Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Car: Pontiac Firebird 1991
Engine: 3.1
Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
Hello dear community, I drive a Pontiac Firebird 3.1 1991 and am considering buying a new muffler.. either the Flowmaster 80 Series or the Flowmaster Delta Flow 40.. I hope it's loud in the interior while driving. Can you advise me or give me a purchase recommendation? Greetings from Germany
Supreme Member




Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 826
From: Colorado USA
Car: '83 Firebird (T/A Clone)
Engine: 350 with L-69 components
Transmission: 700R-4, 2000 RPM stall converter
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt/3.73 ..
Re: Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
Neither. They would sound terrible...
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
Look at a borla or magnaflow. Those fiberglass mufflers still sound decent on a V6. I belive GM made an option for them on the fourth generation V6. The fiberglass mufflers, while having a shorter lifespan, will not have the cackle and drone of a Flowmaster style muffler.
Moderator




Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Re: Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
I think the best sound you're going to get is with an 80 series. Usually they sound good at idle with a 6.
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 812
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
I would get the most quiet close to stock muffler for it I could find.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 135
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
Stock replacement mufflers tend to be quieter and more restrictive than the stock muffler. The stock v6 mufflers had just a little bit of sound tuned into them. The basic Dynomax Turbo muffler produces a similar tone, just a little louder. Flowmaster chamber type mufflers sound terrible on the GM 60 degree v6.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member




Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 826
From: Colorado USA
Car: '83 Firebird (T/A Clone)
Engine: 350 with L-69 components
Transmission: 700R-4, 2000 RPM stall converter
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt/3.73 ..
Re: Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
I vote stock or glass-pack. I know a guy who put a glass-pack on a Fiero with a 2.8 V-6 and it sounded pretty dang good...
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 135
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Supreme Member




Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 803
From: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Flowmaster 80 Series or Flowmaster Delta Flow 40?
I am NOT by any means a fan of the Chevrolet 60-degree V6 Engine Family...
The Early Buick 3.8L V6 (RWD like the grand National) Engine would be a far better Engine.
The Engine is essentially a Buick 300 Cubic-Inch V8 that has 2 Cylinders removed.
They sound great with a Flowmaster Super 40/ 44 Series Muffler.
Speaking of Engines with 2 Cylinders removed...
The Chevrolet 4.3L V6 Engine would be also be a far better Engine, and they are plentiful (you can find them anywhere).
The Engine is essentially a Chevrolet 350 Cubic-Inch V8 that has 2 Cylinders removed.
They sound great with a Flowmaster Super 40/ 44 Series Muffler.
I have recently been experimenting withe the very Late/ the last of the Vortec 4.3L Engines.
Essentially building them as if they were a Vortec 350 Engine...
And they actually can make a little Horse-Power.
The most recent 4.3L that I have together...
I detuned it to roughly 400 HP @7,200 RPM...
It sounds AMAZING with Flowmaster Super 40 Series Mufflers!!!
I also threw on a really old 66/ 91 Turbocharger for $hits-n-Giggles...
I stopped at 800 HP...
But it sounded GREAT with a Flowmaster Super 10 Series Muffler!!!
The Early Buick 3.8L V6 (RWD like the grand National) Engine would be a far better Engine.
The Engine is essentially a Buick 300 Cubic-Inch V8 that has 2 Cylinders removed.
They sound great with a Flowmaster Super 40/ 44 Series Muffler.
Speaking of Engines with 2 Cylinders removed...
The Chevrolet 4.3L V6 Engine would be also be a far better Engine, and they are plentiful (you can find them anywhere).
The Engine is essentially a Chevrolet 350 Cubic-Inch V8 that has 2 Cylinders removed.
They sound great with a Flowmaster Super 40/ 44 Series Muffler.
I have recently been experimenting withe the very Late/ the last of the Vortec 4.3L Engines.
Essentially building them as if they were a Vortec 350 Engine...
And they actually can make a little Horse-Power.
The most recent 4.3L that I have together...
I detuned it to roughly 400 HP @7,200 RPM...
It sounds AMAZING with Flowmaster Super 40 Series Mufflers!!!
I also threw on a really old 66/ 91 Turbocharger for $hits-n-Giggles...
I stopped at 800 HP...
But it sounded GREAT with a Flowmaster Super 10 Series Muffler!!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





