on 288 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: long tube vs. short tube

Originally posted by stroken_camaro9
got a 350 in a 92 camaro runs 12.4 @ 112.9 mph. run open shorty headers. i was just wondering if there would be an advantage to running long tube headers before i spend money and time on it. or am i just fine with the way it is?
What shorties are you running? Switching to long tubes will make you more power with that type of ET and mph. How much depends on what you are starting with. If ground clearnace is not an issue I would go the long tube route in a second.
Old 08-03-2004, 05:26 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
stroken_camaro9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: my house
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 camaro rs
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
.

i've got the hooker comp shorty headers
Old 08-03-2004, 08:56 PM
  #4  
Member
 
Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
I agree, Long Tubes are definatly better. Make sure they are equal length, thats the most important thing about headers, and will add the most power.

Some helpful info for those interested.

PRIMARY TUBE LENGTH
"Shorter lengths add torque above peak RPM point & reduce torque below it; Longer tubes add torque below peak RPM point & reduce torque above it."

PRIMARY TUBE DIAMETER
"Affects engine RPM were peak torque is created. Small Diameter provides higher flow velocity = better scavenging. Large diameter provides higher flow volume"

COLLECTORS
"Collector length affects scavenging & torque peak. Short = mid range to top end. Long = low end to mid range."

hope that helps...
Old 08-03-2004, 10:23 PM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Long tubes open at the collectors at the track would certainly be better than shorties open at the collectors at the track.

Shorties with the good y-pipe like the 2055's and a decent exhaust after would run pretty close to long tubes without the hassle of uncorking.

The information contained in the post above is true, but has more to do with getting the last nth out of a race engine than it does in typical street engine cars occasionally raced.

And the complete list of tuned equal-length primary headers available off the shelf for SBC 3rd gens is as follows:





.
Old 08-03-2004, 10:58 PM
  #6  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
You forgot Stahl in your list.
Old 08-04-2004, 10:23 AM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
As in http://www.stahlheaders.com/Frame%20New%20Drag.htm ?

That'll work in the typical TGO member's budget. Real off-the-shelf bolt-ins (especially the "#7 and #8 goes through fenderwell" part). How could I have forgotten them????
Old 08-04-2004, 11:36 AM
  #8  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
You never said they had to be practical.
Old 08-04-2004, 12:07 PM
  #9  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Silly me...
Old 08-04-2004, 05:24 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
stroken_camaro9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: my house
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 camaro rs
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
.

well this is a 90% drag car that is drivin on the street maybe 2 times a month. at the track i run open headers, so what would be the best header and size to get for my setup?
Old 08-04-2004, 11:11 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
KagA152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Roscoe, IL
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: LQ4
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
hooker long tubes
Old 08-15-2004, 07:44 AM
  #12  
Member
 
contactpatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Engine: sbc 350
What length of primary tube, is best?
Old 08-19-2004, 11:14 PM
  #13  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
arlockstedt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird Formula 350 WS6
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
this is prolly a dumb ? but will the hooker 2210 super comp long tubes fit a 89 firebird formula 350? or will i have problems fitting them? Also......i have the hooker super comp shorty headers now.....will going to long tubes make that big of a difference with my combo listed below? Also will they still fit wi the heads having .300 raised exhaust ports?

my setup;

97 4-bolt 350 with roller cam setup. (bored over 0.030) complete ARP bolt kit.
ARP studs and windage tray for the mains
Eagle 4340 forged, light-weight crankshaft 0.010 and large journal
Eagle ESP forged rods 5.7 H-beam with arp bolts
WISECO ProTrue pistons ( 10.3 to 1 cr with 64cc heads and a 9.000" deck )
Edelbrock hydraulic roller cam ( dur@.050 234/238 lift (1.6rr) .575/.585 lobe seperation 112* Intake centerline 107*)
Edelbrock Victor Jr heads 64cc 2.08 and 1.60 valves Custom Dual Springs and Perfesionally CNC ported all the way through and ARP studed to the block.
Holley Stealth Ram Intake w/ afpr -- fully CNC ported and port match with heads
58mm Throttle Body
30lb fms injectors
Full MSD setup
Hooker SuperComp Headers (shorties...want long tubes)
Underdrive pullies
Edelbrock aluminum high flow water pump

ANY HELP OR SUGGESTIONS PLEASE.....THANKS.....Aaron
Old 08-20-2004, 10:22 AM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
unknown_host's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by Adrenaline
I agree, Long Tubes are definatly better. Make sure they are equal length, thats the most important thing about headers, and will add the most power.

Some helpful info for those interested.

PRIMARY TUBE LENGTH
"Shorter lengths add torque above peak RPM point & reduce torque below it; Longer tubes add torque below peak RPM point & reduce torque above it."

PRIMARY TUBE DIAMETER
"Affects engine RPM were peak torque is created. Small Diameter provides higher flow velocity = better scavenging. Large diameter provides higher flow volume"

COLLECTORS
"Collector length affects scavenging & torque peak. Short = mid range to top end. Long = low end to mid range."

hope that helps...
In his book, David Vizard says he has never seen a performance difference on the dyno between an "equal length header" and a non equal length.
Old 08-20-2004, 09:07 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by contactpatch
What length of primary tube, is best?
that kinda depends on what the setup is

with long tubes the longer they are the easier it is to get them to have a nice straight flow out to the rest of the exhuast without going through tight bends and such

but longer also tends to bias the power more twords the lower end of the rpm range
Old 08-20-2004, 09:08 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by unknown_host
In his book, David Vizard says he has never seen a performance difference on the dyno between an "equal length header" and a non equal length.

I swear you must either be funded by david Vizard or work for his publishing company
Old 08-20-2004, 09:45 PM
  #17  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
thecoolone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: L98
Originally posted by rx7speed
that kinda depends on what the setup is

with long tubes the longer they are the easier it is to get them to have a nice straight flow out to the rest of the exhuast without going through tight bends and such

but longer also tends to bias the power more twords the lower end of the rpm range
Curious, this would then mean for those of us with TPI, shorties would be best since TPI has more than enough power on the low end, and not enough in the upper rpm range?
Old 08-20-2004, 10:42 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by thecoolone
Curious, this would then mean for those of us with TPI, shorties would be best since TPI has more than enough power on the low end, and not enough in the upper rpm range?
that I can't explain with perfect knowledge but can guess and make my ASSUMPTIONS.

long tubes even though are biased to the low end generally also have a broad power band (again assumption) and sincethey tend to be longer they have less problems with bends and kinks in the system and are able to transition the exhuast out the tailpipe a little easier

but only assumption

prolly want to check with the others first on this one
Old 08-21-2004, 02:57 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
unknown_host's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by rx7speed
I swear you must either be funded by david Vizard or work for his publishing company
Or I have 2 of his books . I personally don't have the money/time to go out and dyno every theory regarding the internal combustion engine, so if a guy (Vizard) does I think his books are worth reading.
Old 08-21-2004, 07:04 AM
  #20  
Member
 
contactpatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Engine: sbc 350
Originally posted by rx7speed
that kinda depends on what the setup is

with long tubes the longer they are the easier it is to get them to have a nice straight flow out to the rest of the exhuast without going through tight bends and such

but longer also tends to bias the power more twords the lower end of the rpm range
.
hhhmmmmmm.
Has the real optimum lenght of headers, ever been experimentally
determined?, Cuz, somewhere out there, someone has a
'header lenght calculator', I tried it, the result at
5000 RPM was sixty inches. (five feet).
Most ''''long'''' tube headers are closer to thirty inches.
Old 08-23-2004, 10:26 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
stroken_camaro9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: my house
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 camaro rs
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
HP

all i know is that my car has a lot of top end cause i run a big MPH.
i mainly want to know if i will gain that much E.T. if i switch to long tubes.
Old 08-23-2004, 11:10 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by unknown_host
Or I have 2 of his books . I personally don't have the money/time to go out and dyno every theory regarding the internal combustion engine, so if a guy (Vizard) does I think his books are worth reading.

it's ok
just know I hear you talk of vizard all the time so figured I would give you crap over your idol


again man just giving you crap


humor

laugh







as far as optimum 60 inches I donno
read somewhere some stuff a little different then that and had the math already done out but I might be wrong I won't say I'm right here
Old 08-24-2004, 10:50 AM
  #23  
Senior Member

 
Dr G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Heres a link to useful article on the basics headers:-

http://www.ssheaders.com/header.htm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
5
01-20-2020 01:06 PM
tglennon11
Electronics
10
09-23-2015 05:30 PM
SG91camaro
Camaros for Sale
2
09-05-2015 10:27 PM
BOOT77
TPI
3
09-05-2015 03:55 PM
rudolphschenker
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
09-04-2015 02:41 AM



Quick Reply: long tube vs. short tube



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.